Do viruses get stronger or...

[Next Time]

or in the case of covid –––

does the immune system of a covid vaxxed individual weaken so the variant appears stronger and deadlier? A new psychological twist in the fearmongering campaign directed at all that play the covid game of Simon says.

Do Viruses Get Stronger Or Weaker Over Time? Will COVID become a milder flu? Or is it likely to stay deadly?​

What are your thoughts?

 

[fncceo]

Who is still talking about COVID?

 

[Next Time]

Who is still talking about COVID?

Some of us.
More about the psychology of the whole $cam.

BTW, do you know Bob?

 

[fncceo]

Some of us.
More about the psychology of the whole $cam.

I didn't care about COVID before it was cool not to care about COVID.

 

[Next Time]

Good for you.
I like to gloat, as I didn't play Simon says.

 

[zaangalewa]

or in the case of covid –––

does the immune system of a covid vaxxed individual weaken so the variant appears stronger and deadlier? A new psychological twist in the fearmongering campaign directed at all that play the covid game of Simon says.

Do Viruses Get Stronger Or Weaker Over Time? Will COVID become a milder flu? Or is it likely to stay deadly?​

What are your thoughts?

First of all is it stupid to speak about a "psychological twist in the fearmongering campaign". If someone says to you: "You will die when you will eat poison." - what has this to do with anything else than this message? Same if someone says "All people will die when they will eat a poison". Not this words produce fear - fear is something what you are doing on your own.

So: What is the poison in this case and is such a sentence in a concrete situation right or wrong?

The poison is a virus - and the difference to other forms of poison is that it is a dynamic poison. So we need the logic of time to speak about the risks. ... The virus is able to mutate and this mutations change the population of the virus and our immune systems are able to learn by natural infections with the virus on its own and/or by artificial vaccinations. And in this combination of effects we are now. If the virus will mutate into a 100% deadly form then only a vaccination is something what is able to help. But also vaccinations have risks. The problem: Such values we get for big populations but not for individuals. So we can say for example in 99% it is is better for the complete population to make vaccinations and in 1% is is better to let find the right answer by the own immune system. This numbers are pure fantasy. I do not have any concrete numbers in the moment. In this case 99% of all men and women would make a vaccination - because human beings are reasonable entities who don't play Russians roulette with 99 deadly revolver cartridges and 1 empty cartridge.

In a very special situation are in all this cases people who need to supress their own immune system or are older and have a weak immune system. Such people should speak with a doctor of their confidence. And the rest of the people should listen to the pieces of advice from autorized medical institutions who watch what is happening.

And there are by the way 2 reasons why to use masks: One reason is not to get infected - but the much more important reason is not to infect others.

 

[zaangalewa]

I didn't care about COVID before it was cool not to care about COVID.

View attachment 707972

So what? Conclusion: Also idiots survive? This explains only why idiots exist. But what about if you killed someone else?

 

[candycorn]

or in the case of covid –––

does the immune system of a covid vaxxed individual weaken so the variant appears stronger and deadlier? A new psychological twist in the fearmongering campaign directed at all that play the covid game of Simon says.

Do Viruses Get Stronger Or Weaker Over Time? Will COVID become a milder flu? Or is it likely to stay deadly?​

What are your thoughts?

My thoughts?

Make a more cogent OP.

 

[fncceo]

If someone says to you: "You will die when you will eat poison."

However, if someone says to you, "You will die if you don't wear a mask, if you stand to close to strangers, if you travel, if you go to the grocery store", even when all evidence suggests to the contrary, then you might suspect that person has a reason for telling you this that has nothing to do with your health or well-being.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

First of all is it stupid to speak about a "psychological twist in the fearmongering campaign". If someone says to you: "You will die when you will eat poison." - what has this to do with anything else than this message? Same if someone says "All people will die when they will eat a poison". Not this words produce fear - fear is something what you are doing on your own.

So: What is the poison in this case and is such a sentence in a concrete situation right or wrong?

The poison is a virus - and the difference to other forms of poison is that it is a dynamic poison. So we need the logic of time to speak about the risks. ... The virus is able to mutate and this mutations change the population of the virus and our immune systems are able to learn by natural infections with the virus on its own and/or by artificial vaccinations. And in this combination of effects we are now. If the virus will mutate into a 100% deadly form then only a vaccination is something what is able to help. But also vaccinations have risks. The problem: Such values we get for big populations but not for individuals. So we can say for example in 99% it is is better for the complete population to make vaccinations and in 1% is is better to let find the right answer by the own immune system. This numbers are pure fantasy. I do not have any concrete numbers in the moment. In this case 99% of all men and women would make a vaccination - because human beings are reasonable entities who don't play Russians roulette with 99 deadly revolver cartridges and 1 empty cartridge.

