Did anyone interfere with your investigation? Mueller...No.

[Billiejeens]

There's nothing illegal about the FBI including the dossier to get warrants.

Yes there is. When the crap is stamped "verified" and it never was and can't be. That's called lying to the court.

Oh **** you people. I would certainly hope that if the FBI got information about a Presidential Campaign advisor possibly colluding with a foreign government, they would investigate.

The dossier was never disproven. So you think it should be ignored? bull ******* shit.

The wire tap was based on other information & not the doissier.

Our country was (and still is) under attack by Russians & you assfucks don't want to do anything about it., I have an idea, care about America instead of that fat assed orange POS you worship.

Oh, they will care should the Russians decide to aid Democrats this time around. That's what it will take.

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

For three years I have been instructing people that he didn't say that.
He verbally stated that was the media's position.

 

[Faun]

Yes there is. When the crap is stamped "verified" and it never was and can't be. That's called lying to the court.

Oh **** you people. I would certainly hope that if the FBI got information about a Presidential Campaign advisor possibly colluding with a foreign government, they would investigate.

The dossier was never disproven. So you think it should be ignored? bull ******* shit.

The wire tap was based on other information & not the doissier.

Our country was (and still is) under attack by Russians & you assfucks don't want to do anything about it., I have an idea, care about America instead of that fat assed orange POS you worship.

Oh, they will care should the Russians decide to aid Democrats this time around. That's what it will take.

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

For three years I have been instructing people that he didn't say that.
He verbally stated that was the media's position.

LOLOL

He was talking about himself and the loyalty of his supporters...

"The people, my people are so smart. And you know what else they say about my people? The polls. They say I have the most loyal people. Did you ever see that? Where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any voters. Ok? It's like incredible."​

It's a cult.

 

[BWK]

Damn that's one quick backpedal loser. If parts of a document are not verified, the whole thing is useless. Comey had the whole thing stamped "verified", KNOWING it was not. That's illegal. Period. End of game.

LOLOLOLOL

Great, show me the FISC regulations that state a document can't be used if some parts are verified and some parts aren't......

What I've seen in courts is that if somebody lies, their whole testimony is thrown out. I mean.....they are presenting
the evidence in front of a judge, right?

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How ******* stupid are you people?

Lol! The dossier IS THE WITNESS, the case is Trump and Russia.
Without the WITNESS there is no case.

How ******* stupid are you, Dave? I haven't seen any boundaries yet.

The Dossier is nothing but a conspiracy theory that was manufactured by Republicans that never went anywhere.

 

[BWK]

Does the Mueller report exonerate Trump? We asked 12 legal experts.

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

Mueller words himself and he believes that he can be tried for Obstruction of Justice

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”

game over

Wrong! He can be indicted after he leaves office via the Mueller report.

for what? a crime that was determined Trump didn't commit?

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

 

[2aguy]

There's nothing illegal about the FBI including the dossier to get warrants.

Yes there is. When the crap is stamped "verified" and it never was and can't be. That's called lying to the court.

Oh **** you people. I would certainly hope that if the FBI got information about a Presidential Campaign advisor possibly colluding with a foreign government, they would investigate.

The dossier was never disproven. So you think it should be ignored? bull ******* shit.

The wire tap was based on other information & not the doissier.

Our country was (and still is) under attack by Russians & you assfucks don't want to do anything about it., I have an idea, care about America instead of that fat assed orange POS you worship.

Oh, they will care should the Russians decide to aid Democrats this time around. That's what it will take.

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

And this is what mueller was trying to hide...


Beyond his purview

Turchie holds that the testimony of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees this past Wednesday confirmed the existence of a hostile intelligence operation against Donald Trump (video below). Suffice it to say that Turchie takes up issues of fact that have come within our purview on several occasions.

Kim Strassel brings Mueller’s testimony within the purview of her weekly Wall Street Journal column today. She scopes out “What Mueller was trying to hide.” The Journal posts Strassel’s column online together with the video below.
---

Strassel continues with this quotable quote:

The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess.

