Darwin destroyed in new book

[rightwinger]

This may come as a shock to you but in the many decades since Darwin lived, science has made lots of progress in the field.


You may feel the Cambrian explosion causes problems for evolution but that is a minority opinion of those with a bias to confirm. Sorry.


What a surprise that science is complex and that complexity grows as we learn more. Doesn't negate the basic premise that horses evolved:

As the number of equid fossils has increased, the actual evolutionary progression from Eohippus to Equus has been discovered to be much more complex and multibranched than was initially supposed. Detailed fossil information on the rate and distribution of new equid species has also revealed that the progression between species was not as smooth and consistent as was once believed.​

​

Although some transitions were indeed gradual progressions, a number of others were relatively abrupt in geologic time, taking place over only a few million years. Both anagenesis, a gradual change in an entire population ‘s gene frequency, and cladogenesis, a population “splitting” into two distinct evolutionary branches, occurred, and many species coexisted with “ancestor” species at various times.​

​

Darwin was a GENIUS
His realization about the similarities and evolution of species over time was groundbreaking

The religious powers of the time considered him a heretic

 

[Dadoalex]

Well, that ;is even easier to dismiss

1)There is not just 1 evolution !!!!
2) Until YOU distinguish micro-evolution (the breeds of dogs)from Macro,No one knows what you are defending
3) And 'common ancestor' is the surely disproved aspect of any evolulutionary theory. Even Gould said that the Cambrian explosions destoryed gradualist views of evolution

25 million years might be gradual at the galactic level but at the genetic level it is 100Million generations.

 

[DudleySmith]

Darwin was a GENIUS
His realization about the similarities and evolution of species over time was groundbreaking

The religious powers of the time considered him a heretic

Darwinism isn't about 'evolution', it's about adaption, and of course you and others don't have the first clue what the differences are. And,you've obviously never been schooled on all the work done by European monasteries re agricultural advances and animal breeding.

Genetic inheritance studies using scientific method were pioneered by a Christian Monk.

The Monk Who Discovered Heredity In a Grain of Pea

Johann Mendel was born in 1822, in a small village in the Austrian Empire, to a family of limited means. His farmer parents struggled to pay for his education, but despite this, young Mendel graduated from high-school with honors. At the university he chose courses in physics, mathematics and...

davidson.weizmann.ac.il

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

aaah, but that was an innovaton upon Darwin, HE NEVER SAID THAT. Nor did he extend evolution to include the universe.
Get an education. He completely rejected any explanation of where that first living thing came from . So do you

DON"T YOU REMEMBER
the cover story in Europe's leading science magazine, New Scientist, admitting that Darwin was wrong about the tree of life.

Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life

This "Tree of Life" sketch is seen in Darwin's "B" notebook, at a press preview of the new "Darwin" exhibition at the American Museum of Natural History November 15, 2005 in New York City Read our related editorial: Uprooting Darwin's tree IN JULY 1837, Charles Darwin had a flash of inspiration...

www.newscientist.com

Lies. Darwin sided with abiogenesis, like virtually all intelligent, educated people.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

2) Until YOU distinguish micro-evolution (the breeds of dogs)from Macro,No one knows what you are defending

Nobody has to do this, because these are made up concepts that are wholly unimportant to the theory of evolution.

 

[DudleySmith]

Lies. Darwin sided with abiogenesis, like virtually all intelligent, educated people.

You meant mathematically ignorant butt stupid believers in wild magical fantasies and impossible probabilities.

 

[alang1216]

Darwin was a GENIUS
His realization about the similarities and evolution of species over time was groundbreaking

The religious powers of the time considered him a heretic

Was Wallace also a genius?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You meant mathematically ignorant butt stupid believers in wild magical fantasies and impossible probabilities.

Hmm, no, sorry. The world of intelligent and educated people has apparently passed you by.

It cracks me up when fools who would fail a 7th grade science quiz insist it is everyone else who is stupid. Good stuff.

 

[Libby von H]

You seem to be confused by the difference between Artificial Selection (which is man-made) and Natural Selection (which occurs naturally in the environment).

Artificial Selection is a controlled experiment that proves the existence of Natural Selection.

The existence of Natural Selection in no way dimishes the probability that G-d exists.

Having had about 10 animals of different breeds, your claim is stupid.
A Border Colllie and a Lab and Lhasa Apso are not proof of Natural Selection at all.
Artificial Selection as the pet breeders see it NEVER goes outside Cat or Dog

You are a moron (though still human, I don't subscribe to variation is evoltion

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Was Wallace also a genius?

Of course. But even geniuses can be fooled by magical hoo ha.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Having had about 10 animals of different breeds, your claim is stupid.
A Border Colllie and a Lab and Lhasa Apso are not proof of Natural Selection at all.
Artificial Selection as the pet breeders see it NEVER goes outside Cat or Dog

You are a moron (though still human, I don't subscribe to variation is evoltion

Wow. What an incredibly stupid post.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Darwinism isn't about 'evolution', it's about adaption,

Well there is the dumbest post of the thread. And it's not close.

