Democrats & Slavery, Like Carrots and Peas

[RightyTighty]

That's the history, and the doctrines of the Democrat Party.
It is now, and has always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

So...yesterday when I reminded of the Confederate Flag pins of the Clinton campaign, this was the response:

"That's not an official Clinton/Gore button, tard. Nice try."
Reality Winner Is An Indoctrinated, Traitorous Liberal Loser


Whenever the famous Clinton/Gore Confederate Flag campaign pin comes to light....anger and fury ensues!

Because it is the truth.


1. The denials gain momentum due to the Democrats/Liberals control and ownership of the media and academia. These, while pointed to as arbiters of facts, are actually contractors of the Left, owned by Liberalism, inc.

PolitiFact

FactCheck

Snopes


2. Here is a specific case: in order to hide the truth, that the Democrats are the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, there is a full-court press (no pun intended) to deny the authenticity of this campaign pin:

View attachment 131688

Clinton-Gore '92 Confederate Flag Campaign Pin Controversy


3. Snopes claims that the pin had been distributed by the ClintonGore campaign is 'probably false.'


4. Let's see if we can prove it was exactly what the Democrat campaign would choose....
Bill Clinton has been a racist his entire life. Why would there be any doubt that he would favor the Confederate flag???

1. b. Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: 1979-1992 Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:
   
   (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.
   
   (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]
   
   (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
   
   Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
   Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit

Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy



More to follow.

/---- The only thing surprising here is that you expect Democrats to admit their racist history. They will lie twist and distort forever.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

When Southerns were Dems, they were racists. Now they are GOP - racists.

 

[IM2]

The conduct for which members of the New Black Panther Party were accused of voter intimidation took place on Election Day in November 2008, at a polling station in a predominantly African-American, Democratic voting district of Philadelphia.[2]

Two members of the New Black Panther party, Minister King Samir Shabazz, and Jerry Jackson, stood in front of the entrance to the polling station in uniforms that have been described as military or paramilitary.[3][4][5] Minister King Shabazz carried a billy club, and is reported to have pointed it at voters while both men shouted racial slurs,[6] including phrases such as "white devil" and "you're about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."[7]

The incident drew the attention of police, who around 10:00 am, sent King Samir away in part because of his billy club. Jackson was allowed to stay, in part because he was a certified poll watcher.[8] Stephen Robert Morse, a journalist and filmmaker, upon arriving at the scene, pulled out a Flip video camera and focused on Samir Shabazz. Morse turned over the video of the incident to ElectionJournal.org.[9] The incident gained national attention after being uploaded to YouTube.[3] No complaints were filed by voters about the incident, although poll watchers witnessed some voters approach the polls and then turn away, apparently in response to the New Black Panther Party members.[10]

Legal proceedings[edit]
The Department of Justice became aware of the incident on Election Day and started an inquiry. Under the Bush Administration, a criminal investigation into the incident was started, but later dropped

In the end a member of the NBPP was charged and it was the one who was carrying the club which was the right decision. Fooliis post falls flat on it's face because of the DOJ's injunction against Malik Shabazz.

 

[Kondor3]

Did any of the current crop of Democrat elites actually have slaves?

Yes.

Rahm Emanuel - Obumble's former Chief of Staff, and present-day Mayor of the City of Chicago, Illinois.

And all of the West Side and South Side plantation-ghetto chattel who are kept liquored-up and drugged-up and fat with SNAP and TANF and LIHEAP, etc.

In return, they loyally vote Democratic, even when the Mayor and City Hall leave them to rot, and to slaughter each other in the hundreds every year.

The Mayor is the Master... the Plantation Owner... dee Massa... and the Ward Alderman are the Overseers.

Rahm (and other Democratic mayors in cities with huge ghetto populations) does, in deed, have (political) slaves.

The Field Hands seem to like the arrangement - otherwise, they would have voted their Masters out of power, ages ago.

Democrats have ruled Chicago since 1932... that's 85 years... the West and South Side ghetto-plantations are worse than ever... and the Dems don't care.

You can tell that they don't care, because they don't do $hit about conditions in those frightful West and South Side neighborhoods.

