Democrats & Slavery, Like Carrots and Peas

[TyroneSlothrop]

Democratic Party in the 1960s was divided between Southern Democrats, most of whom opposed civil rights legislation, and Democrats from outside the South who more often than not supported it.

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

The GOP, so famous at standing up for the drakies that the darkies won't vote for them since the party is beloved by the KKK (and so many other White Pride folks).

These people are shameless they want to Gas Light folks into imagining that the GOP is not Racist in the 21 st Century...This year 2017 the GOP is the KKK go to Party ...everybody and their cousin knows it ...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democratic Party in the 1960s was divided between Southern Democrats, most of whom opposed civil rights legislation, and Democrats from outside the South who more often than not supported it.

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Here is what ended up Happening
Johnson signs Civil Rights Act - Jul 02, 1964 - HISTORY.co

Here's yet another book you didn't read:

" Then there is the mistaken belief that the rise of blacks from poverty into middle class occupations can be traced from some time after the 60’s civil rights movement and government actions, when, in reality, the most dramatic improvements occurred in the to decades prior to the 60’s!"
Thomas Sowell, "Economic Facts and Fallacies," chapter eight.


Kind of explains why you're a dunce, huh?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Democratic Party in the 1960s was divided between Southern Democrats, most of whom opposed civil rights legislation, and Democrats from outside the South who more often than not supported it.

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Here is what ended up Happening
Johnson signs Civil Rights Act - Jul 02, 1964 - HISTORY.co

Here's yet another book you didn't read:

" Then there is the mistaken belief that the rise of blacks from poverty into middle class occupations can be traced from some time after the 60’s civil rights movement and government actions, when, in reality, the most dramatic improvements occurred in the to decades prior to the 60’s!"
Thomas Sowell, "Economic Facts and Fallacies," chapter eight.


Kind of explains why you're a dunce, huh?

Uncle Tommy Sowell Only gets to vote and write because of LBJ LOL

 

[NYcarbineer]

Democratic Party in the 1960s was divided between Southern Democrats, most of whom opposed civil rights legislation, and Democrats from outside the South who more often than not supported it.

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Not true. Stop lying.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democratic Party in the 1960s was divided between Southern Democrats, most of whom opposed civil rights legislation, and Democrats from outside the South who more often than not supported it.

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

The GOP, so famous at standing up for the drakies that the darkies won't vote for them since the party is beloved by the KKK (and so many other White Pride folks).

These people are shameless they want to Gas Light folks into imagining that the GOP is not Racist in the 21 st Century...This year 2017 the GOP is the KKK go to Party ...everybody and their cousin knows it ...

Democrats are and always have been the racists.....even to black Democrat in their party:

While talking a great game, it is well known by all except liberals in general, and the Black community specifically, that the Democrat Party claims to be concerned with support of blacks, their record with respect to black politicians tells a different story…



1. In 2005, the Democrats did not name Donna Brazile to head the Democratic National Committee. They chose Howard Dean.


2. “Gov. David A. Paterson defiantly vowed to run for election next year despite the White House‘s urging that he withdraw from the New York governor’s race.” Obama Asks Paterson to Quit New York Governor’s Race

3. President Barack Obama has kept mum on the fate of Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) for days -- but he tells CBS News that it's time for the embattled 80-year-old former Ways and Means Chairman to end his career "with dignity."

"I think Charlie Rangel served a very long time and served-- his constituents very well. But these-- allegations are very troubling," Obama told Harry Smith in an interview to be aired on the "Early Show." and first broadcast on the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric. Obama: Time for Rangel to end career "with dignity"

4 Harold Ford told not to run for Senator from New York:

“From the start, Mr. Ford’s potential candidacy angered national Democratic Party leaders by disrupting plans for what was planned as a seamless Gillibrand nomination. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Senate majority leader, called Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg to discourage him from supporting Mr. Ford, and Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York met personally with Mr. Ford to argue against his candidacy.” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/nyregion/02ford.html


