Deplatform OAN & Newsmax

[Carl in Michigan]

The anti-First Amendment Left wants to silence ALL VOICES they cannot control.

Can they not understand how this "unity" over is going to lead to something very bad?
View attachment 444665

CNN Trying To Deplatform OAN and Newsmax

'We have to turn down the capability of these Conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences.'

legalinsurrection.com

There is a distinct difference between Free Speech and Speech that incites Insurrection, Sedition and Treason.

**** OAN and DOUBLE **** NEWS MAX.

They are platforms used spread hate, lies and Treason.

So leftist organizations like BLM need to be "deplatformed" instead of receiving tens of millions in corporate donations.

 

[Camp]

The person or people who invested their money in a platform and fund the everyday operations of the platform are the ones who have free speech. How is there free speech when a news source of social platform is forced to promote someone else's opinions or lies? Seriously, these folks are angry because they can't force a plarform to cover lies and misinformation.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Private corporation are under no obligation to carry anything.

If they want to boot Newsmax and OAN off their platforms, that is their right.

That hasn't been the generally accepted interpretation of the first amendment though

 

[Toro]

The problem is those service providers do allow violent speech, by the left. It’s well documented and you know it. They are just selectively enforcing their rules. Selective enforcement of laws and rules is un-American, it’s fascism.

So are the mods and admin of USMB fascists also? They selectively ban people too. You can go offline and read about how unfair the mods are here for banning people, particularly those on the left. Be serious.

What you are are arguing for the re-imposition of The Fairness Doctrine but for the Internet. If you don't know what that is, google it. If we still had it, Rush Limbaugh and right-wing radio wouldn't exist today.

These are private corporations. They have their own terms of service. They can apply those terms of service as they see fit.

If you can't see the sedition and the attack on our republic that arose from the cynical lies of your leaders and media, that's your problem. In fact, that is the problem.

 

[Toro]

 

[Toro]

Here. Read about how all the "fascist" mods "de-platformed" mostly leftist posters on USMB. How unfair!

USMessageBoard Reviews - 1.7 Stars

105 reviews for USMessageBoard, 1.7 stars: 'I was being heavily insulted by the MAGAts when I finally decided to say that they are protecting a Convicted Felon who was protecting a convicted Pedo who would bury him if allowed to speak truthfully. I stated that they were Pedos protecting Pedos. I...

www.sitejabber.com

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The anti-First Amendment Left wants to silence ALL VOICES they cannot control.

Can they not understand how this "unity" over is going to lead to something very bad?
View attachment 444665

CNN Trying To Deplatform OAN and Newsmax

'We have to turn down the capability of these Conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences.'

legalinsurrection.com

It doesn’t make any difference how many threads the dishonest right starts concerning this lie – it’s still a lie.

how is it a lie when the left is saying it openly??

You don't expect an answer do you?

 

[progressive hunter]

The anti-First Amendment Left wants to silence ALL VOICES they cannot control.

Can they not understand how this "unity" over is going to lead to something very bad?
View attachment 444665

CNN Trying To Deplatform OAN and Newsmax

'We have to turn down the capability of these Conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences.'

legalinsurrection.com

It doesn’t make any difference how many threads the dishonest right starts concerning this lie – it’s still a lie.

how is it a lie when the left is saying it openly??

You don't expect an answer do you?

not from him,,

 

[WelfareQueen]

Private corporation are under no obligation to carry anything.

If they want to boot Newsmax and OAN off their platforms, that is their right.

I am sure you would approve of private businesses denying service to blacks or gays. I mean they are under no obligation, right?

Fucktard.

 

[Weatherman2020]

We have wacko propagandists telling people not to wear masks and spreading dangerous misinformation and lies, very much like screaming fire in a crowded theater. **** 'em. Shut 'em down and lock 'em up.

Swastika girlie.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The anti-First Amendment Left wants to silence ALL VOICES they cannot control.

Can they not understand how this "unity" over is going to lead to something very bad?
View attachment 444665

CNN Trying To Deplatform OAN and Newsmax

'We have to turn down the capability of these Conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences.'

legalinsurrection.com

“The anti-First Amendment Left…”

lol

Ignorant nonsense and demagoguery.

‘The left’ is not anti-First Amendment, ‘the left’ doesn’t seek to ‘silence’ anyone, how the media edit their content has nothing to do with ‘the left,’ and the First Amendment doesn’t apply to private media.

Again, no one believes these ridiculous, ignorant lies.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The anti-First Amendment Left wants to silence ALL VOICES they cannot control.

