- Thread starter
- #121
It's still a debate forum - something else you suck at.Like all leftists, Synthia believes he has far more influence than he actually does -- which is zero. He really believes people hang on his every word.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's still a debate forum - something else you suck at.Like all leftists, Synthia believes he has far more influence than he actually does -- which is zero. He really believes people hang on his every word.
You don't want debate. You want instant, unthinking agreement and endorsement.It's still a debate forum - something else you suck at.
WTF, retard?When they act like a publisher they should be treated like a publisher. Are you just stupid? It's OK.
In your vapid and shallow dreams, honey. We are legion and it's time to get real.
Apropos of NOTHING, like most of your posts.Not watching OAN.
One America News Network - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
It’s why it was canceled. Nobody is watching it.
Apropos of NOTHING, like most of your posts.
You like to think you're important.It was one of your early replies. This screen shot may refresh your memory.
View attachment 589116
You see? Otis said that not enough people were watching it.
You said that you were legion.
The facts say this. OANN claims between 150,000 a day and 500,000 viewers a day. Even using their high number half a million in a nation of more than 330 million is not legion.
Neilson estimates an average of 15,000 a day.
But again. Using OANN’s high number more people watch PBS. That hardly qualifies as legion.
So now that your reply is shown to be inappropriate. What have you to say now that the reply has been explained?
You like to think you're important.
That takes emotional maturity and intellectual honesty.I like to think if I screw up I would admit it.
because you dont like the guy?....this is America synth....even you can run for president.....if you dont want trump then tell the fucking democrats to run someone who appeals to more people than the shit they have been putting up...otherwise if they keep putting up half-assed people.....you might get your buddy back...If you're not opposing Trump returning, like the Democrats and Never Trumpers are, then you must have no problem with it, right?
They cannot have it both ways. That is the point that sailed right over your fat head.WTF, retard?
They are being treated like a publisher.
Protected by the constitution.
A publisher doesn't have to publish RWNJ's theories.
Have you ever read letters to the editor in your local newspaper?
A TV provider can't be forced to carry anything it doesn't want to.
So, Trumptards would be fighting for the atheist channel to be published on Direct TV?
What about the gay TV channel?
Kiddie porn anyone?
That would require a level of autonomy Synthia doesn't possess.because you dont like the guy?....this is America synth....even you can run for president.....if you dont want trump then tell the fucking democrats to run someone who appeals to more people than the shit they have been putting up...otherwise if they keep putting up half-assed people.....you might get your buddy back...
So what? They could send them through the counter 100 times. Wouldn't change a thing, tiger than to get a more accurate count.Counting the votes doesn't matter?
Like those Dems who were putting the same stack through, multiple times?
So, a person whose vote was counted a hundred times is "a more accurate count".So what? They could send them through the counter 100 times. Wouldn't change a thing, tiger than to get a more accurate count.
WTF, IDIOT?They cannot have it both ways. That is the point that sailed right over your fat head.
You want them to publish only what the government approves.WTF, IDIOT?
Your "point" is the one on top of your head.
YES, they can have it both ways, you moron.
They are private companies.
So, you want the government to step in, to force them to publish BS?
How communist of you.
Should a government allow seditious incitement be published?You want them to publish only what the government approves.
How communist of you.
Not gonna read 7 pages.My new service does carry OANN.
Freedom's a bitch, ain't it?Should a government allow seditious incitement be published?
Should a government allow bomb-making instructions be disseminated over the internet freely? 'The Turner Diaries'?
How about if they are American Muslims preaching the sedition and publishing the bomb-making?
No, you don't. You're a Democrat.Unlike you I want strong, smart national security.
I don't listen to talking heads. Don't project your pathetic need to have your opinions handed to you on others.You want to drool while listening to Mark LEVin yammer about "freeeedom and liberty", the fat useless fuck.