Democrats censure Senator Sinema

[Clipper]

Another illustration of how fascist the Dimwinger party is. Vote exactly how we tell you, or you will be censured.

You ever hear of Liz Cheney, numbnuts.

 

[Concerned American]

Romney doesn't suck Trump's ass.

Got it.

I'm sure you do--you're sucking on Biden's left nut, Romney can have the right. Got it.

 

[Clipper]

I'm sure you do--you're sucking on Biden's left nut, Romney can have the right. Got it.

So what's your reason for attacking Romney other then your man crush on the Orange One?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Stop being pulled over by police for being Black and you won't have to worry about being gunned down.

Nobody gets pulled over for being black. Police need an offense to pull anybody over regardless of race.

I think you're either a commie or you're in bed with the rich, I don't think you can be both.

Why not?

 

[Concerned American]

So what's your reason for attacking Romney other then your man crush on the Orange One?

So what's your reason for attacking Sinema and Manchin other than your obsession with licking Biden's shitty ass.

 

[alang1216]

The trouble with that system is so did the commie down the street as well as fourteen of his dead relatives.

Apparently that is easy to say but impossible to prove. One might be forgiven for thinking you're just making stuff up or parroting others that make stuff up. Maybe someday you'll get tired of being played.

 

[Concerned American]

Apparently that is easy to say but impossible to prove. One might be forgiven for thinking you're just making stuff up or parroting others that make stuff up. Maybe someday you'll get tired of being played.

Maybe you ought to avail yourself to some history. Tamany Hall, NYC. The Daly political machine and gravestone voting, Chicago. If you think there is no fraud in current day elections, you are seriously deluded.

 

[alang1216]

Nobody gets pulled over for being black. Police need an offense to pull anybody over regardless of race.

I have no idea what planet you're from but you might want to ask all your Black what they think.

Inside 100 million police traffic stops: New evidence of racial bias​

 

[Clipper]

So what's your reason for attacking Sinema and Manchin other than your obsession with licking Biden's shitty ass.

When did I attack Sinema & Manchin, cement head.

 

[Concerned American]

I have no idea what planet you're from but you might want to ask all your Black what they think.

Inside 100 million police traffic stops: New evidence of racial bias​

HaHaHa, a robbery by a black man is reported--should police pull over a white woman?
Crime infested Harlem or Watts, who else is going to be pulled over--a white grandparent?
South Chicago, gang member is shot in a drive-by--should the white teacher be pulled over?
C'mon man--change the channel.

 

[Concerned American]

When did I attack Sinema & Manchin, cement head.

When you switched from Biden's left nut to licking his shitty ass.

 

[Clipper]

When you switched from Biden's left nut to licking his shitty ass.

Thd question was when did I attack Sinema & Manchin, Trump asseater crying over The Orange One.

 

[alang1216]

HaHaHa, a robbery by a black man is reported--should police pull over a white woman?
Crime infested Harlem or Watts, who else is going to be pulled over--a white grandparent?
South Chicago, gang member is shot in a drive-by--should the white teacher be pulled over?
C'mon man--change the channel.

Sorry but numbers don't lie. Sucks when reality collides with ideology:

Using information obtained through public record requests, the Stanford Open Policing Project examined almost 100 million traffic stops conducted from 2011 to 2017 across 21 state patrol agencies, including California, Illinois, New York and Texas, and 29 municipal police departments, including New Orleans, Philadelphia, San Francisco and St. Paul, Minnesota.​

​

The results show that police stopped and searched black and Latino drivers on the basis of less evidence than used in stopping white drivers, who are searched less often but are more likely to be found with illegal items.​

 

[Concerned American]

Thd question was when did I attack Sinema & Manchin, Trump asseater crying over The Orange One.

The fact of the matter is, you're obsessed with the last POTUS. The one who lives rent free in your head. The topic was the censure of Sinema--not Romney, not Cheney, and not your obsession with whether or not Trump's ass was licked. Troll somewhere else or stay on topic.

 

[Concerned American]

Sorry but numbers don't lie. Sucks when reality collides with ideology:

Using information obtained through public record requests, the Stanford Open Policing Project examined almost 100 million traffic stops conducted from 2011 to 2017 across 21 state patrol agencies, including California, Illinois, New York and Texas, and 29 municipal police departments, including New Orleans, Philadelphia, San Francisco and St. Paul, Minnesota.​

​

The results show that police stopped and searched black and Latino drivers on the basis of less evidence than used in stopping white drivers, who are searched less often but are more likely to be found with illegal items.​

It just occurred to me that you hijacked the shit out of this thread. The topic is the censure of Sinema. Stay on topic--I don't GAF about your race-baiting bullshit.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I have no idea what planet you're from but you might want to ask all your Black what they think.

