That guy wrote a manifesto and hit the IRS building dead-on. It's a little different.
Because he wrote the manifesto not because he used a plane as a weapon?
Is this a rhetorical question? Of course the fucking manifesto. It's a confession, you dolt!
Sorry, there is something called the totality of the circumstances, meaning did he commit this supposed suicide while alone or did he use a plane as a dangerous instrumentality where he could have killed many.
Look, I don't blame people for suspecting terrorism when a Middle Eastern man appears to have deliberately crashed a plan near a populated area.
What I find somewhat hilarious and definitely repugnant is someone starting a thread about said crash, and coming to the immediate conclusion that (a) it was terrorism and (b) a presidential campaign has been helped/damaged by the crash.
(a) We don't know if it's terrorism.
(b) LOL @ Trump being helped by ANYTHING.