Curtis Sliwa plans to crack down on crime as NYC mayor

IM2
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax
So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.
First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.
And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.
Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..
Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.
Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.
People are getting nurdered while complying. So shut your ass.
For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy.
Yes, and the vast majority of little girls weren't raped yesterday, so no need being concerned about that either.
What a crock of hyperbole... we should ALL support 'defrocking' cops who get too far out of line and intentionally harm people...

But for every Bad Cop who gets out of line (and gets publicity) there are hundreds upon hundreds of far more righteous ones...

At present, the Left is using Bad Cops as a stereotypical norm to paint police departments nationwide as racist and heavy-handed and wrong-headed...

And all that is one big steaming pile of hor$e$hit... the Left needs to be called-out on that and they need to be resisted in that context... strenuously.
If the cops don't like their reputation being sullied by bad cops, they should police their own instead of supporting the bad cops. We shouldn't have to wait until we have video of a cop murdering a citizen before he is stopped. His coworkers know which ones are most likely to do that sort of thing long before grieving family members have to watch a video of their loved one's death.
Since they are a powerful fiefdom that is not going to happen. Salary, benefits and pensions. They have taken a bit of a beating. But it has been scattered in certain areas and others may have some deserving retribution. People on this forum are right that many cops do not deserve what is being done today also. There are men who like the action, but it can take a toll on them over the years in busier areas.
 
Polishprince
At least they have insurance available to them. I don't know of a single person falsely arrested or falsely charged with a crime who had insurance to cover a cop planting drugs on them. Victims of bad cops have to pay for their own defense every day. Instead of looking at it in terms of avoiding court, a cop should look at it in terms of what is legal for them to do. That's why we pay them.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
IM2
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax
So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.
First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.
And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.
Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..
Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.
Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.
People are getting nurdered while complying. So shut your ass.
For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy.
Yes, and the vast majority of little girls weren't raped yesterday, so no need being concerned about that either.
What a crock of hyperbole... we should ALL support 'defrocking' cops who get too far out of line and intentionally harm people...

But for every Bad Cop who gets out of line (and gets publicity) there are hundreds upon hundreds of far more righteous ones...

At present, the Left is using Bad Cops as a stereotypical norm to paint police departments nationwide as racist and heavy-handed and wrong-headed...

And all that is one big steaming pile of hor$e$hit... the Left needs to be called-out on that and they need to be resisted in that context... strenuously.
If the cops don't like their reputation being sullied by bad cops, they should police their own instead of supporting the bad cops. We shouldn't have to wait until we have video of a cop murdering a citizen before he is stopped. His coworkers know which ones are most likely to do that sort of thing long before grieving family members have to watch a video of their loved one's death.
Since they are a powerful fiefdom that is not going to happen. Salary, benefits and pensions. They have taken a bit of a beating. But it has been scattered in certain areas and others may have some deserving retribution. People on this forum are right that many cops do not deserve what is being done today also. There are men who like the action, but it can take a toll on them over the years in busier areas.
If they aren't actively policing their own, they do deserve push back. Don't try to tell me that cops don't know who, among their ranks is overzealous. They knew what the job was before they were ever issued a uniform. If they can't follow the rules for that job it's time for them to do something else.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.
Are you seriously unaware that death is not a lawful punishment for disobedience, even to a cop?
are you seriously unaware of the fact that you do not have the slightest clue as to
what cops face out in the field and especially in some neighborhoods
So when were cops granted the right to kill because they had a rough day?
they weren't and they don't
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.
Are you seriously unaware that death is not a lawful punishment for disobedience, even to a cop?
are you seriously unaware of the fact that you do not have the slightest clue as to
what cops face out in the field and especially in some neighborhoods
So when were cops granted the right to kill because they had a rough day?
they weren't and they don't
So why did that pig think it was OK to murder Floyd?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.
Are you seriously unaware that death is not a lawful punishment for disobedience, even to a cop?
are you seriously unaware of the fact that you do not have the slightest clue as to
what cops face out in the field and especially in some neighborhoods
So when were cops granted the right to kill because they had a rough day?
they weren't and they don't

Yes they do.
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.
Are you seriously unaware that death is not a lawful punishment for disobedience, even to a cop?
are you seriously unaware of the fact that you do not have the slightest clue as to
what cops face out in the field and especially in some neighborhoods
So when were cops granted the right to kill because they had a rough day?
they weren't and they don't

Yes they do.
how many do you think they will murder this weekend?
 
About as many blacks die in one weekend in Chicago as do at the hands of white police in a year
It’s called perspective which is something thinkers engage in and emotetards choose to disregard
 
IM2
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax
So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.
First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.
And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.
Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..
Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.
Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.
People are getting nurdered while complying. So shut your ass.
For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy.
Yes, and the vast majority of little girls weren't raped yesterday, so no need being concerned about that either.
What a crock of hyperbole... we should ALL support 'defrocking' cops who get too far out of line and intentionally harm people...

But for every Bad Cop who gets out of line (and gets publicity) there are hundreds upon hundreds of far more righteous ones...

At present, the Left is using Bad Cops as a stereotypical norm to paint police departments nationwide as racist and heavy-handed and wrong-headed...

