Did anyone interfere with your investigation? Mueller...No.

[S.J.]

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

Because impeachment isn't always the appropriate response. Something the right doesn't comprehend.

The only response they have is to keep throwing shit against the wall, hoping something will stick. Is that what you're banking on?

 

[S.J.]

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a ******* LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

Um, yeah it is, moron. That's not even in dispute (except by idiots like you).

If you thought you had an argument, you don't. Because you didn't provide a rebuttal. So your cry baby "um, yeah it is moron", is an answer coming from a losing ignoramus, which is you. If you can't prove me wrong, then get lost.

You have it backwards, dickwad. Show me where the FBI corroborated the dossier's accuracy. That's ******* laughable.

That's common knowledge. It's been linked on this forum dozens of times. You have Google right? Don't be a ***** and look for yourself.

If it's been posted, dig it up and prove your claim, *****.

 

[BWK]

Dipshit.......comey and the FBI used that opposition research to get illegal FISA warrants....you moron.......the only one getting dirt on the opposition political campaign from the Russians was hilary and the democrats through steele and Fusion GPS.....and now it appears Weismann, the guy actually in charge, not mueller, was conspiring with a Ukrainian oligarch.....

The Trump Boomerang is about to return and hit the democrats right in the head...

There's nothing illegal about the FBI including the dossier to get warrants.

Yes there is. When the crap is stamped "verified" and it never was and can't be. That's called lying to the court.

Parts of it were verified and according to the FBI, the parts presented to the FISC were.

Damn that's one quick backpedal loser. If parts of a document are not verified, the whole thing is useless. Comey had the whole thing stamped "verified", KNOWING it was not. That's illegal. Period. End of game.

LOLOLOLOL

Great, show me the FISC regulations that state a document can't be used if some parts are verified and some parts aren't......

They are going upstream without a paddle with the conspiracy Dossier nonsense.

 

[BWK]

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

Because impeachment isn't always the appropriate response. Something the right doesn't comprehend.

The only response they have is to keep throwing shit against the wall, hoping something will stick. Is that what you're banking on?

Seeing that the Trump crimes have already been proven, that isn't something the Left needs to hope for.

 

[Faun]

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How ******* stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a ******* LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

No they didn't......it was a fake dossier that they then broke the law when they used it to get FISA warrants......

No they didn't......it was a fake dossier that they then broke the law when they used it to get FISA warrants...... Do you have any idea how absolutely useless and inaccurate, this statement is? It doesn't say anything, it doesn't argue anything, but what it does say, is that you failed to prove me wrong. You people are nothing but cry babies without arguing anything down. I can't find any factual rebuttals so I'll just say "No they didn't" and pout like a crying baby. You are pitiful. View attachment 271201

Keep in mind, it's from the same idiot who thinks Putin gave Hillary $145 million and thinks the investigation into collusion with Russian was a hoax

That one's not playing with a full deck, if ya know what I mean?

 

[BWK]

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

Because impeachment isn't always the appropriate response. Something the right doesn't comprehend.

The only response they have is to keep throwing shit against the wall, hoping something will stick. Is that what you're banking on?

You didn't present the counter argument. Did you google the FBI corroborating the Dossier? Lol! You are afraid to know. What a coward.

 

[S.J.]

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

Because impeachment isn't always the appropriate response. Something the right doesn't comprehend.

The only response they have is to keep throwing shit against the wall, hoping something will stick. Is that what you're banking on?

You didn't present the counter argument. Did you google the FBI corroborating the Dossier? Lol! You are afraid to know. What a coward.

The burden of proof is on YOU, buddy, not me. If you have something, post it.

 

[Faun]

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

Because impeachment isn't always the appropriate response. Something the right doesn't comprehend.

The only response they have is to keep throwing shit against the wall, hoping something will stick. Is that what you're banking on?

No. But impeachment is not always the right thing to do. It places a huge strain on the country and should be reserved for serious offenses, IMO.

Case in point... Clinton broke the law. The brain-dead fanatical right impeached him for it. But the law he broke was to lie under oath on a deposition about cheating on his wife. He should never have been impeached for that. But Republicans care more about their party than they do their country, so they impeached him anyway, which if course, the Senate acquitted him.

Now we have trump, who could very well be impeached for obstruction of justice. But like with Clinton, he should not be. His obstruction, which very likely is criminal, does not warrant dragging the country through an impeachment over it. Which will almost certainly also end in acquittal. And despite the cries for impeachment by many Democrats, so far, they're at least holding off on proceeding in that direction. I applaud them for resisting the temptation.

 

[BWK]

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

Because impeachment isn't always the appropriate response. Something the right doesn't comprehend.

The only response they have is to keep throwing shit against the wall, hoping something will stick. Is that what you're banking on?

You didn't present the counter argument. Did you google the FBI corroborating the Dossier? Lol! You are afraid to know. What a coward.

The burden of proof is on YOU, buddy, not me. If you have something, post it.

And when I do, is that the point in time when you disappear? Is that the point in time when you say fake news? Is that the point in time when you will not counter my argument? Yes! Bottom line, whether I do or not, you can't/won't dispute it, proving me wrong. Trump's Russia dossier corroborated: FBI used document to obtain wiretap on Carter Page

What parts of the dossier have been corroborated?, page 10

Trump–Russia dossier - Wikipedia

 

[Faun]

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

Um, yeah it is, moron. That's not even in dispute (except by idiots like you).

If you thought you had an argument, you don't. Because you didn't provide a rebuttal. So your cry baby "um, yeah it is moron", is an answer coming from a losing ignoramus, which is you. If you can't prove me wrong, then get lost.

You have it backwards, dickwad. Show me where the FBI corroborated the dossier's accuracy. That's ******* laughable.

That's common knowledge. It's been linked on this forum dozens of times. You have Google right? Don't be a ***** and look for yourself.

If it's been posted, dig it up and prove your claim, *****.

I myself have posted about that in the past...

Summary of Evidence Released - What It Says

 

[S.J.]

No. But impeachment is not always the right thing to do. It places a huge strain on the country and should be reserved for serious offenses, IMO.

Ok, what do you think your options are then?

 

[rjs330]

When even the democrat, left wing, government media are telling you asshats it was a disaster, you need to understand...it was a disaster....

Does the Mueller report exonerate Trump? We asked 12 legal experts.

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

Mueller words himself and he believes that he can be tried for Obstruction of Justice

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”

game over

Wrong! He can be indicted after he leaves office via the Mueller report.

for what? a crime that was determined Trump didn't commit?

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

He also never said he did. Mueller himself said he didn't determine one way or the other. Therefore Trump is innocent until proven guilty. And furthermore no one who actually matters has alleged he committed any crimes.

 

[TRFjr]

for what? a crime that was determined Trump didn't commit?

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

OMG! How can a human being be this stupid? Do you understand the English language? For real? Again, for the blind, deaf, and dumb; Mueller could not reach a determination because he didn't have the authority. His job was a fact finding job, not a determination job. "NOTHING ELSE!" The determination based on Mueller's findings, goes to Congress, which it will. If you can't understand that, then you are nothing more than a vegetable with someone typing for you, who is as brain dead as you.

just a fact finding endeavor?

Well here is the fact that Mueller found

"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime” ​

 

[WEATHER53]

For liberals facts don’t matter. What they expect is for actuality to morph into what satisfies their feelings
It’s like drug addiction and they behave like addicts

 

[TRFjr]

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

let this reality slap you in the face a reality you refuse to except


"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

 

[S.J.]

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

Because impeachment isn't always the appropriate response. Something the right doesn't comprehend.

The only response they have is to keep throwing shit against the wall, hoping something will stick. Is that what you're banking on?

You didn't present the counter argument. Did you google the FBI corroborating the Dossier? Lol! You are afraid to know. What a coward.

The burden of proof is on YOU, buddy, not me. If you have something, post it.

And when I do, is that the point in time when you disappear? Is that the point in time when you say fake news? Is that the point in time when you will not counter my argument? Yes! Bottom line, whether I do or not, you can't/won't dispute it, proving me wrong. Trump's Russia dossier corroborated: FBI used document to obtain wiretap on Carter Page

What parts of the dossier have been corroborated?, page 10

Trump–Russia dossier - Wikipedia

I hate to tell you this, dumbshit, but none of your links lays out one shred of proof. The first one (Salon.com...lol) is a left wing propaganda site and does not prove anything. It just says that it's been proven but does not show the proof. Like you, it's just claiming the dossier was proven, which it was not.
Your second link is a discussion forum that proves absolutely nothing. Just idiots like you making the claim that it was proven.
Wiki doesn't show any proof either. You failed again, chump.

 

[rjs330]

Oh **** you people. I would certainly hope that if the FBI got information about a Presidential Campaign advisor possibly colluding with a foreign government, they would investigate.

The dossier was never disproven. So you think it should be ignored? bull ******* shit.

The wire tap was based on other information & not the doissier.

Our country was (and still is) under attack by Russians & you assfucks don't want to do anything about it., I have an idea, care about America instead of that fat assed orange POS you worship.

Oh, they will care should the Russians decide to aid Democrats this time around. That's what it will take.

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

And this is what mueller was trying to hide...


Beyond his purview

Turchie holds that the testimony of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees this past Wednesday confirmed the existence of a hostile intelligence operation against Donald Trump (video below). Suffice it to say that Turchie takes up issues of fact that have come within our purview on several occasions.

