Democrats and Neocons in DoD Continue to Play With the Idea of a Coup

[JimBowie1958]

This is treason.

Shut it down, arrest those involved and execute them.

Playing With Fire: Democrats and Their Military Quislings Flirt With Borderline Seditious Military Coup - Revolver News

ATTENTION NEWS JUNKIES: We are the new Drudge, be sure to check our news feed by CLICKING HERE As the election approaches, more and more ominous evidence is quickly piling up that the U.S. military’s nearly 250-year separation from national politics is eroding. Frightening signs indicate that...

www.revolver.news

Later, when the President had rioters cleared from Lafayette Square after several days of violence and destruction, Mattis wasn’t content with telling The Atlantic that he disagreed with the president and thought he was overreacting. Mattis went further: He suggested the president’s decision was illegal:​

​

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside. [Source: The Atlantic]​

​

Of course, Mattis is being completely ridiculous, at best; he’s showing off the simple, dog-like mind that was bamboozled by the Theranos scam. Dispersing violent rioters who have already nearly burned down a church is not “violating the Constitutional rights of fellow citizens.” Still, what matters is that Mattis thinks it is, and what he says as a result. And make no mistake, Mattis knows exactly what he is saying. When soldiers are given an illegal order, they must refuse. Mattis is trying to lay the groundwork for soldiers, and generals, to refuse the president’s orders. From there, it is a very small step to simply removing the president entirely.​

​

Mattis, at least, is now a private citizen. But there are worrying signs that even within current military brass, commanders are steeling themselves to intervene in civilian politics. On June 2, after the worst week of rioting in America since the MLK assassination riots, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley issued a public memo that was, essentially, a public warning to the president.​

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is treason.

Shut it down, arrest those involved and execute them.

Playing With Fire: Democrats and Their Military Quislings Flirt With Borderline Seditious Military Coup - Revolver News

ATTENTION NEWS JUNKIES: We are the new Drudge, be sure to check our news feed by CLICKING HERE As the election approaches, more and more ominous evidence is quickly piling up that the U.S. military’s nearly 250-year separation from national politics is eroding. Frightening signs indicate that...

www.revolver.news

Later, when the President had rioters cleared from Lafayette Square after several days of violence and destruction, Mattis wasn’t content with telling The Atlantic that he disagreed with the president and thought he was overreacting. Mattis went further: He suggested the president’s decision was illegal:​

​

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside. [Source: The Atlantic]​

​

Of course, Mattis is being completely ridiculous, at best; he’s showing off the simple, dog-like mind that was bamboozled by the Theranos scam. Dispersing violent rioters who have already nearly burned down a church is not “violating the Constitutional rights of fellow citizens.” Still, what matters is that Mattis thinks it is, and what he says as a result. And make no mistake, Mattis knows exactly what he is saying. When soldiers are given an illegal order, they must refuse. Mattis is trying to lay the groundwork for soldiers, and generals, to refuse the president’s orders. From there, it is a very small step to simply removing the president entirely.​

​

Mattis, at least, is now a private citizen. But there are worrying signs that even within current military brass, commanders are steeling themselves to intervene in civilian politics. On June 2, after the worst week of rioting in America since the MLK assassination riots, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley issued a public memo that was, essentially, a public warning to the president.​

The Protesters he had cleared out were on Church owned property and were peaceful. Included in those protesters were members of that church. Rump had no legal right to have them removed from Privately owned property so that he could do a Photo Op. Mattis is 100% correct.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

​

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts,​

​

I have provided evidence that the military/security complex, using the media and the Democrats, intends to turn the November election into a color revolution - here, here, and here. ​

​

The CIA is very experienced at color revolutions, having pulled them off in a number of countries where the existing government did not suit the CIA. As we have known since CIA Director John Brennan’s denunciations of President Trump, Trump doesn’t suit the CIA either. As far as the CIA is concerned, Trump is no different from Hugo Chavez, Nicolas Maduro, Charles de Gaulle, Manuel Zelaya, Evo Morales, Viktor Yanukovych, and a large number of others. ...​

