Always believe the Establishment and science over the non-science and private researchers. The only thing better than science is better science, and the anti-covid people simply don't have it.Yes...always believe the establishment. ALWAYS.Okay now how can one find out if one is asymptotic? We know (well some of us know) the PCR test is ineffective and just maybe a fraud. Fauci The Great FRAUD admits it.There is no scientific evidence showing that has ever occurred. Tell me how many people have been infected, incubated, died.No. I’ll take not getting the virus altogether. I’m healthy and I supplement my immune system. Throughout this pandemic I’ve not changed my lifestyle one bit. I’ve used airlines several times and traveled several thousand miles in my motorhome visiting multiple states.One, I think anyone would take that over going to the hospital, being intubated, then dying.Do you work for big pharma?Why? How many went to the hospital, how many intubated, how many died?The problem with that conclusion is it’s not accurate. There are plenty of people who got the vaccine and then got covid and some have died.Getting the virus shot is a gamble, I factored in the possibility that by getting the shot I would not infect anyone or become infected. That the possibility of killing this virus to save more lives & a return to more normal life was worth the risk. 2 shots zero problems.
because none are 100% effective. howeverrrrrrrrr............ statistically speaking, very few actually got the disease AND most that have after vaccinated, their symptoms were milder & avoided hospitalization.
You have any evidence to support your assertions? I have a study showing that, far from helping, those who got the Pfizer vaccine were more likely to get Covid variants:
CDZ - Will Vaccinated People Be More Vulnerable to Variants?
My mother sent me the link to this article that was just published today on Mercola.com. Here's their "story at a glance version": ** Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked April 19, 2021 STORY AT-A-GLANCE Experts have raised warnings about the problematic history of coronavirus...www.usmessageboard.com
ummmm... every year we get a flu shot, based on the most prevalent strain(s) going around at the time.
virus' mutate. this is a brand spanking new one & the research is still evolving. tweeks & boosters will probably become the norm until/unless a cure happens.
You're missing the point- the study found that people who took the Pfizer vaccine were 8 times more likely to get a Covid 19 variant. Which means that far from helping defend against this variant, the Pfizer vaccine was actually making things worse.
None?
I guess you’re cool with getting the covid after taking the jab, as long as you don’t go to hospital, get intubated, or die.
Two, are you mental? Tell us how many were infected after being vaxxed.
As to your question, I’ve no idea how many have infected after being vaxxed. If it’s 10% are you comfortable with that? 20%? 30%?
Do you work for big pharma?
you could be or might have been an asymptomatic carrier. you might feel just peachy - shed that covid to an unsuspecting fellow american & THEY could wind up being worm bait.
way to go!
Original Investigation
Infectious Diseases
January 7, 2021
SARS-CoV-2 Transmission From People Without COVID-19 Symptoms
Michael A. Johansson, PhD1,2; Talia M. Quandelacy, PhD, MPH1; Sarah Kada, PhD1; et al Pragati Venkata Prasad, MPH1; Molly Steele, PhD, MPH1; John T. Brooks, MD1; Rachel B. Slayton, PhD, MPH1,2; Matthew Biggerstaff, ScD, MPH1,2; Jay C. Butler, MD2
Author Affiliations Article Information
JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2035057. oi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35057
COVID-19 Resource Center
Key Points
Question What proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread is associated with transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from persons with no symptoms?
Findings In this decision analytical model assessing multiple scenarios for the infectious period and the proportion of transmission from individuals who never have COVID-19 symptoms, transmission from asymptomatic individuals was estimated to account for more than half of all transmission.
Meaning The findings of this study suggest that the identification and isolation of persons with symptomatic COVID-19 alone will not control the ongoing spread of SARS-CoV-2.
Objective To assess the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 transmissions in the community that likely occur from persons without symptoms.
Design, Setting, and Participants This decision analytical model assessed the relative amount of transmission from presymptomatic, never symptomatic, and symptomatic individuals across a range of scenarios in which the proportion of transmission from people who never develop symptoms (ie, remain asymptomatic) and the infectious period were varied according to published best estimates.
Conclusions and Relevance In this decision analytical model of multiple scenarios of proportions of asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 and infectious periods, transmission from asymptomatic individuals was estimated to account for more than half of all transmissions.
Results The baseline assumptions for the model were that peak infectiousness occurred at the median of symptom onset and that 30% of individuals with infection never develop symptoms and are 75% as infectious as those who do develop symptoms. Combined, these baseline assumptions imply that persons with infection who never develop symptoms may account for approximately 24% of all transmission. In this base case, 59% of all transmission came from asymptomatic transmission, comprising 35% from presymptomatic individuals and 24% from individuals who never develop symptoms. Under a broad range of values for each of these assumptions, at least 50% of new SARS-CoV-2 infections was estimated to have originated from exposure to individuals with infection but without symptoms.
Conclusions and Relevance In this decision analytical model of multiple scenarios of proportions of asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 and infectious periods, transmission from asymptomatic individuals was estimated to account for more than half of all transmissions.
SARS-CoV-2 Transmission From People Without COVID-19 Symptoms
so there you go.
as far as knowing that one can become infected by an asymptomatic carrier - it is impossible to determine how many actually knew their infector; if that person is a stranger on a subway ... or at the grocery store. especially given the abysmal fail the trump administration lead in the way of contact tracing.
NOW, put your critical thinking cap on:
to date, we have 32,000,000 confirmed cases of covid
& 570,000 dead.
are you trying to peddle that NONE of them thar cases, (32 million of them) were ever hospitalized or intubated due to catching it from an unknown carrier?
& none died?
Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (the question being asked of Fauci starts at the 3m50s mark; Fauci answers beginning at the 4m40s mark) [2]: “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.
Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.
That’s called a false positive.
What Fauci failed to say on the video—AND WHAT HE OBVIOUSLY KNEW—is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.
Therefore, all labs in the US, following the FDA guideline, are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…
Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…
The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.
The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.
Fauci, Smoking Gun Evidence, Pandemic Fraud; Memo To Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan - LewRockwell
well as far as your Q ... when there is contact tracing & one becomes ill ( after +/- 10 days of being infected b4 symptoms & spreading their own cooties ... & that contact tracing reveals someone else
( a friend, family member, co worker is asymptomatic ) tests positive- but has been to the grocery store or the subway etc... that's how.
as far as your ' source '?
LOL!!!!! while i give you JAMA:
American Medical Association ( AMA)
Share:
PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
American Medical Association ( AMA) - Media Bias Fact Check
- Overall, we rate the American Medical Association (AMA) Pro-science based on the support for the consensus of science on medical issues. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to the use of credible sources and a clean fact check record.
you give me biased spin.
Lew Rockwell
Share:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
Lew Rockwell - Media Bias Fact Check
- Overall, we rate Lew Rockwell Questionable based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience.
Silly girl...Rockwell had nothing to do with what I posted. Now can you please show me where my link by Jon Rappoport (not Lew Rockwell silly girl) misquoted your beloved Caesar, Fauci The Fraud?