Democrats: Get Used To Being Subsumed

[Cassandro]

You never answered my question.

Are you engaging in some sort of Socratic subterfuge?

You asked why I brought up the issue of Jewish communists, and I answered that it was because you said that the Mamdani Democrat party were both communist and anti-Semitic.

I then asked how this had come about (since, as you have said, Jewish people were generally sympathetic to communist ideology in the last century). Thus it was my question that you did not answer, not vice versa.

 

[PoliticalChic]

oh ! make no mistake the idiotic emotionally driven Dems on this message board are probably the cream of the crop when it comes to informed dems [most dem voters are politically uninformed ] and the so called informed Dems on this board are Bolshevik wannabes .. the only major difference between modern Dems and the Bolshevik revolutionaries in the early 20th century is said revolutionaries were a lot tougher that the weakling modern Bolsheviks [ progressives ] that have taken over the democrat party ..

I have asked a number of the board's Democrats if they will vote Bolshevik if the party tells them to, and only one said he would vote elsewhere.

I attribute this to a number of things including cowardice and the damage done through government schooling.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you engaging in some sort of Socratic subterfuge?

You asked why I brought up the issue of Jewish communists, and I answered that it was because you said that the Mamdani Democrat party were both communist and anti-Semitic.

I then asked how this had come about since, as you have said, Jewish people were generally sympathetic to communist ideology in the last century. Thus it was my question that you did not answer, not vice versa.

I asked why you brought up Jews.


I did answer,and still have no gotten an explanation of your obsession with Jews.

Do you like/hate Jews?

Are you one of those who has never been to Israel, but hate it?


Can you respond?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sad?

That you are asked about an extraneous subject, as "Jew" does not appear in the OP to which you voluntarily subscribed.

Is this something you are afraid to divulge?

Changed to 'wow'???????

 

[alang1216]

1. So you are a traditional Democrat, out to help the less fortunate. Enviable! Your mistake was not holding many of them to the same level of personal responsibility that made your life comfortable: 2 parent household, no out of wedlock children, crime-free, finishing schooling, no drug use, planning and saving.




2. You thought you had like-minded folks you could ally with, communists. About half of the Party’s support always came from the interchangeable terms socialist/communist/Progressive/ etc. Professor Kengor said this, describing the Menshevik element:
"The progressive left, and the liberal left, while not themselves communists, share many of the same sympathies, such of redistribution of wealth, and worker’s rights, nationalizations of industry, etc, but are not quite as far left as the communists, and would not go to the same lengths as the communists to achieve their goals. This does not mean, though, that the help of these dupes is not necessary in order for the communists to achieve victory. Even at their peak, in the ‘30’s, the Communist Party of the United States never had more than 100 thousand members: so deception of the ‘dupes’ was critical. "
Dr. Paul Kengor, Hoover Institution, Stanford “DUPES: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century




3. FDR bent over backwards for the communists: “On September 2, 1939, the day after the outbreak of war in Europe, Whittaker Chambers had told much of what he knew about Soviet espionage in the United States to Adolph Berle, Assistant Secretary of State and President’s Roosevelt’s advisor on internal security. Immediately afterwards, Berle drew up a memorandum for the President which listed Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White and the other leading communists for whom Chambers acted as courier. One was a leading presidential aide, Lauchlin Currie….Roosevelt, however, was not interested. He seems to have dismissed the whole idea of espionage rings within his administration as absurd.” ‘The Sword and the Shield: The Mitrokhin Archives, the History of the KGB,” by Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin.p.107 *When he was told of Stalin’s agents in his administration…..he promoted them.





4. Allowing communists to gain influence, especially in the field of education, persuaded many of the young to see Nazis and the most evil, and Bolsheviks as simply the silly old uncle (Uncle Joe). In truth, communism was far worse and did more damage…and still does…than Nazism.
AI Overview
Jimmy Carter said the U.S. had an "inordinate fear of Communism."




5. Subsumed means to be absorbed. Your well-intended Democrat Party has been subsumed into an out and out Bolshevik entity: Mamdani and the Democrat officials who offered him support stand for this: The Mamdani Democrat party stands for abolishing private property, seizing the means of production, socialism/communism, anti-Semitism, and racism.


You do have a choice.

Jimmy Carter said the U.S. had an "inordinate fear of Communism" and, thanks to the right he was correct. Communism is an economic system, no more, no less. The US economy has a major portion organized along Communist lines, as does most other countries, and it works just fine. That doesn't mean it can or will replace the free market but it has it's place.

What the US SHOULD have a fear of are foreign authoritarian political systems, be they right or left.

 

[yidnar]

Are you engaging in some sort of Socratic subterfuge?

You asked why I brought up the issue of Jewish communists, and I answered that it was because you said that the Mamdani Democrat party were both communist and anti-Semitic.