5. “As state comptroller, [Carl] McCall earned the distinction of being the first African American ever elected to a statewide office in New York. Four years later voters overwhelmingly supported McCall over Republican Bruce Blakeman 64.75 to 32.1%. McCall's reelection in 1998 may have given him the confidence he needed in order to pursue the governor's mansion….The McCall campaign had the support of the Democratic Party; whether or not McCall had the party's full support has been the subject of much debate….Still one wonders just how committed the party was to McCall's campaign….shunned by some of the state's most respected Democrats…McCall blamed his money woes on the national Democratic Party, claiming that the party had abandoned his campaign….” H. Carl McCall for Governor: a lesson to all black high-profile statewide office seekers. - Free Online Library


6. And, most telling, Bill Clinton’s remarks about the black candidate for the presidency:

“[A]s Hillary bungled Caroline, Bill’s handling of Ted was even worse. The day after Iowa, he phoned Kennedy and pressed for an endorsement, making the case for his wife. But Bill then went on, belittling Obama in a manner that deeply offended Kennedy. Recounting the conversation later to a friend, Teddy fumed that Clinton had said, A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.”

Teddy's anger


7. Three staffers working for embattled Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) were asked by security officers to leave an event in downtown Washington on Thursday after they tried to display large campaign signs just as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was about to speak. .. Waters told The Hill afterward that the staffers had been displaying the signs at the annual legislative conference for the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, which was held at the Washington convention center a few blocks away. “It ain’t about Nancy. It’s about black people,” Waters said. http://thehill.com/homenews/house/119331-aides-working-for-maxine-waters-asked-to-leave-pelosi-event


8. And what Governor of Arkansas made the Saturday before Easter "Confederate Flag Day"?
The Arkansas Code, Section 1-5-107. Confederate Flag Day.
(a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as "Confederate Flag Day" in this state.
No person, firm, or corporation shall display any Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America.
Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).

"In April 1985, Governor Bill Clinton signed Act 985 into law...'
Mark R. Levin on Trent Lott & Moral Outrage on National Review Online


9. Do Democrats in Congress support blacks by practicing affirmative action in their hiring…and of course this would be our of moral convictions, as they are legally exempt from affirmative action requirements. More than passing interesting, the ‘National Journal,’ a survey of congressional staffers revealed that Democrats hired black employees at the same rate as Republicans: 2 percent. “The Racial Breakdown of Congressional Staffs,” National Journal, June 21, 2005
Schweitzer, “Do As I Say,” p. 9


10. Clinton pushed black candidate to drop out of Florida race:

“Bill Clinton sought to persuade Rep. Kendrick Meek to drop out of the race for Senate during a trip to Florida last week — and nearly succeeded…Clinton did not dangle a job in front of Meek, who gave up a safe House seat to run for the Senate, but instead made the case that the move would advance the congressman’s future prospects, said a third Democrat familiar with the conversations. Clinton campaigned with Meek in Florida on Oct. 19 and 20, and thought he had won Meek over. But as the week wore on, Meek lost his enthusiasm for the arrangement, spurred in part, a third Democratic source said, by his wife’s belief that he could still win the race. Clinton spoke with Meek again at week’s end, three Democrats said, and again Meek said he would drop out.”

Read more: Clinton pushed Meek to quit Fla. race


By some strange coincidence, the Democrats, again, force a black to the back:

11. “Under an arrangement reached two days ago, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the current majority leader, would get the No. 2 job of minority whip come January. Clyburn, now majority whip, would hold the post of assistant leader, newly created for the purpose of heading off a contest for the whip position.” http://www.businessweek.com/news/20...dership-as-clyburn-settles-for-no-3-post.html

 

[PoliticalChic]

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Here is what ended up Happening
Johnson signs Civil Rights Act - Jul 02, 1964 - HISTORY.co

Here's yet another book you didn't read:

" Then there is the mistaken belief that the rise of blacks from poverty into middle class occupations can be traced from some time after the 60’s civil rights movement and government actions, when, in reality, the most dramatic improvements occurred in the to decades prior to the 60’s!"
Thomas Sowell, "Economic Facts and Fallacies," chapter eight.


Kind of explains why you're a dunce, huh?

Uncle Tommy Sowell Only gets to vote and write because of LBJ LOL

"....the most dramatic improvements occurred in the to decades prior to the 60’s!"

That means while LBJ was busy blocking anti-lynching bills.