Russiagate was a coup that failed, followed by the failed Impeachgate coup. Faced with Trump’s reelection and the realization that upon reelection Trump will be able to deal with the treason against him, the Deep State has decided to take him out with a color revolution.​

​

​

The evidence of a color revolution in the works is abundantly supplied by CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, NPR, Washington Post and numerous Internet sites funded by the CIA and the foundations and corporations through which it operates, all of which are committed to Trump’s ejection from the Oval Office. The American public does not realize the extent to which the institutions of a free society have been penetrated and turned against freedom. All of these media organizations are establishing the story in the mind of Americans that Trump will not leave office when he loses or steals the election and must be driven out. ​

​

​

Emails are arriving from readers in the UK and Europe reporting that the British and European media are at work preparing the acceptability of the CIA’s color revolution against President Trump. It is taken for granted by both media and politicians in Europe and the UK that Trump cannot win reelection because he:​

​

​

(1) is a Putin agent,​

(2) abuses the power of his office,​

(3) represents racist “Trump Deplorables,”​

(4) is a womanizer - “grab them by the pussy,”​

(5) is responsible for America leading the world in Covid-19 cases and deaths,​

(6) doesn’t support NATO (a sinecure for many Europeans),​

(7) is an outsider and not a member of The Establishment and “is not like us,”​

(8) “has orange hair” (orange is considered a low class color). ​

The scenarios for what the American, British, and European media assume to be a necessary color revolution to drive Trump from office are: ​

​

1. Trump loses the election, refuses to leave office and must be dislodged or democracy is lost.
2. Trump wins the election by fraud and must be dislodged or democracy is lost.

The scenarios do not accommodate Trump actually winning the election by the vote of the people. That outcome is outside the possibilities.​

​

According to the media, Trump can only lose or steal the election.​

​

With Antifa and Black Lives Matter now experienced in violent protests, they will be unleashed anew on American cities when there is news of a Trump election victory. The media will explain the violence as necessary to free us from a tyrant and egg on the violence, as will the Democrat Party. The CIA will be certain that the violence is well funded.​

​

Trump, isolated in his own government, which has failed to bring charges against the Obama regime officials who tried to frame the President of the United States and drive him from office—Barr and Durham represent The Establishment, not the President or law—will be cut off from Twitter, Facebook and from the print and TV media. All Americans and the world will hear is that Trump lost and must go or Trump won by vote fraud and must go. It will be impossible for Trump or anyone to refute the charges. The weak-minded, weak-willed Republicans will collapse. Republicans are not people capable of combat. Republicans believe that to disparage the military/security complex is unpatriotic. Thus, they are sitting ducks.​

 

[JimBowie1958]

The Protesters he had cleared out were on Church owned property and were peaceful. Included in those protesters were members of that church. Rump had no legal right to have them removed from Privately owned property so that he could do a Photo Op. Mattis is 100% correct.

Yeah, they 'peacefully' set fire to the church and assaulted people that were bystanders.

Piss off you fucking liar.

Fire set at D.C.'s historic St. John’s Episcopal Church

A fire was set at the historic St. John’s Episcopal Church, known as "the Church of the Presidents," in Washington, D.C. amid protests. The fire department said there was a fire in the basement and was extinguished.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Care4all]

Barr and Trump pepper gassing, and shooting rubber bullets at peaceful protesters before curfew, so to clear the park.... for a stroll in the park and photo op for Trump, in front of St John's church, holding a Holy Bible upside down, while proclaiming himself to be your savior, was a impeachable offense....(And Biblical reference to the antichrist)

 

[Care4all]

The Protesters he had cleared out were on Church owned property and were peaceful. Included in those protesters were members of that church. Rump had no legal right to have them removed from Privately owned property so that he could do a Photo Op. Mattis is 100% correct.

Yeah, they 'peacefully' set fire to the church and assaulted people that were bystanders.

