- Dec 25, 2009
- 15,907
- 6,513
- 390
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #361
The earliest stages are not yet a human being, because there is no sentience yet.
So people in a coma should be euthanized?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The earliest stages are not yet a human being, because there is no sentience yet.
And in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human being
A "pre-born" person isn't, yet, a person. It has no rights.
Only in libtardia would a fucking bird's egg have more rights than a pre-born human being.
And in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human being
It's the beginning of human life, bro. LOL.
So it's ok to kill babies in the womb but it's NOT ok to destroy an eagle's egg. Yea, you're consistent.
And in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human being
It's the beginning of human life, bro. LOL.
So it's ok to kill babies in the womb but it's NOT ok to destroy an eagle's egg. Yea, you're consistent.
Yup, pretty much.
One is endangered and the other isn't. When humans are an endangered species, then I'll be right there with you about preserving human life.
But that's not the case. Not yet at least.
But when does sentience manifest?And still not a human beingAnd in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human beingwhat we are talking about is the early stages of human life,,,
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
they are still the earliest stages of human life,,,
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
the earliest stages of one,,,
gotta start somewhere,,,
The earliest stages are not yet a human being, because there is no sentience yet.
Worrying about something that is not even sentient yet is to over value the potential for life, and all ovum have a potential for life.
Should we prevent periods so that no potential for life is lost?
Which obviously is fairly foolish since we thrown away adult lives all the time.
Such as the 3 million Vietnamese we killed, the half million Iraqis we murdered, etc.
I never said it wasn't OK to destroy bird eggs.And in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human being
It's the beginning of human life, bro. LOL.
So it's ok to kill babies in the womb but it's NOT ok to destroy an eagle's egg. Yea, you're consistent.
Only in libtardia would a fucking bird's egg have more rights than a pre-born human being.
And still not a human beingAnd in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human beingwhat we are talking about is the early stages of human life,,,
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
they are still the earliest stages of human life,,,
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
the earliest stages of one,,,
gotta start somewhere,,,
The earliest stages are not yet a human being, because there is no sentience yet.
Worrying about something that is not even sentient yet is to over value the potential for life, and all ovum have a potential for life.
Should we prevent periods so that no potential for life is lost?
Which obviously is fairly foolish since we thrown away adult lives all the time.
Such as the 3 million Vietnamese we killed, the half million Iraqis we murdered, etc.