Daily kos poll

[Mr.Fitnah]

Has the Coakly Brown race a tie
Daily Kos :: State of the Nation

FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE
VERY FAV FAV UNFAV VERY UNFAV NO OPINION
COAKLEY 23 35 16 15 11
BROWN 18 33 18 12 19
KENNEDY 17 21 23 21 18


Martha Coakley
FAV UNFAV NO OPINION
ALL 58 31 11
MEN 52 38 10
WOMEN 64 24 12
DEMOCRATS 85 8 7
REPUBLICANS 16 63 21
INDEPENDENTS 52 37 11
18-29 64 24 12
30-44 60 30 10
45-59 54 35 11
60+ 61 29 10
Scott Brown
FAV UNFAV NO OPINION
ALL 51 30 19
MEN 56 26 18
WOMEN 46 34 20
DEMOCRATS 24 54 22
REPUBLICANS 88 7 5
INDEPENDENTS 59 18 23
18-29 42 38 20
30-44 51 29 20
45-59 56 26 18
60+ 48 34 18
Joseph Kennedy
FAV UNFAV NO OPINION
ALL 38 44 18
MEN 44 39 17
WOMEN 32 49 19
DEMOCRATS 32 49 19
REPUBLICANS 37 43 20
INDEPENDENTS 45 39 16
18-29 32 50 18
30-44 39 43 18
45-59 42 41 17
60+ 34 47 19
QUESTION: If the 2010 special election for U.S. Senate were held today, would you vote for Martha Coakley, the Democrat, Scott Brown, the Republican, or Joseph Kennedy, the Libertarian candidate?
MARTHA COAKLEY SCOTT BROWN JOSEPH KENNEDY UNDECIDED
ALL 48 48 3 1
MEN 41 54 4 1
WOMEN 55 42 2 1
DEMOCRATS 89 9 1 1
REPUBLICANS 6 90 3 1
INDEPENDENTS 29 65 5 1
WHITE 44 52 3 1
BLACK 90 7 0 3
HISPANIC 75 23 0 2
OTHER 77 21 0 2
18-29 61 35 2 2
30-44 49 48 2 1
45-59 42 52 5 1
60+ 50 47 2 1
BOSTON 54 42 3 1
SOUTHEAST 38 57 4 1
WEST/CENTRAL 44 53 2 1
Demographics
MEN 242 48%
WOMEN 258 52%
DEMOCRATS 195 39%
REPUBLICANS 97 19%
INDEPENDENTS/OTHER 208 42%
WHITE 451 90%
BLACK 19 4%
HISPANIC 16 3%
OTHER 14 3%
18-29 70 14%
30-44 130 26%
45-59 221 44%
60+ 79 16%
BOSTON 274 55%
SOUTHEAST 111 22%
WEST/CENTRAL 115 23%
Methodology
MASSACHUSETTS POLL RESULTS – JANUARY 2010

The Research 2000 Massachusetts Poll was conducted from January 15 through January 17, 2010. A total of 500 likely voters who vote regularly in state elections were interviewed statewide by telephone.

Those interviewed were selected by the random variation of the last four digits of telephone numbers. A cross-section of exchanges was utilized in order to ensure an accurate reflection of the state. Quotas were assigned to reflect the voter registration of distribution by county.

The margin for error, according to standards customarily used by statisticians, is no more than plus or minus 4.5% percentage points. This means that there is a 95 percent probability that the “true” figure would fall within that range if the entire population were sampled. The margin for error is higher for any subgroup, such as for gender or party affiliation.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Wow!!!! Even the far left whackos have Brown winning

 

[Lost Soul]

And in the real world not some leftard fastasy, Brown is leading with 9 points.

Whenever I see Daily KOS anything, I just ignore it and step over it like any other piece of shit.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

They have it a tie wit this demographic

DEMOCRATS 195 39%
REPUBLICANS 97 19%
INDEPENDENTS/OTHER 208 42%

 

[Lost Soul]

They have it a tie wit this demographic

DEMOCRATS 195 39%
REPUBLICANS 97 19%
INDEPENDENTS/OTHER 208 42%

As usual they cheat and poll more democrats. But more honest polls have Brown kicking the bitch ass. What is it with liberals and their cheating polls? They cannot win without trying to deceive the voters?



