Do you support release of "original" transcript of Trump/Ukraine call?

[JimH52]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not the partial summary transcript. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

nobody gives a F about that dumbshit

Voters will care....trump thinks he can freely commit obstruction since he has a stooge named Barr in the DOJ....

SAD....he used to be a good lawyer...now just a trump Goon

 

[Norman]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

I support the mods create a new type of ban where the users are banned to post in the conspiracy theories section only after displaying too much tin foil hat in the other sections.

 

[harmonica]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not the partial summary transcript. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

nobody gives a F about that dumbshit

Voters will care....trump thinks he can freely commit obstruction since he has a stooge named Barr in the DOJ....

SAD....he used to be a good lawyer...now just a trump Goon

you are STILL talking obstruction???!!! hahahhahahahahahhahaha

 

[The Breeze]

What happened to the whistle blower? Isn't his testimony enough?

 

[The Breeze]

Lol!

 

[Wry Catcher]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

I'd prefer the audio of the phone call (though I suspect the audio would have missing spaces like Nixon's tapes).

 

[MAGAman]

How about the Bidens phone calls?

 

[bripat9643]

Didn’t he release the actual call?

No, he didn't. He released a summary, and it even says that it's a summary of the call at the bottom of the first page.

And, I wish people would quit calling it a "transcript". Transcripts are word for word accurate, whereas summaries aren't.

It's not a summary, moron. The boilerplate at the bottom says that the transcript is not made from a recording and is not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. However, it's the most accurate record available.

 

[The Breeze]

How about the Bidens phone calls?

That's who needs investigating.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Didn’t he release the actual call?

No, he didn't. He released a summary, and it even says that it's a summary of the call at the bottom of the first page.

And, I wish people would quit calling it a "transcript". Transcripts are word for word accurate, whereas summaries aren't.

It's not a summary, moron. The boilerplate at the bottom is that the transcript is not made from a recording and is not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. However, it's the most accurate record available.

Wrong. The most accurate record is on the classified server. All Trump has to do is declassify it, and release it.

 

[bripat9643]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

I'd prefer the audio of the phone call (though I suspect the audio would have missing spaces like Nixon's tapes).

There is no audio, you ******* moron.

 

[Doc7505]

Didn’t he release the actual call?