You people shouldn't even be commenting on evolution.

 

[rightwinger]

Having had about 10 animals of different breeds, your claim is stupid.
A Border Colllie and a Lab and Lhasa Apso are not proof of Natural Selection at all.
Artificial Selection as the pet breeders see it NEVER goes outside Cat or Dog

You are a moron (though still human, I don't subscribe to variation is evoltion

Now
Explain it through a creationist point of view

 

[sparky]

actually Western Civilization until recently reversed that
Natural THeology shows there must be a Creator, by reason.

more, for a reason Libby

~S~

 

[DudleySmith]

Hmm, no, sorry. The world of intelligent and educated people has apparently passed you by.

It cracks me up when fools who would fail a 7th grade science quiz insist it is everyone else who is stupid. Good stuff.

Yes, we know you have no clue about the ridiculously exponential odds against your idiot claims ever happening. That's because you've never taken a math course or a science course.

 

[DudleySmith]

Well there is the dumbest post of the thread. And it's not close.

You people shouldn't even be commenting on evolution.

And now you prove you've never even read Darwin's own writings. Again no surprise; sexual deviants have a fear of bout theology and science, since neither back up their agenda of 'normalizing' homosexual fetishism, raping kiddies, and sexual mutilation fetishes. Anybody who doesn't know scientists distinguish between evolution and adaptation has no business babbling the idiot bullshit you parrot here.

 

[DudleySmith]

more, for a reason Libby

View attachment 932725

View attachment 932726
~S~

The artist who came up with that ape to human progression drawing has himself said it was faked and he deliberately made the extinct species of apes look a lot closer to human appearances than the bones themselves would indicate. There are 'links' portrayed that don't exist in the fossil record in that drawing as well. Same with all the other drawings of dinosaurs, pulled completely out of the artists' asses.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

DARWIN'S BLUFF

Darwin Was a Loser Before He Was Recast as a Legend​

The Myth was not the man. A new book
shows this in Darwin’s own words.

Darwin Was a Loser Before He Was Recast as a Legend – CEH

crev.info

View attachment 932377

I never read “Origin” and now regret that. Bears evolved into whales?

The central claims of “evolution” and “natural selection” are illogical and mathematically impossible. Moreover, they assume that an unaware, dead Universe has an underlying drive for life, improvement and self awareness

 

[Libby von H]

Darwin was a GENIUS
His realization about the similarities and evolution of species over time was groundbreaking

The religious powers of the time considered him a heretic

A triple false.Give that man a prize.
He was considered a complete fraud by geologists
Grounbreaking,yes, but made on almost all poor points, as he himself admitted
And you always make that same mistake : You can only be a heretic about a point of Faith.

If a citizen, member of a country and state, even a high up non-Chuch official (or Church official if not in an official capacity) says 'boo' about something, you always say that nothing counts in that except that they are religious. Yet in history it is rare to find that attitude. They happened to be Christian and they thought he was wrong. By your ILlogic everyone who was not-Christian and accepted Darwin did it because they were not Christian.

 

[luiza]

Just a snippet from the opening and setting out his real roots . Pearls to swine etc .

Why does it matter that Darwin came from these lines? Well, ask yourself why they are hiding it. The answer is obvious:-- because they want you to think Darwin proceeded on merit, not on preference.They don't want you realizing he advanced on a series of byes and was promoted heavily from the cradle to do exactly what he did.
It was no accident or choice of Darwin himself. Although he wasn't a total fraud, in many ways he was just another frontman, chosen as the face of this particular project to keep your eyes off bigger names. And those names we have now just seen: Stanley, Howard, Paget,Stuart, Egerton. The same ones we always see. We are only missing Cohen.We have all the usual signs of this. Although we now know these families were all Phoenicians,children of El, we are told the Darwins were Unitarians. You will say, “What do you mean, we know they were Phoenicians?” Well, they admit the Darwins were top Freemasons. Charles' grandfatherErasmus was one of the ranking Masons in the British Isles, being head of the Time Immemorial Lodge, #2 in Scotland.
There is his coat of arms. Oh, what is that on top?
Wiki tells us it is a demi-griffin, but there is no such thing as a demi-griffin. That is a Phoenix. He is holding in his claws a scallop.
What does the scallop signify in masonry?
Exactly what you would think: secrecy.
Same thing with the Latin: e conchisomnia: everything out of conches, or shells.
In other words, everything a big psyop.
Many sources have been planted, assuring us Erasmus was talking about the seashells seen on mountaintops—proof of evolution. But that is just a cover story. He meant nothing of the sort."

Read on for trouble and Wallace