DHS Secretary Is The Dumbest Gator In The Swamp

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The whole right is dumb as hell. Their ignorance and bigotry stems from not knowing jack shit.....I was listening to her, and I was like WTF is this....as a 10 year old in a third world country I knew already what race are most Norwegians, where's at in the world, its capital, currency etc....And here we are we have a higher up in-government not knowing basic general stuff. Shame!!!

dumb as hell is giving them too much credit .. a box of gravel works

I'm sure you meant to say Democrats in the Senate. It was stupid question.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

When asked if Norway is a mostly white country, the blonde haired, blue-eyed retard in charge of our nation's security admitted she had no idea.

Trump Homeland Security Secretary Not Sure If Most Norwegians Are White

The term “white” is not defined, and is generally used ONLY in reference to Americans in America. When have we ever refered to Norwegiens as “white?”

She was properly instructed by counsel to assume nothing. Speculation is improper. The questions called for speculation.

Those who want to make this a race issue are mad because they failed to get the response they wanted.

It is fun to watch these angry leftists ask one question and expect her to answer another. The crying and tantrums are glorious.

Wow. You are as retarded as she is!

That must make you very jealous!

Both of them are so out of your league that you don't even register on the same scale.

If they are retarded, you are a vegetable.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Let me give you twats an example:

Q: "Do you know what time it is?"

Unprepared Witness: " it is 3:32 pm"

Properly Prepared Witness: "Yes"


You fucktards see the difference? That preperation is why you are throwing fits, and it is glorious.

I am surprised the Senator didn't ask her: "What color is your hair?"

She answers: "Blonde"

The Senator then says: "I have no further questions."

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

When asked if Norway is a mostly white country, the blonde haired, blue-eyed retard in charge of our nation's security admitted she had no idea.

Trump Homeland Security Secretary Not Sure If Most Norwegians Are White

And the best part are the ******* party zealots on this forum defending her like she was Albert Einstein.

It has to suck to be so beholden to a party that you cannot even be allowed to laugh when they do something dumb.

She did not say what the OP alleged. You didn't watch the video because it wasn't a cartoon.

 

[August West]

When asked if Norway is a mostly white country, the blonde haired, blue-eyed retard in charge of our nation's security admitted she had no idea.

Trump Homeland Security Secretary Not Sure If Most Norwegians Are White

You left wingers think Norway is one of the best countries ever. Wouldn't that be racist if that country was all white? It's as if you're saying the best country to live in and model our own after is pretty ******* white in its make up of population.

Socialism is what makes Norway great. Not skin color.

LMAO! Socialism has never made a country great.

Quasi-socialistic Costa Rica is the only Central American country that people are trying to get into, not out of. I`ve been there several times and I know that no Costa Rican wants to move to Honduras.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I am pretty sure my cat understands this better than you do. Using your fucked up view of hearsay no Cabinet Sec could ever testify about the work done bun their agency unless they did the work themselves or watched it happen.

The Sec of Ag could not testify about the wildfires unless they were there themselves fighting the fires and then only the small part they saw.

The Dir of FEMA could not testify about the damage from a hurricane unless they talked to every single person affected by it.

The Sec of Trans could not testify about the state of the roads and bridges in the country unless they personally drove every mile of road and examined every single bridge in the country.

You really should stick to just posting your sexual fantasies, at least you understand those

You are confusing all the issues because you don't understand speculation as it relates to hearsay.

You are all mixed up on the issue of how a witness MAY testify and how a witness MUST testify.

The DHS Sec. MAY testify about whatever the **** she wants if she is asked a question.

She MAY guess or speculate as to how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll tootsie pop if they ask her. But, if she refuses to guess and says "I don't know" it doesn't matter how angry they get, she is not required to guess. She may have heard or read somewhere (that's where the hearsay comes in), but she is not lying or being evasive if she says "I don't know."

If they ask her how many terror plots her agency has stopped in the last 30 days, she MAY testify, if she knows, but under normal circumstances, would not be required to answer if she does not know. BUT, now you are getting into non-human entity knowledge, apex witness testimony, corporate/entity witness designations, and whole bunch of other shit, which a totally different topic and I don't feel like explaining it. Go look it up,

The only testimony the DHS Sec. MUST testify to is her personal knowledge UNLESS she was subpoenaed to testify on behalf of DHS (again, I don't have all ******* day to explain. go look it up if you are interested).