Kim Strassel brings Mueller’s testimony within the purview of her weekly Wall Street Journal column today. She scopes out “What Mueller was trying to hide.” The Journal posts Strassel’s column online together with the video below.
---

Strassel continues with this quotable quote:

The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess.

Christopher Steele’s dossier was central to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe, the basis of many of the claims of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Yet the Mueller authors studiously wrote around the dossier, mentioning it only in perfunctory terms. The report ignored Mr. Steele’s paymaster, Fusion GPS, and its own ties to Russians. It also ignored Fusion’s paymaster, the Clinton campaign, and the ugly politics behind the dossier hit job.

Mr. Mueller’s testimony this week put to rest any doubt that this sheltering was deliberate. In his opening statement he declared that he would not “address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called Steele Dossier.” The purpose of those omissions was obvious, as those two areas go to the heart of why the nation has been forced to endure years of collusion fantasy.

I got only as far as the silly part about it being a hoax. There was no hoax. It was not a hoax that Russia hacked us -- that was real. It was not a hoax that trump was surrounded by people with ties to Russia -- that was real. It was not a hiax that some of those people had direct contact with some of the Russian hackers and Wikileaks -- that was real. It was not a hoax that it needed to be investigated -- that too was real.

Since the day Mueller was appointed Special Counsel, trump was doing everything he could to marginalize Mueller. Extending to labeling his investigation as a Russia-collusion Hoax, knowing full well his cult members would run with it. Y'all are nothing if not faithful servants.

The hoax was that Trump conspired, colluded or cooperated with the Russians to tamper with the election. It didn't happen despite what you and the media wanted to believe.

 

[rjs330]

LOLOLOLOL

Great, show me the FISC regulations that state a document can't be used if some parts are verified and some parts aren't......

What I've seen in courts is that if somebody lies, their whole testimony is thrown out. I mean.....they are presenting
the evidence in front of a judge, right?

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How ******* stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a ******* LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

No they didn't. And even more importantly at the time the warrants were obtained there was no verification done. And Comey swore on oath that what was said was true. Yet he didn't know whether it was or not because it wasn't verified. Steele himself said so!

 

[Marion Morrison]

Sorry, dipstick........hilary and the democrats are the only ones who actually used Russian assets against the opposition political party......

There is nothing illegal in hiring a opposition research. There is nothing illegal about investigstiong hjow Trump liued about his business in Russia,,.

If

Sorry, dipstick........hilary and the democrats are the only ones who actually used Russian assets against the opposition political party......

It is not illegal to investigate Trump's business in Russia.

It is illegal to work with a foreign government to help win an election.

Tell us again why Trump lied about his campaign's contact with the Russians & why he lied about Trump Tower Moscow.

Dipshit.......comey and the FBI used that opposition research to get illegal FISA warrants....you moron.......the only one getting dirt on the opposition political campaign from the Russians was hilary and the democrats through steele and Fusion GPS.....and now it appears Weismann, the guy actually in charge, not mueller, was conspiring with a Ukrainian oligarch.....

The Trump Boomerang is about to return and hit the democrats right in the head...

There's nothing illegal about the FBI including the dossier to get warrants.

Yes there is. When the crap is stamped "verified" and it never was and can't be. That's called lying to the court.

Oh **** you people. I would certainly hope that if the FBI got information about a Presidential Campaign advisor possibly colluding with a foreign government, they would investigate.

The dossier was never disproven. So you think it should be ignored? bull ******* shit.

The wire tap was based on other information & not the doissier.

Our country was (and still is) under attack by Russians & you assfucks don't want to do anything about it., I have an idea, care about America instead of that fat assed orange POS you worship.

What did Obammy do about it? He was the president when it all went down.

I do know what he did, but let's see if you do.

 

[The Purge]

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How ******* stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a ******* LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

No they didn't......it was a fake dossier that they then broke the law when they used it to get FISA warrants......

No they didn't......it was a fake dossier that they then broke the law when they used it to get FISA warrants...... Do you have any idea how absolutely useless and inaccurate, this statement is? It doesn't say anything, it doesn't argue anything, but what it does say, is that you failed to prove me wrong. You people are nothing but cry babies without arguing anything down. I can't find any factual rebuttals so I'll just say "No they didn't" and pout like a crying baby. You are pitiful. View attachment 271201

Keep in mind, it's from the same idiot who thinks Putin gave Hillary $145 million and thinks the investigation into collusion with Russian was a hoax

That one's not playing with a full deck, if ya know what I mean?

You simply can't help the low 2 digit IQ ABNORMALS

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
Apr 23, 2015 · Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation ... Now, after Russia's annexation of Crimea and aggression in ... many so-called F.O.F.s — Friends of Frank — in attendance