Christopher Steele’s dossier was central to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe, the basis of many of the claims of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Yet the Mueller authors studiously wrote around the dossier, mentioning it only in perfunctory terms. The report ignored Mr. Steele’s paymaster, Fusion GPS, and its own ties to Russians. It also ignored Fusion’s paymaster, the Clinton campaign, and the ugly politics behind the dossier hit job.

Mr. Mueller’s testimony this week put to rest any doubt that this sheltering was deliberate. In his opening statement he declared that he would not “address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called Steele Dossier.” The purpose of those omissions was obvious, as those two areas go to the heart of why the nation has been forced to endure years of collusion fantasy.

 

[BWK]

Yes there is. When the crap is stamped "verified" and it never was and can't be. That's called lying to the court.

Oh **** you people. I would certainly hope that if the FBI got information about a Presidential Campaign advisor possibly colluding with a foreign government, they would investigate.

The dossier was never disproven. So you think it should be ignored? bull ******* shit.

The wire tap was based on other information & not the doissier.

Our country was (and still is) under attack by Russians & you assfucks don't want to do anything about it., I have an idea, care about America instead of that fat assed orange POS you worship.

Oh, they will care should the Russians decide to aid Democrats this time around. That's what it will take.

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

And this is what mueller was trying to hide...


Beyond his purview

Turchie holds that the testimony of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees this past Wednesday confirmed the existence of a hostile intelligence operation against Donald Trump (video below). Suffice it to say that Turchie takes up issues of fact that have come within our purview on several occasions.

Kim Strassel brings Mueller’s testimony within the purview of her weekly Wall Street Journal column today. She scopes out “What Mueller was trying to hide.” The Journal posts Strassel’s column online together with the video below.
---

Strassel continues with this quotable quote:

The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess.

Christopher Steele’s dossier was central to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe, the basis of many of the claims of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Yet the Mueller authors studiously wrote around the dossier, mentioning it only in perfunctory terms. The report ignored Mr. Steele’s paymaster, Fusion GPS, and its own ties to Russians. It also ignored Fusion’s paymaster, the Clinton campaign, and the ugly politics behind the dossier hit job.

Mr. Mueller’s testimony this week put to rest any doubt that this sheltering was deliberate. In his opening statement he declared that he would not “address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called Steele Dossier.” The purpose of those omissions was obvious, as those two areas go to the heart of why the nation has been forced to endure years of collusion fantasy.

Conspiracy theories were not on his radar. Wasn't his job.

 

[TRFjr]

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”

game over

Wrong! He can be indicted after he leaves office via the Mueller report.

for what? a crime that was determined Trump didn't commit?

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

So no one ever committed a crime other than those who were convicted in court.

so you don't believe in innocent till proven guilty? how fascist of you

 

[TRFjr]

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”

game over

Wrong! He can be indicted after he leaves office via the Mueller report.

for what? a crime that was determined Trump didn't commit?

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

 

[Faun]

Yes there is. When the crap is stamped "verified" and it never was and can't be. That's called lying to the court.

Oh **** you people. I would certainly hope that if the FBI got information about a Presidential Campaign advisor possibly colluding with a foreign government, they would investigate.

The dossier was never disproven. So you think it should be ignored? bull ******* shit.

The wire tap was based on other information & not the doissier.

Our country was (and still is) under attack by Russians & you assfucks don't want to do anything about it., I have an idea, care about America instead of that fat assed orange POS you worship.

Oh, they will care should the Russians decide to aid Democrats this time around. That's what it will take.

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

And this is what mueller was trying to hide...


Beyond his purview

Turchie holds that the testimony of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees this past Wednesday confirmed the existence of a hostile intelligence operation against Donald Trump (video below). Suffice it to say that Turchie takes up issues of fact that have come within our purview on several occasions.

Kim Strassel brings Mueller’s testimony within the purview of her weekly Wall Street Journal column today. She scopes out “What Mueller was trying to hide.” The Journal posts Strassel’s column online together with the video below.
---

Strassel continues with this quotable quote:

The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess.

Christopher Steele’s dossier was central to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe, the basis of many of the claims of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Yet the Mueller authors studiously wrote around the dossier, mentioning it only in perfunctory terms. The report ignored Mr. Steele’s paymaster, Fusion GPS, and its own ties to Russians. It also ignored Fusion’s paymaster, the Clinton campaign, and the ugly politics behind the dossier hit job.

