Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's not for lack of trying."Der taken r guns!"
They haven't "taken ur guns" for over 245 years. Don't hold your breath.
If they ask me where my guns are, I will tell them that I lost them all in an unfortunate boating accident.They will. And you will taste dicks readily when the time comes. Conservatives have no spine...just ask Broke Loser.
You may think you can be tough when they come to your door, but by then you will have no choice but to drop to your knees, put your hands behind your back and tell them not only where each and every one of your stashes is located, but also that of any and all friends or family you might have.
You'll be surprised how fast you change into compliance when they have a gun shoved up your behind ready to pull the trigger.
I'd challenge them in court, and win.No you won't. When Obama was there you called him a terrorist, Muslim and tyrannical yet you never fired a shot. You haven't the guts Rambo.
If the government come for your guns, you would evacuate your bowels before you did the house.
What would you do? Shoot them? that puts you in jail. Take on the military? In your dreams.
You'd do nothing. You've got no guts.
Unconstitutional. We have the right to have enough firepower for effective self defense. We also have the right to any kind of gun that there is no justification for banning.size and type of gun regulated, and no need whatsoever to carry them around in public.
The lack of freedom in the UK is heartbreaking.If you're interested in UK guns, watch this.
Americans have never felt that freedom is irrelevant.Rights and privileges has never been a concern, not sure if anyone outside on America has wanted to argue that, it's irrelevant.
Murder victims are just as dead when they are killed with a different kind of weapon.The issue is the violence/deaths from guns.
Handguns that have to be as long as a rifle are not exactly handguns anymore.The UK had handguns, never a problem. Then the Dunblane massacre of 1996 resulted in them being banned. So they now have to be a certain length, per in the video. I imagine to restrict concealment
Unconstitutional. We have the right to have enough firepower for effective self defense. We also have the right to any kind of gun that there is no justification for banning.
We also have the right to defend ourselves while out in public.
The lack of freedom in the UK is heartbreaking.
Murder victims are just as dead when they are killed with a different kind of weapon.
That is incorrect. People have the right to keep and bear arms even if they are not a member of any military organization.If you have a weapon, you should be in the reserve of the militia. It's written in the second amendment. Carrying a weapon makes a man liable for military service.
Upholding our rights is never bad.This is bad because it doesn't help create a militia, instead gun ownership becomes chaotic and will eventually lead to the left taking those rights away under the pretense of endangering life.
The Constitution disagrees with you. Everyone has the right to keep and bear arms.I believe that only those who agree to join the militia, conduct exercises and, if necessary, fight for the state should have the right to bear arms.
The NRA will always protect our rights.Otherwise, this will lead to the federalization of the state and the deprivation of the right to own weapons in general.
Let's start with the ancient right to keep and bear arms.What law gives women the right to own guns?
That is incorrect. The entire people have the right to keep and bear arms, not just members of a military body, and certainly not just men.And at the same time, the right to arms is directly related to the militia
Accordingly, only men are allowed, and men must be in the militia.
That is incorrect. It says nothing of the sort.This follows from the text of the amendment itself.
No. Congress cannot change what is written in the constitution. And it says that US men as part of the militia have the right to own weapons, and must also have equipment and be organized.
There is no such requirement.I didn't say that gun ownership should be abolished. It must be streamlined and clearly linked to the state's right to form a militia.
True. But having guns for private self defense is one part of it.The mere right to individual self-defense does not fully implement the 2nd Amendment, it also includes the right to be protected from the feds.
Not nonsense. The two parts of the Second Amendment are independent from each other.nonsense
Having murder victims be killed with a different kind of weapon is not much consolation for losing your freedom.Don't feel too bad for them. They suffer from having a much lower gun homicide rate than we do and I bet that makes them feel sad.
Having murder victims be killed with a different kind of weapon is not much consolation for losing your freedom.
A person who is killed with a less efficient weapon is just as dead as a person who is killed with a more efficient weapon.The difference is a matter of "efficiency".
A person who is killed with a less efficient weapon is just as dead as a person who is killed with a more efficient weapon.
Most homicides are close range events with few victims. The greater efficiency of guns doesn't make much difference in those situations.Correct. But a gun can make MORE of those dead people in a minute than a hammer.
Even today it sometimes takes 15 minutes just to get a 911 operator to pick up your call. Rigor Mortis will set in before the first reponder arrives.What those ignorant of history (such as OP?) fail to realize is that in the period from first settlement in North America by Europeans up to only the past century or so, those living in rural areas had to deal with both four legged and two legged varmints.
Four legged could include bear, wolf, large cat(puma), and even none legged such as rattle snake. Arms(weapons) of one sort or another helped increase one's chance of survivng an attack.
Two legged sorts could be the occasional roving criminal sorts and on occasions also tribes/war bands of local natives~"first peoples"~Indians, ... Again arms(weapons) would prove helpful in defense. Local militias were often "organized" to deal with these potential threats, and later also for a more military purpose. At time of the War of Independence, many local militias were left over from a couple decades prior and their use in the French and Indian Wars.
There was no "9-1-1" to call for help in 1775.
That's why guns are often the weapon of choice.1) Most suicides without guns are unsuccessful.
That's actually a healthy attitude.2) The main problem with Japan is that they do not view Suicide as a sin.
Time to add rocket artillery to the second.
You need to be ready for everything.
Those problems that you listed are due to the fact that people forget why they need weapons. It will sober them up.
If you have a weapon, you should be in the reserve of the militia. It's written in the second amendment. Carrying a weapon makes a man liable for military service.
I do not think there will be a civil war anytime soon.
Perhaps economic division between Republicans and Democrats, but not a war.
Weapons are very harmful.
Firearms are very dangerous and unnecessary toys.
It had nothing to do with the people revolting against the government of the people. Congress had the authority to establish and regulate the various state militias.
Totally agree! Every American should have access to any and all "arms". No limits. Including nuclear.
I know that when I go to the grocery store or the church or even to see a movie I am TERRIFIED that evil-doers will be around every corner. That's one of the best parts of living in America today. You know there's baddies out there doing evil things.
Don't feel too bad for them. They suffer from having a much lower gun homicide rate than we do and I bet that makes them feel sad.
I once heard about someone being killed with a hammer. I guess if we didn't have guns that kill quickly and efficiently we'd still have a weekly mass hammering. A lot more work but I'm sure it can achieve the same body count.
RIP over 30,000 people who die by guns in USA every year.
Weapons are of little use except murder and suicide.
