Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[Flopper]

Issues in his district. (we're discussing district judges over-stepping their authority)

Criminal cases are tried in a federal district where the arrest occurred, however that is not written in stone. A civil case will be tried in the district in which the suit is filed. Since the judges ruling will be based of federal law, it can be filed in any federal district. The decision of the court will be based on federal law and thus it's scope is federal, not district.

 

[kyzr]

Criminal cases are tried in a federal district where the arrest occurred, however that is not written in stone. A civil case will be tried in the district in which the suit is filed. Since the judges ruling will be based of federal law, it can be filed in any federal district. The decision of the court will be based on federal law and thus it's scope is federal, not district.

Point being that the ACLU judge shops to liberal districts.
The deportations to El Salvadore were from TX, yet the suit was filed in DC not TX.
Districts that take "Lawfare" cases out of their district need to be defunded by congress.

 

[Flopper]

And what is the lane of federal judge?

I've heard of judge shopping but how does that work. The planiff does not get to pick the judge There are 94 federal districts and 677 judges. That averages out to about 7 judges per district. The chief judge of a district is responsible for assigning cases but standard procedure is assign the next judge that is free.

Picking or shopping for judges might have been possible, say in 1910 when there were only 78 federal courts and only 153 judges. Having about 2 judges per court and sometimes only 1, judge shopping might be easy but not today.

 

[kyzr]

I've heard of judge shopping but how does that work. The planiff does not get to pick the judge There are 94 federal districts and 677 judges. That's averages out to about 7 judges per district. The chief judge of a district is responsible for assigning cases but standard procedure is assign the next judge that is free.
Picking or shopping for judges might have benn possible in say 1910 when there were only 78 federal courts and only 153 judges. Having about 2 judges per court, judge shopping might be easy but not today.

A federal judge in Washington who has caught the ire of President Trump for his role in the case involving the deportation of alleged gang members will also preside over a case involving the administration's use of a messaging app to discuss military operations.

https://www.npr.org/2025/03/26/nx-s1-5341540/boasberg-trump-signal-national-security-atlantic-lawsuit

Federal judge who drew Trump's anger picks up new case against administration​

As the chief judge of a federal district court, Boasberg has dealt with legal matters involving Trump in the past. Notably, he ruled that former Vice President Mike Pence had to testify in front of a grand jury in the Justice Department's probe into the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

So the Chief Judge can just take the cases he wants. Shoots your post #303 in the ass, huh?

 

[Flopper]

A federal judge in Washington who has caught the ire of President Trump for his role in the case involving the deportation of alleged gang members will also preside over a case involving the administration's use of a messaging app to discuss military operations.

https://www.npr.org/2025/03/26/nx-s1-5341540/boasberg-trump-signal-national-security-atlantic-lawsuit

Federal judge who drew Trump's anger picks up new case against administration​

As the chief judge of a federal district court, Boasberg has dealt with legal matters involving Trump in the past. Notably, he ruled that former Vice President Mike Pence had to testify in front of a grand jury in the Justice Department's probe into the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

So the Chief Judge can just take the cases he wants. Shoots your post #303 in the ass, huh?

Cases are typical assigned base on availability. However the Chief Judge can take any case he chooses. Since Chief Judges are most often the most experience judges they often take high profile cases.

Boasberg is known as one of the least partisan judges on the federal bench and has had favorable ruling in cases involving the president, for example his lenient punishments of Jan 6th rioter. And in Trump’s first term, he released FISA court materials that exposed huge problems with the FBI’s probe into connections between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia’s election meddling. He also paved the way for conservative groups to obtain some of Hillary Clinton’s emails from her private server. Republicans were praising him and democrats were questioning his objectivity.

The head of the local bar association describe him as "A judge you knew when you went into court with him, that he was going to follow the rules. He is very predictable because he followed the law. He is not a rash judge at all."

Of all head judges, he has one the lowest rates of overturned cases.