And all that is one big steaming pile of hor$e$hit... the Left needs to be called-out on that and they need to be resisted in that context... strenuously.
If the cops don't like their reputation being sullied by bad cops, they should police their own instead of supporting the bad cops. We shouldn't have to wait until we have video of a cop murdering a citizen before he is stopped. His coworkers know which ones are most likely to do that sort of thing long before grieving family members have to watch a video of their loved one's death.
Since they are a powerful fiefdom that is not going to happen. Salary, benefits and pensions. They have taken a bit of a beating. But it has been scattered in certain areas and others may have some deserving retribution. People on this forum are right that many cops do not deserve what is being done today also. There are men who like the action, but it can take a toll on them over the years in busier areas.
If they aren't actively policing their own, they do deserve push back. Don't try to tell me that cops don't know who, among their ranks is overzealous. They knew what the job was before they were ever issued a uniform. If they can't follow the rules for that job it's time for them to do something else.

I am sure that police do know who in the ranks are overzealous, adequately zealous or underzealous.

But what you want an officer to do? Sneak around and eavesdrop on what their brother officers are doing and letting the criminals know that you are on their side?

In any event, a complaint against an officer means nothing. A lot of people falsely complain about officers after they get tickets or get arrested.
 
IM2
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax
So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.
First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.
And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.
Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..
Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.
Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.
People are getting nurdered while complying. So shut your ass.
For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy.
Yes, and the vast majority of little girls weren't raped yesterday, so no need being concerned about that either.
What a crock of hyperbole... we should ALL support 'defrocking' cops who get too far out of line and intentionally harm people...

But for every Bad Cop who gets out of line (and gets publicity) there are hundreds upon hundreds of far more righteous ones...

At present, the Left is using Bad Cops as a stereotypical norm to paint police departments nationwide as racist and heavy-handed and wrong-headed...

And all that is one big steaming pile of hor$e$hit... the Left needs to be called-out on that and they need to be resisted in that context... strenuously.
If the cops don't like their reputation being sullied by bad cops, they should police their own instead of supporting the bad cops. We shouldn't have to wait until we have video of a cop murdering a citizen before he is stopped. His coworkers know which ones are most likely to do that sort of thing long before grieving family members have to watch a video of their loved one's death.
Since they are a powerful fiefdom that is not going to happen. Salary, benefits and pensions. They have taken a bit of a beating. But it has been scattered in certain areas and others may have some deserving retribution. People on this forum are right that many cops do not deserve what is being done today also. There are men who like the action, but it can take a toll on them over the years in busier areas.
If they aren't actively policing their own, they do deserve push back. Don't try to tell me that cops don't know who, among their ranks is overzealous. They knew what the job was before they were ever issued a uniform. If they can't follow the rules for that job it's time for them to do something else.

I am sure that police do know who in the ranks are overzealous, adequately zealous or underzealous.

But what you want an officer to do? Sneak around and eavesdrop on what their brother officers are doing and letting the criminals know that you are on their side?

In any event, a complaint against an officer means nothing. A lot of people falsely complain about officers after they get tickets or get arrested.
Not lying to cover for another cop is the same as being on the criminal's side? Do you really believe that crap?
 
About as many blacks die in one weekend in Chicago as do at the hands of white police in a year
It’s called perspective which is something thinkers engage in and emotetards choose to disregard
You seriously don't understand the difference between losing your life as a random victim of crime versus being murdered by your government (the police)?

No wonder we're not making any progress.
 
"For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy."

NOBODY WHO COMPLIES SHOULD EVER BE BEATEN OR SHOT!

Understand Con-door.
Well hell has frozen over. We actually agree on something.
 
Sliwa is unlikely to win, but Adams was a police captain and understands the problems facing the NYPD right now, so that is hopeful.
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.

As we have seen over and over again, obeying a cop’s command will not save your life. In video after video, the police shoot suspects who are obeying police commands.

The issue is not the behaviour of the suspects, the problem is the behaviour of the police. American police or treating citizens like an enemy combatants in the field, instead of people in need of assistance. They must be “neutralized”.

Yep, and prisons are full of innocent people, just ask em....dumbass.
 
About as many blacks die in one weekend in Chicago as do at the hands of white police in a year
It’s called perspective which is something thinkers engage in and emotetards choose to disregard
You seriously don't understand the difference between losing your life as a random victim of crime versus being murdered by your government (the police)?

No wonder we're not making any progress.
Weather53, Can you explain that one to me? I am referring to the issue of
the huge numbers of victims of random crime which mysteriously seems to
bother you. In my opinion, and also significant, albeit limited, experience,
most the deaths by murder of young black males in my city are not actually
"random"
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Heres an idea, dont have your community robbing, murdering and assaulting people and we wont need to beat or kill any of them.
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.

As we have seen over and over again, obeying a cop’s command will not save your life. In video after video, the police shoot suspects who are obeying police commands.

The issue is not the behaviour of the suspects, the problem is the behaviour of the police. American police or treating citizens like an enemy combatants in the field, instead of people in need of assistance. They must be “neutralized”.
You would be hard pressed to find examples of cops shooting people who are obeying them. I can think of only one off the top of my head. If your expectation is the cops will be 100% infallible, you are a fucking moron. Where in life do we ever see perfection?
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.
Are you seriously unaware that death is not a lawful punishment for disobedience, even to a cop?
Death is the potential punishment when you fight with cops.
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Heres an idea, dont have your community robbing, murdering and assaulting people and we wont need to beat or kill any of them.
Please say which government agency is responsible for beating and killing people based on the beater and killer's mood?
 

Forum List

Back
Top