In a very special situation are in all this cases people who need to supress their own immune system or are older and have a weak immune system. Such people should speak with a doctor of their confidence. And the rest of the people should listen to the pieces of advice from autorized medical institutions who watch what is happening.

And there are by the way 2 reasons why to use masks: One reason is not to get infected - but the much more important reason is not to infect others.

Sounds like you need a booster.

 

[sparky]

What are your thoughts?

One commonly repeated myth that I’ve seen is that all viruses grow weaker and less dangerous to their host over time, so we can simply “wait out” COVID and not bother with a vaccine.


The WHO does the legwork for big pharma , normally monitoring what is a new threat during other countries 'flu season' ahead of ours so vax manufacturing can be accomplished ahead of it hitting it's main customer base, the USofA.

The problem is, and has always been, a virus can mutate quicker than millions of doses can be manufactured , ergo by the time most DO become a threat, the 'jabs' offered are less effective, if at all

~S~

 

[zaangalewa]

OhPleaseJustQuit


What do you like to say by using the Japanese emoticon "funny"? We Germans normally don't have any form of humor in context of infections with viri.

 

[zaangalewa]

However, if someone says to you, "You will die if you don't wear a mask,

What never a professional said. In case of an FFP2-mask the reduction of partocles in the size of such virusses is 90-99%.

if you stand to close to strangers,

The distance of 1-2 body lengths had been an important factor in case of the spreading of the virusses. Other virusses need a distance of more than 30 yards.

if you travel, if you go to the grocery store", even when all evidence suggests to the contrary,

What's nonsense.

then you might suspect that person has a reason for telling you this that has nothing to do with your health or well-being.

And? Are you sure you never did infect someone in contact with this virus which had been in the first generations damned deadly and destructive? Do not give me this answer - give god your answer.

 

[zaangalewa]

Sounds like you need a booster.

Sounds like you need a brain. Do you have a real question in context "booster"? I am personally for example not sure about whether a fully intact immune system reacts on a fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, ... booster with the same serum. It could perhaps be counterproductive to do so. But fortunatelly exist meanwhile a lot of different vaccines.

 

[Next Time]

First of all is it stupid to speak about a "psychological twist in the fearmongering campaign". If someone says to you: "You will die when you will eat poison." - what has this to do with anything else than this message? Same if someone says "All people will die when they will eat a poison". Not this words produce fear - fear is something what you are doing on your own.

So: What is the poison in this case and is such a sentence in a concrete situation right or wrong?

The poison is a virus - and the difference to other forms of poison is that it is a dynamic poison. So we need the logic of time to speak about the risks. ... The virus is able to mutate and this mutations change the population of the virus and our immune systems are able to learn by natural infections with the virus on its own and/or by artificial vaccinations. And in this combination of effects we are now. If the virus will mutate into a 100% deadly form then only a vaccination is something what is able to help. But also vaccinations have risks. The problem: Such values we get for big populations but not for individuals. So we can say for example in 99% it is is better for the complete population to make vaccinations and in 1% is is better to let find the right answer by the own immune system. This numbers are pure fantasy. I do not have any concrete numbers in the moment. In this case 99% of all men and women would make a vaccination - because human beings are reasonable entities who don't play Russians roulette with 99 deadly revolver cartridges and 1 empty cartridge.

In a very special situation are in all this cases people who need to supress their own immune system or are older and have a weak immune system. Such people should speak with a doctor of their confidence. And the rest of the people should listen to the pieces of advice from autorized medical institutions who watch what is happening.

And there are by the way 2 reasons why to use masks: One reason is not to get infected - but the much more important reason is not to infect others.

Can you put all these together?

Masks are Harmful: 17 Ways That Masks Can Cause Harm

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Viruses become weaker as they mutate.

 

[westwall]

or in the case of covid –––

does the immune system of a covid vaxxed individual weaken so the variant appears stronger and deadlier? A new psychological twist in the fearmongering campaign directed at all that play the covid game of Simon says.

Do Viruses Get Stronger Or Weaker Over Time? Will COVID become a milder flu? Or is it likely to stay deadly?​

What are your thoughts?

It is a proven fact that viruses weaken with each mutation.

 

[Next Time]

An interesting FOI was found. If the request could not be fulfilled, then it doesn't exist, right?

 

[Next Time]

Viruses become weaker as they mutate.

It is a proven fact that viruses weaken with each mutation.

Indeed they do.

 

[toobfreak]

do-viruses-get-stronger-or-weaker-over-time

Weaker. The natural process is that since weaker viruses multiply better by letting the host live/recover better, weaker viruses get spread around by more people than do stronger ones who make you sicker and keep you at home infecting fewer.