Cruz

[Arianrhod]

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

A real conservative will never support a socialist

But they would support Trump?

Watch *****!

Watch you *****? Doesn't sound terribly interesting.

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

A real conservative will never support a socialist

But they would support Trump?

Over a socialist, yes.

So "anybody but Sanders." Without exception?

 

[S.J.]

Cruz is not an honest man.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

A real conservative will never support a socialist

But they would support Trump?

Watch *****!

Watch you *****? Doesn't sound terribly interesting.

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

A real conservative will never support a socialist

But they would support Trump?

Over a socialist, yes.

So "anybody but Sanders." Without exception?

I explained....he's a socialist. Your reading comprehension is pitiful

 

[LoneLaugher]

The OP thinks Cruz is electable.

Cute.

 

[Arianrhod]

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

A real conservative will never support a socialist

But they would support Trump?

Watch *****!

Watch you *****? Doesn't sound terribly interesting.

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

A real conservative will never support a socialist

But they would support Trump?

Over a socialist, yes.

So "anybody but Sanders." Without exception?

I explained....he's a socialist.

You didn't explain. You stated. Then you reiterated. Neither is an explanation. You also didn't answer the follow-up question, which is an answer in itself.

Now say something about my reading comprehension again.

 

[DarkFury]

With Cruz doing well in both states, shouldn't conservatives be coalescing around him now? He is clearly electable, a constitutionalist, and he isn't a progressive like Trump.

It seems like common sense here.

Who?
Do you call Cruz getting less than 12% "doing well"?
Maybe on Uranus but not on planet earth pal.

Its that common core math and "everyone gets a prize thinking".
They actually believe that shit.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A real conservative will never support a socialist

But they would support Trump?

Watch *****!

Watch you *****? Doesn't sound terribly interesting.

A real conservative will never support a socialist

But they would support Trump?

Over a socialist, yes.

So "anybody but Sanders." Without exception?

I explained....he's a socialist.

You didn't explain. You stated. Then you reiterated. Neither is an explanation. You also didn't answer the follow-up question, which is an answer in itself.

Now say something about my reading comprehension again.

You're annoying, go bother someone else and stop acting like a troll

 

[Votto]

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

As for Bernie, he just wants to increase the size and scope of government instead of limit it.

But really, increasing the size and scope of government is what both parties have done over the years, so I guess a complete takeover of pretty much everything that is left is only a natural progression.

 

[Arianrhod]

But they would support Trump?

Watch *****!

Watch you *****? Doesn't sound terribly interesting.

But they would support Trump?

Over a socialist, yes.

So "anybody but Sanders." Without exception?

I explained....he's a socialist.

You didn't explain. You stated. Then you reiterated. Neither is an explanation. You also didn't answer the follow-up question, which is an answer in itself.

Now say something about my reading comprehension again.

You're annoying, go bother someone else and stop acting like a troll

Excellent on-topic post. It shows the depth of your interest in the GOP candidates.

 

[blackhawk]

With Cruz doing well in both states, shouldn't conservatives be coalescing around him now? He is clearly electable, a constitutionalist, and he isn't a progressive like Trump.

It seems like common sense here.

He is going to have to show he has appeal beyond the Republican base I don't know that he ahs done that yet.

 

[Jroc]

With Cruz doing well in both states, shouldn't conservatives be coalescing around him now? He is clearly electable, a constitutionalist, and he isn't a progressive like Trump.

It seems like common sense here.

A near tie with Jeb is good?

Jeb spent 30 million. Cruz spent less than a million yeah that's good.

 

[Ame®icano]

With Cruz doing well in both states, shouldn't conservatives be coalescing around him now? He is clearly electable, a constitutionalist, and he isn't a progressive like Trump.

It seems like common sense here.

I like Cruz. Almost everything... except the face.

He always looks both, happy and sad. His face is like saying... "I like lasagna, but that's not what I ordered."

 

[imawhosure]

With Cruz doing well in both states, shouldn't conservatives be coalescing around him now? He is clearly electable, a constitutionalist, and he isn't a progressive like Trump.

It seems like common sense here.

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

A real conservative will never support a socialist

But they would support Trump?

Over a socialist, yes.

You are correct, it should be Cruz, but the left and right establishment has demonized him far longer than Trump because they seen him coming long before Trump even announced. The left know exactly who they will get with Cruz, and they no lika dat stuff! Believe it or not, Trump is seen as more workable/controllable by both party's.

Let me put it this way----------> before Trump/Sanders turned everything on its head, Cruz was the only honestly viable alternative to the establishment again having its way. Remember how the pundits said Trump would fade quickly? And so, they kind of ignored him and kept on lambasting Cruz figuring the Donald would self implode and all would be well for their establishment plan. All they had to do is get rid of Cruz; or so they thought!

So what you are witnessing is the power of the establishment, and the power of the media in full "attack" mode for what they did to Cruz.

Realize the obvious.................Cruz is mean, wants to make a theocracy, is crazy, everybody mistrusts him, is unelectable...............but oh yeah, Hillary is a wonderful candidate, and will be elected because a right wing conspiracy is after her! Seriously. SERIOUSLY! There is your media and establishment politicians working the plebes like us!

