Democratic Socialism/Communism is the only solution to advanced automation & artificial intelligence.

The $ amounts you show are not subsidies but incentives. Amazon for instance builds its call centers and warehouses and distribution facilities etc. where it can get the best tax breaks and other incentives to put those installations where it does. For instance the state of New Mexico and the City of Los Lunas provided tax and land cost benefits to entice Amazon to build a million square foot facility in that small town of 17,000 population. In return Amazon will provide more than 600 good jobs that in turn will in turn boost other businesses and encourage economic growth. The same kind of deal was given Intel to build a huge facility in Rio Rancho NM that was pretty much no town at all. It now the third largest city in New Mexico.

The jobs require housing and gas stations and super markets and other businesses that spring up to get all that lovely money and the next thing you know you have a thriving community that can afford great city services, hospitals, schools, museums, recreation facilities and other quality of life things.

That is what government can do without costing the tax payers a dime. So we should know the difference between a 'subsidy' that actually pays tax dollars to get somebody to provide a product or service and incentives that encourage economic growth.
FoxFyre, your argument that the financial support provided to corporations like Amazon and Boeing are merely "incentives" and not subsidies is fundamentally misleading.

1. The Nature of "Incentives"

You claim that the financial benefits provided to companies like Amazon and Boeing are "incentives" rather than subsidies. However, these incentives function effectively as subsidies because they involve significant financial concessions from the government to the companies. Whether it's tax breaks, grants, or land cost benefits, these are all forms of financial assistance that reduce the operational costs for these corporations, effectively subsidizing their business activities.

Example: The subsidies and tax breaks provided to Boeing by the state of Washington amount to billions of dollars. These subsidies are not merely incentives but direct financial support that reduces Boeing's operational costs and boosts its profitability.

2. Economic Growth and Job Creation

You argue that these incentives lead to economic growth and job creation in local communities. While it’s true that large corporations can bring jobs and economic activity, this argument overlooks the broader implications:

  • Corporate Welfare: These incentives are corporate welfare, where public money is used to support highly profitable corporations. The benefits to the community can be outweighed by the cost to taxpayers, who fund these subsidies while the corporations reap the profits.
  • Questionable ROI: Studies have shown that the return on investment (ROI) for these incentives is often questionable.

3. Dependency on Government Support

You claim that free market capitalism doesn’t rely on government support, yet the reality is that many of the largest and most profitable companies in the world depend heavily on government subsidies and support. This includes not just tax breaks and grants but also bailouts during economic crises:

  • 2008 Financial Crisis: During the financial crisis, companies like General Motors and AIG received massive bailouts from the government to prevent a complete economic collapse. These bailouts were not incentives but direct financial assistance to keep these companies afloat.
  • Subsidies Across Industries: States and local governments in the US provide approximately $70 billion annually in subsidies to businesses, benefiting a wide range of industries from tech to energy to manufacturing.

4. The Myth of the Free Market

You romanticize the idea of a free market where businesses thrive without government intervention, yet this notion is far from reality. Modern capitalism is characterized by significant government involvement and support:

  • Monopolies and Oligopolies: The free market rarely exists in its pure form. Instead, we see monopolies and oligopolies where a few large corporations dominate entire industries, often stifling competition and innovation. These corporations benefit from regulatory capture, where they influence government policies to maintain their market dominance .
  • Worker Exploitation: The so-called free market often leads to the exploitation of workers, with low wages, poor working conditions, and minimal job security. This exploitation is one reason why many workers turn to government support systems to survive.

5. Socialism and the Future

Given the trajectory of technological advancement, socialism offers a sustainable and equitable alternative:

  • Equitable Distribution: A socialist system will ensure that the benefits of automation and AI are shared equitably across society, rather than concentrated in the hands of a few.
  • Public Ownership: Publicly owned production means that resources and profits can be reinvested into the community, improving infrastructure, healthcare, education, and more.
  • Democratic Planning: Centralized planning does not mean top-down control; it can involve democratic participation from all sectors of society, ensuring that production meets the needs of the people, not just the profits of the few.