Anyone stupid enough to asking her a question that goes beyond her actual personal knowledge can expect an "I don't know" response. She could have guessed about Norway's demographics, but she was not required to do so, and there is nothing those poor, ass hurt trolls can do but cry about it. That makes them, you, and others who do not understand, pissed.

Watching an inexperienced dude ask a bunch of flawed questions to somebody who is prepared and knows how to answer is hysterically entertaining. It can go on forever!

Here is an example of a cross-examiner who doesn't understand how to ask a proper question trying to get a simple answer out of a witness who is properly prepared and follows those instructions:


Do you know what time it is?

No.

Can you look and see?

Yes.

Please tell me the current time?

I don't know.

You just testified that you can look and see?

Yes.

Did you look?

No.

Can you look?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

Why don't you know?

Because I have not looked at a clock or watch.

Can you do that now?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

You just said you could look?

(pause. no answer. not a question)

Can you look?

Yes.

What time do you think it is?

I don't know.

You don't have any estimate about the time?

No.

If I told you it is morning time, would you believe me?

I am not sure if I would.

Why?

I would need more information.

You are deliberately evading my question?

(pause. not a question)

Will you tell me what time it is?

Yes.

Well?

(not a question)

I am waiting?

(not a question)

You know how to tell time, don't you?

Yes.

Any day, sweetheart?

(not a question)

______________________-


Do I need to go into more detail? Do you get it yet?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I am pretty sure my cat understands this better than you do. Using your fucked up view of hearsay no Cabinet Sec could ever testify about the work done bun their agency unless they did the work themselves or watched it happen.

The Sec of Ag could not testify about the wildfires unless they were there themselves fighting the fires and then only the small part they saw.

The Dir of FEMA could not testify about the damage from a hurricane unless they talked to every single person affected by it.

The Sec of Trans could not testify about the state of the roads and bridges in the country unless they personally drove every mile of road and examined every single bridge in the country.

You really should stick to just posting your sexual fantasies, at least you understand those

You are confusing all the issues because you don't understand speculation as it relates to hearsay.

You are all mixed up on the issue of how a witness MAY testify and how a witness MUST testify.

The DHS Sec. MAY testify about whatever the **** she wants if she is asked a question.

She MAY guess or speculate as to how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll tootsie pop if they ask her. But, if she refuses to guess and says "I don't know" it doesn't matter how angry they get, she is not required to guess. She may have heard or read somewhere (that's where the hearsay comes in), but she is not lying or being evasive if she says "I don't know."

If they ask her how many terror plots her agency has stopped in the last 30 days, she MAY testify, if she knows, but under normal circumstances, would not be required to answer if she does not know. BUT, now you are getting into non-human entity knowledge, apex witness testimony, corporate/entity witness designations, and whole bunch of other shit, which a totally different topic and I don't feel like explaining it. Go look it up,

The only testimony the DHS Sec. MUST testify to is her personal knowledge UNLESS she was subpoenaed to testify on behalf of DHS (again, I don't have all ******* day to explain. go look it up if you are interested).

Anyone stupid enough to asking her a question that goes beyond her actual personal knowledge can expect an "I don't know" response. She could have guessed about Norway's demographics, but she was not required to do so, and there is nothing those poor ass hurt trolls can do but cry about it. That makes them, you, and others who do not understand, pissed.

Watching an inexperienced dude ask a bunch of flawed questions to somebody who is prepared and knows how to answer is hysterically entertaining. It can go on forever!

Here is an example of a cross-examiner who doesn't understand how to ask a proper question trying to get a simple answer out of a witness who is properly prepared and follows those instructions:


Do you know what time it is?

No.

Can you look and see?

Yes.

Please tell me the current time?

I don't know.

You just testified that you can look and see?

Yes.

Did you look?

No.

Can you look?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

Why don't you know?

Because I have not looked at a clock or watch.

Can you do that now?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

You just said you could look?

(pause. no answer. not a question)

Can you look?

Yes.

What time do you think it is?

I don't know.

You don't have any estimate about the time?

No.

If I told you it is morning time, would you believe me?

I am not sure if I would.

Why?

I would need more information.

