P F Tinmore, et al,
This is one of those, epiphany moments!
Since it was decided by the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference, they must be the foreigners! I have not seen HAMAS raise the issue at the international level.
Most Respectfully,
R
This is one of those, epiphany moments!
Wow, this is strong talk!
(COMMENT)What about the surrender and disarm precondition.
Capacity is one of the absolute requisites for any treaty. Status of Forces and Truce conditions are general conditions for peace negotiations. It is beyond my expertise.
(COMMENT)Abbas can make any agreement he wants. It doesn't mean squat to the Palestinians.
So why do they keep insisting on a fake peace process?
You are obviously an advocate for anti-Palestinian Government elements. If nothing that PLO (Mahmoud Abbas, Chairman) Team agrees to is binding to the Palestinian, then, of course you are correct. The Talks are failed due to a lack of capacity and good faith on the Part of the Palestinians. And this would just add to the list of historical behaviors that would lead a reasonable and prudent person to believe that the majority of Palestinians are Hostile and operating outside the concept of "Settlement by peaceful means of disputes between States."
But it would also suggest, coincidentally, that the State of Palestine is yet another failed Arab Regime.
Most Respectfully,
R
(COMMENT)Foreigners deciding who has the "capacity" to make an agreement has nothing to do with the Palestinians
Since it was decided by the Seventh Arab League Summit Conference, they must be the foreigners! I have not seen HAMAS raise the issue at the international level.
Most Respectfully,
R
Last edited: