Mac1958
Diamond Member
The alternate universe.How is reciting military law about unlawful orders sedition?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The alternate universe.How is reciting military law about unlawful orders sedition?
No he didn't. Bush was the anti gun president, not Reagan.His wife taking a bullet to the head had a lot to do with that
Even Reagan revised his views of the second amendment after he was shot
No he didn't. Bush was the anti gun president, not Reagan.
And westwall has left the chatRonald Reagan spoke several times in support of restrictions on automatic and assault-style weapons. The most commonly cited quote comes from a 1989 op-ed he co-wrote in the New York Times supporting the Brady Bill:
“This level of violence must be stopped. These weapons are not for sporting purposes or needed for the defense of the home.”
— Ronald Reagan, March 28, 1989
Another well-known line came in a 1991 letter urging Congress to pass the federal assault-weapons ban:
“I do not believe the Second Amendment prohibits restrictions on automatic weapons.”
— Letter to Rep. William Hughes, May 3, 1991
What did they say that was not factually true?
Drama Queen post of the day"Your honor, Senator Kelly dared to remind the military of their duty, which has also been communicated to them in the past, by the military. For that he deserves the death penalty".
Every recruit is told that they must disobey illegal orders.
Does it matter who tells them ?By members of congress, via social media? Apropos of nothing?
Yea **** the military code of justice!So yeah, put it on a 20 year old soldier to defy his commanding officer and chuck his career. That's just super advice. FFS you people are nuts.
Does it matter who tells them ?
They take an oath when they sign up that says just what these Congresspeople said
I agreeValkyrie!!!! Lol, this is so stupid
What the Congresspeople did was not an order stupid.Yes, it matters.
Soldiers take orders from their chain of command. Eric Swalwell and the other insurrectionists aren't part of that chain.
From a former Colonel: "I’m not sure I’ve ever been angrier at Democrats than I am right now.Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
Article 92 – Failure to Obey an Order
- Service members must obey lawful orders.
- An order must:
- Come from competent authority,
- Relate to military duty,
- Not violate the Constitution or laws of the United States.
An unlawful order is not protected by Article 92.
2. Duty to Disobey Unlawful Orders
U.S. military law has long held that personnel have an affirmative duty to refuse an order that is patently illegal.
This principle traces to:
- The Nuremberg Principles
- U.S. military case law (e.g., United States v. Calley regarding My Lai)
If you watch closely, they never said that.That President Trump has issued illegal orders.