Democrat Senator Mark Kelly Faces Court-Martial After Department of War Launches Review of Allegations of Misconduct

All of the people who said they cared about lawfare 5 seconds ago should be up in arms over this. Mark Kelly has a First Amendment right to express his opinion. This administration truly detest freedom of speech.

And people have the First to respond to Kelly. Correct?
 
Good. He's a true traitor. He has been bought by the chinese communist party for years.
Citing the Uniform Code of Military Justice means you'll be court marshaled under the Trump regime?

The blowhard's petty vendetta spree is pathetic.

Judge dismisses cases against James Comey, Letitia James

This baseless aspersion to wee wee up the MAGAts will also fizzle.
 
Last edited:
“You can refuse illegal orders,” or “You must refuse illegal orders,”
Military members can refuse unlawful orders (e.g., lack of authority), but not illegal orders (e.g., exceeding a posted speed limit).

Those who encourage the latter are guilty of sedition against the United States.
 
What these Democrat filth are doing is encouraging a form of military coup where service members get to decide not to do things they disagree with politically by pretending those otherwise lawful things are “unlawful.”

Democrats did not write the regulation on refusing to follow an unlawful order.

Reminding military members, especially in command positions is patriotic
 
All of the people who said they cared about lawfare 5 seconds ago should be up in arms over this. Mark Kelly has a First Amendment right to express his opinion. This administration truly detest freedom of speech.
He also has Constitutional protections as a member of Congress.
  • Clause 1 Pay, Privileges, and Immunities
  • The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
 
Military members can refuse unlawful orders (e.g., lack of authority), but not illegal orders (e.g., exceeding a posted speed limit).
Where did Kelly advocate exceeding speed limits?
 
He also has Constitutional protections as a member of Congress.
  • Clause 1 Pay, Privileges, and Immunities
  • The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

This is treason.
 
15th post
The alternate universe.
If you are an authoritarian criminal and you want to issue illegal orders, being reminded they don't have to be followed, is apparently sedition.
 
Thanks for proving how little you truly understand regarding this issue.
MAGA is so authoritarian they can convince their devotees that black is white, up is down, illegal orders mean legal orders.

Not everyone is so depraved as MAGA.
 
Back
Top Bottom