Yes. And they’d be right.Ok. Republicans have abandoned conservatism. They’ve abandoned the traditional Republican core beliefs. What do they have to run on? Democrats suck?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. And they’d be right.Ok. Republicans have abandoned conservatism. They’ve abandoned the traditional Republican core beliefs. What do they have to run on? Democrats suck?
Well then. You’ll have no problem pointing us to a Constitutional provision or a rule of law (other than RvW) that allows the murder of children.They still follow the Constitution and rule of law.. They don't pledge allegiance to a particular party or president.
Yes. And they’d be right.
It is much more than a game. The future of our republic is at stake.Then politics has become nothing but a High School Homecoming game. Go Blue! Beat them Red!
Sounds like a terroristic thread. Sadly that's acceptable in the Biden administration if liberal trash is involved.
As we see with time, citizens views are changed whether they like it or not. Whether it is by cajoling or by pure force of elites. In all ways the circumventing of anything of sense can be. Whether it is good or bad. The result is our views we see here.
The big bake sale.Win what?
It wouldn't matter...These Democrats are not really "Liberal" in any sense of the word anymore...They are authortarian DSA assholes...What will happen is up to a seperate but equal branch to them which they hate.Somone might want to inform the Senator that the Supreme Court does not base it's decisions on public opinions or even veiled threats from politicans.
Here’s the scary thing, and I DO mean scary: the newest justice said during her nomination hearing that justices are allowed to consider impact - and not just constitutionality - when weighing their decisions. That means that if the intolerant and violent leftists threaten bloodshed, the justices could take that into consideration.Somone might want to inform the Senator that the Supreme Court does not base it's decisions on public opinions or even veiled threats from politicans.
It could go either way. The legal backing of Roe v. Wade is rather flimsy from a constitutional standpoint. That being said, we've had flimsy rulings other than this one.Well, here we have an idiot Democrat. Are you thrilled? They won't overturn Roe v Wade..whether American women take to the streets in protest or not.
To be safe, I say we put him in solitary confinement with no bail for about 6 months.I read the article and the comments from the senator carefully, there was no mention of insurrection or violence.
Why is almost everything you post a lie?
Possible but not probable if they do that then they invite it from all sides on any issue that comes before the court.Here’s the scary thing, and I DO mean scary: the newest justice said during her nomination hearing that justices are allowed to consider impact - and not just constitutionality - when weighing their decisions. That means that if the intolerant and violent leftists threaten bloodshed, the justices could take that into consideration.
I can't wait weather What a great opportunity to rid ourselves of 1000's of traitorous republican scum Hows your old pal VH doing?Funny how the Left can call for open violence to overthrow our government and everything is good.
The Left setting stage for yet more violence.
Funny how the Left can call for open violence to overthrow our government and everything is good.
The Left setting stage for yet more violence.
"I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price!" Schumer yelled. "You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions."
Pay the price? How?