Do You Think That Dick Cheney Is A Good Person?

[Artevelde]

I've never met him, so I couldn't really say. He was a very effective politician and Vice-President though.

 

[theliq]

or an honest person?

Why/why not?

rattle marcatl,

if cheney despises the contemptible lieberrhoidals & obamarrhoidals, then he isn't only honest and good ........ Cheney is superlative, and his value cannot possibly be underestimated.

Why ?????

Answer: Because lieberrhoidals & obamarrhoidals are fucking political freaks whose destructive power is equal to the fascists and the commies that history has proven to be forces of destruction.

Not only that, these lieberrhoidals & obamarrhoidals are genuine congenital idiots and established pieces of shit for not recognizing what a gaggle of shitheads they are.

finished ??????????? Now fuck off

 

[theliq]

He is absolutely a good person and an honest person.

Not sure that I'd go hunting with him though...

that's interesting... most people think he's an evil lying creep.

In one word HALLIBURTON

 

[theliq]

that's interesting... most people think he's an evil lying creep.

Typical lefty. To a liberal "people" only means other liberals.

No, nor do I believe him honest, obviously. Still, his acceptance of his gay daughter and marriage equality are good signs, humans can change.

Yeah ?????????????? But how much was he PAID......Grrrrrr to Mr 10%

 

[Sarah G]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/4082559-post188.html

Still.

 

[theliq]

Obama thought invading Iraq was a bad idea.

Cheney thought it was a brilliant idea.

That's about all you need to know about the difference between those two.

Cheney is a greedy,selfish,grasping C..........of course he though it was a Brilliant Idea to Defraud Everyone and making tonnes of CASH........but why did he have to use DEAD AMERICANS TO DO IT........ya fucking BIG MOUTH

 

[Sarah G]

that's interesting... most people think he's an evil lying creep.

Typical lefty. To a liberal "people" only means other liberals.

No, nor do I believe him honest, obviously. Still, his acceptance of his gay daughter and marriage equality are good signs, humans can change.

Regarding his daughter, seriously, what else could he do. He is a very public figure and shunning, hating, arguing with his daughter would just be another thing he had to deal with in the press. His daughter and wife aren't really that much better.

He's soulless. Look up slimey politician and you will find his pic.

 

[Unkotare]

Your superiority must be very comforting, whether justified or not.

 

[theliq]

Or an honest person?

Why/why not?

He's a good person....and he's a professional politician. I think most politicians are, in essence, good people but its easy to see them in the worst possible light.

Same question...what things that he did that stood out as particularly good to you?

See Marc,when it comes to the crunch,he/she couldn't answer....just saying.steve

 

[JoeB131]

I think Dick Cheney is a decent man who loves his country.

I don't always agree with him, but I think he's a patriot and he acts to his conscience.

 

[Misty]

I think Dick Cheney is good person. I think he is mischaracterized and maybe even a bit monotone.

None of us our perfect only liberals pretend that they are perfect.

But I bet dick Cheney would help you one on one before Obama would, one on one.

 

[blackhawk]

Kind of a pointless question since I feel safe in saying no one here knows Cheney personally which is one of the key things in deciding if someone is a good person or not add to that everyone's opinion on Cheney is most likely tainted by their political ideology as most if not all the post here tend to show.

 

[frazzledgear]

This is one of many, many reasons I'll never be a liberal. The fact they have political disagreements with someone translates into "bad, evil person". The left (not the lib power elite ones because they KNOW it isn't true) believes they are motivated by pure, warm, fuzzy and touchy-feely things. Since they lack critical thinking skills this becomes deciphered by their midget brains as believing anyone who has different political opinions can only have different opinions because they are motivated by slimy, ugly, evil things. In their limited capacity for reason they actually think they have a lock on "noble" which means the only thing that can be motivating those who disagree is "evil". Because if they were motivated by "noble-y" things, they would be liberals! See how that works. They convince themselves it is the MOTIVE itself that actually determines how to best achieve a particular goal. And THEY have a lock on "noble-y, warm, fuzzy, pure etc." motives so it means ONLY their ideas about how to achieve it are ever acceptable! Only the left will support a bill based on nothing but the name of it and don't give a shit if the fine print guarantees utter disaster - because for them, it's the thought that counts most. Not the reality. It is why that total whacko nutcase Pelosi had no problem saying they had to pass the bill before we could find out ehat was in it! Their MOTIVES and touchy-feely title to the bill were all THEY needed to know- so it should be good enough for everyone else too! Hard to believe anyone's brain misfires that badly who isn't a danger to themselves, but that is the underlying mentality. It is the thinking of an immature, underdeveloped brain and it takes great effort to overcome that handicap. Liberals routinely engage in street protests and turn violent - the lib media sees this as a sign of their passion when it is a sign of their immaturity no different from a spoiled brat's temper tantrum. The right, who tend to be individualists instead of collectivists rarely engage in public political demonstrations of any kind. Which the lib media also knows -and is why they found the completely law-abiding, litter cleaning, zero arrests largely middle-aged Tea Party so scary. It isn't normal behavior for the right while badly behaved, violent libs throwing temper tantrums in the street is routine.

FYI Dick Cheney had a sterling reputation for more than 50 years both in the public and private sector as a man who took his responsibilities seriously even when doing the right thing for the nation was not in his personal best interests. (Oh that the same could be said of the Obummer.)

One constant is true- in all discussions political the left will ALWAYS portray their political opponents in one of two ways. Either they are among the most stupid human beings walking or they are pure evil. In their world no such thing as a poltical opponent who shares many of their same goals but has different and possibly valid opinions about how to best achieve them. No such critter in their world. When it comes to their poltical opponents, even though fellow Americans, liberals are more willing to give a proven sociopathic, lying ass mass murderering dictator the benefit of the doubt over any politician with an "R" after his name. With Bush they doubled down - in one breath insisting the man with two advanced degrees from two of the most prestigious colleges in the nation was among the dumbest people walking (and then twice put up people to run against him who were demonstrably less intelligent)- and in the next insisting he was a Machiavellian genius capable of concocting and carrying out one of the worst acts of evil against his own citizens. There are too many examples for this post of their legendary lack of critical thinking and limited capacity for rational thought.

You want to know why it is when leftwing extremists get full control and power they inevitably attack, imprison and murder their fellow citizens? Because they spent decades before gaining total power telling each other their own fellow citizens were evil, bad and terrible and these bad, evil people deserve to be destroyed, that THEIR OWN ends justify any means. Liberals give meaningless lip service to being "tolerant". It is a sick joke because the left has zero tolerance for political dissent and without tolerance for differences in THOUGHT, particularly political thought there is no tolerance whatsoever. One only need be a black, woman, Hispanic or gay with the "wrong" poltical opinions to find out just how meaningless their claims of tolerance, how superficial they really are - and how viciously intolerant the left truly is and how suddely being black, female, Hispanic or gay is also used as the basis for their vicious attacks. After all if you are black, female, Hispanic or gay and NOT a liberal - you deserve to be personally destroyed in the most aggressive, vicious and dehumanizing way possible.

If the left could remake the world, they would do their best to force our species to live as an ant colony and one only needs to study the history of any nation where the left grabbed absolute power to know what they do to anyone who objects to life as an ant.

Liberalism is truly a mental illness.

 

[theliq]

Kind of a pointless question since I feel safe in saying no one here knows Cheney personally which is one of the key things in deciding if someone is a good person or not add to that everyone's opinion on Cheney is most likely tainted by their political ideology as most if not all the post here tend to show.

Yeah,.......I for one WOULDN'T WANT TO KNOW HIM........I only access people by their deeds as talk's cheap..........and Chaney is awful..theliq

 

[theliq]

This is one of many, many reasons I'll never be a liberal. The fact they have political disagreements with someone translates into "bad, evil person". The left (not the lib power elite ones because they KNOW it isn't true) believes they are motivated by pure, warm, fuzzy and touchy-feely things. Since they lack critical thinking skills this becomes deciphered by their midget brains as believing anyone who has different political opinions can only have different opinions because they are motivated by slim, ugly, evil things. In their limited capacity for reason they actually think they have a lock on "noble" which means all that is left is "evil" for anyone who disagrees.