Conclusion

Your argument overlooks the significant role government already plays in propping up the capitalist system and ignores the potential for a more equitable, sustainable system through socialism. As automation and AI continue to evolve, we need to rethink our economic models to ensure they serve the many, not just the few. Capitalism, with its reliance on government support and its failure to address the needs of the entire population, is not the answer. Socialism, with its focus on public ownership, equitable distribution, and democratic planning, is the solution.
 
demolition-man-simon-phoenix.gif
 
Countries like North Korea and Cuba are not isolated failures of communism but are nations under siege by the capitalist empire, primarily the USA. These countries are subjected to brutal economic sanctions, military threats, and international isolation orchestrated by the United States, which controls the world banking system and the reserve currency. The USA uses its economic might to cripple these nations, making it incredibly difficult for them to thrive independently.

Impact of Sanctions and Embargoes

The economic embargo on Cuba is a prime example. The US imposes severe penalties on international banks and companies that engage in any financial transactions with Cuba. This makes Cuba a pariah in the global financial system. Any foreign company that does business in Cuba cannot do business in the US. Cargo ships that anchor in Cuban ports are prohibited from anchoring in US ports for six months. These sanctions are designed to strangle the Cuban economy and have nothing to do with the effectiveness of socialism or communism.

Comparison with Democratic Socialism

Western Europe, with its democratic socialist policies, demonstrates that socialism can be highly successful when not under siege. Countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Norway implement extensive social welfare programs, public healthcare, and education systems that are the envy of the world. These nations are not subjected to the same crippling sanctions and military threats that countries like Cuba face. If American progressives propose similar policies, they are derided as "commies" by Republicans, yet these policies lead to thriving, equitable societies.

The Role of BRICS

The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are now challenging American dominance over the world economy. They are working to establish alternative systems to bypass the negative effects of American economic sanctions. This effort underscores the extent to which the US uses its economic power to suppress nations that do not conform to its capitalist model.

Conclusion

The argument that communism should succeed despite being besieged by the world's largest economic and military power is absurd. The failures you attribute to communism are largely the result of sustained and deliberate economic warfare by capitalist powers. When socialism is allowed to function without such interference, as seen in various European nations, it can lead to prosperous, equitable societies. To ignore this context is to misunderstand the true nature of the global economic system and the deliberate actions taken by capitalist powers to undermine alternatives to their hegemony.
If those "socialist/communist" nations NEED trade with the failed capitalists then they are the failed nations, failed examples of socialism~communism~Marxism.

If marxism-socialsim-communism works as presented, than it would be independent of need from capitalist systems. That you claim marxism-socialsim-communism needs to have trade and economic dealing with non-marxism-socialsim-communism underscores that such are NOT independent, stand alone economic-social-government systems but rather are dependent parasites of the more successful Capitalist systems where Wealth is created, to such an extant as to subsidize the delusional socialist systems by redistributing some of their capitalist wealth to the failures.

It's all basic logic, basic math, and basic economics. If you fail to grasp this than you are in need of remedial education and training in the basics.

Put down the crack pipe and stop polluting your brain. Maybe then you might grasp the basics of reality.
 
If those "socialist/communist" nations NEED trade with the failed capitalists then they are the failed nations, failed examples of socialism~communism~Marxism.

If marxism-socialsim-communism works as presented, than it would be independent of need from capitalist systems. That you claim marxism-socialsim-communism needs to have trade and economic dealing with non-marxism-socialsim-communism underscores that such are NOT independent, stand alone economic-social-government systems but rather are dependent parasites of the more successful Capitalist systems where Wealth is created, to such an extant as to subsidize the delusional socialist systems by redistributing some of their capitalist wealth to the failures.