You are deliberately evading my question?

(pause. not a question)

Will you tell me what time it is?

Yes.

Well?

(not a question)

I am waiting?

(not a question)

You know how to tell time, don't you?

Yes.

Any day, sweetheart?

(not a question)

______________________-


Do I need to go into more detail? Do you get it yet?

I always liked the lists of actual questions lawyers asked.

Lawyer: When is your birthday?

Witness: March 1st.

Lawyer: What year?

Witness: Every year!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I am pretty sure my cat understands this better than you do. Using your fucked up view of hearsay no Cabinet Sec could ever testify about the work done bun their agency unless they did the work themselves or watched it happen.

The Sec of Ag could not testify about the wildfires unless they were there themselves fighting the fires and then only the small part they saw.

The Dir of FEMA could not testify about the damage from a hurricane unless they talked to every single person affected by it.

The Sec of Trans could not testify about the state of the roads and bridges in the country unless they personally drove every mile of road and examined every single bridge in the country.

You really should stick to just posting your sexual fantasies, at least you understand those

You are confusing all the issues because you don't understand speculation as it relates to hearsay.

You are all mixed up on the issue of how a witness MAY testify and how a witness MUST testify.

The DHS Sec. MAY testify about whatever the **** she wants if she is asked a question.

She MAY guess or speculate as to how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll tootsie pop if they ask her. But, if she refuses to guess and says "I don't know" it doesn't matter how angry they get, she is not required to guess. She may have heard or read somewhere (that's where the hearsay comes in), but she is not lying or being evasive if she says "I don't know."

If they ask her how many terror plots her agency has stopped in the last 30 days, she MAY testify, if she knows, but under normal circumstances, would not be required to answer if she does not know. BUT, now you are getting into non-human entity knowledge, apex witness testimony, corporate/entity witness designations, and whole bunch of other shit, which a totally different topic and I don't feel like explaining it. Go look it up,

The only testimony the DHS Sec. MUST testify to is her personal knowledge UNLESS she was subpoenaed to testify on behalf of DHS (again, I don't have all ******* day to explain. go look it up if you are interested).

Anyone stupid enough to asking her a question that goes beyond her actual personal knowledge can expect an "I don't know" response. She could have guessed about Norway's demographics, but she was not required to do so, and there is nothing those poor, ass hurt trolls can do but cry about it. That makes them, you, and others who do not understand, pissed.

Watching an inexperienced dude ask a bunch of flawed questions to somebody who is prepared and knows how to answer is hysterically entertaining. It can go on forever!

Here is an example of a cross-examiner who doesn't understand how to ask a proper question trying to get a simple answer out of a witness who is properly prepared and follows those instructions:


Do you know what time it is?

No.

Can you look and see?

Yes.

Please tell me the current time?

I don't know.

You just testified that you can look and see?

Yes.

Did you look?

No.

Can you look?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

Why don't you know?

Because I have not looked at a clock or watch.

Can you do that now?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

You just said you could look?

(pause. no answer. not a question)

Can you look?

Yes.

What time do you think it is?

I don't know.

You don't have any estimate about the time?

No.

If I told you it is morning time, would you believe me?

I am not sure if I would.

Why?

I would need more information.

You are deliberately evading my question?

(pause. not a question)

Will you tell me what time it is?

Yes.

Well?

(not a question)

I am waiting?

(not a question)

You know how to tell time, don't you?

Yes.

Any day, sweetheart?

(not a question)

______________________-


Do I need to go into more detail? Do you get it yet?

Yeah. You really should stick to sexual fantasies, at least those made sense instead of this rambling pile of horse shit


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[g5000]

I am pretty sure my cat understands this better than you do. Using your fucked up view of hearsay no Cabinet Sec could ever testify about the work done bun their agency unless they did the work themselves or watched it happen.

The Sec of Ag could not testify about the wildfires unless they were there themselves fighting the fires and then only the small part they saw.

The Dir of FEMA could not testify about the damage from a hurricane unless they talked to every single person affected by it.

The Sec of Trans could not testify about the state of the roads and bridges in the country unless they personally drove every mile of road and examined every single bridge in the country.

You really should stick to just posting your sexual fantasies, at least you understand those

You are confusing all the issues because you don't understand speculation as it relates to hearsay.