Post more, so I can continue to destroy every one of your lies.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Democratic Party in the 1960s was divided between Southern Democrats, most of whom opposed civil rights legislation, and Democrats from outside the South who more often than not supported it.

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Not true. Stop lying.

/---- If you have any proof it's not true, send it to Wikipedia:
Civil Rights Act of 1957
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Civil Rights Act of 1957, Pub.L. 85–315, 71 Stat. 634, enacted September 9, 1957, primarily a voting rights bill, was the first federal civil rights legislation passed by the United States Congress since the Civil Rights Act of 1875. The Civil Rights Act of 1957 was also Congress's show of support for the Supreme Court's Brown decisions,[1] the Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which had eventually led to the integration (desegregation) of public schools. Following the Supreme Court ruling, Southern whites in Virginia began a "Massive Resistance." Violence against blacks rose there and in other states, as in Little Rock, Arkansas where that year President Dwight D. Eisenhower had ordered in federal troops to protect nine children integrating into a public school, the first time the federal government had sent troops to the South since the Reconstruction era.[2] There had been continued physical assaults against suspected activists and bombings of schools and churches in the South. The administration of Eisenhower proposed legislation to protect the right to vote by African Americans.

Democratic Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, an ardent segregationist, sustained the longest one-person filibuster in history in an attempt to keep the bill from becoming law. His one-man filibuster lasted 24 hours and 18 minutes; he began with readings of every state's election laws in alphabetical order. Thurmond later read from the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and George Washington's Farewell Address. His speech set the record for a Senate filibuster.[3] The bill passed the House with a vote of 285 to 126 (Republicans 167–19 for, Democrats 118–107 for)[4] and the Senate 72 to 18 (Republicans 43–0 for, Democrats 29–18 for).[5] President Eisenhower signed it on September 9, 1957.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Democratic Party in the 1960s was divided between Southern Democrats, most of whom opposed civil rights legislation, and Democrats from outside the South who more often than not supported it.

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

on June 19, 1963, Emmanuel Celler, a New York Democrat, introduced H.R. 7152—what would become the Civil Rights Act of 1964—to the House of Representatives.


Read more: A Deeper Look at the Politicians Who Passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 | History | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter

 

[NYcarbineer]

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Here is what ended up Happening
Johnson signs Civil Rights Act - Jul 02, 1964 - HISTORY.co

Here's yet another book you didn't read:

" Then there is the mistaken belief that the rise of blacks from poverty into middle class occupations can be traced from some time after the 60’s civil rights movement and government actions, when, in reality, the most dramatic improvements occurred in the to decades prior to the 60’s!"
Thomas Sowell, "Economic Facts and Fallacies," chapter eight.


Kind of explains why you're a dunce, huh?

Uncle Tommy Sowell Only gets to vote and write because of LBJ LOL

"....the most dramatic improvements occurred in the to decades prior to the 60’s!"

That means while LBJ was busy blocking anti-lynching bills.



Post more, so I can continue to destroy every one of your lies.

LBJ SIGNED the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Barry Goldwater, the father of modern conservatism, OPPOSED it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Democratic Party in the 1960s was divided between Southern Democrats, most of whom opposed civil rights legislation, and Democrats from outside the South who more often than not supported it.

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Not true. Stop lying.

/---- If you have any proof it's not true, send it to Wikipedia:
Civil Rights Act of 1957
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Civil Rights Act of 1957, Pub.L. 85–315, 71 Stat. 634, enacted September 9, 1957, primarily a voting rights bill, was the first federal civil rights legislation passed by the United States Congress since the Civil Rights Act of 1875. The Civil Rights Act of 1957 was also Congress's show of support for the Supreme Court's Brown decisions,[1] the Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which had eventually led to the integration (desegregation) of public schools. Following the Supreme Court ruling, Southern whites in Virginia began a "Massive Resistance." Violence against blacks rose there and in other states, as in Little Rock, Arkansas where that year President Dwight D. Eisenhower had ordered in federal troops to protect nine children integrating into a public school, the first time the federal government had sent troops to the South since the Reconstruction era.[2] There had been continued physical assaults against suspected activists and bombings of schools and churches in the South. The administration of Eisenhower proposed legislation to protect the right to vote by African Americans.