Politico/InAdv 1/17 - 1/17 804 LV 52 43 Brown +9
PJM/CrossTarget (R) 1/17 - 1/17 574 LV 52 42 Brown +10
PPP (D) 1/16 - 1/17 1231 LV 51 46 Brown +5
ARG 1/15 - 1/17 600 LV 52 45 Brown +7
Daily Kos/R2000 1/15 - 1/17 500 LV 48 48 Tie
InsideMedford/MRG 1/15 - 1/15 565 LV 51 41 Brown +10
PJM/CrossTarget (R) 1/14 - 1/14 946 LV 54 39 Brown +15
ARG 1/12 - 1/14 600 LV 48 45 Brown +3

 

[NYcarbineer]

They have it a tie wit this demographic

DEMOCRATS 195 39%
REPUBLICANS 97 19%
INDEPENDENTS/OTHER 208 42%

As usual they cheat and poll more democrats. But more honest polls have Brown kicking the bitch ass. What is it with liberals and their cheating polls? They cannot win without trying to deceive the voters?

Democrats outnumber Republicans 3 to 1 in MA. The poll shows them at 2 to 1.

Where's the cheating?

 

[del]

They have it a tie wit this demographic

DEMOCRATS 195 39%
REPUBLICANS 97 19%
INDEPENDENTS/OTHER 208 42%

As usual they cheat and poll more democrats. But more honest polls have Brown kicking the bitch ass. What is it with liberals and their cheating polls? They cannot win without trying to deceive the voters?

Democrats outnumber Republicans 3 to 1 in MA. The poll shows them at 2 to 1.

Where's the cheating?

unenrolled voters are under represented. more than half of us (52%) are unenrolled (independent).

i wouldn't call it cheating, more like wishful thinking.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

They have it a tie wit this demographic

DEMOCRATS 195 39%
REPUBLICANS 97 19%
INDEPENDENTS/OTHER 208 42%

As usual they cheat and poll more democrats. But more honest polls have Brown kicking the bitch ass. What is it with liberals and their cheating polls? They cannot win without trying to deceive the voters?

Democrats outnumber Republicans 3 to 1 in MA. The poll shows them at 2 to 1.

Where's the cheating?

No cheating...Coakley is such a dipshit 1/3 of the Dem's said fuck it...I'm not polling or voting.

 

[WillowTree]

And in the real world not some leftard fastasy, Brown is leading with 9 points.

Whenever I see Daily KOS anything, I just ignore it and step over it like any other piece of shit.

the only value in reading at the KOS is to know thine enemy and the stuff they wallow in.. I'ts helpful..

 

[NYcarbineer]

As usual they cheat and poll more democrats. But more honest polls have Brown kicking the bitch ass. What is it with liberals and their cheating polls? They cannot win without trying to deceive the voters?

Democrats outnumber Republicans 3 to 1 in MA. The poll shows them at 2 to 1.

Where's the cheating?

No cheating...Coakley is such a dipshit 1/3 of the Dem's said fuck it...I'm not polling or voting.

Well, remember you said this in the event Brown wins and the right tries to create the myth that Coakley was NOT a lousy candidate.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

we will see what the vote turns out to be...and that is such a blistering endorsement of Coakley...nice going!!!!!

 

[NYcarbineer]

we will see what the vote turns out to be...and that is such a blistering endorsement of Coakley...nice going!!!!!

I don't endorse complacent candidates who take things for granted and run crappy campaigns; I have a liberal Democratic Congressman in my Republican NY district because his opponent, the incumbent was just that.

 

[TheSuaveOne]

I'd hold a KOS poll in the same regard I would a poll that was produced by Free Republic. Partisan hacks pushing an agenda that isn't the same as the majority of the populous.

-TSO

 

[PatekPhilippe]

we will see what the vote turns out to be...and that is such a blistering endorsement of Coakley...nice going!!!!!

I don't endorse complacent candidates who take things for granted and run crappy campaigns; I have a liberal Democratic Congressman in my Republican NY district because his opponent, the incumbent was just that.

So it's all flash, flair and visual effect for you....that explains a lot...and the country wonders why it keeps falling for a con job. How did you like those Roman columns in Obama's campaign where he regally stepped out?...kinda like the phony Emperor Commodus. Kinda like "Hail Ceaser!!!!!! Hail Ceaser!!!!!!" Right? Wow...the depth of your being is mind boggling.