- Dec 18, 2013
- Reaction score
The House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, met with former White House deputy chief of staff Tony Ornato on two occasions in January and March as part of its investigation, according to a source familiar with his testimony.www.cnn.com
here's why you won't see one
A spokesperson for the select committee declined to comment on Ornato’s interviews with the panel.
Members of the committee have expressed frustration with aspects of Ornato’s previous testimony, and some have suggested he lacks credibility.
yep, which mean the information is useless.
I just posted why you won't see one. stop being redundant.
Your ignorance of the reports is your problem.Then quote Ornato denying he said that to her. What are you waiting for to post that quote?
Your ignorance of the reports is your problem.
Quote Ornato saying what the discredited liar claimed.
And why has Nazi Piglosi refused to take them up on their offer to testify?
He did, as well as the other agent there. They both offered to testify, and the SS said they could.Aww, you poor thing. You got caught lying and now you're desperately trying to spin your way out of it.
Moron, you claimed Ornato denied telling Hutchinson what she claimed he told her.
That's a lie as there is no quote from him denying he told her that.
Sucks to be you. And not just because you were caught lying again.
He did, as well as the other agent there. They both offered to testify, and the SS said they could.
Why hasnt Nazi called them? What is she afraid of?
Now, quote Ornato saying what the proven liar claimed.
Your ignorance of the reports isn't my problem, Simp.If he did, you'd be able to quote him. And had you been able to quote him, you would have quoted him. You didn't quote him because you can't because no such quote exists.
And he didn't need Nancy Pelosi's permission to deny telling that story to Hutchinson. Absolutely nothing prevented him from making a public statement.
I'm not lying, I'm quoting the Republican-led commission report on the matter...
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
No they didn't. Carter Ham Africom Commander was in a car with Panetta when he got the word. They briefed Obama as soon as they could.
Your ignorance of the reports isn't my problem, Simp.
Quote Amato saying Trump tried to hijack "The Beast?.
Again they were lying Panetta knew immediately that there was no protest.
Emails Show Susan Rice Prepped To Lie By White House
The fish rots from the head, as the saying goes, and no further proof is needed than a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, contained in more than 100 pages of documents released by Judicial Watch and obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request.
That email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 p.m. ET," was sent to other key White House staffers such as then-Communications Director David Plouffe and Press Secretary Jay Carney the day before now-National Security Adviser Susan Rice made her whirlwind tour on five Sunday news show appearances to specifically and emphatically blame an Internet video for the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, in which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other nationals were killed.
One of the goals listed in the emails was the need for Rice "to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy." She was also to "reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges." Her job was not to tell the truth, but to put lipstick on the Obama administration's Benghazi pig
Scandal: Newly obtained emails on Benghazi show then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice was coached by a key White House aide to lie and ignore the facts known and reported on the... Read Morewww.investors.com
So, you have nothing showing Ornato said what the proven liar claimed.Moron, no report quoted Ornato denying telling Hutchinson that story.
Once again you make me laugh out loud at your desperation to try to spin this on me because YOU were caught lying. Here again you demand I quote something to support something I never said.
I quoted the Republican-led commission report which states there were multiple conflicting reports coming in early on and how the CIA went with the protest as the likeliest cause for about 2 weeks. The Obama administration echoed what the CIA reported to them. Republicans investigated Benghazi ad nauseum, holding some 8 independent investigations. Why should anyone ignore their findings?