Piss off you fucking liar.

Fire set at D.C.'s historic St. John’s Episcopal Church

A fire was set at the historic St. John’s Episcopal Church, known as "the Church of the Presidents," in Washington, D.C. amid protests. The fire department said there was a fire in the basement and was extinguished.

www.nbcnews.com

The protesters he gassed did not set fire to St John's.....stop LYING.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

​

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts,​

​

I have provided evidence that the military/security complex, using the media and the Democrats, intends to turn the November election into a color revolution - here, here, and here. ​

​

The CIA is very experienced at color revolutions, having pulled them off in a number of countries where the existing government did not suit the CIA. As we have known since CIA Director John Brennan’s denunciations of President Trump, Trump doesn’t suit the CIA either. As far as the CIA is concerned, Trump is no different from Hugo Chavez, Nicolas Maduro, Charles de Gaulle, Manuel Zelaya, Evo Morales, Viktor Yanukovych, and a large number of others. ...​

Russiagate was a coup that failed, followed by the failed Impeachgate coup. Faced with Trump’s reelection and the realization that upon reelection Trump will be able to deal with the treason against him, the Deep State has decided to take him out with a color revolution.​

​

​

The evidence of a color revolution in the works is abundantly supplied by CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, NPR, Washington Post and numerous Internet sites funded by the CIA and the foundations and corporations through which it operates, all of which are committed to Trump’s ejection from the Oval Office. The American public does not realize the extent to which the institutions of a free society have been penetrated and turned against freedom. All of these media organizations are establishing the story in the mind of Americans that Trump will not leave office when he loses or steals the election and must be driven out. ​

​

​

Emails are arriving from readers in the UK and Europe reporting that the British and European media are at work preparing the acceptability of the CIA’s color revolution against President Trump. It is taken for granted by both media and politicians in Europe and the UK that Trump cannot win reelection because he:​

​

​

(1) is a Putin agent,​

(2) abuses the power of his office,​

(3) represents racist “Trump Deplorables,”​

(4) is a womanizer - “grab them by the pussy,”​

(5) is responsible for America leading the world in Covid-19 cases and deaths,​

(6) doesn’t support NATO (a sinecure for many Europeans),​

(7) is an outsider and not a member of The Establishment and “is not like us,”​

(8) “has orange hair” (orange is considered a low class color). ​

The scenarios for what the American, British, and European media assume to be a necessary color revolution to drive Trump from office are: ​

​

1. Trump loses the election, refuses to leave office and must be dislodged or democracy is lost.
2. Trump wins the election by fraud and must be dislodged or democracy is lost.

The scenarios do not accommodate Trump actually winning the election by the vote of the people. That outcome is outside the possibilities.​

​

According to the media, Trump can only lose or steal the election.​

​

With Antifa and Black Lives Matter now experienced in violent protests, they will be unleashed anew on American cities when there is news of a Trump election victory. The media will explain the violence as necessary to free us from a tyrant and egg on the violence, as will the Democrat Party. The CIA will be certain that the violence is well funded.​

​

Trump, isolated in his own government, which has failed to bring charges against the Obama regime officials who tried to frame the President of the United States and drive him from office—Barr and Durham represent The Establishment, not the President or law—will be cut off from Twitter, Facebook and from the print and TV media. All Americans and the world will hear is that Trump lost and must go or Trump won by vote fraud and must go. It will be impossible for Trump or anyone to refute the charges. The weak-minded, weak-willed Republicans will collapse. Republicans are not people capable of combat. Republicans believe that to disparage the military/security complex is unpatriotic. Thus, they are sitting ducks.​

The only chance America and Americans have is the second .

 

[Daryl Hunt]

The Protesters he had cleared out were on Church owned property and were peaceful. Included in those protesters were members of that church. Rump had no legal right to have them removed from Privately owned property so that he could do a Photo Op. Mattis is 100% correct.

Yeah, they 'peacefully' set fire to the church and assaulted people that were bystanders.