Oh, they talk a good game, and they hire and fire a few officials, like Police Superintendents now and then, but it doesn't change a damned thing.

They talk a good game, but they don't do diddly-squat, and they continjue to get away with it, election after election after election.

Why?

Because there's nothing out there for the Field Hands to vote for as a viable alternative... better the Devil You Know, who at least tosses you a bone now and then.

Cities with republican mayors with so called large ghetto populations are having the same problems if not worse.

I know because I fought a republican mayor and republican city council to equalize funding for organizations that were working in the black community.

Republicans don't ever take responsibility for anything. No matter how miserably their policies fail it's always the democrats fault.

1. very few, if any, truly large American cities, 'boasting' very large minority-populated ghetto(es), are run by Republicans

2. Republicans suck at managing cities with large minority populations; which is why I said that residents of underserved neighborhoods have no alternatives to vote for

3. This has nothing to do with Democrats running inner-city ghetto plantations in most large American cities

Stop deflecting.

If you're a Democrat, or lean in that direction, then defend them, and their record, and/or refute my assertions (that Democrats rule big cities and let their minorities rot within)

You don't defend "your side" by saying "Well, the other guys are just as bad, if not worse."

That's not a defense.

That's a childish "Well, the other guys do it, too."

We leave such debating tactics aside, when we graduate Third Grade, eh?

Try again.

Defend your Democrats, and the shameful way they run inner-city ghettoes.

If you can.

You entire argument is the other guys are responsible for the problems of "the blacks" not us republicans.

152 years after final Emancipation and 53 years after passage of the Civil Rights act, the problems of Blacks are squarely on the shoulders of Blacks.

 

[Kondor3]

...Why pick cities ? Cities can have ordinances , but they ruled by the state laws and leadership...

Yeah... right... because it reflects badly on Democrats...

Yeah... right... if you say that to the New York or Chicago or Los Angeles City Councils, or most State Legislatures, you'll be laughed out the door...

... More intellectual dishonesty...

The only 'intellectual dishonesty' at work in this context is Democrats trying to weasel their way out of responsibility for their own decades-long grotesque failures.

Trying, and failing.

 

[Kondor3]

Yes.

Rahm Emanuel - Obumble's former Chief of Staff, and present-day Mayor of the City of Chicago, Illinois.

And all of the West Side and South Side plantation-ghetto chattel who are kept liquored-up and drugged-up and fat with SNAP and TANF and LIHEAP, etc.

In return, they loyally vote Democratic, even when the Mayor and City Hall leave them to rot, and to slaughter each other in the hundreds every year.

The Mayor is the Master... the Plantation Owner... dee Massa... and the Ward Alderman are the Overseers.

Rahm (and other Democratic mayors in cities with huge ghetto populations) does, in deed, have (political) slaves.

The Field Hands seem to like the arrangement - otherwise, they would have voted their Masters out of power, ages ago.

Democrats have ruled Chicago since 1932... that's 85 years... the West and South Side ghetto-plantations are worse than ever... and the Dems don't care.

You can tell that they don't care, because they don't do $hit about conditions in those frightful West and South Side neighborhoods.

Oh, they talk a good game, and they hire and fire a few officials, like Police Superintendents now and then, but it doesn't change a damned thing.

They talk a good game, but they don't do diddly-squat, and they continjue to get away with it, election after election after election.

Why?

Because there's nothing out there for the Field Hands to vote for as a viable alternative... better the Devil You Know, who at least tosses you a bone now and then.

Cities with republican mayors with so called large ghetto populations are having the same problems if not worse.

I know because I fought a republican mayor and republican city council to equalize funding for organizations that were working in the black community.

Republicans don't ever take responsibility for anything. No matter how miserably their policies fail it's always the democrats fault.

1. DEMOCRAT LEADERSHIP!

Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn’t elected
a Republican mayor since 1961;

Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn’t elected one since 1954;

Cincinnati, OH (3rd)… since 1984;

Cleveland, OH (4th)… since 1989;

Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican Mayor; (*Miami currently has a Republican Mayor (Tomas Regalado)

St. Louis, MO (6th)…. since 1949;

El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican Mayor;

Milwaukee, WI (8th)… since 1908;

Philadelphia, PA (9th)… since 1952;

Newark, NJ (10th)… since 1907.