Now they have also entered the Trump zone in overtime no less just recently. When speaking about/reporting on him when not tied to voting, how many are positive, how many are negative? Now put the same barometer to Hillary, and to a lesser extent Sanders as far as him being an actual Socialist?

I know it is very, very, difficult, but you can't allow the MSM to jade your view. I am not going to sit here and tell everyone they are out and out lying to you, but what they are doing if nothing else is,
"deception by omission." They have an agenda, never forget that. If you doubt it, look at the picture the paper in New York put up along with the Huffington's report. They INSULTED and RIDICULED the voters for voting the way they did to try and help stop others from voting the same way. Not for SOCIALIST Sanders mind you, but for Donald Trump who is nowhere near a Socialist.

So, do you think they have an agenda? And after that display of journalistic neutrality, does it help explain to all how Cruz is the devil himself, after these same journalists have been pounding him for far, far, longer because they seen him coming? Now you know why Cruz is not as viable as he should be, because the MSM and establishment tried to GUIDE you to the nominee they wanted for over a year. It is what they do, and damn if we didn't almost fall for it again!

 

[FA_Q2]

What makes you think he is 'clearly electable.' Cruiz is the exact opposite, he is not very electable considering he has very little pull with the center.

 

[Agit8r]

Well, there is one eeensy little issue...

 

[imawhosure]

What makes you think he is 'clearly electable.' Cruiz is the exact opposite, he is not very electable considering he has very little pull with the center.

That is like me asking you why Sanders electable since he is a Socialist, or Hillary is electable after seeing the only demographic she won was "over 65," and "makes more than 200,000 a year."

See you people are starting from a false notion.....................that 50 something % of the electorate want Hillary TODAY, so that means she is a lock.

The electorate is not a set number. The electorate are the people who show at the polls. Very few elections have had even 60% in modern times. So who can win is determined by who shows, not by what people think! So, lets watch SC and see how many, and for which side show. No, it is not the general, but it gives everyone a working percentage to see who/whom is motivated. So far, Mrs Clinton can't get 10 people in a 500 seat Stadium to buy tickets to protect her candidacy. It is WORSE for her if she wins SC by 15% if primary vote totals are down by 35%, then if she wins by 7%, but vote totals are up by 20%. You can then show enthusiasm!

 

[Avatar4321]

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

What exactly is fake about him?

He knows the constitution. He memorized it when he was 13. He has been arguing for it his entire life.

He is passionate for his beliefs and an amazing debater. Professors have stated how he would out argue he teachers he had in the ivy league schools he attended.

So he has guts. He has taken on both Republican and Democrats who are progressives.

I see nothing fake about him. Heck look at his answer to the heroin question at the debate the other night. It was completely authentic

 

[imawhosure]

He's a fake, funded by big-money, and his ethics are of question. Real conservatives should support either Trump or Sanders

What exactly is fake about him?

He knows the constitution. He memorized it when he was 13. He has been arguing for it his entire life.

He is passionate for his beliefs and an amazing debater. Professors have stated how he would out argue he teachers he had in the ivy league schools he attended.

So he has guts. He has taken on both Republican and Democrats who are progressives.

I see nothing fake about him. Heck look at his answer to the heroin question at the debate the other night. It was completely authentic

We should all laugh at the excuses some of these people give, lol.

Besides Trump and Sanders, who is not bankrolled by big money? (and we know Sanders just got a 5 million dollar cash infusion after his win. Did he get it from small donors? I dunno, nobody has posted it yet)

And so, lets all do the correct thing and throw anybody backed by anybody out. That leaves Trump and Sanders, or maybe just Trump!

Ok, so lets just make Trump President then, what you say! And if Sanders did get that 5 mill from small donations, just let them 2 face off in the general-)

 

[FA_Q2]

What makes you think he is 'clearly electable.' Cruiz is the exact opposite, he is not very electable considering he has very little pull with the center.

That is like me asking you why Sanders electable since he is a Socialist, or Hillary is electable after seeing the only demographic she won was "over 65," and "makes more than 200,000 a year."

See you people are starting from a false notion.....................that 50 something % of the electorate want Hillary TODAY, so that means she is a lock.

The electorate is not a set number. The electorate are the people who show at the polls. Very few elections have had even 60% in modern times. So who can win is determined by who shows, not by what people think! So, lets watch SC and see how many, and for which side show. No, it is not the general, but it gives everyone a working percentage to see who/whom is motivated. So far, Mrs Clinton can't get 10 people in a 500 seat Stadium to buy tickets to protect her candidacy. It is WORSE for her if she wins SC by 15% if primary vote totals are down by 35%, then if she wins by 7%, but vote totals are up by 20%. You can then show enthusiasm!

"You people?"

You constructed a straw man and then failed to even argue effectively against your false charge. I said absolutely nothing about the current polls, how many people show up or anything you mentioned in that post. It is a solid fact that you need to garner votes from independents (the lions share of the electorate) to win an election. Cruiz may get the 23 or so percent of republicans to show up but if he cannot get enough from outside the party it will not matter if they all show up.

 

[FA_Q2]

Well, there is one eeensy little issue...

View attachment 62996

Ah, another birther.

Just to let you know, that is not an 'eeensy' issue - it is not an issue at all.