A number of studies say
"yes", but of course, the "devil is in the details", so then again, it could all be smoke and mirrors. Or, maybe not? Hmmmm......
Do Racism Conservatism and Low I.Q. Go Hand in Hand Psychology Today
Low IQ Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice Racism Bias Politics Right-Wing and Left-Wing Ideology
Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice Racism Conservatism
Multiple Scientific Studies Confirm Extreme Conservatism Linked to Racism Low I.Q. Americans Against the Tea Party
Those FOUR links refer to an intensive study done by Hodson, & Busseri, in 2012, called: "Bright minds and dark attitudes: Lower cognitive ability predicts greater
prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact." It was published in
Psychological Science, 23, 187-195.
And this study:
Are Conservatives Dumber Than Liberals - Reason.com
(though that study does not run along the same lines exactly)
And this study, from 2009-2010:
Study Are Liberals Smarter Than Conservatives - TIME
(that link is an excellent case for finding the really necessary stuff in the details... hint, hint...)
And a completely different study from 2013, actually comparing the brain sizes of people of different political orientations:
The Surprising Brain Differences Between Democrats and Republicans Mother Jones
and the direct links:
Fear as a Disposition and an Emotional State A Genetic and Environmental Approach to Out-Group Political Preferences - Hatemi - 2013 - American Journal of Political Science - Wiley Online Library
PLOS ONE Red Brain Blue Brain Evaluative Processes Differ in Democrats and Republicans
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, before anyone get's his or her dander up, go read the links. You will be surprised at the plethora of information out there, and a lot of it can be rebutted - you just need to know where to look. I have DELIBERATELY not quoted anything from the links yet, to allow others to first read from start to finish and digest the material at hand.
PS: I live in a time zone that is 6 hours ahead of New York City, so some responses on my part will be delayed.
RULES FOR THIS DISCUSSION:
- No ad hominems. No flaming, no getting personal, no insults. Stick to the topic, not the person.
- Dictionary definitions will prevail.
- Claiming that you are speaking on behalf of others is absolutely forbidden.
- What you post is de facto your opinion unless substantiated with credible links.
- When you are asked to provide a credible link to substantiate your position you must do so or you automatically forfeit your position.
- Links can be contested and if they can be shown to be biased they will be discounted. For this reason I already provided neutral links directly to the core data for a number of studies under the links of websites that one side may consider partisan.
- If you are going to invoke partisan terminology then be prepared to have it called out for what it is.
- No one is exempt from legitimate criticism - including the OP.
- Serious debate also means taking time to formulate an answer - so this should be a slow, thoughtful thread. I don't expect a response in the first 60 minutes after the thread goes up. You will need at least that much time to actually absorb the material needed to successfully debate this statistical issue.
- Have some fun while you are at it. That's an order. Life is short, enjoy what you do.
-Stat