It's all basic logic, basic math, and basic economics. If you fail to grasp this than you are in need of remedial education and training in the basics.

Put down the crack pipe and stop polluting your brain. Maybe then you might grasp the basics of reality.

Stryder, your insults and simplistic arguments don’t address the realities of global economic dynamics and the deliberate sabotage of socialist countries by capitalist powers.

Economic Warfare and Sanctions

The US controls the world’s banking system, threatening banks with fines and penalties if they do business with Cuba. Cargo ships that anchor in Cuba are prohibited from anchoring in an American port for 180 days. If foreign companies or governments engage in business with Cuba, they are often penalized or barred from the American market. This isolates Cuba economically and politically. The same tactics are used against countries like North Korea, Venezuela, and Nicaragua—any nation deemed "too Marxist" or communist.

Reference:

Interference in Socialist Trade

Even when socialist countries like Cuba and Venezuela try to trade with or help each other, the US intervenes. A few years ago, the US Navy stopped a Venezuelan cargo tanker full of oil from anchoring in Cuba, forcing it back to Venezuela. Communist countries can’t even help each other without US interference.

Dependency on Trade

It’s absurd to assert that communist countries shouldn’t trade with other countries. No country, including the US, operates in isolation. Just because a country is communist doesn’t mean it should be cut off from importing materials necessary for production. The US also relies on other countries for certain resources. Pretending that a developing nation should be completely isolated is nonsense. Embargoes are economic warfare designed to cripple these nations.

Success of Democratic Socialism

Countries in Western Europe with democratic socialist policies—such as Denmark, Sweden, and Norway—thrive when not subjected to external sabotage. These nations have extensive social welfare programs, public healthcare, and education systems, leading to high standards of living and economic stability.

Reference: The Guardian - Scandinavian Countries Are the Happiest

The Role of BRICS

BRICS nations are working to bypass US economic control, highlighting the oppressive nature of American dominance.
Reference: China continues to dominate an expanded BRICS | East Asia Forum

Robustness of Communism

Despite all the attempts to sabotage these smaller, developing communist countries, they still survive thanks to the versatility and robustness of communism as an economic and political system. The resilience of these nations under constant economic and political pressure is a testament to the strength and adaptability of communist principles.

Conclusion

The struggles of socialist countries are due to external pressures and deliberate economic sabotage by capitalist powers. When allowed to function without interference, socialism can lead to prosperous, equitable societies. Ignoring these external factors weakens your position and shows a lack of understanding of global economic dynamics.
 
Last edited:
Those are countries under siege-socialism. They're under siege by the capitalist empire i.e. USA = 800 Pound Gorilla. The nations that don't outwardly identify as socialist or communist, and have more of a mixed economy (socialism light), are generally not sanctioned and under siege, and such countries do very well.

Western Europe is essentially Democratic Socialist. You Republicans shout "Commie" whenever an American progressive politician tries to implement the same government policies that are in those democratic socialist countries, here in America. So based upon your own rhetoric, there are many successful socialist countries around the world.
/——/
1720858532016.webp
 
/——/ Says the useful idiot who insists on living in a capitalist country.
What a stupid comment. I was born and raised here, this is my country, just as much as it is yours. Why would I leave my country and go live somewhere else? Especially, somewhere else that is being economically sanctioned and threatened with war, by my government? Communists are here to stay and we're going to turn this country into a communist country. We're not going anywhere you piece of shit. Why don't you leave? Get the fuck out of here.
 
What a stupid comment. I was born and raised here, this is my country, just as much as it is yours. Why would I leave my country and go live somewhere else? Especially, somewhere else that is being economically sanctioned and threatened with war, by my government? Communists are here to stay and we're going to turn this country into a communist country. We're not going anywhere you piece of shit. Why don't you leave? Get the fuck out of here.
/---/ Yeah, sure you are, azzhole.
 