You are all mixed up on the issue of how a witness MAY testify and how a witness MUST testify.

The DHS Sec. MAY testify about whatever the **** she wants if she is asked a question.

She MAY guess or speculate as to how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll tootsie pop if they ask her. But, if she refuses to guess and says "I don't know" it doesn't matter how angry they get, she is not required to guess. She may have heard or read somewhere (that's where the hearsay comes in), but she is not lying or being evasive if she says "I don't know."

If they ask her how many terror plots her agency has stopped in the last 30 days, she MAY testify, if she knows, but under normal circumstances, would not be required to answer if she does not know. BUT, now you are getting into non-human entity knowledge, apex witness testimony, corporate/entity witness designations, and whole bunch of other shit, which a totally different topic and I don't feel like explaining it. Go look it up,

The only testimony the DHS Sec. MUST testify to is her personal knowledge UNLESS she was subpoenaed to testify on behalf of DHS (again, I don't have all ******* day to explain. go look it up if you are interested).

Anyone stupid enough to asking her a question that goes beyond her actual personal knowledge can expect an "I don't know" response. She could have guessed about Norway's demographics, but she was not required to do so, and there is nothing those poor, ass hurt trolls can do but cry about it. That makes them, you, and others who do not understand, pissed.

Watching an inexperienced dude ask a bunch of flawed questions to somebody who is prepared and knows how to answer is hysterically entertaining. It can go on forever!

Here is an example of a cross-examiner who doesn't understand how to ask a proper question trying to get a simple answer out of a witness who is properly prepared and follows those instructions:


Do you know what time it is?

No.

Can you look and see?

Yes.

Please tell me the current time?

I don't know.

You just testified that you can look and see?

Yes.

Did you look?

No.

Can you look?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

Why don't you know?

Because I have not looked at a clock or watch.

Can you do that now?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

You just said you could look?

(pause. no answer. not a question)

Can you look?

Yes.

What time do you think it is?

I don't know.

You don't have any estimate about the time?

No.

If I told you it is morning time, would you believe me?

I am not sure if I would.

Why?

I would need more information.

You are deliberately evading my question?

(pause. not a question)

Will you tell me what time it is?

Yes.

Well?

(not a question)

I am waiting?

(not a question)

You know how to tell time, don't you?

Yes.

Any day, sweetheart?

(not a question)

______________________-


Do I need to go into more detail? Do you get it yet?

You have no idea how ******* stupid you sound, do you.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You conducted the autopsy on the deceased, did you not?

Yes.

And, was he dead when you did the autopsy?
(real question. not even kidding)(it gets worse or better, depending on your perspective)

Yes.

And you didn't bother to check his vitals to make sure he was dead, did you?

No.

Well, how can you testify that the deceased was dead when you didn't bother to check his vitals?

Well, his brain was in a jar on my desk, but I suppose he could still be alive today. For all I know, he could be out there practicing law.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You have no idea how ******* stupid you sound, do you.

Why? Explain to me why my explanation sounds stupid?

Can you? Or, are you just ass hurt because you know I am ******* right?

Don't throw bullshit around? Anyone can say "you sound stupid, huu huu."

'Splain it to me.

(you won't because you can't and because you are a coward)

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Yeah. You really should stick to sexual fantasies, at least those made sense instead of this rambling pile of horse shit

Back to the gay insults. I accept your surrender.

 

[TNHarley]

It was amusing watching how hard this guy was trying to cram race into it.

That's just who these people are. Leverage race at every opportunity.

A shithole is a shithole, regardless of the race of its inhabitants.
.

What is amusing is the focus on the shithole countries themselves when that is irrelevant. Trump was talking about people from those places as though they were not deserving of the American dream because of where they came from.

I'm glad we let this guy from a "shithole country" into ours...Doddering Donnie isn't.

Soldier, immigrant from Ghana, died rescuing neighbors in Bronx fire - CNN

The people have nothing to do with their countries? How ******* stupid.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I am pretty sure my cat understands this better than you do. Using your fucked up view of hearsay no Cabinet Sec could ever testify about the work done bun their agency unless they did the work themselves or watched it happen.

The Sec of Ag could not testify about the wildfires unless they were there themselves fighting the fires and then only the small part they saw.

