Do You Support the President? You got to be Kidding!!! ROFLMAO!!

[thereisnospoon]

Obama's Approval Rating Plummets to All-Time Low

President Barack Obama's approval rating has sunk to a new low of 44 percent, according to a Bloomberg News poll.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com Newsmax.com - Breaking news from around the globe: U.S. news, politics, world, health, finance, video, science, technology, live news stream
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

He's actually polling at 88%. 50% wouldn't give a thumbs-up if he praised Palin and blew Rush, on Hannity's show.

88% of WHOM?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

still brain-dead I see

Yep, the kid is back in town. How was the vacation? I had one recently myself.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Obama's Approval Rating Plummets to All-Time Low

President Barack Obama's approval rating has sunk to a new low of 44 percent, according to a Bloomberg News poll.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com Newsmax.com - Breaking news from around the globe: U.S. news, politics, world, health, finance, video, science, technology, live news stream
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

He's actually polling at 88%. 50% wouldn't give a thumbs-up if he praised Palin and blew Rush, on Hannity's show.

88% of WHOM?

Obama voters of course.

 

[B. Kidd]

Wow.....just WOW!

This thread full of baby-mama-drama........

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwA6FLlkiX8]Babymama drama smh LOL hit his azssss - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Kondor3]

Depends... on an issue-by-issue basis, but, generally, and in the main, and by default... not really.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Obama's Approval Rating Plummets to All-Time Low

President Barack Obama's approval rating has sunk to a new low of 44 percent, according to a Bloomberg News poll.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com Newsmax.com - Breaking news from around the globe: U.S. news, politics, world, health, finance, video, science, technology, live news stream
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Dear GISMYS: Anyone like Bush or Obama who gets elected by half the nation, and clearly does NOT represent the other half, is going to hover around 50/50. That's a no-brainer
and doesn't take any stats to explain if you look at the Partisan representation and splits.

We already KNEW this. What has changed? Bush represented more of the conservatives and Republicans while alienating the liberals and Democrats. Obama represented more of the liberals and Democrats while alienating the Republicans and conservatives.

Both dividing the nation 50/50 in terms of representing one party/side over the other.

What I look at are what are the policies and solutions that are going to work for America.
Not who is or who isn't in office; these programs to stabilize and rebuild the economy are going to require ALL businesses, ALL nonprofits, ALL people/populations from all states.
(Ex: Bush supported programs to help people coming out of incarceration and integrating into society as working productive citizens -- why didn't the liberal progressives who want prison reform jump on this issue to work together? Obama supports microlending and education to break the cycle of poverty and dependence -- why not collaborate on that?)

To represent ALL the population takes ALL parties, not just 50/50 depending on "agenda."

What if we took a poll as to how many people agreed with Einsteins' theories?
What tiny % of the population could appreciate contributions from Einstein, Mozart, etc.?

Why not look at the principles, approaches and solutions that everyone supports.
Those are independent of WHICH person or party is in control of what office.

Just focusing on who gets what office, who is up or down in the polls, doesn't solve the actual problems. This seems like a distraction compared to the work that is really required.

Reminds me of divorced parents, fighting for custody and control, so they take every thing each other does wrong and uses that in court to slam and discredit each other; instead of working together for the best interest of the children and family. The money they waste hiring lawyers and fighting drawn out battles in court depletes from their kids college fund.
So while both sides fight, they lose time and resources, defeating their whole purpose.

Is this really the best use of resources, that we could be investing directly into solutions?

"Dear GISMYS: Anyone like Bush or Obama who gets elected by half the nation, and clearly does NOT represent the other half, is going to hover around 50/50."
That is not true.
The difference between this president and others before him that took just over 50% of the popular vote is that Obama has divided the nation along many lines.
Economy. Business vs Labor. Along racial lines. Divided us into groups and pitted them against each other.
Even Clinton who won for the second time with less than 50% of the popular vote, kept the country going in one direction. For all of his faults, Clinton did not use classism or groupism for his own political purposes.
There is a very small but vocal and active faction of people who are in blind loyalty to Obama. They actually support Obama's 'flipping the bird' to all who do not support his every whim.
Obama governs by "if you don't like it, **** you".
He even said so himself. During his first term Obama declared that the American people just don't understand what I'm trying to accomplish.
Obama To Americans: You Don't Deserve To Be Free - Forbes

 

[bodecea]

Do You Support the President?= You got to be Kidding!!! ===http://www.newsmax.com/surveys/Results/id/114/

Yes I do...

 

[BlindBoo]

I cant believe there are people so stupid they still support our loser President

The last president that lost the popular vote and still won the presidency was G. W. Bush.

50,999,897 to 50,456,002

So yeah I can't believe it either.

 

[Moonglow]

Do You Support the President?= You got to be Kidding!!! ===http://www.newsmax.com/surveys/Results/id/114/

Kinda like myself and God...I go by other peoples views...

 

[bedowin62]

I cant believe there are people so stupid they still support our loser President

The last president that lost the popular vote and still won the presidency was G. W. Bush.

50,999,897 to 50,456,002

So yeah I can't believe it either.

good one stupid

yet more people had jobs when Bush was president

EVERYTHING WAS BETTER

ur a joke

 

[bodecea]

Obama's Approval Rating Plummets to All-Time Low

President Barack Obama's approval rating has sunk to a new low of 44 percent, according to a Bloomberg News poll.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com Newsmax.com - Breaking news from around the globe: U.S. news, politics, world, health, finance, video, science, technology, live news stream
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

How very odd that 44% would be a "new low" when I've seen him poll at 39% in the past. Isn't 44% ABOVE 39%? Are you really that stupid?

 

[Moonglow]

I cant believe there are people so stupid they still support our loser President

The last president that lost the popular vote and still won the presidency was G. W. Bush.

50,999,897 to 50,456,002

So yeah I can't believe it either.

good one stupid

yet more people had jobs when Bush was president

EVERYTHING WAS BETTER

ur a joke

There was fewer people on the planet then also....