Top 10 Poorest Cities run by Democrats

Why pick cities ? Cities can have ordinances , but they ruled by the state laws and leadership.

More intellectual dishonesty.

Are the 10 Poorest U.S. States Really Republican?
Poorest states run red:


The poorest states, based on per capita income, are, from first to last: Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, West Virginia, Louisiana, Montana, South Carolina, Kentucky, Alabama, and North Carolina. Of

Arkansas....Little Rock....mayor....democrat

Arkansas is a deep red state. Who cares what a city mayor is !? How much leeway does a mayor have ?

He gets to control and spend Property Taxes.

He gets to control and spend Sales and Value-Added Taxes.

He gets most of his operating budget within the boundaries of his municipality.

He gets some additional funding from the County in which his City resides.

He gets some additional funding from the State in which his City resides.

He gets some additional funding from the Federal government.

He and his City Council have an ENORMOUS amount of leeway.

If you had a functional understanding of the workings of municipal government across that domain, you would already know these things.

 

[RightyTighty]

That's the history, and the doctrines of the Democrat Party.
It is now, and has always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

So...yesterday when I reminded of the Confederate Flag pins of the Clinton campaign, this was the response:

"That's not an official Clinton/Gore button, tard. Nice try."
Reality Winner Is An Indoctrinated, Traitorous Liberal Loser


Whenever the famous Clinton/Gore Confederate Flag campaign pin comes to light....anger and fury ensues!

Because it is the truth.


1. The denials gain momentum due to the Democrats/Liberals control and ownership of the media and academia. These, while pointed to as arbiters of facts, are actually contractors of the Left, owned by Liberalism, inc.

PolitiFact

FactCheck

Snopes


2. Here is a specific case: in order to hide the truth, that the Democrats are the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, there is a full-court press (no pun intended) to deny the authenticity of this campaign pin:

View attachment 131688

Clinton-Gore '92 Confederate Flag Campaign Pin Controversy


3. Snopes claims that the pin had been distributed by the ClintonGore campaign is 'probably false.'


4. Let's see if we can prove it was exactly what the Democrat campaign would choose....
Bill Clinton has been a racist his entire life. Why would there be any doubt that he would favor the Confederate flag???

1. b. Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: 1979-1992 Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:
   
   (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.
   
   (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]
   
   (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
   
   Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
   Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit

Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy



More to follow.

/---- The only thing surprising here is that you expect Democrats to admit their racist history. They will lie twist and distort forever.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I think we know of the democratic history. The problem is how you republicans do not want to begin taking about your racist present.

There is no racist present for Republicans...we don't care about skin color...you are a democrat so skin color rules your life...

Utter bullshit. The darkies won't even vote GOP. Explain that?

 

[IM2]

That's the history, and the doctrines of the Democrat Party.
It is now, and has always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

So...yesterday when I reminded of the Confederate Flag pins of the Clinton campaign, this was the response:

"That's not an official Clinton/Gore button, tard. Nice try."
Reality Winner Is An Indoctrinated, Traitorous Liberal Loser


Whenever the famous Clinton/Gore Confederate Flag campaign pin comes to light....anger and fury ensues!

Because it is the truth.


1. The denials gain momentum due to the Democrats/Liberals control and ownership of the media and academia. These, while pointed to as arbiters of facts, are actually contractors of the Left, owned by Liberalism, inc.

PolitiFact

FactCheck

Snopes


2. Here is a specific case: in order to hide the truth, that the Democrats are the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, there is a full-court press (no pun intended) to deny the authenticity of this campaign pin:

View attachment 131688

Clinton-Gore '92 Confederate Flag Campaign Pin Controversy


3. Snopes claims that the pin had been distributed by the ClintonGore campaign is 'probably false.'


4. Let's see if we can prove it was exactly what the Democrat campaign would choose....
Bill Clinton has been a racist his entire life. Why would there be any doubt that he would favor the Confederate flag???