Mr. Mueller’s testimony this week put to rest any doubt that this sheltering was deliberate. In his opening statement he declared that he would not “address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called Steele Dossier.” The purpose of those omissions was obvious, as those two areas go to the heart of why the nation has been forced to endure years of collusion fantasy.

I got only as far as the silly part about it being a hoax. There was no hoax. It was not a hoax that Russia hacked us -- that was real. It was not a hoax that trump was surrounded by people with ties to Russia -- that was real. It was not a hiax that some of those people had direct contact with some of the Russian hackers and Wikileaks -- that was real. It was not a hoax that it needed to be investigated -- that too was real.

Since the day Mueller was appointed Special Counsel, trump was doing everything he could to marginalize Mueller. Extending to labeling his investigation as a Russia-collusion Hoax, knowing full well his cult members would run with it. Y'all are nothing if not faithful servants.

 

[RealDave]

Wrong! He can be indicted after he leaves office via the Mueller report.

for what? a crime that was determined Trump didn't commit?

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

 

[BWK]

for what? a crime that was determined Trump didn't commit?

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

 

[S.J.]

Parts of it were verified and according to the FBI, the parts presented to the FISC were.

Damn that's one quick backpedal loser. If parts of a document are not verified, the whole thing is useless. Comey had the whole thing stamped "verified", KNOWING it was not. That's illegal. Period. End of game.

LOLOLOLOL

Great, show me the FISC regulations that state a document can't be used if some parts are verified and some parts aren't......

What I've seen in courts is that if somebody lies, their whole testimony is thrown out. I mean.....they are presenting
the evidence in front of a judge, right?

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How ******* stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a ******* LIE.

 

[S.J.]

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

 

[BWK]

Wrong! He can be indicted after he leaves office via the Mueller report.

for what? a crime that was determined Trump didn't commit?

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

OMG! How can a human being be this stupid? Do you understand the English language? For real? Again, for the blind, deaf, and dumb; Mueller could not reach a determination because he didn't have the authority. His job was a fact finding job, not a determination job. "NOTHING ELSE!" The determination based on Mueller's findings, goes to Congress, which it will. If you can't understand that, then you are nothing more than a vegetable with someone typing for you, who is as brain dead as you.

 

[2aguy]

Oh **** you people. I would certainly hope that if the FBI got information about a Presidential Campaign advisor possibly colluding with a foreign government, they would investigate.

The dossier was never disproven. So you think it should be ignored? bull ******* shit.

The wire tap was based on other information & not the doissier.

Our country was (and still is) under attack by Russians & you assfucks don't want to do anything about it., I have an idea, care about America instead of that fat assed orange POS you worship.

Oh, they will care should the Russians decide to aid Democrats this time around. That's what it will take.

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

And this is what mueller was trying to hide...


Beyond his purview

Turchie holds that the testimony of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees this past Wednesday confirmed the existence of a hostile intelligence operation against Donald Trump (video below). Suffice it to say that Turchie takes up issues of fact that have come within our purview on several occasions.

Kim Strassel brings Mueller’s testimony within the purview of her weekly Wall Street Journal column today. She scopes out “What Mueller was trying to hide.” The Journal posts Strassel’s column online together with the video below.
---

Strassel continues with this quotable quote:

The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess.

Christopher Steele’s dossier was central to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe, the basis of many of the claims of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Yet the Mueller authors studiously wrote around the dossier, mentioning it only in perfunctory terms. The report ignored Mr. Steele’s paymaster, Fusion GPS, and its own ties to Russians. It also ignored Fusion’s paymaster, the Clinton campaign, and the ugly politics behind the dossier hit job.

Mr. Mueller’s testimony this week put to rest any doubt that this sheltering was deliberate. In his opening statement he declared that he would not “address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called Steele Dossier.” The purpose of those omissions was obvious, as those two areas go to the heart of why the nation has been forced to endure years of collusion fantasy.

I got only as far as the silly part about it being a hoax. There was no hoax. It was not a hoax that Russia hacked us -- that was real. It was not a hoax that trump was surrounded by people with ties to Russia -- that was real. It was not a hiax that some of those people had direct contact with some of the Russian hackers and Wikileaks -- that was real. It was not a hoax that it needed to be investigated -- that too was real.

