I made a
thread for the Johnson and Johnson Vaccine, figure would make sense to do one for Pfizer as well. So starting it off with some quotes from an article on a 33 year old woman:
[snip]
What makes you think that having a discussion about EVERY anecdotal medical event ASSOCIATED in time only to a vaccine, is gonna end any differently? Science aint built on anecdotes.
As mentioned elsewhere, what you call anecdotes, I call evidence. Science is about observing reality, coming up with hypotheses as to why reality is the way it is, and then finding ways to test these hypotheses to come up with theories as to how the world works. In this thread, I am trying to gather evidence as to what the Pfizer Covid vaccine does to humans. The end goal is to see if, as a group, we can come up with a conclusion as to how harmful or helpful this vaccine is.
This woman's symptoms have no medical linkage to a vaccine. The doctors can barely detect any measurements to MAKE A DIAGNOSIS..
A young woman who was apparently in fine health before taking Pfizer's Covid vaccine became paralyzed 12 hours after taking it. As you say, the doctors can't figure out why she is paralyzed. In such situations, the logical thing to do would be to consider anything unusual she has done immediately prior to becoming paralyzed. We know that she took this novel covid 'vaccine'. We know that others have also become paralyzed after taking Pfizer's vaccine. It's only natural to suspect that Pfizer's vaccine may be the reason she became paralyzed. Now, one can ofcourse say that most people haven't become paralyzed after taking Pfizer's Covid vaccine, so clearly it's not simply a matter of taking the vaccine. However, from what I've been reading, different people react to these vaccines differently. We know, for instance, that some people who have allergic reactions suffer anaphylactic shock from taking Covid vaccines. Based on the reports, it would seem that some may get paralyzed. I can certainly agree that we don't yet know why, but serious scientists don't balk at forming hypothesis and theories simply because they don't yet have the whole picture.
So a healthy college football linebacker gets his 1st Chimiganga at Chipotle Grill and the next MORNING -- wakes up with severe tingling in his extremities.. PROVE that the Chimiganga is NOT the proximate CAUSE of that condition. It does not WORK THAT WAY... If it did, we'd have no over the counter drugs, no prescription drugs and witch doctors for medical advisors..
I agree that drug companies don't have to prove that their products don't kill and injure people. I'm not even saying that they should have to. However, I think most would agree that proper safety tests should be done before allowing people to take them. I'm sure you're aware that the Covid vaccines were rushed and regular testing procedures, such as animal tests, were skipped, going straight to human trials. I hope you have heard that there were some adverse reactions in the human trials. I certainly did. In any case, the vaccine companies told us that the trials went swimmingly and now, here we are, with the Astrazeneca Covid vaccine suspended in around 20 countries last I checked, including the U.S., and the Johnson and Johnson vaccine has just been recommended for suspension as well in the U.S. due to blood clot issues. Meanwhile, both Pfizer and Moderna have had a lot more reports of blood clotting than Johnson and Johnson.
When you vaccinate MILLIONS of people, ALL - the adverse effects are reported. But the name "adverse effect" is misleading.. It should be "potential adverse effect".. It's why most prescript drugs carry so many "possible side effects".. Because in an abundance of zealous OVERPROTECTION, the FDA decides that EVERY adverse reaction must be disclosed. Even it there NO POSSIBLE connection to the drug..
I think you're flat out wrong there- if there was no possible connection, it wouldn't be listed as a -possible- side effect. Feel free to present evidence to the contrary.
Better to discuss WHY all of these anecdotal effects are USEFUL to science illiterate psuedo-celebs like RFK Jr. Because they want to believe that there are answers to autism and other mysterious diseases that are SIMPLE...
From what I've read, no one has ever argued that vaccines are the -only- cause of autism. But there is certainly a good deal of evidence that vaccines can be -a- cause of autism. For starters though, do you believe that mercury can cause autism? If not, I suggest taking a look at this article, which details the first cases of autism back in 1938:
By Teresa Conrick "SINCE 1938 there have come to our attention", is becoming a famous introductory description about autism. Written by psychiatrist, Dr. Leo Kanner, it began the narrative that described those first eleven children, all born in the 1930's,...
www.ageofautism.com
I just read a bit yesterday from RFK Jr, making an unrepentant spectacle of himself, claiming that mRNA vaccines "mutilate human DNA"...
Is that an actual quote or are you attempting to convey what he said in your own words? From a previous conversation with you, it appears that it is the latter. In any case, by all means, cite the article you are referring to here and I'd be happy to take a look.
This is all you really need to know here. Because if provoking the human immune system to learn how to DESTROY a SPECIFIC foreign body to keep you well is "mutilation of human DNA" -- than you better not get a bee sting or get ringworm..
Without getting into what you alleged RFK said (I await your citation), I'm sure you're well aware that for people with alergic reactions to them, bee stings can be fatal due to anaphylaxis:
Three Britons have died in the past month from bee or wasp stings. Rebecca Allison explains why such an everyday hazard can be fatal
www.theguardian.com
Some people who get vaccines also get anaphylaxis and die as well.