Curtis Sliwa plans to crack down on crime as NYC mayor

Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax
So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.
First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.
And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.
Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..
Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.
Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.
People are getting nurdered while complying. So shut your ass.
For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy.
Yes, and the vast majority of little girls weren't raped yesterday, so no need being concerned about that either.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
"For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy."

NOBODY WHO COMPLIES SHOULD EVER BE BEATEN OR SHOT!

Understand Con-door.
 
IM2
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax
So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.
First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.
And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.
Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..
Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.
Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.
People are getting nurdered while complying. So shut your ass.
For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy.
Yes, and the vast majority of little girls weren't raped yesterday, so no need being concerned about that either.
What a crock of hyperbole... we should ALL support 'defrocking' cops who get too far out of line and intentionally harm people...

But for every Bad Cop who gets out of line (and gets publicity) there are hundreds upon hundreds of far more righteous ones...

At present, the Left is using Bad Cops as a stereotypical norm to paint police departments nationwide as racist and heavy-handed and wrong-headed...

And all that is one big steaming pile of hor$e$hit... the Left needs to be called-out on that and they need to be resisted in that context... strenuously.
 
"For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy."

NOBODY WHO COMPLIES SHOULD EVER BE BEATEN OR SHOT!

Understand Con-door.
There is no disagreement between us on that particular score, I-Am-Two...
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
IM2
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
When and where does that happen?
7 deaths in 50,000 violent encounters is zip
This is another liberal bullshit statistically vapid hoax
So how do you explain all the videos of that happening? Imagine how many times it's happened without video.
First all police encounters, especially arrests , cannot and should not be pleasant experiences always or even mostly.
And this is the problem, far too many idiots with this type of thinking.

A traffic violation is a minor offense for which the punishment is a fine, not even jail time. So treating people as if they're public enemy number one for a an infraction because the cop is having a bad day or is just an violent, racist asshole is a law enforcement problem.

Don't expect the public to fix their problems, and when you all react the same old way, expect to find yourselves being dealt with in new ways.
Don't want to end-up with your a$$ in a sling, or with a toe-tag?

When you're stopped by police...

1. keep your hands visible at all times
2. obey all police commands
3. shut the phukk up until you're asked to speak
4. be respectful when asked a question
5. don't make excuses - save it for the judge
6. don't run or resist

Whether it's a parking ticket, or a traffic stop, or a car accident, or a suspect-stop, or whether caught-in-the-act red-handed... whatever...

Obey the Six Rules above and you greatly improve your chances of surviving the encounter.,..
Well kondor the first problem here is that Curtis Sliwa will never be mayor of NYC. As for your 6 rules, we have this document called the constitution that gives us rights. One right is the freedom not be face unreasonable searches and seizures. Police do not have the right to make unlawful demands and we do not have to comply with them.

Police have been acting unconstitutionally for quite some time and they try defending themselves with the claim of qualified immunity. Well guess what, there is not a statute in this country that gives police qualified immunity. So they have been killing and beating people in violation of the law. So you take your six rules and shove them deep in your intestines, because they are invalid.
Tell me more about your Constitutional rights when you violently resist a Police Officer and are staring down the barrel of his Glock on a dark road.

Our law enforcement people NEED broad and sweeping powers in order to do they're job and we have given them such power over us to keep the peace.

The benefit to society gained by a continued granting of 'qualified immunity' vastly outweighs the rare and occasional abuse of any such legal shielding.

My six rules were NOT meant to serve as an outline of suspect-side Constitutional rights.

My six rules WERE mean to serve as a common-sense outline of how to keep damned-near any stop-or-arrest situation from ending in harm to the suspect.

That collection serves as GREAT advice that will work darned-near every time.

There's plenty of time to argue Constitutionality and motives and procedural correctness in front of the judge.

At the point-of-arrest is NOT the place to do it.

Fail to observe such rules at your own very great peril.

Choose not to... and choose to violently resist... and you may very well end-up with a toe-tag in the morgue... Nature tends to de-select the less intelligent.
People are getting nurdered while complying. So shut your ass.
For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy.
Yes, and the vast majority of little girls weren't raped yesterday, so no need being concerned about that either.
What a crock of hyperbole... we should ALL support 'defrocking' cops who get too far out of line and intentionally harm people...

But for every Bad Cop who gets out of line (and gets publicity) there are hundreds upon hundreds of far more righteous ones...

At present, the Left is using Bad Cops as a stereotypical norm to paint police departments nationwide as racist and heavy-handed and wrong-headed...

And all that is one big steaming pile of hor$e$hit... the Left needs to be called-out on that and they need to be resisted in that context... strenuously.
If the cops don't like their reputation being sullied by bad cops, they should police their own instead of supporting the bad cops. We shouldn't have to wait until we have video of a cop murdering a citizen before he is stopped. His coworkers know which ones are most likely to do that sort of thing long before grieving family members have to watch a video of their loved one's death.
 
Sliwa is a tough kid who grew up in the mean NY streets and became a target of organized crime thugs. He is articulate and conservative. Bring it on.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Sliwa is a tough kid who grew up in the mean NY streets and became a target of organized crime thugs. He is articulate and conservative. Bring it on.
Sliwa will not be mayor of NYC.
 
"For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy."

NOBODY WHO COMPLIES SHOULD EVER BE BEATEN OR SHOT!

Understand Con-door.
Well at least he's acknowledged it's murder and our government should not be murdering it's citizen, no matter the pretext.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
"For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy."

NOBODY WHO COMPLIES SHOULD EVER BE BEATEN OR SHOT!

Understand Con-door.
Well at least he's acknowledged it's murder and our government should not be murdering it's citizen, no matter the pretext.