‘Principled and fair’: Judge Boasberg had nonpartisan record before facing Trump’s fury

He’s a former law school roommate of Brett Kavanaugh and his personality has poked through his rulings with quirky references to Star Trek and Fugees lyrics.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Flopper]

Point being that the ACLU judge shops to liberal districts.
The deportations to El Salvadore were from TX, yet the suit was filed in DC not TX.
Districts that take "Lawfare" cases out of their district need to be defunded by congress.

I've heard of judge shopping but how does that work. The planiff does not get to pick the judge There are 94 federal districts and 677 judges. That averages out to about 7 judges per district. The chief judge of a district is responsible for assigning cases but standard procedure is assign the next judge that is free.

Picking or shopping for judges might have been possible, say in 1910 when there were only 78 federal courts and only 153 judges. Having about 2 judges per court and sometimes only 1, judge shopping might be easy but not today.

 

[kyzr]

Cases are typically assigned base on availability. However the Chief Judge can take any case he chooses. Since Chief Judges are most often the most experience judges they often take high profile cases.
Boasberg is known as one of the least partisan judges on the federal bench and has had favorable ruling in cases involving the president, for example his lenient punishments of Jan 6th rioter. And in Trump’s first term, he released FISA court materials that exposed huge problems with the FBI’s probe into connections between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia’s election meddling. He also paved the way for conservative groups to obtain some of Hillary Clinton’s emails from her private server. Republicans were praising him and democrats were questioning his objectivity.
The head of the local bar association describe him as "A judge you knew when you went into court with him, that he was going to follow the rules. He is very predictable because he followed the law. He is not a rash judge at all."
Of all head judges, he has one the lowest rates of overturned cases.

That is all well and good, but Boasberg is doing the country a disservice protecting violent criminal illegal gang-members from deportation, all because he wants to provide legal protections at the taxpayers' expense when the US has limited resources.
The USSC needs to step up and restore Constitutionality to the process, district judges cannot be allowed to thwart a president's Article 2 powers.

 

[Edgetho]

Our judicial system has a method of correcting such overreach by judges. A district judge's decision can always be overturned by a court of appeals and the court of appeals decision can be overturned by the Supreme Court. So most of these wild decision by district judges are corrected by a higher court.

By statute, the chief judge of each district court has the responsibility to enforce the court's rules and orders on case. In addition the chief judge makes all assignment of cases, court rooms, and other resources. He or she answers to the president of United States, probably indirectly through the DOJ. When selecting judges for promotion or moving to other districts, the chief judge's recommendation is very import.

Although a chief judge of a district does not officially have the power to discipline a wayward judge, he can make life for that judge pretty unpleasant. That judge could find himself doing nothing but bail hearings and handling federal misdemeanors.

You mean like Merchan and/or Engoron in New Yawk? Where the persecutor made up a law just to persecute OMB out of whole cloth? Totes made up. A never used, never heard of Law and the Judges did -- Nothing about it. Went along with it. Even the scumbags on SCOTUS let them sentence him -- On a Made-Up, never heard of, never used before Law.

For the first time in American History, a sitting President is sentenced by a Pip-Squeak, Horse Shit, Local-Yokel Judge.

And you're okay with that? As long as it's somebody else's Ox being gored, I'm sure you are. As usual

The Judiicial Branch is out of control. SCOTUS doesn't seem willing to bring them to heel so the next step is to limit or even destroy their power. Which they have too much of.

The Judicial Branch IS The Deep State. Lawyers are a major, major, MAJOR problem in this Country and they need to be de-fanged.

Dick The Butcher has always been my favorite Shakespearean character anyway.

 

[Edgetho]

That is all well and good, but Boasberg is doing the country a disservice protecting violent criminal illegal gang-members from deportation, all because he wants to provide legal protections at the taxpayers' expense when the US has limited resources.
The USSC needs to step up and restore Constitutionality to the process, district judges cannot be allowed to thwart a president's Article 2 powers.

Something people need to understand..... There is no honor in the Legal Profession. They will lie, mis-lead, withold evidence..... They only care about winning.