Democratic Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, an ardent segregationist, sustained the longest one-person filibuster in history in an attempt to keep the bill from becoming law. His one-man filibuster lasted 24 hours and 18 minutes; he began with readings of every state's election laws in alphabetical order. Thurmond later read from the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and George Washington's Farewell Address. His speech set the record for a Senate filibuster.[3] The bill passed the House with a vote of 285 to 126 (Republicans 167–19 for, Democrats 118–107 for)[4] and the Senate 72 to 18 (Republicans 43–0 for, Democrats 29–18 for).[5] President Eisenhower signed it on September 9, 1957.

That would be the Strom Thurmond who became a revered Republican,

or was that some other Strom Thurmond? lolol

 

[NYcarbineer]

Given that about 99% of the rightwingers on USMB OPPOSE the Civil Rights Act of 1964 NOW...

...it's funny to hear them out of the other side of their mouth try to cheer for it as a Republican bill.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Here is what ended up Happening
Johnson signs Civil Rights Act - Jul 02, 1964 - HISTORY.co

Here's yet another book you didn't read:

" Then there is the mistaken belief that the rise of blacks from poverty into middle class occupations can be traced from some time after the 60’s civil rights movement and government actions, when, in reality, the most dramatic improvements occurred in the to decades prior to the 60’s!"
Thomas Sowell, "Economic Facts and Fallacies," chapter eight.


Kind of explains why you're a dunce, huh?

Uncle Tommy Sowell Only gets to vote and write because of LBJ LOL

"....the most dramatic improvements occurred in the to decades prior to the 60’s!"

That means while LBJ was busy blocking anti-lynching bills.



Post more, so I can continue to destroy every one of your lies.

LBJ SIGNED the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Barry Goldwater, the father of modern conservatism, OPPOSED it.

/---- That's all you got? What about the Dems like Al Gore Sr who filibustered it?
BTW
One of the most prominently held urban legends of our time is that Senator Barry Goldwater, the GOP candidate for president in 1964, was against civil rights because he voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This vote of Goldwater marked the start of when “the GOP began to go against civil rights” according to CNN’s Roland Martin’s version of the legend.

Goldwater had problems with title II and title VII of the 1964 bill. He felt that constitutionally the federal government had no legal right to interfere in who people hired, fired; or to whom they sold their products, goods and services. He felt that “power” laid in the various states, and with the people. He was a strong advocate of the tenth amendment. Goldwater’s constitutional stance did not mean he agreed with the segregation and racial discrimination practiced in the South. To the contrary, he fought against these kinds of racial divides in his own state of Arizona. He supported the integration of the Arizona National guard and Phoenix public schools.[4] Goldwater was, also, a member of the NAACP and the Urban League.[5]
Urban Legend: Goldwater Against Civil Rights

 

[Cellblock2429]

Given that about 99% of the rightwingers on USMB OPPOSE the Civil Rights Act of 1964 NOW...

...it's funny to hear them out of the other side of their mouth try to cheer for it as a Republican bill.

/---- Ahh the first straw man argument of the day. Got any proof of your ridiculous claim Spanky?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Not true. Stop lying.

/---- If you have any proof it's not true, send it to Wikipedia:
Civil Rights Act of 1957
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Civil Rights Act of 1957, Pub.L. 85–315, 71 Stat. 634, enacted September 9, 1957, primarily a voting rights bill, was the first federal civil rights legislation passed by the United States Congress since the Civil Rights Act of 1875. The Civil Rights Act of 1957 was also Congress's show of support for the Supreme Court's Brown decisions,[1] the Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which had eventually led to the integration (desegregation) of public schools. Following the Supreme Court ruling, Southern whites in Virginia began a "Massive Resistance." Violence against blacks rose there and in other states, as in Little Rock, Arkansas where that year President Dwight D. Eisenhower had ordered in federal troops to protect nine children integrating into a public school, the first time the federal government had sent troops to the South since the Reconstruction era.[2] There had been continued physical assaults against suspected activists and bombings of schools and churches in the South. The administration of Eisenhower proposed legislation to protect the right to vote by African Americans.