1. b. Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: 1979-1992 Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:
   
   (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.
   
   (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]
   
   (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
   
   Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
   Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit

Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy



More to follow.

/---- The only thing surprising here is that you expect Democrats to admit their racist history. They will lie twist and distort forever.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I think we know of the democratic history. The problem is how you republicans do not want to begin taking about your racist present.

There is no racist present for Republicans...we don't care about skin color...you are a democrat so skin color rules your life...

Utter bullshit. The darkies won't even vote GOP. Explain that?

Who are the darkies?

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

"Lordy---Another Racist Confederate Monument Is Going Down."

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Lordy---Another Racist Confederate Monument Is Going Down."

There were the intell agency heads....'.no evidence.'

Congressfolks.....'no evidence.'

Yates testimony.....a flop.

Comey......verified everything Trump has been saying.

Now it's the assault on Sessions that buffoons hang their hopes on.



I feel soooo bad for all of you Trump-haters....again, your hopes and dreams smashed like so many Faberge eggs.

Every time, 'You wait and see....now....Trump's gonna be exposed, charged, impeached...."
Now, Comey leaves you jilted again.

You guys are like the ugly guy who keeps getting turned down by the girls you ask to the prom.


I certainly hope you keep your hopes up, you dunce.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That's the history, and the doctrines of the Democrat Party.
It is now, and has always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

So...yesterday when I reminded of the Confederate Flag pins of the Clinton campaign, this was the response:

"That's not an official Clinton/Gore button, tard. Nice try."
Reality Winner Is An Indoctrinated, Traitorous Liberal Loser


Whenever the famous Clinton/Gore Confederate Flag campaign pin comes to light....anger and fury ensues!

Because it is the truth.


1. The denials gain momentum due to the Democrats/Liberals control and ownership of the media and academia. These, while pointed to as arbiters of facts, are actually contractors of the Left, owned by Liberalism, inc.

PolitiFact

FactCheck

Snopes


2. Here is a specific case: in order to hide the truth, that the Democrats are the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, there is a full-court press (no pun intended) to deny the authenticity of this campaign pin:

View attachment 131688

Clinton-Gore '92 Confederate Flag Campaign Pin Controversy


3. Snopes claims that the pin had been distributed by the ClintonGore campaign is 'probably false.'


4. Let's see if we can prove it was exactly what the Democrat campaign would choose....
Bill Clinton has been a racist his entire life. Why would there be any doubt that he would favor the Confederate flag???

1. b. Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: 1979-1992 Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:
   
   (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.
   
   (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]
   
   (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
   
   Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
   Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit

Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy



More to follow.

/---- The only thing surprising here is that you expect Democrats to admit their racist history. They will lie twist and distort forever.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I think we know of the democratic history. The problem is how you republicans do not want to begin taking about your racist present.

There is no racist present for Republicans...we don't care about skin color...you are a democrat so skin color rules your life...

Utter bullshit. The darkies won't even vote GOP. Explain that?

Who are the darkies?

Is this another word you want banned?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

"Lordy---Another Racist Confederate Monument Is Going Down."

There were the intell agency heads....'.no evidence.'

Congressfolks.....'no evidence.'

Yates testimony.....a flop.

Comey......verified everything Trump has been saying.

Now it's the assault on Sessions that buffoons hang their hopes on.



I feel soooo bad for all of you Trump-haters....again, your hopes and dreams smashed like so many Faberge eggs.

Every time, 'You wait and see....now....Trump's gonna be exposed, charged, impeached...."
Now, Comey leaves you jilted again.

You guys are like the ugly guy who keeps getting turned down by the girls you ask to the prom.


I certainly hope you keep your hopes up, you dunce.

Here is what you are honey and go make some sammiches for the men and bring me a beer

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Did any of the current crop of Democrat elites actually have slaves?

Yes.

Rahm Emanuel - Obumble's former Chief of Staff, and present-day Mayor of the City of Chicago, Illinois.

And all of the West Side and South Side plantation-ghetto chattel who are kept liquored-up and drugged-up and fat with SNAP and TANF and LIHEAP, etc.