Apparently not. White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

~~~~~~
Read the Trump-Ukraine phone call readout
Read the Trump-Ukraine phone call readout
By POLITICO STAFF -- 09/25/2019 10:15 AM EDT

The White House released a readout of President Donald Trump's phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. You can read the PDF document below or read our line-by-line analysis of the conversation that launched an impeachment inquiry.

«
Page 1 of 5

 

[bripat9643]

Didn’t he release the actual call?

No, he didn't. He released a summary, and it even says that it's a summary of the call at the bottom of the first page.

And, I wish people would quit calling it a "transcript". Transcripts are word for word accurate, whereas summaries aren't.

It's not a summary, moron. The boilerplate at the bottom is that the transcript is not made from a recording and is not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. However, it's the most accurate record available.

Wrong. The most accurate record is on the classified server. All Trump has to do is declassify it, and release it.

He already has, dumbass.

 

[basquebromance]

Brothers and sisters: Nelson Mandela reminded us that nothing is impossible until happens.

well, my friends, impeachment is impossible...until it happens!

 

[bripat9643]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not the partial summary transcript. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

It ha already been released, you ******* moron.

You clearly missed the part at the bottom of the first page where it says that it's a summary, and is not a word for word documentation of what was said in the call. A summary has been released, but the transcript is still on the server.

BTW................it helps to know what words mean. Let me help you out..............

summary
[ suhm-uh-ree ]
||
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR summary ON THESAURUS.COM
noun, plural sum·ma·ries.
1. a comprehensive and usually brief abstract, recapitulation, or compendium of previously stated facts or statements.
adjective
2. brief and comprehensive; concise.
3. direct and prompt; unceremoniously fast: to treat someone with summary dispatch.
4. (of legal proceedings, jurisdiction, etc.) conducted without, or exempt from, the various steps and delays of a formal trial.

transcript
[ tran-skript ]
|
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR transcript ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
1. a written, typewritten, or printed copy; something transcribed or made by transcribing.
2. an exact copy or reproduction, especially one having an official status.
3. an official report supplied by a school on the record of an individual student, listing subjects studied, grades received, etc.
4. a form of something as rendered from one alphabet or language into another.

It's not a "summary." it's a transcription, recorded as events happen. The boilerplate at the bottom is meaningless. All that does is give them a pass in case their record isn't 100% accurate. However, it's the only record available. There is no unedited version available.

Sorry, but you are an idiot. It's not "boilerplate" as you call it, it's telling you that it's not a word for word account of what happened, and it even says that there may be some parts left out. Not my fault you don't know or understand what words mean.

By the way, I'll help you out yet again, but this is getting tedious. You really should read a dictionary sometime.

boilerplate
or boil·er plate
[ boi-ler-pleyt ]
|
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR boilerplate ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
1. plating of iron or steel for making the shells of boilers, covering the hulls of ships, etc.
2. Journalism.

1. syndicated or ready-to-print copy, used especially by weekly newspapers.
2. trite, hackneyed writing.

3. the detailed standard wording of a contract, warranty, etc.
4. Informal. phrases or units of text used repeatedly, as in correspondence produced by a word-processing system.
5. frozen, crusty, hard-packed snow, often with icy patches.

4. Informal. phrases or units of text used repeatedly, as in correspondence produced by a word-processing system.

That's exactly what it is.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Didn’t he release the actual call?

No, he didn't. He released a summary, and it even says that it's a summary of the call at the bottom of the first page.

And, I wish people would quit calling it a "transcript". Transcripts are word for word accurate, whereas summaries aren't.

It's not a summary, moron. The boilerplate at the bottom is that the transcript is not made from a recording and is not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. However, it's the most accurate record available.

Wrong. The most accurate record is on the classified server. All Trump has to do is declassify it, and release it.

He already has, dumbass.

Post 32 has a copy of the summary of the call that was released. It even says that it's not a verbatim transcript of the call. And, if it's not verbatim, it's not accurate. Look up verbatim yourself, I'm tired of teaching you.

 

[Lakhota]

Didn’t he release the actual call?

Apparently not. White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

~~~~~~
Read the Trump-Ukraine phone call readout
Read the Trump-Ukraine phone call readout
By POLITICO STAFF -- 09/25/2019 10:15 AM EDT

The White House released a readout of President Donald Trump's phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. You can read the PDF document below or read our line-by-line analysis of the conversation that launched an impeachment inquiry.

«
Page 1 of 5

Now show us the ORIGINAL that is locked in a classified server.

 

[MAGAman]

Wrong. The most accurate record is on the classified server. All Trump has to do is declassify it, and release it.

He already has, Einstien.

It exonerates him.

That's why the hearings are in a SCIF.

 

[bripat9643]

Didn’t he release the actual call?

No, he didn't. He released a summary, and it even says that it's a summary of the call at the bottom of the first page.

And, I wish people would quit calling it a "transcript". Transcripts are word for word accurate, whereas summaries aren't.

It's not a summary, moron. The boilerplate at the bottom is that the transcript is not made from a recording and is not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. However, it's the most accurate record available.

Wrong. The most accurate record is on the classified server. All Trump has to do is declassify it, and release it.

He already has, dumbass.

Post 32 has a copy of the summary of the call that was released. It even says that it's not a verbatim transcript of the call. And, if it's not verbatim, it's not accurate. Look up verbatim yourself, I'm tired of teaching you.

How could anything typed as the discussion transpired be a verbatim transcript? The transcribers obviously left out sneezes and passages where Trump repeated himself or was at a loss for words. The didn't record every "uhm" and pause in the conversation.

You're such a desperate asshole.

 

[bripat9643]

Didn’t he release the actual call?

Apparently not. White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

~~~~~~
Read the Trump-Ukraine phone call readout
Read the Trump-Ukraine phone call readout
By POLITICO STAFF -- 09/25/2019 10:15 AM EDT

The White House released a readout of President Donald Trump's phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. You can read the PDF document below or read our line-by-line analysis of the conversation that launched an impeachment inquiry.

«
Page 1 of 5

Now show us the ORIGINAL that is locked in a classified server.

Trump published the original, you ******* moron.