Democratic Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, an ardent segregationist, sustained the longest one-person filibuster in history in an attempt to keep the bill from becoming law. His one-man filibuster lasted 24 hours and 18 minutes; he began with readings of every state's election laws in alphabetical order. Thurmond later read from the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and George Washington's Farewell Address. His speech set the record for a Senate filibuster.[3] The bill passed the House with a vote of 285 to 126 (Republicans 167–19 for, Democrats 118–107 for)[4] and the Senate 72 to 18 (Republicans 43–0 for, Democrats 29–18 for).[5] President Eisenhower signed it on September 9, 1957.

That would be the Strom Thurmond who became a revered Republican,

or was that some other Strom Thurmond? lolol

/----- Yeah Strom did switch but none of the other Dems did.. Now how about this:
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Praises 'Friend and Mentor' Robert Byrd (a ...
www.breitbart.com/2016...race/.../hillary-clinton-friend-mentor-robert-byrd-kkk/
Aug 25, 2016 - In 2010, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton fondly eulogized Sen. Robert Byrd, a former member and recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan. ... As a young man in West Virginia, Byrd was involved in the KKK and reportedly recruited 150 members to the group. ... Long after Byrd claimed to ...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Given that about 99% of the rightwingers on USMB OPPOSE the Civil Rights Act of 1964 NOW...

...it's funny to hear them out of the other side of their mouth try to cheer for it as a Republican bill.

/---- Ahh the first straw man argument of the day. Got any proof of your ridiculous claim Spanky?
View attachment 132678

Go ahead and ask your rightwing pals around here.

Ask them this:

Should a business be able to refuse service to anyone, for any reason?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Democrats....the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship...the party whose boots you've been trained to lick.
I love revealing that.

So you are now in favor of tearing the Monuments to the Confederacy down and taking down the Dixie Flag of the "Filthy Democrats" ?

/---- Personally I don't care. The South had to lose the war. Yeah they were the underdogs and they fought ferociously but they were wrong to try and preserve slavery.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Given that about 99% of the rightwingers on USMB OPPOSE the Civil Rights Act of 1964 NOW...

...it's funny to hear them out of the other side of their mouth try to cheer for it as a Republican bill.

/---- Ahh the first straw man argument of the day. Got any proof of your ridiculous claim Spanky?
View attachment 132678

Go ahead and ask your rightwing pals around here.

Ask them this:

Should a business be able to refuse service to anyone, for any reason?

/----

 

[Cellblock2429]

Should be noted too that the Civil Rights Act represented LBJ's carrying out of the JFK agenda.

/---- Shoud be noted too: “Democrat pundits pretend that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was the creation of the Kennedy or Johnson administrations, but in fact it was an extension of the Republican Party’s 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts,” Zak told TheBlaze. “Barry Goldwater, the GOP’s presidential nominee that year, did not appreciate the fact that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was thoroughly Republican policy.” ---Michael Zak, author of “Back to Basics for the Republican Party,”

Here is what ended up Happening
Johnson signs Civil Rights Act - Jul 02, 1964 - HISTORY.co

Here's yet another book you didn't read:

" Then there is the mistaken belief that the rise of blacks from poverty into middle class occupations can be traced from some time after the 60’s civil rights movement and government actions, when, in reality, the most dramatic improvements occurred in the to decades prior to the 60’s!"
Thomas Sowell, "Economic Facts and Fallacies," chapter eight.


Kind of explains why you're a dunce, huh?

Uncle Tommy Sowell Only gets to vote and write because of LBJ LOL

/---- Uncle Tom????? And you call Republicans racists? You are not only a hypocrite you are too stupid to accept not every Black agrees with you.

 

[Dragonlady]

Democrats and racism are most definitely like carrots and peas - completely different.

One is a plant root. The other is a plant seed. They are nothing alike.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats and racism are most definitely like carrots and peas - completely different.

One is a plant root. The other is a plant seed. They are nothing alike.

Clearly, your intellectual constellation is certainly plantlike.

Democrats are the authors of Jim Crow, the supporters of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.


Based on how totally, irreparably wrong you are, one can only wonder how you find your way, each day, back to the double-decker porta-potty you call home.