In return, they loyally vote Democratic, even when the Mayor and City Hall leave them to rot, and to slaughter each other in the hundreds every year.

The Mayor is the Master... the Plantation Owner... dee Massa... and the Ward Alderman are the Overseers.

Rahm (and other Democratic mayors in cities with huge ghetto populations) does, in deed, have (political) slaves.

The Field Hands seem to like the arrangement - otherwise, they would have voted their Masters out of power, ages ago.

Democrats have ruled Chicago since 1932... that's 85 years... the West and South Side ghetto-plantations are worse than ever... and the Dems don't care.

You can tell that they don't care, because they don't do $hit about conditions in those frightful West and South Side neighborhoods.

Oh, they talk a good game, and they hire and fire a few officials, like Police Superintendents now and then, but it doesn't change a damned thing.

They talk a good game, but they don't do diddly-squat, and they continjue to get away with it, election after election after election.

Why?

Because there's nothing out there for the Field Hands to vote for as a viable alternative... better the Devil You Know, who at least tosses you a bone now and then.

Cities with republican mayors with so called large ghetto populations are having the same problems if not worse.

I know because I fought a republican mayor and republican city council to equalize funding for organizations that were working in the black community.

Republicans don't ever take responsibility for anything. No matter how miserably their policies fail it's always the democrats fault.

1. very few, if any, truly large American cities, 'boasting' very large minority-populated ghetto(es), are run by Republicans

2. Republicans suck at managing cities with large minority populations; which is why I said that residents of underserved neighborhoods have no alternatives to vote for

3. This has nothing to do with Democrats running inner-city ghetto plantations in most large American cities

Stop deflecting.

If you're a Democrat, or lean in that direction, then defend them, and their record, and/or refute my assertions (that Democrats rule big cities and let their minorities rot within)

You don't defend "your side" by saying "Well, the other guys are just as bad, if not worse."

That's not a defense.

That's a childish "Well, the other guys do it, too."

We leave such debating tactics aside, when we graduate Third Grade, eh?

Try again.

Defend your Democrats, and the shameful way they run inner-city ghettoes.

If you can.

You entire argument is the other guys are responsible for the problems of "the blacks" not us republicans.

152 years after final Emancipation and 53 years after passage of the Civil Rights act, the problems of Blacks are squarely on the shoulders of Blacks.

They only got Civil Rights in 1964 thanks to LBJ...prior to that the Black Americans could not drink water from a public Fountain for whites

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes.

Rahm Emanuel - Obumble's former Chief of Staff, and present-day Mayor of the City of Chicago, Illinois.

And all of the West Side and South Side plantation-ghetto chattel who are kept liquored-up and drugged-up and fat with SNAP and TANF and LIHEAP, etc.

In return, they loyally vote Democratic, even when the Mayor and City Hall leave them to rot, and to slaughter each other in the hundreds every year.

The Mayor is the Master... the Plantation Owner... dee Massa... and the Ward Alderman are the Overseers.

Rahm (and other Democratic mayors in cities with huge ghetto populations) does, in deed, have (political) slaves.

The Field Hands seem to like the arrangement - otherwise, they would have voted their Masters out of power, ages ago.

Democrats have ruled Chicago since 1932... that's 85 years... the West and South Side ghetto-plantations are worse than ever... and the Dems don't care.

You can tell that they don't care, because they don't do $hit about conditions in those frightful West and South Side neighborhoods.

Oh, they talk a good game, and they hire and fire a few officials, like Police Superintendents now and then, but it doesn't change a damned thing.

They talk a good game, but they don't do diddly-squat, and they continjue to get away with it, election after election after election.

Why?

Because there's nothing out there for the Field Hands to vote for as a viable alternative... better the Devil You Know, who at least tosses you a bone now and then.

Cities with republican mayors with so called large ghetto populations are having the same problems if not worse.

I know because I fought a republican mayor and republican city council to equalize funding for organizations that were working in the black community.

Republicans don't ever take responsibility for anything. No matter how miserably their policies fail it's always the democrats fault.

