Democrat .. Respect for Life

[PaintMyHouse]

Human life having value is an assumption. A big one, and a wrong one.

Now that is a post for the ages.

It should be installed in the Leftist Museum of Ignorance....sorry for the redundancy.

Leftism and ignorance go together like a horse and carriage...or if you prefer, like peas and carrots.

Don't assume that humans matter. It's both very human and very wrong.

 

[Conservative65]

If you think republican women don't get abortions you're an idiot.

And until the day you have a fetus inside you for nine months, you really have no say with what a woman does with her body.

I do when the woman having the baby she said was her choice can't afford to support it and taxpayers like me are forced to do it.

 

[Conservative65]

If you think republican women don't get abortions you're an idiot.

And until the day you have a fetus inside you for nine months, you really have no say with what a woman does with her body.

As long as taxpayers are paying taxes they have a say. As long as you pay insurance premiums you have a say. As long as the Democratic Party represents death, you will be reminded....

I noticed the GOP did away with abortion when they were in power, hypocrite much?

It can't be done by majority rule dumbass. I'll let you guess the two ways it can be done.

 

[gipper]

So sex and baby killing go together in your limited mind.

No, it's just that a lot of people when they have that moment, aren't thinking about a rubber or taking contraception for a few weeks before doing the deed.

Sometimes, stuff just happens.

I always knew you were incapable of rational thought. Now you proved it.

Humans, in your small mind, are not capable of understanding their actions have consequences. They are like a dog in heat. Right?

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

[JoeB131]

Okay, now i'm convinced you've never gotten laid after that last diatribe.

 

[gipper]

Human life having value is an assumption. A big one, and a wrong one.

Now that is a post for the ages.

It should be installed in the Leftist Museum of Ignorance....sorry for the redundancy.

Leftism and ignorance go together like a horse and carriage...or if you prefer, like peas and carrots.

Don't assume that humans matter. It's both very human and very wrong.

Well of course the Left does not value human life. They prove it often. Abortion is just one example.

To the Left, the world would be so much better if we culled a few trillion humans. Then we could obtain their much desired utopia, while saving the planet from the scourge that is humankind.

 

[Roadrunner]

Human life having value is an assumption. A big one, and a wrong one.

Now that is a post for the ages.

It should be installed in the Leftist Museum of Ignorance....sorry for the redundancy.

Leftism and ignorance go together like a horse and carriage...or if you prefer, like peas and carrots.

Don't assume that humans matter. It's both very human and very wrong.

Well of course the Left does not value human life. They prove it often. Abortion is just one example.

To the Left, the world would be so much better if we culled a few trillion humans. Then we could obtain their much desired utopia, while saving the planet from the scourge that is humankind.

To the Left, there is no right to life until one is convicted of a heinous capital crime.

 

[JoeB131]

To the Left, there is no right to life until one is convicted of a heinous capital crime.

Well, yeah, and when you have 153 people who were convicted of heinous crimes they didn't commit, we truly wonder if the government should be making that call.

Which has nothing to with a woman's right to choose.

 

[gipper]

Okay, now i'm convinced you've never gotten laid after that last diatribe.

Libs refuse to accept the consequence of their actions.

You fit the lib stereotype perfectly.

 

[JoeB131]

Okay, now i'm convinced you've never gotten laid after that last diatribe.

Libs refuse to accept the consequence of their actions.

You fit the lib stereotype perfectly.

I'd have happily pay for any abortion for a pregnancy I caused. That's accepting consequences. I'd have also paid child support.

But ultimately, it was her choice. Not mine.

 

[gipper]

Human life having value is an assumption. A big one, and a wrong one.

Now that is a post for the ages.

It should be installed in the Leftist Museum of Ignorance....sorry for the redundancy.

Leftism and ignorance go together like a horse and carriage...or if you prefer, like peas and carrots.

Don't assume that humans matter. It's both very human and very wrong.

Well of course the Left does not value human life. They prove it often. Abortion is just one example.

To the Left, the world would be so much better if we culled a few trillion humans. Then we could obtain their much desired utopia, while saving the planet from the scourge that is humankind.

To the Left, there is no right to life until one is convicted of a heinous capital crime.

Yes.

To the lib, protecting a convicted murderer from state sanctioned death penalty, while promoting a woman's right to murder her offspring in the womb, is a perfectly sensible and logical position.

 

[JoeB131]

To the lib, protecting a convicted murderer from state sanctioned death penalty, while promoting a woman's right to murder her offspring in the womb, is a perfectly sensible and logical position.

again- the reason a lot of us are against the death penalty is that we've had too many cases where the wrong person almost got executed, not to mention that it's vastly more expensive than locking them up for the rest of their lives.

Meanwhile- and i know you have a hard time grasping this- you aren't going to ever make a woman give birth to a baby she doesn't want to give birth to.

Which is why women were never convicted of having abortions even before Roe. they'd never get a case to stand up in court.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you think republican women don't get abortions you're an idiot.

And until the day you have a fetus inside you for nine months, you really have no say with what a woman does with her body.

As long as taxpayers are paying taxes they have a say. As long as you pay insurance premiums you have a say. As long as the Democratic Party represents death, you will be reminded....

And you should be reminded that most Americans do not want Roe v Wade overturned.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Human life having value is an assumption. A big one, and a wrong one.

Now that is a post for the ages.

