Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

[Monk-Eye]

" Drivel Address Been There For Decades Sew Is There Anything Else "

* Complaining As An Insolent Simpleton About Robust Necessities And Jumping To Stale Conclusions *

Okay. I think you've been given enough rope and time to come up with a rational argument and, your needlessly complex, multi-syllabic verbiage not withstanding, shows what a whack-a doodle you are.
Your faulty reasoning not only condones abortion but would allow one to simply murder anyone who you find is not mentally aware (coma patients, seniors, victims of brain injuries, etc.) based on the fact they are not presently mentally cognizant. Therefore the State is free to kill them.
I'm done keeping you company. I've seen more than enough.

Individuals which have been born are entitled to due process of law , whether that be to remove their wright to life for having removed the wright to life of another as in the case of capital punishment , or whether to have life support removed , whereas a fetus has not incurred a wright to life by virtue of not having been born .

The roe v wade decided that post natural viability a state interest may begin and a state can proscribe abortion in the third trimester except for a few exceptions .

 

[HikerGuy83]

Blackmun was a blithering idiot on the principles of the Constitution.

Yes, he pretty much wiped is rear end with it.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Eponymous Black Mun Logically Of Course Is Too Much To Handle Or Address By Logical Fallacy Enthusiasts "

* Know Thing Nothing Two Too To State When Traitorous Heretic Shill Exposed *

Blackmun was a blithering idiot on the principles of the Constitution.

Yes, he pretty much wiped is rear end with it.

It is comical to see such dismissive caricatures as those haughtily perceiving that populism can not be redirected based on informed consent .

The proverbial bubble has burst for the abortion anti-choice cabal of so called constitutional originalists pushing " nor prohibited by it to us states " from us 10th amendment , and it is a matter of when and how fast the proverbial bubble will deflate and not if the proverbial bubble will burst and deflate .

By equitable doctrine with a live birth requirement to become a citizen in us 14th amendment , a live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen , whereby states are prohibited from proscribing abortion .

#AbortionChoiceRepublicans #ProChoiceRepublicans #UsRepublicans understand that #scotus decision of #dobbs is #dumbfounded jurisprudence and #sedition law against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments .

#dobbs is supported by #traitors to principles of us republic who , when informed of and understand the " logically , of course , a legitimate state interest .. not .. prior to live birth " explicative by blackmun , then continue with dumbfounded conviction to support sedition law against principles of us republic and against explicit laws - to include title 1 section 8 of us code , are committing violence against the citizens of us republic .

* Links To Beat Downs Available For Public Viewing Beyond Censors *

" Apparently Correct That Indifference Was Consistent With Advocacy "

* Looking Forward To The Realism *

Congratulations on being a witness to that implementation .

The twitter handles for the federalist society , the national republican lawyers , along with a myriad of many other front page public personas , including @realDonaldTrump on truth social , are wondering now about public updates of information by links to these recitations form the free press , which have been overtly omitted by political think tanks , pundits for and against , and by the entirety of jurisprudence and the press .

Then again , perhaps there is not any money for lawyers or charities in settled law .

Then again , any citizen has legal standing that the equal protection clause is being violated , based on a live birth requirement in us 14th amendment .


* Links Are Easy To Embed Got Reader Ship *

9942 - Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

Applying THe Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction

* Applying The Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of A Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction * * Opening Post Subjective Objective Sew Gnomon * The term right is a faux pas of diction , as to equivocate the term right with a mathematical norm leads to a contradiction ...

www.usmessageboard.com

Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade " * On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism * The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom...

www.usmessageboard.com

Abortion Anti-Choice Poster Child Pleads For Dismissal Of Homicide Based On Dobbs Decision

" Abortion Anti-Choice Poster Child Pleads For Dismissal Of Homicide Based On Dobbs Decision " * Opening Post Circumstance As A Premise Of Contention * https://www.yahoo.com/news/pro-life-murderer-james-kopp-085600908.html Pro-life murderer James Kopp says conviction should be tossed because...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Chuz Life]

Thread 'Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade'

Sep 21, 2020

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade "

* On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism *

The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom wrote the majority opinion on roe v wade , ' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth." .


* Deeper Analysis *...

• Monk-Eye
• Replies: 48
• Forum: Law and Justice System

From your own link.

"(c)
Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section."

1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Monk-Eye]

" An Actual Legal Victim Versus Conjectural Legal Nonsense "

* Nothing To See Here *

Thread 'Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade'

Sep 21, 2020

" Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade "

* On Behalf Of Pro Choice Republican Constitutionalism *

The next nominee for us supreme court should be asked to explain the following statement from justice blackmun whom wrote the majority opinion on roe v wade , ' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth." .


* Deeper Analysis *...

• Monk-Eye
• Replies: 48
• Forum: Law and Justice System

From your own link.
"(c)
Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section."

1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant

www.law.cornell.edu

No constitutional rite exists , and none is construed to affirm , deny , expand , or contract any legal status or legal right .

All related offenses are against the mother and applicable penalties should apply .

 

[Chuz Life]

 

[Blaster]

Blackmun wasn't qualified to serve on SCOTUS.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Trolls Challenged By Simple Interpretation Of A Sentence "

* Independence Of The Individual Clause *

View attachment 1143643

The title 1 section 8 of us code does not affirm , deny , expand , or contract any legal status or legal rite , which means those not " born alive " are not included in the definition of a person and are not entitled to constitutional protections according to us 14th amendment .

All related offenses are against the mother and applicable penalties should apply .

1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant

www.law.cornell.edu

(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section.

Previously answered in post #45 - Demand Any Nomination For Us Supreme Court Justice Explain Blackmun ' Logically Of Course ' Statement From Roe V Wade .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" On Wit And Wisdom From Homeless Schizophrenics "

" Witless Intimations Of Traitors Against Us Constitution And Republic "

Blackmun wasn't qualified to serve on SCOTUS.

The constitutional protections of a us citizen are instantiated through a live birth requirement , and states do not have the power to abrogate the enumerated rite to equal protection with a citizen which includes its non incidental requirement for live birth , which means that states are prohibited from providing constitutional protections to any which has not been " born alive " , which also means states cannot proscribe abortion .

None needs to explain a logically of course statement to a supreme court justice or anyone for that matter , while bands of idiots contested for precedence through a public narrative for a nonsense rite to privacy - add CLOWN SHOES .

' Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth." .