Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
100% spot-on.
Division and polarisation is a lucrative industry and a vote winner (if you play your cards right).
I think the term is divide and conquer - and then the Democrats/left can ride in and benefit from it.
It's kinda like an approved contractor who botches the job on purpose knowing he's got the contract to do the repairs and fix it. The perfect storm.
Problem is, it's the right who benefit from it the most.
A black dude gets elected, number of gun sales go up massively..... I mean....
“I mean...” what? What are you implying?
I'm implying the right use fear as a tool to get them support.
I'm implying "it's the right who benefit the most" from friction in society.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Your "take" ignores the demographics of both the Democratic party and "Liberals."I do NOT think that most Dems want a "race war."
I think that most Dems genuinely feel sorry for that particular ethnicity and want to pass legislation that they think will help them.
I also think that many Dems are hypocrites, for many of them do not actually live integrated lives themselves. For example, many rich Dem liberals live in highly protected enclaves, and many ordinary Dem liberals do their best to live in predominately Caucasian neighborhoods and send their kids to predominately Caucasian schools.
Yeah, them KNEEEGROW places are a wreckAnd everytime Ipass African American areas i see the same results with taxes inching higher to keep the ghettos at bay. When neighborhoods change over, old neighborhood that had little crime is then turned over several years into a higher crime area in the newer one which is accepted by the African Americans living there. Even if it rankles them. The Prog system has maxed out any success. Now they have to lower standards from their agendas to keep it going.Sounds accurate to me. What say you?
Candace Owens is an Uncle Tom who makes a lot of money telling racist white people what they want to hear.
When she takes her minstrel show on the road in front of black people, and gets jeered off the stage, I'll take her seriously.
Actually, even conservatives are getting wise to her clown show.
Liberals love their country so much, they either loot it, burn it or tear it down. Liberal Black people HATE Conservative Black people. That's not love either.Liberals ARE Black People and White people coming together and loving their country.!
You aint black!If she really did say that, she's nuts.
I'm sorry. I was busy thinking about 1/6.Liberals love their country so much, they either loot it, burn it or tear it down. Liberal Black people HATE Conservative Black people. That's not love either.Liberals ARE Black People and White people coming together and loving their country.!
but if she agreed with you then she would be taken seriously right joe?...what if she doesnt get jeered off the stage.....will you take her seriously then?...
Not really. She'd still be saying really stupid shit.
Yes I'm sure you are totally obsessed with the Capitol Security failure on 1/6.I'm sorry. I was busy thinking about 1/6.
100% spot-on.
Division and polarisation is a lucrative industry and a vote winner (if you play your cards right).
I think the term is divide and conquer - and then the Democrats/left can ride in and benefit from it.
It's kinda like an approved contractor who botches the job on purpose knowing he's got the contract to do the repairs and fix it. The perfect storm.
Problem is, it's the right who benefit from it the most.
A black dude gets elected, number of gun sales go up massively..... I mean....
“I mean...” what? What are you implying?
I'm implying the right use fear as a tool to get them support.
Don't be an idiot. Nobody's trying to scare anyone for fuck's sake. The reason gun sales go up is because gun owners and wannabe gun owners are afraid Democrats will try to take them away or curb their ownership options even more than they already have.
Jesus.
I'm implying "it's the right who benefit the most" from friction in society.
The right "benefits" from friction in society? How, exactly?
How is this any different from the left's cancel culture of today? People like you are so goddamn paranoid about racism you vilified a teenager for smiling at someone.100% spot-on.
Division and polarisation is a lucrative industry and a vote winner (if you play your cards right).
I think the term is divide and conquer - and then the Democrats/left can ride in and benefit from it.
It's kinda like an approved contractor who botches the job on purpose knowing he's got the contract to do the repairs and fix it. The perfect storm.
Problem is, it's the right who benefit from it the most.
A black dude gets elected, number of gun sales go up massively..... I mean....
“I mean...” what? What are you implying?
I'm implying the right use fear as a tool to get them support.
Don't be an idiot. Nobody's trying to scare anyone for fuck's sake. The reason gun sales go up is because gun owners and wannabe gun owners are afraid Democrats will try to take them away or curb their ownership options even more than they already have.
Jesus.
I'm implying "it's the right who benefit the most" from friction in society.
The right "benefits" from friction in society? How, exactly?
Hilarious.
Of course they're trying to put fear into people. Look at McCarthy in the 1950s, the fear of Communism.
I don't want to see because it's irrelevant.Anti-communism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Take a look if you want to see.
Considering that the Democrat party is guilty of its own fearmongering, this is also irrelevant.Then we have the post 9/11 fear mongering. Pretty obvious that certain people were trying to make Islam the enemy because most OPEC countries were Muslim.
The reality is that the anti-Communist agenda came from the right. They celebrated the demise of the USSR in 1990/1991 and then lost the election. Clinton for 8 years. Once they got it back with Dubya, they went on the offensive, made a new enemy.
Because they do want to take our guns away. Any person with any sense knows that if the Democrat party could outlaw firearms they would do so in a New York minute. As it is, they know they can't (at least not yet) so they whittle away what they can a piece at a time such as "assault" weapons bans, clip size restrictions, etc.Yes, people are scared Democrats will take their guns away. Why is that?
Trump came out and said that guns should be taken off people. Not Obama. So why is it that Republicans fear their guns will be taken away by Democrats? Because they've been told this will happen.