Piss off you fucking liar.

Fire set at D.C.'s historic St. John’s Episcopal Church

A fire was set at the historic St. John’s Episcopal Church, known as "the Church of the Presidents," in Washington, D.C. amid protests. The fire department said there was a fire in the basement and was extinguished.

www.nbcnews.com

Put a site up that doesn't require me to turn off my ad blocker. I can't read your crap. But a fast scan before the interruption, there was a small fire in the basement and no reason was given other than the fire department was called. The location of the Rioters lighting fires gave NO locations. The source is from a blog, not a news source. I can put anything I want up on the internet, does that make it true? I stated truth on the people that they gassed. And the Church Leaders voiced outrage over it. You Rumpsters believe anything your Orange Deity says even when the House of God is defiled by your goons.

 

[Votto]

This is treason.

Shut it down, arrest those involved and execute them.

Playing With Fire: Democrats and Their Military Quislings Flirt With Borderline Seditious Military Coup - Revolver News

ATTENTION NEWS JUNKIES: We are the new Drudge, be sure to check our news feed by CLICKING HERE As the election approaches, more and more ominous evidence is quickly piling up that the U.S. military’s nearly 250-year separation from national politics is eroding. Frightening signs indicate that...

www.revolver.news

Later, when the President had rioters cleared from Lafayette Square after several days of violence and destruction, Mattis wasn’t content with telling The Atlantic that he disagreed with the president and thought he was overreacting. Mattis went further: He suggested the president’s decision was illegal:​

​

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside. [Source: The Atlantic]​

​

Of course, Mattis is being completely ridiculous, at best; he’s showing off the simple, dog-like mind that was bamboozled by the Theranos scam. Dispersing violent rioters who have already nearly burned down a church is not “violating the Constitutional rights of fellow citizens.” Still, what matters is that Mattis thinks it is, and what he says as a result. And make no mistake, Mattis knows exactly what he is saying. When soldiers are given an illegal order, they must refuse. Mattis is trying to lay the groundwork for soldiers, and generals, to refuse the president’s orders. From there, it is a very small step to simply removing the president entirely.​

​

Mattis, at least, is now a private citizen. But there are worrying signs that even within current military brass, commanders are steeling themselves to intervene in civilian politics. On June 2, after the worst week of rioting in America since the MLK assassination riots, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley issued a public memo that was, essentially, a public warning to the president.​

IF those involved are not arrested, then only one conclusion can be reached, our Republic is gone.

The trouble is, I'm 99.9999999% sure they won't be.

 

[alang1216]

This is treason.

Shut it down, arrest those involved and execute them.

Playing With Fire: Democrats and Their Military Quislings Flirt With Borderline Seditious Military Coup - Revolver News

ATTENTION NEWS JUNKIES: We are the new Drudge, be sure to check our news feed by CLICKING HERE As the election approaches, more and more ominous evidence is quickly piling up that the U.S. military’s nearly 250-year separation from national politics is eroding. Frightening signs indicate that...

www.revolver.news

Later, when the President had rioters cleared from Lafayette Square after several days of violence and destruction, Mattis wasn’t content with telling The Atlantic that he disagreed with the president and thought he was overreacting. Mattis went further: He suggested the president’s decision was illegal:​

​

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside. [Source: The Atlantic]​

​

Of course, Mattis is being completely ridiculous, at best; he’s showing off the simple, dog-like mind that was bamboozled by the Theranos scam. Dispersing violent rioters who have already nearly burned down a church is not “violating the Constitutional rights of fellow citizens.” Still, what matters is that Mattis thinks it is, and what he says as a result. And make no mistake, Mattis knows exactly what he is saying. When soldiers are given an illegal order, they must refuse. Mattis is trying to lay the groundwork for soldiers, and generals, to refuse the president’s orders. From there, it is a very small step to simply removing the president entirely.​

​

Mattis, at least, is now a private citizen. But there are worrying signs that even within current military brass, commanders are steeling themselves to intervene in civilian politics. On June 2, after the worst week of rioting in America since the MLK assassination riots, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley issued a public memo that was, essentially, a public warning to the president.​

Mattis suggested the president’s decision was illegal. Not that Trump cares about the Constitution but Mattis was probably right:

The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385, original at 20 Stat. 152) signed on June 18, 1878, by President Rutherford B. Hayes which limits the powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States. The Act was passed as an amendment to an army appropriation bill following the end of Reconstruction and was updated in 1956 and 1981.​

 

[Penelope]

This is treason.

