Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That would create two classes of employee. One class, of union represented workers, with a grievance procedure available to them. And the other that have to take their cases to court.How about we just change federal law so that nonunion workers no longer are covered by labor contracts. Then rtw will no longer be needed.
You show complete ignorance in economics.It is pathetic that Unions are not making grounds on their own in this environment. During a freaking LABOR Shortage, they can't grow themselves?
Federal law already says that non-union workers are not covered by labor contracts. IOW, the union does not have to represent them in any labor dispute, but my understanding is that they do it anyway, maybe to lure those non-union guys into the union.How about we just change federal law so that nonunion workers no longer are covered by labor contracts. Then rtw will no longer be needed.
WrongFederal law already says that non-union workers are not covered by labor contracts. IOW, the union does not have to represent them in any labor dispute, but my understanding is that they do it anyway, maybe to lure those non-union guys into the union.
Sure it can....The Supreme Court has said that religious beliefs are personal and it does not matter whether they are in accord with the teachings and dictates of a particular faith.Some nutcase evangelical preacher telling them not to vaccinate does NOT qualify as "their faith says..." Who does qualify for a religious exemption beside Christian Scientists?
Cool....I never said they were.Christian scientists aren't the one's leading the anti-vaccination movement.
A Christian Science perspective on vaccination and public health
www.christianscience.com
The supreme court also upheld just the opposite. That even solidly established tenets of a religion weren't protected when it came to use of drugs, like peyote or marijuana.Sure it can....The Supreme Court has said that religious beliefs are personal and it does not matter whether they are in accord with the teachings and dictates of a particular faith.
Christian scientists have long standing opposition to vaccinations, yet they yield to the public good. It's others that are pushing the anti-vaccination movement in the name of religion.Cool....I never said they were.
Pittance? You are hilarious in your ignorance!More high paying jobs or those pittance $20 per hour ones.
when did they hold the opposite.The supreme court also upheld just the opposite. That even solidly established tenets of a religion weren't protected when it came to use of drugs, like peyote or marijuana.
Cool...I never mentioned the Christian ScientistChristian scientists have long standing opposition to vaccinations, yet they yield to the public good. It's others that are pushing the anti-vaccination movement in the name of religion.
Unions are dying because people now have a choice to join in so many states.Half of the reason our industrial base ended up in China is that republicans really desperately wanted to break the political power of Labor. Was it worth it?
Glad you admit we don’t need unions.Unions were supported by democrats while management was supported by republicans. Somehow big business having unopposed political power is better? Maybe if you are a billionaire. Didn't work out so well for the rest of us. Just how far back towards the mill system of the 1880s do we have to go before we need unions again?
i’m always curious how pro choice only goes so farUnions are dying because people now have a choice to join in so many states.
Why do you oppose choice when ever that choice doesn’t kill a baby?
Except a law that violates free exercise by any group, has to be overturned.Sure they said laws against drugs didn't violate the free exercise clause of the first amendment....because they were neutral, not motivated by a desire to interfere with religion and of general applicability to all individual.
They are one of the few who have a legitimate objection in the name of religion.Cool...I never mentioned the Christian Scientist
ok.Except a law that violates free exercise by any group, has to be overturned.
It's no different than other "neutral" laws shown to discriminate
frankly i don’t think you have a right to tell people if their religion is legit or not. Quite selfish of youThey are one of the few who have a legitimate objection in the name of religion.
The others are using "religion" as an excuse, without any foundation, knowing the USSC takes the stand that they won't analyze the basis of a religious claim. In short, they won't question the legitimacy of the interpretation the person claims his religion says.
22 states have them and the Dems want to pass a Federal law to ban them. This would mean, if it passes, every worker in America would be forced to join a union in every shop which has one. Ya. the good ole dems don't like freedom of choice at all. I was in a union for 6 years, but I quit because the union kept giving my dues money to Bill Clinton, who I was vehemently opposed to. I wrote the union President about it and I never even got an answer.,
frankly i don’t think you have a right to tell people if their religion is legit or not. Quite selfish of you
