Democrats have won..

You're not responding to my question.

If the GOP gives the Dems every thing that they asked for in their absurd version of the CR, what will prevent the Dems from asking for more in less than three weeks when their absurd CR runs out (but the COVID ACA Supplements are still permanent)?

On the other hand, the GOP's CR runs out on November 21, so the Democrats can sign it, losing nothing, and all EBT and WIC cards would be re-funded. Then negotiations can continue, with Dems having just as much leverage as they did on October 1, except for the starving children.

Are the democrats willing to give up having starving children as leverage is then the only question.

Democrats will always ask for more, and if we weren't where we are now, id say yeah, hold out, but dems have shown that they are willing to let kids starve in order to pay for Healthcare for illegals. They called our bluff and now we are in a situation. The kids cant be the pawns. We need to do whatever it takes to keep them from not having food, and then we can run every campaign ad showing how the dems were willing to starve children in order to save Healthcare for illegals.
 
Democrats will always ask for more,
Exactly, and if we give in to their demands because they are willing to starve kids, there will be no end to it. You dont' want to speculate what their next demand will be?
and if we weren't where we are now, id say yeah, hold out, but dems have shown that they are willing to let kids starve in order to pay for Healthcare for illegals. They called our bluff and now we are in a situation. The kids cant be the pawns. We need to do whatever it takes to keep them from not having food, and then we can run every campaign ad showing how the dems were willing to starve children in order to save Healthcare for illegals.
"Called our bluff?" That is bizarre interpretation of current events.

I can see Trump using the contingency fund to keep kids from starving, but literally giving up the store to the Democrats is an invitation do disaster.

Suppose their next demand is that Red states gerrymander themselves to give Dems more seats? Should we agree to that demand if the threat is to starve children?

Please answer, I'm tired of repeating my questions.
 
They are making the point that the Republican party is unwilling to compromise and they do not care about the average American. Especially don't care about the working poor. Willing to let them go hungry and without health care. Yes they said they would negotiate after the Democrats signed on but why take that chance. They've lied before and they seem to believe if they are in the majority they don't have to compromise at all.
You described the demscum to a t.
 
~~~~~~<
That's because Otto105 is really a racist.
And he is also one more sock in the revered family sock tree that has at least half a dozen other identities here.
 
Back
Top Bottom