Shut it down, arrest those involved and execute them.

Playing With Fire: Democrats and Their Military Quislings Flirt With Borderline Seditious Military Coup - Revolver News

ATTENTION NEWS JUNKIES: We are the new Drudge, be sure to check our news feed by CLICKING HERE As the election approaches, more and more ominous evidence is quickly piling up that the U.S. military’s nearly 250-year separation from national politics is eroding. Frightening signs indicate that...

www.revolver.news

Later, when the President had rioters cleared from Lafayette Square after several days of violence and destruction, Mattis wasn’t content with telling The Atlantic that he disagreed with the president and thought he was overreacting. Mattis went further: He suggested the president’s decision was illegal:​

​

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside. [Source: The Atlantic]​

​

Of course, Mattis is being completely ridiculous, at best; he’s showing off the simple, dog-like mind that was bamboozled by the Theranos scam. Dispersing violent rioters who have already nearly burned down a church is not “violating the Constitutional rights of fellow citizens.” Still, what matters is that Mattis thinks it is, and what he says as a result. And make no mistake, Mattis knows exactly what he is saying. When soldiers are given an illegal order, they must refuse. Mattis is trying to lay the groundwork for soldiers, and generals, to refuse the president’s orders. From there, it is a very small step to simply removing the president entirely.​

​

Mattis, at least, is now a private citizen. But there are worrying signs that even within current military brass, commanders are steeling themselves to intervene in civilian politics. On June 2, after the worst week of rioting in America since the MLK assassination riots, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley issued a public memo that was, essentially, a public warning to the president.​

Nothing could be further from the truth, tramp is doing a coup right before your eyes.

 

[Mac1958]

Rumpsters believe anything your Orange Deity says even when the House of God is defiled by your goons.

Never did I think we'd be in a situation that so closely mirrored history.

A dangerous, profoundly damaged buffoon somehow found his way into power, and a cult of personality is protecting and enabling him. Patriotic Americans near him can clearly see what he is, what is happening, and they are powerless to stop it. The authoritarian nationalist strongman and his enablers exist in an alternative universe that shuts out all contrary thought. They essentially protect him with their pure, unconditional adoration.

And on top of all that, every indication is that this, an authoritarian nationalist strongman, is what these people -- Americans -- have really wanted, all along.

Fer fuck's sake, I can't believe we're seeing this happen here. I remain confident the Constitution will stop this from going too far, but it still is mind-blowing.

 

[Penelope]

This is treason.

Shut it down, arrest those involved and execute them.

Playing With Fire: Democrats and Their Military Quislings Flirt With Borderline Seditious Military Coup - Revolver News

ATTENTION NEWS JUNKIES: We are the new Drudge, be sure to check our news feed by CLICKING HERE As the election approaches, more and more ominous evidence is quickly piling up that the U.S. military’s nearly 250-year separation from national politics is eroding. Frightening signs indicate that...

www.revolver.news

Later, when the President had rioters cleared from Lafayette Square after several days of violence and destruction, Mattis wasn’t content with telling The Atlantic that he disagreed with the president and thought he was overreacting. Mattis went further: He suggested the president’s decision was illegal:​

​

When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside. [Source: The Atlantic]​

