Democrats make counterproposal to end the shutdown. Will republican vote to continue to shutdown.?

people from all ideologies agree in this board, that not accepting a proposal by the opposing party means you love the shutdown and you don’t care about poor people.

We are about to find out if Republicans really want the shutdown to end, because if they do not agree with Democrats counter proposal, it follows that GOP does not care about the people who are suffering from this shutdown.

This will take time so I will notify you as soon as Republican make a decision on whether they dislike or like to shut down.

The onus is on the Democrats. This ploy is, offer something ridiculous, and when the Republicans turn it down, we'll blame them for the shutdown. Tell politico that we see right through them. Tell Schumer to stop using the people in this country for leverage.
 
Democrats only had a razor-thin majority and two centrist Democrats (Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema) refused to change the filibuster or back some of the larger packages that would’ve carried broad ACA changes.
Repubs' majority in the Senate was razor thin 2017-2018. How did they manage to "gut" Obamacare?
 
Assy

It doesn’t matter. It is the position of you and all conservatives here that Democrats should accept CR split forth by Republicans even if it results in premium hikes for Obamacare.
It doesn't. Are you lying or ignorant?
 
After Republicans' dismal showing Tuesday, Democrats' insistence that millions of Americans not be deprived of their healthcare coverage may gain Trump's support in an attempt to check his growing disapproval:


Pardoning his sleazeball fellow felons and getting cozy with authoritarians isn't going to do it.


Americans? WTF is talking about Americans?
 
By your logic, yes, because when you talked about Democrats not accepting previous CR, you have never ever mentioned any details in it, and whether Democrats agree with him.
A clean CR. In other words funding the things already funded. It just extends the current funding. No one gets what they want.
So details must not be taken into consideration by your logic. Be consistent.
You are a moron
 
people from all ideologies agree in this board, that not accepting a proposal by the opposing party means you love the shutdown and you don’t care about poor people.

We are about to find out if Republicans really want the shutdown to end, because if they do not agree with Democrats counter proposal, it follows that GOP does not care about the people who are suffering from this shutdown.

This will take time so I will notify you as soon as Republican make a decision on whether they dislike or like to shut down.

You’re such an intellectual slouch.

Try a quick recap of actual history.

The Schumer shutdown was an effort by that scumbag Senator to extort concessions from President Trump and the GOP majority of both chambers of Congress because the Dims — being in the minority, as they are — have virtually no electoral power. It is Schumer and the Dims who are hurting “the poor” and the rest of America via the shutdown.

The way asshole libs like you, lib, try to spin things (albeit fraudulently and transparently), because the Trump Administration refuses to acquiesce to the Dim effort to engage in extortion, it becomes somehow the GOP’s fault for the consequences of the Schumer shutdown.

:cuckoo:

You spin efforts are a lie and have no value.

**** the Dim “proposal.” And **** Schumer. And **** you, too, lib.

I’m thrilled that —so far — the GOP and the Trump Administration have held the line. There should be zero negotiations with those extortionist scumbag Dims.
 
You’re such an intellectual slouch.

Try a quick recap of actual history.

The Schumer shutdown was an effort by that scumbag Senator to extort concessions from President Trump and the GOP majority of both chambers of Congress because the Dims — being in the minority, as they are — have virtually no electoral power. It is Schumer and the Dims who are hurting “the poor” and the rest of America via the shutdown.

The way asshole libs like you, lib, try to spin things (albeit fraudulently and transparently), because the Trump Administration refuses to acquiesce to the Dim effort to engage in extortion, it becomes somehow the GOP’s fault for the consequences of the Schumer shutdown.

:cuckoo:

You spin efforts are a lie and have no value.

**** the Dim “proposal.” And **** Schumer. And **** you, too, lib.

I’m thrilled that —so far — the GOP and the Trump Administration have held the line. There should be zero negotiations with those extortionist scumbag Dims.
Your leader was just begging judge to let him give zero food stamps to poor people.
Now it is not the right time for you to talk about hurting the poor.
Now sit down, Marie Antoinette.
 
Your leader was just begging judge to let him give zero food stamps to poor people.
Now it is not the right time for you to talk about hurting the poor.
Now sit down, Marie Antoinette.
STFU, parasite. There is nothing in the constitution that states my tax dollars should be used to feed, clothe, house or provide health insurance to the parasites among us. Get off your butt and feed yourself--if you can move that much weight.
 
Your leader was just begging judge to let him give zero food stamps to poor people.
Now it is not the right time for you to talk about hurting the poor.
Now sit down, Marie Antoinette.
"Conservative from Georgia", you guys are not going to get any more free shit while Trump is in power. Go for the Clean Bill.
 
Your leader was just begging judge to let him give zero food stamps to poor people.
Our President literally asked for no such thing. You liar.
Now it is not the right time for you to talk about hurting the poor.
Your conversation. And the blame is entirely on your side. So, you’re wrong. Any time I wish to “talk about it is just fine.

You just don’t like it to have to be confronted with the truth of the matter.
Now sit down, Marie Antoinette.
Go **** yourself, fraud boi.
 
1762554385220.gif
 
Your leader was just begging judge to let him give zero food stamps to poor people.
Now it is not the right time for you to talk about hurting the poor.
Now sit down, Marie Antoinette.
Until the government is funded nothing should be paid out. Until the idiots in Washington feel real pain from this nonsense it won’t stop.
 
15th post
Hardly, those subsidies were designed to end. It wouldn't be an extension, it is completely new.

So Trumps tax cuts that predominantly benefits the wealthy were not extended since they were due to consent.

They were completely new tax cuts predominately benefiting the wealthy?

WW
 
So Trumps tax cuts that predominantly benefits the wealthy were not extended since they were due to consent.

They were completely new tax cuts predominately benefiting the wealthy?

WW
All income tax cuts will always predominantly benefit the wealthy because the wealthy pay most of the taxes. Over 50% of US citizens pay zero income tax. The top 10% pay the vast majority of the income tax 72% to be exact. What tax cut could you pass that wouldn’t predominantly benefit the wealthy?
 


LOL

1. Trump never won NY, NJ, or VA in three elections, going 0-9.

2. All six Senators are Democrats. No Republican has been elected Senator from NJ since 1972, none in NY since 1992, none in VA since 2002.

3. They are Blue States.

Sure, it may not be 'good', but all three went as expected because of the above three reasons.
 
Back
Top Bottom