The Dir of FEMA could not testify about the damage from a hurricane unless they talked to every single person affected by it.

The Sec of Trans could not testify about the state of the roads and bridges in the country unless they personally drove every mile of road and examined every single bridge in the country.

You really should stick to just posting your sexual fantasies, at least you understand those

You are confusing all the issues because you don't understand speculation as it relates to hearsay.

You are all mixed up on the issue of how a witness MAY testify and how a witness MUST testify.

The DHS Sec. MAY testify about whatever the **** she wants if she is asked a question.

She MAY guess or speculate as to how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll tootsie pop if they ask her. But, if she refuses to guess and says "I don't know" it doesn't matter how angry they get, she is not required to guess. She may have heard or read somewhere (that's where the hearsay comes in), but she is not lying or being evasive if she says "I don't know."

If they ask her how many terror plots her agency has stopped in the last 30 days, she MAY testify, if she knows, but under normal circumstances, would not be required to answer if she does not know. BUT, now you are getting into non-human entity knowledge, apex witness testimony, corporate/entity witness designations, and whole bunch of other shit, which a totally different topic and I don't feel like explaining it. Go look it up,

The only testimony the DHS Sec. MUST testify to is her personal knowledge UNLESS she was subpoenaed to testify on behalf of DHS (again, I don't have all ******* day to explain. go look it up if you are interested).

Anyone stupid enough to asking her a question that goes beyond her actual personal knowledge can expect an "I don't know" response. She could have guessed about Norway's demographics, but she was not required to do so, and there is nothing those poor, ass hurt trolls can do but cry about it. That makes them, you, and others who do not understand, pissed.

Watching an inexperienced dude ask a bunch of flawed questions to somebody who is prepared and knows how to answer is hysterically entertaining. It can go on forever!

Here is an example of a cross-examiner who doesn't understand how to ask a proper question trying to get a simple answer out of a witness who is properly prepared and follows those instructions:


Do you know what time it is?

No.

Can you look and see?

Yes.

Please tell me the current time?

I don't know.

You just testified that you can look and see?

Yes.

Did you look?

No.

Can you look?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

Why don't you know?

Because I have not looked at a clock or watch.

Can you do that now?

Yes.

What time is it?

I don't know.

You just said you could look?

(pause. no answer. not a question)

Can you look?

Yes.

What time do you think it is?

I don't know.

You don't have any estimate about the time?

No.

If I told you it is morning time, would you believe me?

I am not sure if I would.

Why?

I would need more information.

You are deliberately evading my question?

(pause. not a question)

Will you tell me what time it is?

Yes.

Well?

(not a question)

I am waiting?

(not a question)

You know how to tell time, don't you?

Yes.

Any day, sweetheart?

(not a question)

______________________-


Do I need to go into more detail? Do you get it yet?

You have no idea how ******* stupid you sound, do you.

Clearly not.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Clearly not.

Why don't you explain to me why my explanation sounds stupid?

Can you?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yeah. You really should stick to sexual fantasies, at least those made sense instead of this rambling pile of horse shit

Back to the gay insults. I accept your surrender.

You are the one that was posting their sexual fantasies, don’t get mad at me over your own actions.

All I am saying is they made a lot more sense than this stupid shit you are posting now


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

All I am saying is they made a lot more sense than this stupid shit you are posting now

Does it not make sense because you are too stupid to understand?

Tell me what you don't understand and I will try to dumb it down more.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The idiot Democrats are just emphasizing that they hate white voters.
They are digging their hole deeper with great gusto LOL

 

[Seawytch]

She's either lying or dumb as a brick. Which one works better for the Trumpsters?

 

[Seawytch]

It was amusing watching how hard this guy was trying to cram race into it.

That's just who these people are. Leverage race at every opportunity.

A shithole is a shithole, regardless of the race of its inhabitants.
.

What is amusing is the focus on the shithole countries themselves when that is irrelevant. Trump was talking about people from those places as though they were not deserving of the American dream because of where they came from.

I'm glad we let this guy from a "shithole country" into ours...Doddering Donnie isn't.

Soldier, immigrant from Ghana, died rescuing neighbors in Bronx fire - CNN

The people have nothing to do with their countries? How ******* stupid.

That a person’s merit or worth is dependent upon what county they come from is racist and ignorant.