Lawyers have no friends other than other lawyers and the whole crew is a den of thieves. They know they can't trust each other because they'll back-stab their bestest buddy at the first chance and they know their BFF will do it to them if they get the chance.

I had a lot of Lawyers as clients in my business. States Attorneys, Plaintiffs Attorneys, Divorce Attorneys, Criminal Attorneys and the worst of the Lot -- Public Defenders.

We can't eliminate the profession. It is a necessary evil in a democracy. But make no mistake..... The emphasis is on the word 'evil'.

Lawyers are like Vultures; necessary in a healthy eco-system, but you don't want to invite them to dinner.

If a Country lets Lawyers get too much control, it is a sure sign of a Terminally Diseased society that is on its last leg.

Which is why many Countries strictly regulate the number of lawyers allowed to operate within its borders. And I'm not talking about totalitarian States. Japan comes to mind. And there are others.... I think India, maybe Spain and Germany.

Why do you think the biggest contributor, BY FAR, to the dimocrap scum Party is -- Lawyers? Does anybody think that's an accident??

We can get control of our Judicial system or we can watch our Country detoriate into a shithole.

Trump wants to but he's gonna need a lot of support.

 

[Flopper]

That is all well and good, but Boasberg is doing the country a disservice protecting violent criminal illegal gang-members from deportation, all because he wants to provide legal protections at the taxpayers' expense when the US has limited resources.
The USSC needs to step up and restore Constitutionality to the process, district judges cannot be allowed to thwart a president's Article 2 powers.

The fact is you don't know that any of what you have been told is true because everyone of those people were denied their constitution right of due process. No court herd their pleas of not being in any gang, not being guilty of any crime, having no outstanding warrants, and even the claims of not being the the person ICE claimed they were.

It may take years, but the truth will all come out, the governments fight to keep them away from loved ones and lawyers and finally the rush to get them out of the country before the courts could stop the flights. The Trump administration has now acknowledged in court that many of the men sent to El Salvador do not have U.S. criminal records.

An ‘administrative error’ sent a Maryland man to an El Salvador prison, ICE says​

Eventually it will all leak out just as it did in the NAZI death camps, the Japanese Interment Camps, the prison camps in the Boar War, and the Soviet Gulags.

It seems very likely the Supreme Court is going to agree with both lower courts and put an end to Trump violations of the constitution and US law. However, it's going to come too late for those who are innocent and already delivered to those hell holes they call prisons where no get's out alive.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[g5000]

Trump was elected... Judges are not...

Judges are appointed by elected officials, or they are elected.

There is a reason they are beyond the reach of public passions, and you are all demonstrating exactly why.

You all really need to read the Federalist Papers.

Someone is filling your heads with a lot of bullshit.

 

[g5000]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country

When someone breaks the law or violates the Constitution, such as the separation of powers, and they are prosecuted or directed to stop their unconstitutional actions, guess what?

That's not lawfare.

For example, if someone foments a coup and tries to overthrow our democracy, being held accountable for that is not lawfare.

Your propagandists invented that term for you weak-minded rubes to run with.

 

[g5000]

This independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the Constitution and the rights of individuals from the effects of those ill humors, which the arts of designing men, or the influence of particular conjunctures, sometimes disseminate among the people themselves, and which, though they speedily give place to better information, and more deliberate reflection, have a tendency, in the meantime, to occasion dangerous innovations in the government, and serious oppressions of the minor party in the community. Though I trust the friends of the proposed Constitution will never concur with its enemies, in questioning that fundamental principle of republican government, which admits the right of the people to alter or abolish the established Constitution, whenever they find it inconsistent with their happiness, yet it is not to be inferred from this principle, that the representatives of the people, whenever a momentary inclination happens to lay hold of a majority of their constituents, incompatible with the provisions in the existing Constitution, would, on that account, be justifiable in a violation of those provisions; or that the courts would be under a greater obligation to connive at infractions in this shape, than when they had proceeded wholly from the cabals of the representative body. Until the people have, by some solemn and authoritative act, annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon themselves collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption, or even knowledge, of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives in a departure from it, prior to such an act. But it is easy to see, that it would require an uncommon portion of fortitude in the judges to do their duty as faithful guardians of the Constitution, where legislative invasions of it had been instigated by the major voice of the community.