​

Of course, Mattis is being completely ridiculous, at best; he’s showing off the simple, dog-like mind that was bamboozled by the Theranos scam. Dispersing violent rioters who have already nearly burned down a church is not “violating the Constitutional rights of fellow citizens.” Still, what matters is that Mattis thinks it is, and what he says as a result. And make no mistake, Mattis knows exactly what he is saying. When soldiers are given an illegal order, they must refuse. Mattis is trying to lay the groundwork for soldiers, and generals, to refuse the president’s orders. From there, it is a very small step to simply removing the president entirely.​

​

Mattis, at least, is now a private citizen. But there are worrying signs that even within current military brass, commanders are steeling themselves to intervene in civilian politics. On June 2, after the worst week of rioting in America since the MLK assassination riots, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley issued a public memo that was, essentially, a public warning to the president.​

IF those involved are not arrested, then only one conclusion can be reached, our Republic is gone.

The trouble is, I'm 99.9999999% sure they won't be.

Nothing to arrest them for.

 

[theHawk]

The war mongers want their war in Syria. If Biden wins, they’ll get their war. If President Trump wins....well....they’re going to have to get creative, their last hoax of Assad using chemical weapons didn’t quite work.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Mattis is trying to lay the groundwork for soldiers, and generals, to refuse the president’s orders. From there, it is a very small step to simply removing the president entirely.

IF those involved are not arrested, then only one conclusion can be reached, our Republic is gone.

Nothing to arrest them for.

The military is bound to obey the orders of the commander in chief, not undermine him and plan a coup against him.

But then again, sedition, rebellion and criminal rackets are the specialty of Tammany Hall Democrats.

 

[mudwhistle]

Barr and Trump pepper gassing, and shooting rubber bullets at peaceful protesters before curfew, so to clear the park.... for a stroll in the park and photo op for Trump, in front of St John's church, holding a Holy Bible upside down, while proclaiming himself to be your savior, was a impeachable offense....(And Biblical reference to the antichrist)

OMG....HE HELD UP AN UPSIDE-DOWN BIBLE???
WHY WASN'T HE IMPEACHED ON THE SPOT????

 

[eagle1462010]

Barr and Trump pepper gassing, and shooting rubber bullets at peaceful protesters before curfew, so to clear the park.... for a stroll in the park and photo op for Trump, in front of St John's church, holding a Holy Bible upside down, while proclaiming himself to be your savior, was a impeachable offense....(And Biblical reference to the antichrist)

Fuck them........Fuck Mattis...........Fuck the Establishment............

Peaceful protesters my ass.........months of burning shit down.......killing police.....dragging people from their cars......beating old ladies with 2 x 4s.............chanting Raise your Fist and chant with me or I'LL KILL YOU.

I SWORE AND OATH........I remember that OATH MATTIS........To protect and Defend the Constitution against all enemies Foreign and DOMESTIC............Those that use VIOLENCE.........FEAR AND INTIMIDATION for a POLITICAL GOAL are by definition Terrorist.

Those that Deny the rights of others......and destroy their property and threaten their lives are violating the laws of the Republic THAT MATTIS SWORE TO PROTECT............

Your dang animals better stay in their stinking safe places run by DNC assholes......We don't play that shit in Fly over country.

Come on down and try your BS here.............and Mattis has proven to be a PUPPET of the establishment........a disgrace to the uniform.

We salute the rank........and not the person in the uniform.

 

[eagle1462010]

Try your shit on them...........In the Rodney king riots under Bush Sr...........3000 National Guard members went into LA to put that shit down as looters burned over 3000 structurers

Try your Riots on them.............GOOD LUCK......military doesn't give a shit you want to steal shit.

 

[eagle1462010]

MATTIS............YOU HAVE BETRAYED THE CORP........FORGOTTEN THE OATH and SIDED with TERRORIST BURNING THE COUNTRY DOWN.

 

[colfax_m]

The military is bound to obey the orders of the commander in chief, not undermine him and plan a coup against him.

But then again, sedition, rebellion and criminal rackets are the specialty of Tammany Hall Democrats.

They're bound to obey any lawful orders of the president.