Reparations? For what? Not for slavery, which is generations in the past; yet, when considering Jim Crow and the efforts by the conservatives to whine loudly about Affirmative Action, which not only benefited people of color, but women too, there is some merit in considering all those who suffered, and continue to suffer hate and fear, ought to receive some consideration.
However, if the consideration is a check, I would oppose that. But let's be clear, the glass ceiling has been broken through at the last election, and the H. or Rep. has a duty to keep their promises and pass legislation to create training for 21st century jobs, increase the minimum wage, close the wages gap, and expose the hate and fear promulgated by the election of trump.
Equal Rights and equal opportunities are the goal, and the Golden Rule is not now and never has been the goal of communism or fascism.
What about reparations for Conservatives targeted by Obama and the IRS.
Oh, that's right, they won a bunch of money in court over that.
Never mind.
So what about those who are 1/1023 Indian? Should Elizabeth Warren get some cash even though she used her race to get into colleges, etc.? What about those who were white but living in Europe at the time of slavery? What about blacks who sold their black relatives into slavery in Africa and then moved to the US?
So many questions.
Only a few questions, and the answer is?
How about legacy admissions to college, the decades where women and people of color were shut out of many careers - the law, police and fire agencies, wall street, medical, the trades and the old boy's club. Lots more data points than you seem capable of posting.
What about that?
Are minorities prevent in today society from working on Wall Street or having Civial Servant Jobs?
What is your State doing to help train the minds of tomorrow or are you going to say California shouldn't be responsible and demand the Federal Government to do their job?
Most of your issues you cry about can be dealt with at the State and Local level but you do not want that because that mean higher taxes just on you and not the person in Red States.
So tell the board why you support the failure of your State and Local Governments when it come to helping the minority communities and demand the Federal Government to do their job when the GOP control the Senate and White House?
Do you have any facts to support your claims?
Q. Are minorities prevent (prevented?) in today society from working on Wall Street or having Civial Servant Jobs?
A. No, Jim Crow laws have been repealed long ago. However, racism and bigotry have not been eliminated, and in fact have become more common / acceptable in the last three years (thanks to D.J. Trump).
A. The Federal Government under Trump and Betsy DeVos won't do anything to support educational curriculum which leads to 21st Century Jobs. Their goal is to create for profit institutions, many of which have been proved as worthless as Trump U.
A. Jobs for minorities, especially in CA require a higher education, which too many American citizens can't achieve, a result of the conservative war on public education.
The jobs in Red States are of concern to Democrats too, it seems fiscal conservatism is unwilling to spend money on remedial education, necessary to compete for jobs, and to move on to higher education (technical or academic).
Isn't it odd that the conservatives opposed spending money to expedite the recovery during the Great Recession, and yet now seem oblivious to the cost of shutting down our government and cutting taxes for the few at the expense of the many.