By who?
How does the right benefit from friction?
Tell people you're "tough on crime", you need lots of crime. Otherwise people aren't going to vote for those who are "tough on crime".
If you have a bogeyman outside, you can say you're going to increase defense spending to keep everyone safe. You're the ones who care about the military.
People are stupid because people are emotional. Throw emotion at them and they will vote for you. Because they want to believe.
Obama's "hope not hate", Trump's "Make America Great Again". Promises of hope for the future. Promises that will never been fulfilled, they don't need to be, they're there as emotionally charged nonsense to get stupid people to vote for them.
She is right.
How is this any different from the left's cancel culture of today? People like you are so goddamn paranoid about racism you vilified a teenager for smiling at someone.100% spot-on.
Division and polarisation is a lucrative industry and a vote winner (if you play your cards right).
I think the term is divide and conquer - and then the Democrats/left can ride in and benefit from it.
It's kinda like an approved contractor who botches the job on purpose knowing he's got the contract to do the repairs and fix it. The perfect storm.
Problem is, it's the right who benefit from it the most.
A black dude gets elected, number of gun sales go up massively..... I mean....
“I mean...” what? What are you implying?
I'm implying the right use fear as a tool to get them support.
Don't be an idiot. Nobody's trying to scare anyone for fuck's sake. The reason gun sales go up is because gun owners and wannabe gun owners are afraid Democrats will try to take them away or curb their ownership options even more than they already have.
Jesus.
I'm implying "it's the right who benefit the most" from friction in society.
The right "benefits" from friction in society? How, exactly?
Hilarious.
Of course they're trying to put fear into people. Look at McCarthy in the 1950s, the fear of Communism.
I don't want to see because it's irrelevant.Anti-communism - Wikipedia
Take a look if you want to see.
Considering that the Democrat party is guilty of its own fearmongering, this is also irrelevant.Then we have the post 9/11 fear mongering. Pretty obvious that certain people were trying to make Islam the enemy because most OPEC countries were Muslim.
The reality is that the anti-Communist agenda came from the right. They celebrated the demise of the USSR in 1990/1991 and then lost the election. Clinton for 8 years. Once they got it back with Dubya, they went on the offensive, made a new enemy.
Because they do want to take our guns away. Any person with any sense knows that if the Democrat party could outlaw firearms they would do so in a New York minute. As it is, they know they can't (at least not yet) so they whittle away what they can a piece at a time such as "assault" weapons bans, clip size restrictions, etc.Yes, people are scared Democrats will take their guns away. Why is that?
Trump came out and said that guns should be taken off people. Not Obama. So why is it that Republicans fear their guns will be taken away by Democrats? Because they've been told this will happen.
By who?How does the right benefit from friction?
Tell people you're "tough on crime", you need lots of crime. Otherwise people aren't going to vote for those who are "tough on crime".
"...you need lots of crime."? That's like saying that in order to sell aspirin, you need lots of headaches. This is the most bass ackwards reasoning I think I've ever seen.
We don't need lots of crime to be tough on crime, we need to be tough on crime because there's lots of crime.
If you have a bogeyman outside, you can say you're going to increase defense spending to keep everyone safe. You're the ones who care about the military.
Every nation on this fucking planet cares about their military and defending their country. How is it that this is a singularly American Republican concern?
People are stupid because people are emotional. Throw emotion at them and they will vote for you. Because they want to believe.
Are you so naive as to think Democrats don't do the exact same thing?
Obama's "hope not hate", Trump's "Make America Great Again". Promises of hope for the future. Promises that will never been fulfilled, they don't need to be, they're there as emotionally charged nonsense to get stupid people to vote for them.
Unless you're suggesting that every person who votes for a candidate in any election is stupid, I fail to see your point.
abcnews.go.com
How is this any different from the left's cancel culture of today? People like you are so goddamn paranoid about racism you vilified a teenager for smiling at someone.
She's right on. The Democrat party of today is doing exactly the opposite of what MLK desired. They have no shame.
Because they do want to take our guns away. Any person with any sense knows that if the Democrat party could outlaw firearms they would do so in a New York minute. As it is, they know they can't (at least not yet) so they whittle away what they can a piece at a time such as "assault" weapons bans, clip size restrictions, etc.
But you never address the underlying causes of crime- Poverty, mental illness, addiction, racism and gun proliferation. You just assume they are bad people and lock them up, paying the prison industrial complex a lot of money to do so."...you need lots of crime."? That's like saying that in order to sell aspirin, you need lots of headaches. This is the most bass ackwards reasoning I think I've ever seen.
We don't need lots of crime to be tough on crime, we need to be tough on crime because there's lots of crime.
Every nation on this fucking planet cares about their military and defending their country. How is it that this is a singularly American Republican concern?
Oh yeah. There are rules in life to keep the corrupt people honest. Bothers you, huh.How is this any different from the left's cancel culture of today? People like you are so goddamn paranoid about racism you vilified a teenager for smiling at someone.
There is no cancel culture. There's consequence culture. You do stupid things, you get held accountable.
Smirky McBitchslap got vilified because he showed up at a racist rally and tried to taunt people of color.
She's right on. The Democrat party of today is doing exactly the opposite of what MLK desired. They have no shame.
Somehow I don't see Aunt Jemimah standing down dogs and hoses for the right to vote. She's standing with the people trying to revoke the right to vote.