I then asked how this had come about (since, as you have said, Jewish people were generally sympathetic to communist ideology in the last century). Thus it was my question that you did not answer, not vice versa.

the majority of of Jews in NYC did not vote for Comiedani ..

In the recent New York City mayoral election held on November 4, 2025, a majority of Jewish voters supported Andrew Cuomo over the winner, Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani.
According to exit polls, 63% of Jewish New Yorkers voted for Andrew Cuomo, while 33% supported Zohran Mamdani. The Republican candidate, Curtis Sliwa, received 3% of the Jewish vote.

 

[yidnar]

I have asked a number of the board's Democrats if they will vote Bolshevik if the party tells them to, and only one said he would vote elsewhere.

I attribute this to a number of things including cowardice and the damage done through government schooling.

or its because of the decades of indoctrination bearing rotten fruit they feel its now politically safe to reveal their true intentions ..

 

[skews13]

Jimmy Carter said the U.S. had an "inordinate fear of Communism" and, thanks to the right he was correct. Communism is an economic system, no more, no less. The US economy has a major portion organized along Communist lines, as does most other countries, and it works just fine. That doesn't mean it can or will replace the free market but it has it's place.

What the US SHOULD have a fear of are foreign authoritarian political systems, be they right or left.

Capitalism is also an economic system. Both revolve around the creation and hoarding of wealth. Right wingers concern on both is who is hoarding the wealth.

Which also shows the only God they worship is money. Which is ironic, given the fact the Abrahamic religions are more closely associated with communism.

Which shows they specifically just worship capitalism.

 

[alang1216]

I have asked a number of the board's Democrats if they will vote Bolshevik if the party tells them to, and only one said he would vote elsewhere.

I attribute this to a number of things including cowardice and the damage done through government schooling.

Hard for me to answer this since the Dems have NEVER told me to vote for a Bolshevik. If you're looking for a Russian stooge there are plenty of choices around other than the Dems. A mirror would be a good start.

 

[IM2]

Folks, this is the type of idiocy produced by the Ivy League.

 

[Mac1958]

Both ends of the spectrum are being "subsumed" by their ideology right now. People are voting out of desperation and it's resulting in wider and wider election differences.

This wouldn't be happening if the parties showed some balls, ignored their crazy bases, and worked together for the good of the country. Collaboration would mean that both parties would have skin the game and would support positive results.

But our current "system" punishes such reason and maturity.

 

[drudge X]

Folks, this is the type of idiocy produced by the Ivy League.

Get real. If Trump was running against Kim Jong, Democrats would tell you Kim Jong is a better choice and you would cast your vote for Kim Jong without question. It's very telling when your side knew that Harris is a bimbo. Not one party member or voters protest and demand that the party should allow voters to decide who should represent the Democrats after Biden dropped out. Yet, Trump is a threat to democracy.

 

[alang1216]

Get real. If Trump was running against Kim Jong, Democrats would tell you Kim Jong is a better choice and you would cast your vote for Kim Jong without question.

There would definitely be a question, namely which autocrat would be more dangerous to our democracy.

It's very telling when your side knew that Harris is a bimbo. Not one party member or voters protest and demand that the party should allow voters to decide who should represent the Democrats after Biden dropped out. Yet, Trump is a threat to democracy.

I doubt any Dems thought Harris was more of a bimbo than "Covfefe" Trump. And let's not forget Harris shared the winning primary ticket with Biden. Would you expect Dems to protest if Biden died in office and she became president?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Both ends of the spectrum are being "subsumed" by their ideology right now. People are voting out of desperation and it's resulting in wider and wider election differences.

This wouldn't be happening if the parties showed some balls, ignored their crazy bases, and worked together for the good of the country. Collaboration would mean that both parties would have skin the game and would support positive results.

But our current "system" punishes such reason and maturity.

"Both ends of the spectrum are being "subsumed" by their ideology right now."


The Democrats objected when called communist.....no longer. That is subsumed.


The Right always stood for free markets, limited government and individual liberty. No need to be subsumed.

 

[Cassandro]

"Jew" does not appear in the OP to which you voluntarily subscribed.

Sorry, I thought "anti-Semitism" was referring to Jews.

The Mamdani Democrat party stands for abolishing private property, seizing the means of production, socialism/communism, anti-Semitism, and racism.

Do you have a different definition?

 

[Cassandro]

How easily I force your sort to run from posts.

How easily you resort to personal attacks.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sorry, I thought "anti-Semitism" was referring to Jews.

Do you have a different definition?

Let's get to the point.

I have the feeling that you have some animus against Jews,

Am I correct.

If so, would you please explain.

 

[PoliticalChic]

How easily you resort to personal attacks.

It's my superpower.

Good of you to notice.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Elections have consequences; Democrats can ride along, but they have to sit in the back.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Yep, and that choice was made Tuesday night. I see it caused some real butt hurt for your side.

Yeah. Where the people of blue states chose to elect Democrats.

Earth-shattering, that was.