It should be installed in the Leftist Museum of Ignorance....sorry for the redundancy.

Leftism and ignorance go together like a horse and carriage...or if you prefer, like peas and carrots.

Don't assume that humans matter. It's both very human and very wrong.

Well of course the Left does not value human life. They prove it often. Abortion is just one example.

To the Left, the world would be so much better if we culled a few trillion humans. Then we could obtain their much desired utopia, while saving the planet from the scourge that is humankind.

To the Left, there is no right to life until one is convicted of a heinous capital crime.

Yes.

To the lib, protecting a convicted murderer from state sanctioned death penalty, while promoting a woman's right to murder her offspring in the womb, is a perfectly sensible and logical position.

So in your world, the woman would also be on death row, if she'd had that abortion?

Try to sell that to the American people.

 

[Seawytch]

Foolish, foolish "conservatives". Liberals want to end abortions just as much as conservatives do...the disagreement occurs when discussing how to bring about an end to all abortions. Abortions are not the problem, just a result of the problem. When we end unwanted pregnancies is when you will see abortions reduced dramatically. Banning abortions won't end them. Women will still get them. Rich women will pay their doctors exorbitant amounts of money to end their pregnancies safely while poor women will end up with someone like Gosling.

Ending abortions will mean more "Dr" Goslings because you would only be stopping the safe, legal regulated ones.

 

[chikenwing]

Funny that a lot of people who are "pro-life" as they put it, meaning against abortions, are pro-executions as well.

How can you be pro-life and support executions?

Do you understand the concept of innocence?

You've moved away from the point.

The point is, if you are PRO-LIFE doesn't that mean ALL LIFE?

It's not pro-life, it's not even pro-human life.

It's anti-abortion.

It doesn't matter whether a person is innocent or not. If you're "pro-life" then you should be supporting LIFE. Not the life that you choose.

It's not pro-life, it's not even pro-human life.
so it a gold fish?? so if a person supports capital punishment,yet is anti abortion in your mind they must do both ir it invalidates the anti abortion stance? is that your logic?

 

[Moonglow]

Human life having value is an assumption. A big one, and a wrong one.

Now that is a post for the ages.

It should be installed in the Leftist Museum of Ignorance....sorry for the redundancy.

Leftism and ignorance go together like a horse and carriage...or if you prefer, like peas and carrots.

Don't assume that humans matter. It's both very human and very wrong.

Well of course the Left does not value human life. They prove it often. Abortion is just one example.

To the Left, the world would be so much better if we culled a few trillion humans. Then we could obtain their much desired utopia, while saving the planet from the scourge that is humankind.

To the Left, there is no right to life until one is convicted of a heinous capital crime.

Yes.

To the lib, protecting a convicted murderer from state sanctioned death penalty, while promoting a woman's right to murder her offspring in the womb, is a perfectly sensible and logical position.

Except this liberal does not live by your pigeon holing....

 

[chikenwing]

Foolish, foolish "conservatives". Liberals want to end abortions just as much as conservatives do...the disagreement occurs when discussing how to bring about an end to all abortions. Abortions are not the problem, just a result of the problem. When we end unwanted pregnancies is when you will see abortions reduced dramatically. Banning abortions won't end them. Women will still get them. Rich women will pay their doctors exorbitant amounts of money to end their pregnancies safely while poor women will end up with someone like Gosling.

Ending abortions will mean more "Dr" Goslings because you would only be stopping the safe, legal regulated ones.

Really? so when a liberal say things like its not human,and many many do just that,your trying to convince people they want to end abortion?? really believe that ??

 

[gipper]

Now that is a post for the ages.

It should be installed in the Leftist Museum of Ignorance....sorry for the redundancy.

Leftism and ignorance go together like a horse and carriage...or if you prefer, like peas and carrots.

Don't assume that humans matter. It's both very human and very wrong.

Well of course the Left does not value human life. They prove it often. Abortion is just one example.

To the Left, the world would be so much better if we culled a few trillion humans. Then we could obtain their much desired utopia, while saving the planet from the scourge that is humankind.

To the Left, there is no right to life until one is convicted of a heinous capital crime.

Yes.

To the lib, protecting a convicted murderer from state sanctioned death penalty, while promoting a woman's right to murder her offspring in the womb, is a perfectly sensible and logical position.

Except this liberal does not live by your pigeon holing....

Good for you assglow.

Now tell me this, do you deny that many libs believe exactly what I stated?

 

[Seawytch]

Foolish, foolish "conservatives". Liberals want to end abortions just as much as conservatives do...the disagreement occurs when discussing how to bring about an end to all abortions. Abortions are not the problem, just a result of the problem. When we end unwanted pregnancies is when you will see abortions reduced dramatically. Banning abortions won't end them. Women will still get them. Rich women will pay their doctors exorbitant amounts of money to end their pregnancies safely while poor women will end up with someone like Gosling.

Ending abortions will mean more "Dr" Goslings because you would only be stopping the safe, legal regulated ones.

Really? so when a liberal say things like its not human,and many many do just that,your trying to convince people they want to end abortion?? really believe that ??

Yes, I really believe that. Nobody "likes" abortion and nobody wants to have one. You end abortion through science and education, not prohibition. Women have been having abortions since the beginning of time and will have them until the end of time. Liberals want them safe, legal and rare.

You reduce abortions by ending unwanted pregnancies, period.