Can they not understand how this "unity" over is going to lead to something very bad?
View attachment 444665

CNN Trying To Deplatform OAN and Newsmax

'We have to turn down the capability of these Conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences.'

legalinsurrection.com

“The anti-First Amendment Left…”

lol

Ignorant nonsense and demagoguery.

‘The left’ is not anti-First Amendment, ‘the left’ doesn’t seek to ‘silence’ anyone, how the media edit their content has nothing to do with ‘the left,’ and the First Amendment doesn’t apply to private media.

Again, no one believes these ridiculous, ignorant lies.

Except for banning Parler, banning Trump, calling for OAN and Newsmax to be taken off air....

Cripes you're fcking stupid

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Blah, blah blah.
More anti free speech leftist talking points.

Apparently, you don't know what "free speech" is.

If you don't like it, maybe you should leave this place forever because people have been banned from here.

Walk the talk or STFU

The problem is those service providers do allow violent speech, by the left. It’s well documented and you know it. They are just selectively enforcing their rules. Selective enforcement of laws and rules is un-American, it’s fascism.

No, the problem is such ignorance, demagoguery, and lies from the right.

How social media edit their content is neither ‘fascist’ nor ‘un-American’ – the notion is ridiculous.

However inconsistent and capricious a given medium might be in editing its content, it doesn’t ‘violate’ free speech or ‘silence’ conservatives.

And it certainly doesn’t warrant conservatives’ wrongheaded desire to subject social media to government regulation and control, or otherwise expose social media to punitive measures.

Don’t like how social media edits their content – don’t participate; and stop whining and lying about being ‘victims’ of ‘big tech.’

 

[theHawk]

Blah, blah blah.
More anti free speech leftist talking points.

Apparently, you don't know what "free speech" is.

If you don't like it, maybe you should leave this place forever because people have been banned from here.

Walk the talk or STFU

The problem is those service providers do allow violent speech, by the left. It’s well documented and you know it. They are just selectively enforcing their rules. Selective enforcement of laws and rules is un-American, it’s fascism.

No, the problem is such ignorance, demagoguery, and lies from the right.

How social media edit their content is neither ‘fascist’ nor ‘un-American’ – the notion is ridiculous.

However inconsistent and capricious a given medium might be in editing its content, it doesn’t ‘violate’ free speech or ‘silence’ conservatives.

And it certainly doesn’t warrant conservatives’ wrongheaded desire to subject social media to government regulation and control, or otherwise expose social media to punitive measures.

Don’t like how social media edits their content – don’t participate; and stop whining and lying about being ‘victims’ of ‘big tech.’

More words from a useless idiot covering for, and applauding the suppression of free speech by Big Tech Oligarchies. If they were shutting down leftwing sites and posters, you’d be screaming fascism. But since they are on your side, it’s all okay with you.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

The anti-First Amendment Left wants to silence ALL VOICES they cannot control.

Can they not understand how this "unity" over is going to lead to something very bad?
View attachment 444665

CNN Trying To Deplatform OAN and Newsmax

'We have to turn down the capability of these Conservative influencers to reach these huge audiences.'

legalinsurrection.com

“The anti-First Amendment Left…”

lol

Ignorant nonsense and demagoguery.

‘The left’ is not anti-First Amendment, ‘the left’ doesn’t seek to ‘silence’ anyone, how the media edit their content has nothing to do with ‘the left,’ and the First Amendment doesn’t apply to private media.

Again, no one believes these ridiculous, ignorant lies.

Except for banning Parler, banning Trump, calling for OAN and Newsmax to be taken off air....

Cripes you're fcking stupid

I really dont believe they dont see THEY are the Nazis

 

[GMCGeneral]

Wonder how long before tyrannical Leftists start going after AM Talk Radio and Lord forbid, churches that don't tow the far Left line and preach the Bible as it is intended?

 

[citygator]

 

[HenryBHough]

In France even the hated royalty retained the right to free speech right up to the blade fell and stopped.

Sadly if one wants one of those machines these days they're only made in China. I guess deals with the Chinks can cut both ways.

 

[daveman]

 

[HenryBHough]

Wonder how long before tyrannical Leftists start going after AM Talk Radio and Lord forbid, churches that don't tow the far Left line and preach the Bible as it is intended?

Actually there already proposals before the FCC that would eliminate AM radio and substitute a very expensive digital system. That would (for the short term) price receivers out of the reach of many. It would bankrupt many smaller stations with transmitters and modifications to antenna systems costing over $100,000 for a moderate-power station. Additionally, the digital signals cannot have the "reach" of AM so service would be denied to large rural areas.

One thing that has been holding it back is the simple fact that the AM broadcast band is not at all to the big bucks satellite and cell phone giants. Hence a sale of a big chunk of spectrum wouldn't raise much, if any, money.