Do new age ‘minorities’ question government authority, abuse of power and overreach like the core people tend to?

BrokeLoser

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2016
42,744
24,749
2,615
MEXIFORNIA
Is there any data on this?
Could this be why an open southern border and “diversity” are such key components for the Democrat Party?
Is core American whitey a major obstacle for totalitarian Democrats as they push toward a socialist state?
 
---GoFundMe effort wants to buy ladders for migrants to climb over crowdfunded border wall---

 
Is there any data on this?
Could this be why an open southern border and “diversity” are such key components for the Democrat Party?
Is core American whitey a major obstacle for totalitarian Democrats as they push toward a socialist state?
Read a history book you moron. This country got freer the less white it got you dipshit.
 
Is there any data on this?
Could this be why an open southern border and “diversity” are such key components for the Democrat Party?
Is core American whitey a major obstacle for totalitarian Democrats as they push toward a socialist state?

No because they are soft and weak people raised to be soft and weak by their parents. So all they care about is non existent social issues because they know nothing of what real life is like or what real problems are.

They were raised on feelings and not prepared for the real world at all. To them the real world is feelings and social agendas according to social media.
 
Education, gender, and religion matter much more than race when it comes to actual political beliefs.

Most non whites vote democrat simply because they don't like Republicans. Or feel that Republicans don't like them. That is 90% of non college educated democrat support. That is what holds the whole coalition together. Native, Asian, Black, and Latino voters have every little in common except they don't think Republicans like them and don't want them in charge.

The educated non whites will all vote democrat just like educated whites irreelvant. But the non college educated are very gettable and the numbers are shifting as we speak. Even black guys are going to start voting republican.

If Republicans can convince non college educated non white men they don't hate them, they will get the majority of that vote. Probably with most of the women eventually too. Certainly latino women.
 
Education, gender, and religion matter much more than race when it comes to actual political beliefs.

Most non whites vote democrat simply because they don't like Republicans. Or feel that Republicans don't like them. That is 90% of non college educated democrat support. That is what holds the whole coalition together. Native, Asian, Black, and Latino voters have every little in common except they don't think Republicans like them and don't want them in charge.

The educated non whites will all vote democrat just like educated whites irreelvant. But the non college educated are very gettable and the numbers are shifting as we speak. Even black guys are going to start voting republican.

If Republicans can convince non college educated non white men they don't hate them, they will get the majority of that vote. Probably with most of the women eventually too. Certainly latino women.
Lol.
 
Education, gender, and religion matter much more than race when it comes to actual political beliefs.

Most non whites vote democrat simply because they don't like Republicans. Or feel that Republicans don't like them. That is 90% of non college educated democrat support. That is what holds the whole coalition together. Native, Asian, Black, and Latino voters have every little in common except they don't think Republicans like them and don't want them in charge.

The educated non whites will all vote democrat just like educated whites irreelvant. But the non college educated are very gettable and the numbers are shifting as we speak. Even black guys are going to start voting republican.

If Republicans can convince non college educated non white men they don't hate them, they will get the majority of that vote. Probably with most of the women eventually too. Certainly latino women.
Native, Asian, Black, and Latino voters have every little in common except they don't think Republicans like them and don't want them in charge.
so since the democrats just use them and dont really give a shit about them also......why dont they get together and form a third party that will actually give a shit about them?...
 
Native, Asian, Black, and Latino voters have every little in common except they don't think Republicans like them and don't want them in charge.
so since the democrats just use them and dont really give a shit about them also......why dont they get together and form a third party that will actually give a shit about them?...

Because you would end up with a bunch of parties.....? lol

Good way to be politically irrelevant in a system like ours.

You understand to do that we would need a parliamentary system, right? Our system basically forces two major parties. It's almost inevitable
 
You got something to say?

Or just want to voice that you're a pleb who doesn't understand the society he lives in?

Blacks are more socially conservative than any other ethnic group in this country.
Lol
 
Read a history book you moron. This country got freer the less white it got you dipshit.
Depends on the aspect. America was freer in terms of less federal intervention and less regulation in the beginning. America got freer in terms of certain civil rights in the last 100 years, but it came at the price of more federal authority.