Inside 100 million police traffic stops: New evidence of racial bias​

What they think and what really happened are two different things. A police officer can't pull anybody for no reason, especially when it comes to race. Police can't search a vehicle without just cause such as seeing a gun, suspected stolen merchandise, criminal tools or otherwise reasonable suspicion.

As a retired professional driver and a person that lives in a predominately black area, I can testify that many blacks are simply terrible drivers. They have little regard for traffic laws. What reason would a cop have for pulling over people of color? it doesn't benefit one police officer. Your article even uses words like "suggest" simply because the data shows more blacks get pulled over and searched.

A police officer will have less tolerance searching a person who (after called in) learns the driver has been arrested in the past for past criminal violations such as DUI with drug use, theft, assault on a police officer and so on. They have a higher tolerance for people that have never been in trouble with the law before. The problem with these findings between blacks and whites leave a lot of other factors out. They simply look at skin color and draw conclusions from there.

This is especially true of sentencing between blacks and whites. A judge has the police and criminal records of all defendants. He or she is likely to dole out harsher sentences on people that have been in jail or prison before than they will first time offenders. The judge takes into consideration how defendants interacted with police, and their respect to the judge and court. All those factors are never examined in any of these so-called studies, but they play a huge part when it comes to sentencing.

 

[Concerned American]

What they think and what really happened are two different things. A police officer can't pull anybody for no reason, especially when it comes to race. Police can't search a vehicle without just cause such as seeing a gun, suspected stolen merchandise, criminal tools or otherwise reasonable suspicion.

As a retired professional driver and a person that lives in a predominately black area, I can testify that many blacks are simply terrible drivers. They have little regard for traffic laws. What reason would a cop have for pulling over people of color? it doesn't benefit one police officer. Your article even uses words like "suggest" simply because the data shows more blacks get pulled over and searched.

A police officer will have less tolerance searching a person who (after called in) learns the driver has been arrested in the past for past criminal violations such as DUI with drug use, theft, assault on a police officer and so on. They have a higher tolerance for people that have never been in trouble with the law before. The problem with these findings between blacks and whites leave a lot of other factors out. They simply look at skin color and draw conclusions from there.

This is especially true of sentencing between blacks and whites. A judge has the police and criminal records of all defendants. He or she is likely to dole out harsher sentences on people that have been in jail or prison before than they will first time offenders. The judge takes into consideration how defendants interacted with police, and their respect to the judge and court. All those factors are never examined in any of these so-called studies, but they play a huge part when it comes to sentencing.

Kind of like comparing the number of young drivers vs old drivers that are pulled over--Insurance rates reflect that data as well.

 

[alang1216]

What they think and what really happened are two different things. A police officer can't pull anybody for no reason, especially when it comes to race. Police can't search a vehicle without just cause such as seeing a gun, suspected stolen merchandise, criminal tools or otherwise reasonable suspicion.

As a retired professional driver and a person that lives in a predominately black area, I can testify that many blacks are simply terrible drivers. They have little regard for traffic laws. What reason would a cop have for pulling over people of color? it doesn't benefit one police officer. Your article even uses words like "suggest" simply because the data shows more blacks get pulled over and searched.

A police officer will have less tolerance searching a person who (after called in) learns the driver has been arrested in the past for past criminal violations such as DUI with drug use, theft, assault on a police officer and so on. They have a higher tolerance for people that have never been in trouble with the law before. The problem with these law between blacks and whites leave a lot of other factors out. They simply look at skin color and draw conclusions from there.

You can make that case in any one instance. You can't make it in 100 million cases. Besides, I think racial profiling is a very real thing in many places.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You can make that case in any one instance. You can't make it in 100 million cases. Besides, I think racial profiling is a very real thing in many places.

You can make the case with 200 million. What difference would it make if it were one million or a hundred? Important factors are never considered, only skin color. When somebody can show me studies of actrual apples to apples, I'll be happy to read it just like I read your link. But thus far, any study anybody showed me about disparities in our justice system between blacks and whites excluded very important details.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Kind of like comparing the number of young drivers vs old drivers that are pulled over--Insurance rates reflect that data as well.

Exactly. I've been racially discriminated before on several occasions. It didn't bother me.

I used to deliver and repair medical equipment back in the 70's and 80's. On several occasions when I was in the projects I was addressed by a police officer simply because I was white. I was in uniform, in a marked van, and it was loaded with medical equipment. They still gave me the third degree. One time an officer asked dispatch (we didn't have cell phones back then) to call my company to insure I was there to service a customer and not looking to buy narcotics which is what any other white person in such a place would be doing there.

I had no problem with it. I understood the officers job and concern and cooperated fully. In every case the officer thanked me for my cooperation. One even escorted me to a customers apartment to assure my safety.