Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[WEATHER53]

Any judges overturning congress?
It’s absurd to let one local district member of a huge body step on POTUS

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Any judges overturning congress?
It’s absurd to let one local district member of a huge body step on POTUS

One judge is the judiciary.

The President is the executive.

You have no point.

 

[kyzr]

They are called "Inferior Courts" in the Constitution for a reason.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

They are called "Inferior Courts" in the Constitution for a reason.

They still are parts of the judiciary with all the rights and powers of their position. Your bitching is meaningless.

 

[Delldude]

They still are parts of the judiciary with all the rights and powers of their position. Your bitching is meaningless.

And they are overstepping their authority.

 

[wamose]

A Democratic victory next year would become inevitable.

That would result in an impeachment and a possible conviction.

The wild card would be the military.

The health, maybe even the existence of our country, cannot survive another Democrat victory

 

[Delldude]

The health, maybe even the existence of our country, cannot survive another Democrat victory

Here's how you do it......run around the country spreading falsehoods about the current administration and what they're uncovering, use the courts to delay their work, agitate your base and hopefully take back control in the legislative branch, then quietly make the findings go away.

That's how they cover their asses.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The health, maybe even the existence of our country, cannot survive another Democrat victory

A Democratic victory is required for the continuance of traditional America.

 

[Delldude]

A Democratic victory is required for the continuance of traditional America.

You mean Marxist don't you?

 

[Flopper]

Someone needs tell Trump that federal judices are not responsible to the Supreme Court.

 

[Flopper]

And they are overstepping their authority.

I think you'll find federal district court judges have a lot of authority. They can interpret federal laws and determine when they apply and when they don't. They have the power to determine constitutionality. And they have the power to enforce their rulings.

Today, a federal appeals court upheld the lower court ruling. They denied the Trump administration’s request to lift a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the Trump administration from deporting immigrants using the Alien Enemies Act.

The president’s use of this wartime authority for immigration enforcement is as unprecedented as it is lawless, with the Trump administration trying to deport people to overseas prisons without any judicial review or due process. It is not only a violation the 5th amendment but violates federal law.

The decision means that hundreds of individuals remain protected from being sent to a notorious black-hole prison in a foreign country, without any due process whatsoever. Finely, American Justice prevails.

Federal Appeals Court Keeps Block on Trump Use of Alien Enemies Act to Deport Immigrants | American Civil Liberties Union

WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court has denied the Trump administration’s request to lift a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the Trump...

www.aclu.org

 

[Delldude]

I think you'll find federal district court judges have a lot of authority. They can interpret federal laws and determine when they apply and when they don't. They have the power to determine constitutionality. And they have the power to enforce their rulings.

Today, a federal appeals court upheld the lower court ruling. They denied the Trump administration’s request to lift a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the Trump administration from deporting immigrants using the Alien Enemies Act.

The president’s use of this wartime authority for immigration enforcement is as unprecedented as it is lawless, with the Trump administration trying to deport people to overseas prisons without any judicial review or due process. It is not only a violation the 5th amendment but violates federal law.

The decision means that hundreds of individuals remain protected from being sent to a notorious black-hole prison in a foreign country, without any due process whatsoever. Finely, American Justice prevails.

Federal Appeals Court Keeps Block on Trump Use of Alien Enemies Act to Deport Immigrants | American Civil Liberties Union

WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court has denied the Trump administration’s request to lift a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the Trump...

www.aclu.org

Still outside their lane.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Someone needs tell Trump that federal judices are not responsible to the Supreme Court.

Um... what?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Today, a federal appeals court upheld the lower court ruling. They denied the Trump administration’s request to lift a temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking the Trump administration from deporting immigrants using the Alien Enemies Act.

There was no lower court ruling, there was an injunction.
The appeals court chose to not stay the injunction.
Neither court ruled on the merits of the case.

 

[kyzr]

Someone needs tell Trump that federal judges are not responsible to the Supreme Court.

You need to prove that idiotic statement. The USSC is the top of the legal food chain, period.

 

[kyzr]

There was no lower court ruling, there was an injunction.
The appeals court chose to not stay the injunction.
Neither court ruled on the merits of the case.

The DOJ needs to tell Trump to ignore that bullshit ruling.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Someone needs tell Trump that federal judices are not responsible to the Supreme Court.

Judges must follow SCOTUS, yes.

 

[Flopper]

There was no lower court ruling, there was an injunction.
The appeals court chose to not stay the injunction.
Neither court ruled on the merits of the case.

The ruling was to issue a temporary injunction. And the appeals court agreed to maintain the injunction.

This case should go to the Supreme Court and I hope it does however, it may not. Trump may well decide he doesn't want to be shot down again by the federal courts. Chief Justice Roberts previously rebuked Trump plus the Supreme Court often upholds appellate court decisions, strongly favors anther loss in court.

Even if the DOJ doesn’t push the case, the Supreme Court might still intervene due to Trump’s clear misuse of the Alien Enemies Act.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The ruling was to issue a temporary injunction. And the appeals court agreed to maintain the injunction.

It was an order, not a ruling.
Neither court heard the case on its merits.

This case should go to the Supreme Court and I hope it does however, it may not.

For that to happen it has to be heard by a district court, ruled on, appealed to an appellate court, ruled on, and then appealed to the SC. None of that has taken place.

Even if the DOJ doesn’t push the case, the Supreme Court might still intervene due to Trump’s clear misuse of the Alien Enemies Act.

The money is on "no".

 

[Flopper]

It was an order, not a ruling.
Neither court heard the case on its merits.

For that to happen it has to be heard by a district court, ruled on, appealed to an appellate court, ruled on, and then appealed to the SC. None of that has taken place.

The money is on "no".

The case was brought to the district court by the plaintiff, the ACLU. The DOJ appear for government but failed to adequately answer the judges questions and the government continued with it's deportation plans which lead to the injunction.

Yes, the Supreme Court can take on a case that ended in an injunction, especially if the injunction is considered a final order or if there's a dispute over the injunction's scope or legality. The Supreme Court is limited only by procedures not the laws in selecting cases to review. In other words, the court has great latitude when it comes to selecting cases.