Since the day Mueller was appointed Special Counsel, trump was doing everything he could to marginalize Mueller. Extending to labeling his investigation as a Russia-collusion Hoax, knowing full well his cult members would run with it. Y'all are nothing if not faithful servants.

No dipshit....Russia is always trying to hack us...the hoax is blaming Trump when it was hilary who took 145 million dollars from Putin, and who likely used her secret, illegal servers to conduct that business with Russia, China and anyone else willing to buy access to the next President....

Since everyone just knew hilary was going to win.....



....and Russian agents who gave steele the lies about Trump when he was on the payroll of hilary and the democrats. Then obama used that fake information through his minions to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump.....

Mueller obviously wasn't in control of the investigation...likely it was that weisman guy......

The Hoax was that it was Trump, and not hilary who broke the law...

 

[2aguy]

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

With the entire machinery of the government under obama's control....they couldn't even successfully set up Trump......that is just how bad these morons are...

 

[BWK]

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

 

[BWK]

Oh, they will care should the Russians decide to aid Democrats this time around. That's what it will take.

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

And this is what mueller was trying to hide...


Beyond his purview

Turchie holds that the testimony of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees this past Wednesday confirmed the existence of a hostile intelligence operation against Donald Trump (video below). Suffice it to say that Turchie takes up issues of fact that have come within our purview on several occasions.

Kim Strassel brings Mueller’s testimony within the purview of her weekly Wall Street Journal column today. She scopes out “What Mueller was trying to hide.” The Journal posts Strassel’s column online together with the video below.
---

Strassel continues with this quotable quote:

The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess.

Christopher Steele’s dossier was central to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe, the basis of many of the claims of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Yet the Mueller authors studiously wrote around the dossier, mentioning it only in perfunctory terms. The report ignored Mr. Steele’s paymaster, Fusion GPS, and its own ties to Russians. It also ignored Fusion’s paymaster, the Clinton campaign, and the ugly politics behind the dossier hit job.

Mr. Mueller’s testimony this week put to rest any doubt that this sheltering was deliberate. In his opening statement he declared that he would not “address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called Steele Dossier.” The purpose of those omissions was obvious, as those two areas go to the heart of why the nation has been forced to endure years of collusion fantasy.

I got only as far as the silly part about it being a hoax. There was no hoax. It was not a hoax that Russia hacked us -- that was real. It was not a hoax that trump was surrounded by people with ties to Russia -- that was real. It was not a hiax that some of those people had direct contact with some of the Russian hackers and Wikileaks -- that was real. It was not a hoax that it needed to be investigated -- that too was real.

Since the day Mueller was appointed Special Counsel, trump was doing everything he could to marginalize Mueller. Extending to labeling his investigation as a Russia-collusion Hoax, knowing full well his cult members would run with it. Y'all are nothing if not faithful servants.

No dipshit....Russia is always trying to hack us...the hoax is blaming Trump when it was hilary who took 145 million dollars from Putin, and who likely used her secret, illegal servers to conduct that business with Russia, China and anyone else willing to buy access to the next President....

Since everyone just knew hilary was going to win.....



....and Russian agents who gave steele the lies about Trump when he was on the payroll of hilary and the democrats. Then obama used that fake information through his minions to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump.....

Mueller obviously wasn't in control of the investigation...likely it was that weisman guy......

The Hoax was that it was Trump, and not hilary who broke the law...

You're a liar. Prove Hillary took $145 million dollars from Putin.

What proof do you have of the information Steele got from the Russians working as a double agent were lies? You don't. You're the liar.

 

[S.J.]

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

 

[BWK]

Damn that's one quick backpedal loser. If parts of a document are not verified, the whole thing is useless. Comey had the whole thing stamped "verified", KNOWING it was not. That's illegal. Period. End of game.

LOLOLOLOL

Great, show me the FISC regulations that state a document can't be used if some parts are verified and some parts aren't......

What I've seen in courts is that if somebody lies, their whole testimony is thrown out. I mean.....they are presenting
the evidence in front of a judge, right?

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How ******* stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a ******* LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.