But it is not with a view to infractions of the Constitution only, that the independence of the judges may be an essential safeguard against the effects of occasional ill humors in the society. These sometimes extend no farther than to the injury of the private rights of particular classes of citizens, by unjust and partial laws. Here also the firmness of the judicial magistracy is of vast importance in mitigating the severity and confining the operation of such laws. It not only serves to moderate the immediate mischiefs of those which may have been passed, but it operates as a check upon the legislative body in passing them; who, perceiving that obstacles to the success of iniquitous intention are to be expected from the scruples of the courts, are in a manner compelled, by the very motives of the injustice they meditate, to qualify their attempts. This is a circumstance calculated to have more influence upon the character of our governments, than but few may be aware of. The benefits of the integrity and moderation of the judiciary have already been felt in more States than one; and though they may have displeased those whose sinister expectations they may have disappointed, they must have commanded the esteem and applause of all the virtuous and disinterested. Considerate men, of every description, ought to prize whatever will tend to beget or fortify that temper in the courts: as no man can be sure that he may not be to-morrow the victim of a spirit of injustice, by which he may be a gainer to-day. And every man must now feel, that the inevitable tendency of such a spirit is to sap the foundations of public and private confidence, and to introduce in its stead universal distrust and distress.

The Avalon Project : Federalist No 78

avalon.law.yale.edu

"ill humors" and "the arts of designing men" is the perfect definition of Trump.
"Considerate men, of every description, ought to prize whatever will tend to beget or fortify that temper in the courts: as no man can be sure that he may not be to-morrow the victim of a spirit of injustice, by which he may be a gainer to-day."

Translation: What goes around, comes around.

When a judge rules you way, he's a constitutional scholar. When he rules against you, he's an activist judge and should burn in hell.

 

[g5000]

Il Duce has neutered the People's legislative branch and is now trying to neuter the judicial branch.

His followers are marching in jackbooted lockstep right behind him.

 

[kyzr]

Il Duce has neutered the People's legislative branch and is now trying to neuter the judicial branch.
His followers are marching in jackbooted lockstep right behind him.

So what branchare you from?
The low-IQ, open borders, woke, DEI, reparations, green, anti-military, anti-God, tranny party?

 

[g5000]

So what branchare you from?
The low-IQ, open borders, woke, DEI, reparations, green, anti-military, anti-God, tranny party?

Nope.

I'm from the fiscally responsible, morally conservative, common sense, critical thinking party.

Which was the Republican party which no longer exists.

 

[WEATHER53]

So what branchare you from?
The low-IQ, open borders, woke, DEI, reparations, green, anti-military, anti-God, tranny party?

He’s from the 12 paid posts and then gone branch

 

[Edgetho]

So what branchare you from?
The low-IQ, open borders, woke, DEI, reparations, green, anti-military, anti-God, tranny party?

The same as every other dimocrap -- Anti American

 

[Edgetho]

The fact is you don't know that any of what you have been told is true because everyone of those people were denied their constitution right of due process. No court herd their pleas of not being in any gang, not being guilty of any crime, having no outstanding warrants, and even the claims of not being the the person ICE claimed they were.

It may take years, but the truth will all come out, the governments fight to keep them away from loved ones and lawyers and finally the rush to get them out of the country before the courts could stop the flights. The Trump administration has now acknowledged in court that many of the men sent to El Salvador do not have U.S. criminal records.

An ‘administrative error’ sent a Maryland man to an El Salvador prison, ICE says​

Eventually it will all leak out just as it did in the NAZI death camps, the Japanese Interment Camps, the prison camps in the Boar War, and the Soviet Gulags.

It seems very likely the Supreme Court is going to agree with both lower courts and put an end to Trump violations of the constitution and US law. However, it's going to come too late for those who are innocent and already delivered to those hell holes they call prisons where no get's out alive.

Time to start playing Cowboys and Lawyers?