True. I guess we can consider that an improvement.
 
"For every person murdered while complying there are scores of thousands who are properly processed while complying. So bite me, doughboy."

NOBODY WHO COMPLIES SHOULD EVER BE BEATEN OR SHOT!

Understand Con-door.
Well at least he's acknowledged it's murder and our government should not be murdering it's citizen, no matter the pretext.

True. I guess we can consider that an improvement.
There was never any question of that.

When a cop goes rogue and harms or kills a suspect even though in full compliance and not resisting, that is abuse of power, and murder.

When a suspect stupidly does NOT comply and violently resists, then the gloves come off; non-lethal overpowering if practicable; lethal force if necessary.

Many of these dumb-a$$e$ really and truly deserve the cracked skulls or toe-tags that they receive...righteous shoots and thumping in the line of duty.

If you're stopped by a law enforcement officer, and told why you're being stopped, shut-the-phukk-up and obey all commands. Tell it to the judge, later.

Fail to do so and Nature may end-up de-selecting you... weeding out the less intelligent amongst us... culling the herd and disposing of the stupid ones.
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.
Are you seriously unaware that death is not a lawful punishment for disobedience, even to a cop?
are you seriously unaware of the fact that you do not have the slightest clue as to
what cops face out in the field and especially in some neighborhoods
 
When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.
The snag is that far too many Americans of color indeed obey that command immediately and end up with a toe-tag regardless.
the snag is that when guns are fired----people OFTEN experience acute lead poisoning----
even when the rifles are being aimed at Bambi. The more bullets----the more likelihood of
OOOOOPSS
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.

You don't get it.

Even False charges have to be defended in court, and insurance companies will have to pay plenty to defend them.

"Being good" and avoiding ugly confrontations can help a police officer avoid legal action. But are hardly foolproof
 

20 Secrets Police Officers Don't Want You to Know


The police don't have the right to look through your phone, even when you're in custody.

Unless you give your express consent or there is a warrant, the police do not have the right to look through the contents of your phone—even when you're in their custody. This was decided in the landmark Riley v. California case in 2014, for which Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. decided that, since "digital data stored on a cell phone cannot itself be used as a weapon to harm an arresting officer or to effectuate the arrestee's escape," there is no immediate need for an officer to access the contents of a person's digital devices.

Nor can they enter your residence without a warrant or your consent.

Regardless of what you might see on TV, police officers can't actually burst into your home unless they either A. have a warrant or B. have received your express consent to do so. However, as Scharff Law Firm in Raleigh, North Carolina, points out, there are a few exceptions to this rule. For instance, an officer can enter your home without your consent under the plain view doctrine when they "can see evidence within their sightline."

They also can't search your property without a warrant or your consent.

Not only do police officers not have the right to enter your home without a warrant, but they also can't search your property without one or your consent. But this right is rather recent; it was only in 2018 that the Supreme Court ruled in Collins v. Virginia that "when a law enforcement officer physically intrudes on [a person's property] to gather evidence, a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment has occurred."

Police officers can legally lie to you about having evidence.
And they can trick you into giving them your DNA.
It's also possible for them to get access to your DNA through DNA testing kit companies.
You are legally allowed to film and photograph police officers.
And they can't ask you to delete videos or photos from your phone without a warrant.
Not all states require that you show an officer your identification.
Police have the right to search any abandoned property.
Everything you say is on the record.
Unless you have been arrested or are being detained, you have every right to leave a police station.
The police aren't required to read you your rights if you aren't being detained.
And even if you were arrested, there are things that you can say before being read your rights that are admissible in court.
You have the right to look at any search warrants.
Officers with search warrants almost always have to knock before they enter your house.
Police need probable cause to pull you over.

The police don't have the right to pull you over without probable cause, notes Dallas criminal attorney Mick Mickelson. What's more, if they do pull you over without a reason to do so and subsequently find evidence of a crime in your car, "they usually can't use that evidence in court against you."

A police officer can give you a speeding ticket based on their visual observations alone.
Police officers aren't as familiar with the laws as we may believe.

Just because police officers are tasked with keeping the streets safe and making sure that citizens are abiding by basic laws doesn't mean that they know every single thing about the criminal justice system. Rather, Rick Bruno, a retired police commander, noted on Quora that "there are a lot of laws out there, and we [police officers] know the basic ones for the most part—the ones we deal with all the time—but sometimes someone does something that looks illegal and we're not quite sure."

And they don't always trust their fellow men in uniform.


ALL true ------if anyone out there needs to know all the ways YOU can avoid cooperating
with the cops-----ASK A CRIMINAL. If you encounter any person who is really really into
the negative response at a time of crisis-----be suspicious
 
Sliwa is a tough kid who grew up in the mean NY streets and became a target of organized crime thugs. He is articulate and conservative. Bring it on.
And he will never be elected.
To the great loss and detriment of the City of New York, in a law-enforcement context. LibTard pu$$ie$ will win the day.
You're supporting a fat guy in a beret, and you want to call other people pussies? Bruce Vilanch wants his outfit back.
 
Here's an idea. Don't use your badge and gun to indiscriminately beat and kill innocent people, and your insurance rates will go way down.
Here's a better idea...

When a cop gives you a command during the course of a stop or arrest, obey that command, immediately... resist violently and you get a nice little toe-tag.
Are you seriously unaware that death is not a lawful punishment for disobedience, even to a cop?
are you seriously unaware of the fact that you do not have the slightest clue as to
what cops face out in the field and especially in some neighborhoods
So when were cops granted the right to kill because they had a rough day?
 

Forum List

Back
Top