Didn't take him long to drop the "democratic" pretense; did it?
You and your ilk are the ones trying to kick us out of here and kill us. That will never happen. We win, you lose. Advanced automation and AI ensures our victory and your defeat. No wages - No capitalism. Now go sit in the corner like a stray dog and lick your wounds.
 
Brainwashed, geriatric boomer shithead, it's your old crusty ass who's on a "short countdown", you pathetic piece of shit.
It won't be just me "Red Front".
I've lots of kids and grandkids think the same and have no tolerance for your parasitic, deadwood, non-productive criminal thief waste of skin.

Communism creates nothing good or useful. It steals ideas and tech from others of free enterprise performance.
That AK in you sig line is a stolen copy of this;
 
It won't be just me "Red Front".
I've lots of kids and grandkids think the same and have no tolerance for your parasitic, deadwood, non-productive criminal thief waste of skin.

Communism creates nothing good or useful. It steals ideas and tech from others of free enterprise performance.
That AK in you sig line is a stolen copy of this;
Your kids will be communists when they're unemployed and hungry, dumb ass. Smart robots and artificial intelligence eliminate wage-labor. You can delude yourself and pretend otherwise if it makes you feel better, but everyone, including the billionaires and the experts agree with me, not you. More than half of jobs will be replaced by smart robots and AI by 2030 and practically all waged-jobs will be completely eliminated by 2040. We had a great depression with just 23% unemployment, imagine the effects of 50%, 60% unemployment? You can't because you're brainwashed and dumb.
 
It won't be just me "Red Front".
I've lots of kids and grandkids think the same and have no tolerance for your parasitic, deadwood, non-productive criminal thief waste of skin.

Communism creates nothing good or useful. It steals ideas and tech from others of free enterprise performance.
That AK in you sig line is a stolen copy of this;
Capitalists create nothing, the working class, i.e. laborers do. You have your head so far up your old crusty geriatric ass that you think capitalists and not workers create everything. This world is built on labor not capitalists, you stupid old, Cold War brainwashed boomer-MAGA-HAT moron.
 
Your kids will be communists when they're unemployed and hungry, dumb ass. Smart robots and artificial intelligence eliminate wage-labor. You can delude yourself and pretend otherwise if it makes you feel better, but everyone, including the billionaires and the experts agree with me, not you. More than half of jobs will be replaced by smart robots and AI by 2030 and practically all waged-jobs will be completely eliminated by 2040. We had a great depression with just 23% unemployment, imagine the effects of 50%, 60% unemployment? You can't because you're brainwashed and dumb.
And we'll all be under a hundred feet of ocean due to gorebal warming by year 2002.
Oh wait. That didn't happen.
Same will be the case with your crackhead fantasies.
 
And we'll all be under a hundred feet of ocean due to gorebal warming by year 2002.
Oh wait. That didn't happen.
Same will be the case with your crackhead fantasies.
No one ever believed that nonsense. Advanced automation and AI are taking jobs right now, so it's not a crackhead fantasy, you dumbass. With advanced automation and AI, there's no more need for human wage labor. A smart-robot works 24/7 for pennies on the dollar and is even more productive, with less liability and complications. You're on crack if you think capitalists are going to choose expensive human labor over smart-robots that don't sleep and cost a few pennies hourly to operate.
 
No one ever believed that nonsense. Advanced automation and AI are taking jobs right now, so it's not a crackhead fantasy, you dumbass. With advanced automation and AI, there's no more need for human wage labor. A smart-robot works 24/7 for pennies on the dollar and is even more productive, with less liability and complications. You're on crack if you think capitalists are going to choose expensive human labor over smart-robots.
It's clear you've never worked a real job in your life.
Hell, you sound like you've never worked to support yourself.
Also you have no idea of the full range or jobs and work that need to be done.

AI and advanced automation have severe limits in what they can and will do. However I'd love to see such operate on that tumor in your brain that makes you so dumb and worthless.
 
Back
Top Bottom