FYI Dick Cheney had a sterling reputation for more than 50 years both in the public and private sector as a man who took his responsibilities seriously even when doing the right thing for the nation was not in his personal best interests. (Oh that the same could be said of the Obummer.)

One constant is true- in all discussions political the left will ALWAYS portray their political opponents in one of two ways. Either they are among the most stupid human beings walking or they are pure evil. In their world no such thing as a poltical opponent who shares many of the same goals but has different and possibly valid opinions about how to best achieve them. No such critter in their world. When it comes to their poltical opponents, even though fellow Americans, liberals are more willing to give a provn sociopathic, lying ass mass murderering dictaor the benefit of the doubt over any politician with an "R" after his name. With Bush they doubled down - in one breath insisting the man with two advanced degrees from two of the most prestigious colleges in the nation was among the dumbest people walking (and then twice put up people to run against him who were demonstrably less intelligent)- and in the next insisting he was a Machiavellian genius capable of concocting and carrying out one of the worst acts of evil against his own citizens. There are too many examples for this post of their legendary lack of critical thinking and limited capacity for rational thought.

You want to know why it is when leftwing extremists get full control and power they inevitably attack, imprison and murder their fellow citizens? Because they spent decades before gaining total power telling each other the only real enemy was fellow citizens and these are bad, evil people who deserve to be destroyed, that THEIR OWN ends justify any means. Liberals give meaningless lip service to being "tolerant". It is a sick joke because the left has zero tolerance for political dissent and without tolerance for differences in THOUGHT, particularly political thought there is no tolerance whatsoever. One only need be a black, woman, Hispanice or gay with the "wrong" poltical opinions to find out just how viciously intolerant the left is and how suddely being black, female, Hispanic or gay is also used as the basis for their vicious attacks. After all if you are black, female, Hispanic or gay and NOT a liberal - you deserve to be personally destroyed in the most aggressive, vicious and dehumanizing way possible.

If the left could remake the world, they would do their best to force our species to live as an ant colony and one only needs to study the history of any nation where the left grabbed absolute power to know what they do to anyone who objects to life as an ant.

Liberalism is truly a mental illness.

Usual Boring Republican Myopic Spew.....You Son are mentally ill,even thinking others have a mental illness.

These boring one liners are in themselves BANAL.theliq

 

[Unkotare]

I only access people by their deeds as talk's cheap..........

Then that would make you...nothing.

 

[blackhawk]

Kind of a pointless question since I feel safe in saying no one here knows Cheney personally which is one of the key things in deciding if someone is a good person or not add to that everyone's opinion on Cheney is most likely tainted by their political ideology as most if not all the post here tend to show.

Yeah,.......I for one WOULDN'T WANT TO KNOW HIM........I only access people by their deeds as talk's cheap..........and Chaney is awful..theliq

And that is very close minded way to look at a person that would be the same as people deciding if you me or any of us for that matter is good person based just on what we post here.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Yanno.................Cheney doesn't even hunt, he gets his game from a fancy supermarket that raises them and releases them close to him.

Too bad he shot his friend in the face. The fucker is too stupid to even shoot a tame bird that was released into the wild without almost killing his "friend".

 

[Unkotare]

Yanno.................Cheney doesn't even hunt, he gets his game from a fancy supermarket that raises them and releases them close to him.

Too bad he shot his friend in the face. The fucker is too stupid to even shoot a tame bird that was released into the wild without almost killing his "friend".

Link? Proof?

 

[ABikerSailor]

You mean you missed this?

Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot and wounded a campaign contributor during a weekend quail hunt on a friend's South Texas ranch, local authorities and the vice president's office said Sunday.

The wounded man, 78-year-old Harry Whittington, was in intensive care at a Corpus Christi hospital after being hit by several pellets of birdshot Saturday afternoon, hospital spokesman Peter Banko told CNN.

"He's doing well and in stable condition today," Banko said.

Whittington, an Austin attorney who gave $1,000 to President Bush's 2000 campaign and $2,000 to his 2004 re-election bid, was among a handful of people accompanying the vice president when the accident occurred Saturday afternoon

Cheney accidentally shoots fellow hunter - CNN

And by the way........game farms in Texas means a slaughterhouse you do yourself.