Democrat Senator Mark Kelly Faces Court-Martial After Department of War Launches Review of Allegations of Misconduct

I completely agree that they do not have to answer questions. I don't know how many times I have to say that before it will penatrate. The fifth amendment says so.

Of course if Mark Kelly is recalled to active duty, he can absolutely be ordered to the interview. But he still won't have to answer questions.

The 5th Amendment says so. Who cares what the voters will think of a Senator refusing to cooperate with law enforcement when suspected of sedition?
If he is on active duty, the FBI will not interview him.

He's a Democrat. You do realize that his wife is Gabby Giffords, a former Republican Congressional Representative. She was the one shot in the head, and he apparently suffered brain damage as a result and became an anti-gun Democrat.
 
If he is on active duty, the FBI will not interview him.
The FBI can and does interview people on active duty.

He's a Democrat. You do realize that his wife is Gabby Giffords, a former Republican Congressional Representative. She was the one shot in the head, and he apparently suffered brain damage as a result and became an anti-gun Democrat.
Yes, a common occurance with TBI.
 
No chance it was a political stunt done to intentionally Jack Him off?
I doubt it. I wouldn’t have predicted Trump would freak out like that.

But then again, he’s kind of authoritarian.
 
Only because Trump says insane shit and MAGA is too afraid to call it out.
Saying insane shit is "the military doesn't have to follow illegal orders", when there haven't been any. Stop with the bullshit.
 
The FBI can and does interview people on active duty.

Not for military violations of the UCMJ. They have no jurisdiction. Do you keep forgetting that I was a naval officer?
Yes, a common occurance with TBI.
The TBI of a spouse turns you into someone your prior self wouldn't give the time of day?
 
Not for military violations of the UCMJ. They have no jurisdiction. Do you keep forgetting that I was a naval officer?
I keep not believing it. No offense, but you believe too many wrong things for me to believe it. Basic stuff, really. Like that the FBI cannot talk to sailors.

The FBI will likely have questions for Kelly about his co-conspirators. But they can also ask about violations of the UCMJ, what would prevent that? They are federal law enforcemnt.

I'm starting to see more value in AI. If you would consult it before you make these outlandish statements, you would save us some time:

1764190049865.webp

When the FBI does this, I'm sure Kelly's lawyer will advise him not to answer any questions.

Which is his right not to do under the . . . well you know.
The TBI of a spouse turns you into someone your prior self wouldn't give the time of day?
I thought you were joking and so was I.

I have no idea about Mark Kelly's history of politics. I only vaguely knew the name until he went off the rails and tried to talk young soldiers into defying orders.
 
Saying insane shit is "the military doesn't have to follow illegal orders", when there haven't been any. Stop with the bullshit.
It’s not insane at all. It remains a true statement regardless of whether illegal orders have been issued or not.
 
Only because Trump says insane shit and MAGA is too afraid to call it out.
Only because you’re suffering from hurt feelings that your leftist clowns will be held accountable for their actions.
 
It’s not insane at all. It remains a true statement regardless of whether illegal orders have been issued or not.
It’s insane but typical for leftist clowns. The goofy infomercial made specific reference to “this administration” and illegal orders. Yet no goofy leftists can identify any illegal orders.
 
Dude, they have Him profiled. Shoulda realized that from 45.
I have a hard time believing any of these members of Congress cares that much about what Trump thinks.

Kinda? They'd all be gone if He was.
He freaks out at the very thought that he has limitations on his authority as president, so I'd say that reveals some authoritarian tendencies. A normal president, one who respects the constitution and our national values wouldn't have freaked out about the statements.
 
I keep not believing it. No offense, but you believe too many wrong things for me to believe it. Basic stuff, really. Like that the FBI cannot talk to sailors.

The FBI will likely have questions for Kelly about his co-conspirators. But they can also ask about violations of the UCMJ, what would prevent that? They are federal law enforcemnt.

I'm starting to see more value in AI. If you would consult it before you make these outlandish statements, you would save us some time:

View attachment 1187985
When the FBI does this, I'm sure Kelly's lawyer will advise him not to answer any questions.

Which is his right not to do under the . . . well you know.

I thought you were joking and so was I.

I have no idea about Mark Kelly's history of politics. I only vaguely knew the name until he went off the rails and tried to talk young soldiers into defying orders.
Federal law enforcement has no jurisdiction in the military. End of story. Civilian crimes ? Yes. Violations of the UCMJ? No f-ing way!
 
15th post
I keep not believing it. No offense, but you believe too many wrong things for me to believe it. Basic stuff, really. Like that the FBI cannot talk to sailors.

The FBI will likely have questions for Kelly about his co-conspirators. But they can also ask about violations of the UCMJ, what would prevent that? They are federal law enforcemnt.

I'm starting to see more value in AI. If you would consult it before you make these outlandish statements, you would save us some time:

View attachment 1187985
When the FBI does this, I'm sure Kelly's lawyer will advise him not to answer any questions.

Which is his right not to do under the . . . well you know.

I thought you were joking and so was I.

I have no idea about Mark Kelly's history of politics. I only vaguely knew the name until he went off the rails and tried to talk young soldiers into defying orders.
Kelly cannot be questioned by the FBI relating to his crimes if he is charged under military law. The Navy has their own investigative service. I am sure you have seen their TV show. It none of the FBI's business as they are not empowered under military rules and regulation.
 
Federal law enforcement has no jurisdiction in the military. End of story. Civilian crimes ? Yes. Violations of the UCMJ? No f-ing way!
We don't know that Mark Kelly is only being investigated for military crimes. We know that his co-conspirators are being investigated for civilian crimes only. Of course, they would want to question him about those potential crimes as well as his own, if any.

Why do you want to skip the whole process and jump to a conclusion?

If they are innocent, they have nothing to worry about, sheesh!

Kelly cannot be questioned by the FBI relating to his crimes if he is charged under military law. The Navy has their own investigative service. I am sure you have seen their TV show.
The Navy's investigative service has a TV show? No, I used to work as a broadcast engineer, watching TV eight to twelve hours at a stretch. My wife and I did not replace our CRT TV when it gave out about twenty years ago and haven't missed sitting in front of the television since.
It none of the FBI's business as they are not empowered under military rules and regulation.
Again, many crimes can be investigated by either the military or the FBI. If a soldier takes his weapon and robs a bank with it, then kidnaps a teller and takes her across state lines in stolen car, I assure you that both the civilian and the military will be involved in the investigation.

Is this another deal where you will argue a ludicrous point and then pretend you were joking when you realize how foolish you sound, or are you going to stick with this one?
 
Last edited:
We don't know that Mark Kelly is only being investigated for military crimes. We know that his co-conspirators are being investigated for civilian crimes only. Of course, they would want to question him about those potential crimes as well as his own, if any.

Why do you want to skip the whole process and jump to a conclusion?

If they are innocent, they have nothing to worry about, sheesh!
None of them are under any obligation to say a damn thing to this sham "investigation". There is NOTHING to investigate. Whoever is giving Trump and Hegseth advice needs their head on a platter for being so reactionary and stupid.
 
I have a hard time believing any of these members of Congress cares that much about what Trump thinks.
It's the DNC, Marc Elias and company. They're the ones that run the playbook.
Who do you think came up with the charade?

He freaks out at the very thought that he has limitations on his authority as president, so I'd say that reveals some authoritarian tendencies.
No He freaks out over the lawfare from the lower courts attempting to restrict His agenda no matter what He does.
It's a ******* joke anymore.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom