Do you agree that pre-born humans are NOT entitled to any rights or even the right to live?

[JoeB131]

Outside of rape, no woman is unwilling to have the baby put in her, try again you ignorant sot.

Women have sex for other reasons than wanting to make babies... you'd know this if your last contact with female genitalia wasn't birth.

 

[progressive hunter]

The argument the unborn have rights begs the question of what rights every human has. What is the difference between "rights" listed for a U.S. citizen and everyone else? Where do these "rights" originate?

what rights are listed for US citizens that are not for all humans???

a "thank you" doesnt answer the question,,,

 

[Blues Man]

I'm not justifying anything.

A blob of a few cells is not a child.

We're going to have to agree to disagree here

that is the early stages of life,,,not just a blob of cells,,,

That's exactly what it is since it is not a child

science says youre wrong,,,

Really?

Post something from a respectable medical journal that says a zygote at 1 day is equivalent in every way to a baby one second before birth

your twisting the question to back up your POV,,,,

science says its the earliest stages of human life,,,

But the 2 are not equivalent and will never be

A human cell is not the same as a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[K9Buck]

That's exactly what it is since it is not a child

So you AGREE that it should be LEGAL to destroy bird eggs because they're not actually birds yet, right?

Federal Laws to Protect Bald Eagles

https://www.fws.gov › midwest › eagle › protect › laws
Mar 4, 2019 - The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests except as authorized under a valid permit (50 CFR 21.11).

 

[K9Buck]

Post something from a respectable medical journal that says a zygote at 1 day is equivalent in every way to a baby one second before birth

Is a zygote the earliest form of human life?

 

[Blues Man]

That's exactly what it is since it is not a child

So you AGREE that it should be LEGAL to destroy bird eggs because they're not actually birds yet, right?

Federal Laws to Protect Bald Eagles

https://www.fws.gov › midwest › eagle › protect › laws
Mar 4, 2019 - The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests except as authorized under a valid permit (50 CFR 21.11).

I don't have a problem with laws that protect wildlife

I would rather live in a world with bald eagles than one without them.

The human race is in no danger of extinction

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[K9Buck]

A human cell is not the same as a human being

A point NOT in dispute.

 

[K9Buck]

I would rather live in a world with bald eagles than one without them.

The human race is in no danger of extinction

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You didn't answer my question. Why don't you want to answer?

 

[Blues Man]

Post something from a respectable medical journal that says a zygote at 1 day is equivalent in every way to a baby one second before birth

Is a zygote the earliest form of human life?

Is a zygote equivalent to a new born child?

A human cell is not equivalent to a human being

A zygote is a potential human being but it is not a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[K9Buck]

Post something from a respectable medical journal that says a zygote at 1 day is equivalent in every way to a baby one second before birth

Is a zygote the earliest form of human life?

Is a zygote equivalent to a new born child?

A human cell is not equivalent to a human being

A zygote is a potential human being but it is not a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Again, you dodge the question. You like to ask questions, but you don't like to answer them.

 

[Blues Man]

I would rather live in a world with bald eagles than one without them.

The human race is in no danger of extinction

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You didn't answer my question. Why don't you want to answer?

I did answer your question



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[dblack]

I realize that many believe that women shouldn't be forced to be inconvenienced with a pregnancy. But why does the woman's "right" to not be inconvenienced trump a pre-born human's right to live their life?

Well, isn't that the whole point of the word "born"? It's the demarcation point between being an appendage, to being a person. It's where we draw the line. It's the reason we have the word. A "pre-born" person isn't, yet, a person. It has no rights.

 

[Blues Man]

Post something from a respectable medical journal that says a zygote at 1 day is equivalent in every way to a baby one second before birth

Is a zygote the earliest form of human life?

Is a zygote equivalent to a new born child?

A human cell is not equivalent to a human being

A zygote is a potential human being but it is not a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Again, you dodge the question. You like to ask questions, but you don't like to answer them.

Again I did answer your question you just don't understand what I said

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[progressive hunter]

that is the early stages of life,,,not just a blob of cells,,,

That's exactly what it is since it is not a child

science says youre wrong,,,

Really?

Post something from a respectable medical journal that says a zygote at 1 day is equivalent in every way to a baby one second before birth

your twisting the question to back up your POV,,,,

science says its the earliest stages of human life,,,

But the 2 are not equivalent and will never be

A human cell is not the same as a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

what we are talking about is the early stages of human life,,,

 

[Blues Man]

That's exactly what it is since it is not a child

science says youre wrong,,,

Really?

Post something from a respectable medical journal that says a zygote at 1 day is equivalent in every way to a baby one second before birth

your twisting the question to back up your POV,,,,

science says its the earliest stages of human life,,,

But the 2 are not equivalent and will never be

A human cell is not the same as a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

what we are talking about is the early stages of human life,,,

And in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human being



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[progressive hunter]

science says youre wrong,,,

Really?

Post something from a respectable medical journal that says a zygote at 1 day is equivalent in every way to a baby one second before birth

your twisting the question to back up your POV,,,,

science says its the earliest stages of human life,,,

But the 2 are not equivalent and will never be

A human cell is not the same as a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

what we are talking about is the early stages of human life,,,

And in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human being



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

they are still the earliest stages of human life,,,

 

[Blues Man]

Really?

Post something from a respectable medical journal that says a zygote at 1 day is equivalent in every way to a baby one second before birth

your twisting the question to back up your POV,,,,

science says its the earliest stages of human life,,,

But the 2 are not equivalent and will never be

A human cell is not the same as a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

what we are talking about is the early stages of human life,,,

And in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human being



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

they are still the earliest stages of human life,,,

And still not a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[progressive hunter]

your twisting the question to back up your POV,,,,

science says its the earliest stages of human life,,,

But the 2 are not equivalent and will never be

A human cell is not the same as a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

what we are talking about is the early stages of human life,,,

And in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human being



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

they are still the earliest stages of human life,,,

And still not a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

the earliest stages of one,,,

gotta start somewhere,,,

 

[Rigby5]

But the 2 are not equivalent and will never be

A human cell is not the same as a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

what we are talking about is the early stages of human life,,,

And in early stages of human life the cells are not a human being but rather a potential human being



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

they are still the earliest stages of human life,,,

And still not a human being

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

the earliest stages of one,,,

gotta start somewhere,,,

The earliest stages are not yet a human being, because there is no sentience yet.
Worrying about something that is not even sentient yet is to over value the potential for life, and all ovum have a potential for life.
Should we prevent periods so that no potential for life is lost?
Which obviously is fairly foolish since we thrown away adult lives all the time.
Such as the 3 million Vietnamese we killed, the half million Iraqis we murdered, etc.

 

[K9Buck]

A "pre-born" person isn't, yet, a person. It has no rights.

Only in libtardia would a fucking bird's egg have more rights than a pre-born human being.