1. very few, if any, truly large American cities, 'boasting' very large minority-populated ghetto(es), are run by Republicans

2. Republicans suck at managing cities with large minority populations; which is why I said that residents of underserved neighborhoods have no alternatives to vote for

3. This has nothing to do with Democrats running inner-city ghetto plantations in most large American cities

Stop deflecting.

If you're a Democrat, or lean in that direction, then defend them, and their record, and/or refute my assertions (that Democrats rule big cities and let their minorities rot within)

You don't defend "your side" by saying "Well, the other guys are just as bad, if not worse."

That's not a defense.

That's a childish "Well, the other guys do it, too."

We leave such debating tactics aside, when we graduate Third Grade, eh?

Try again.

Defend your Democrats, and the shameful way they run inner-city ghettoes.

If you can.

You entire argument is the other guys are responsible for the problems of "the blacks" not us republicans.

152 years after final Emancipation and 53 years after passage of the Civil Rights act, the problems of Blacks are squarely on the shoulders of Blacks.

They only got Civil Rights in 1964 thanks to LBJ...prior to that the Black Americans could not drink water from a public Fountain for whites

Every affront to blacks came due to the pen and the whip of the Democrat Party.

It is so easy to destroy your Liberals both because you never read any books, and because you are so stupid.
The two may be related.


Case in point:

Prior to 1957, LBJ “had never supported civil rights legislation- any civil rights legislation. In the Senate and House alike, his record was an unbroken one of votes against every civil rights bill that had ever come to a vote: against voting rights bills; against bills that would have struck at job discrimination and at segregation in other areas of American life; even against bills that would have protected blacks from lynching.”
Robert Caro, “Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson, vol.3,” p. xv.



Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill.

LBJ MLK Democrats show the Way

 

[Cellblock2429]

/---- The only thing surprising here is that you expect Democrats to admit their racist history. They will lie twist and distort forever.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I think we know of the democratic history. The problem is how you republicans do not want to begin taking about your racist present.

There is no racist present for Republicans...we don't care about skin color...you are a democrat so skin color rules your life...

Utter bullshit. The darkies won't even vote GOP. Explain that?

Who are the darkies?

Is this another word you want banned?

 

[Timmy]

SO those are democrats trying to save confederate memorials ?

Why won't you righties answer ? It's a simple question.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill.

LBJ MLK Democrats show the WayView attachment 132660

1. Glad you didn't deny that you never read books.

2. You couldn't deny that Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill to reach Congress.

3. Your history lesson here:

· In 1857, a Democratically controlled Supreme Court delivered the Dred Scott decision, declaring that blacks were not persons or citizens but instead were property and therefore had no rights.

· The 13th Amendment to abolish slavery was voted for by 100% of the Republicans in congress and by 23% of the Democrats in congress.

· Not one Democrat either in the House or the Senate voted for the 14th amendment declaring that former slaves were full citizens of the state in which they lived and were therefore entitled to all the rights and privileges of any other citizen in that state.

· Not a single one of the 56 Democrats in Congress voted for the 15th amendment that granted explicit voting rights to black Americans.

· In 1866 Democrats formed the Ku Klux Klan to pave the way for Democrats to regain control in the elections.

· George Wallace was a Democrat.

· Bull Connor was a Democrat.

· In the 20th and 21st century Democrats prevented Black Americans trapped in failing schools from choosing a better school. In fact Democrats voted against the bill by 99%.

· Jim Crow laws, poll taxes, grandfather clauses, Literacy tests, white only primaries, and physical violence all came from the Democratic Party.

· Between 1882 and 1964, 4,743 individuals were lynched. 3,446 blacks and 1,297 whites. Republicans often led the efforts to pass federal anti-lynching laws and Democrats successfully blocked those bills.

· Though both the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were signed into law under Democrat President, Lyndon Johnson, it was the Republicans in Congress who made it possible in both cases – not to overlook the fact that the heart of both bills came from the work of Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

· In the 108th Congress, when Republicans proposed a permanent extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, it was opposed by the Congressional Black Caucus (composed only of Democrats).