We now see the consequences of this: more regulation in other avenues of life, more federal debts, more taxes, a vast surveillance state, a bloated military, endless war, and politicized institutions (ATF, DOJ, FBI, etc.).

I'm not saying the browner we get, the more statist we get, but the more feds are asked to intervene, the more they're going to be in your business.
 
Thought not

At least you know your place
Lol. Yes. My place is here laughing at you. I am black. The Republican party will never get over 10% of the black vote because they've decided to be the party of white southern racism.
 
Depends on the aspect. America was freer in terms of less federal intervention and less regulation in the beginning. America got freer in terms of certain civil rights in the last 100 years, but it came at the price of more federal authority.
No. America got freer in absolute terms. Kind of hard to make an intelligent argument that you were more free while you were keeping people in bondage and then with forced segregation but I'm sure a moron like you will give it a shot anyway.
 
...
Is core American whitey ....

"core American" means nothing (and you wouldn't be one if it did). It is a stupid, juvenile slogan you made up and now repeat endlessly because of your idiot racist OCD. YOU are not ANY kind of American, you fucking cockroach.
 
Lol. Yes. My place is here laughing at you. I am black. The Republican party will never get over 10% of the black vote because they've decided to be the party of white southern racism.

You're black and you think the blacks are more socially liberal than the whites or anyone else per capita in AMerica? lol

You're insane

You're poor and stupid of course you're socially conservative

Only thing stopping you from voting republican is your feelings about republicans not their social views. Black male republican share of the vote been going up and up, will keep going.
 
No. America got freer in absolute terms. Kind of hard to make an intelligent argument that you were more free while you were keeping people in bondage and then with forced segregated but I'm sure a moron like you will give it a shot anyway.
If you can withhold insults for a moment, maybe we can have a meaningful conversation.

I said "certain aspects" for a reason. Slavery and segregation were obvious examples of local and federal governments allowing or imposing control over an entire race of people. Obviously, that goes against freedom as well.

However, the point I'm making here is that government rarely ever changes to allow someone more freedom of action without taking something in return. The Civil War effectively ended slavery, but it also ended the voluntary nature of the union of states. Seceding is no longer an option that states can consider without the possibility of war. That was not the original design of the country.

Ending segregation did improve the quality of life for America overall, but it also involved the creation of antidiscriminatory laws that are often used in selective ways that reflect politics rather than the original intent of promoting equality.

In short, every time we see an increase in one freedom, there is often a decrease or consequence elsewhere. The end result is often a larger government.

To be clear, however, I'm not suggesting that we should go back to slavery or segregation. I'm just saying that we have a lot of work to do in increasing freedoms elsewhere and in reducing government abuse and overreach.
 
If you can withhold insults for a moment, maybe we can have a meaningful conversation.

I said "certain aspects" for a reason. Slavery and segregation were obvious examples of local and federal governments allowing or imposing control over an entire race of people. Obviously, that goes against freedom as well.

However, the point I'm making here is that government rarely ever changes to allow someone more freedom of action without taking something in return. The Civil War effectively ended slavery, but it also ended the voluntary nature of the union of states. Seceding is no longer an option that states can consider without the possibility of war. That was not the original design of the country.

Ending segregation did improve the quality of life for America overall, but it also involved the creation of antidiscriminatory laws that are often used in selective ways that reflect politics rather than the original intent of promoting equality.

In short, every time we see an increase in one freedom, there is often a decrease or consequence elsewhere. The end result is often a larger government.

To be clear, however, I'm not suggesting that we should go back to slavery or segregation. I'm just saying that we have a lot of work to do in increasing freedoms elsewhere and in reducing government abuse and overreach.

Your whole view breaks down when you realize that Europe, a much whiter place. Is substantively less free than America

Basically every white nation is

Anglos may love freedom. Whites certainly don't.

And the least white Anglo nation is the most free.
 
Your whole view breaks down when you realize that Europe, a much whiter place. Is substantively less free than America

Basically every white nation is

Anglos may love freedom. Whites certainly don't.
I think you're quoting the wrong person here, but if not, my argument is about government overreach, not race.
 

Forum List

Back
Top