· Following the Civil War, Frederick Douglass received Presidential appointments from Republican Presidents Ulysses Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, and James A. Garfield. Democratic President Grover Cleveland removed Frederick Douglas from office but Republican President Benjamin Harrison reappointed him.

· Very few today know that in 1808 Congress abolished the slave trade. Although slavery still had not been abolished in all the states, things definitely were moving in the right direction.

· By 1820, most of the Founding Fathers were dead and Thomas Jefferson’ party (the Democratic Party) had become the majority party in Congress.

· In 1789, Congress passed the Northwest Ordinance that prohibited slavery in a federal territory. In 1820, the Democratic Congress passed the Missouri Compromise and reversed that earlier policy, permitting slavery in almost half of the federal territories.

· In 1850, Democrats in Congress passed the “Fugitive Slave Law”. That law required Northerners to return escaped slaves back into slavery or else pay huge fines.

· Because the “Fugitive Slave Law” allowed Free Blacks to be carried into slavery, this law was disastrous for blacks in the North; and as a consequence of the atrocious provisions of this Democratic law, some 20,000 blacks in the North left the United States and fled to Canada.

· The “Underground Railroad” reached the height of its activity during this period, helping thousands of slaves escape from slavery in the South all the way out of the United States and into Canada – simply to escape the reach of the Democrats’ Fugitive Slave Law.

· In 1854, the Democratically controlled Congress passed another law strengthening slavery: the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Even though Democrats in Congress had already expanded the federal territories in which slavery was permitted through their passage of the Missouri Compromise, they had retained a ban on slavery in the Kansas-Nebraska territory. But through the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Democrats repealed those earlier restrictions, thus allowing slavery to be introduced into parts of the new territory where it previously had been forbidden.

· Following the passage of these pro-slavery laws in Congress, in May of 1854, a number of the anti-slavery Democrats in Congress – along with some anti-slavery members from other political parties, including the Whigs, Free Soilers, and Emancipationists, formed a new political party to fight slavery and secure equal civil rights for black Americans. The name of that party? They called it the Republican Party because they wanted to return to the principles of freedom and equality first set forth in the governing documents of the Republic before pro-slavery members of Congress had perverted those original principles.

· One of the founders of the Republican was U.S. Senator Charles Sumner. In 1856, Sumner gave a two day long speech in the U.S. Senate against slavery. Following that speech, Democratic Representative Preston Brooks from South Carolina came from the House, across the Rotunda of the Capitol, and over to the Senate where he literally clubbed down Sumner on the floor of the Senate, knocked him unconscious, and beat him almost to death. According to the sources of that day, many Democrats thought that Sumner’s clubbing was deserved, and it even amused them. What happened to Democrat Preston Brooks following his vicious attack on Sumner? He was proclaimed a southern hero and easily re-elected to Congress.

· In 1856, the Republican Party entered its first Presidential election, running Republican John C. Fremont against Democrat James Buchanan. In that election, the Republican Party issued its first-ever Party platform. It was a short document with only nine planks in the platform, but significantly, six of the nine planks set forth bold declarations of equality and civil rights for African Americans based on the principles of the Declaration of Independence.

· In 1856, the Democratic platform took a position strongly defending slavery and warned: “All efforts of the abolitionists… are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences and all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people”.

Account Suspended




Democrats....the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship...the party whose boots you've been trained to lick.
I love revealing that.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

SO those are democrats trying to save confederate memorials ?

Why won't you righties answer ? It's a simple question.

One would think that the GOP would be going 'Lets Tear Down all those Monuments to Democrat Party s Racism "...Instead they want to preserve that and the Slaver Flag

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Despite frequent assertions to the contrary, many seemingly intractable problems encountered by a significant number of black Americans do not result from racial discrimination, but rather from the policies, regulations, and restrictions emanating from federal, state, and local government.
[That means from the 'Father's of Jim Crow....the Democrats"]

The free market and the profit motive, far from enemies to blacks, have been their friends. The real threat are the coercive powers of government, used to stifle market competition. They are the limitations on black socioeconomic progress, not racial discrimination." [That means Democrats]
“Race & Economics,” by Walter E. Williams, chapter one.