Cruz supporters hit new low: anti Trump ad to slut shame model Melania who posed for GQ

[Iceweasel]

no wonder every white male voter is not voting for Hillary, have u seen her first lady?

Anyone who votes for a candidate based on their physical appearance, is a total fool. Serial killers Paul Bernardo and Karlo Homolka were young and extremely attractive. It's how they got young women to approach their car.

But then Republicans have to continue to make up excuses for not voting for the most qualified candidate running. Trump rountinely dismisses women on the basis of their looks. Anyone who bases their opinions of women based on their looks, as Trump does, is not qualified to be President. He hasn't the experience, the background, or the temperament to be in that position. He's petty, vindictive, as well as a liar and a narcissist.

If you consider lying and incompetence a good thing then to you Hillary is the most qualified. obama had no experience running anything so trump is light years ahead of where he was. Hating Republicans doesn't make your idiotic beliefs look any better.

 

[Iceweasel]

Only if she decides to be the food Nazi and tell schools how to eat.

Bad First Lady character: Wanting to encourage healthy eating among the children of our country.

Good First Lady character: Being a mail order gold-digger bride.

Some people are so ******* stupid.

You missed the point, as usual. Michelle has been heavy handed and nobody elected her to control what everyone's kids eat. That should be up to local communities but she, like her worthless husband believes in making their opinions the law for everyone.

That concerns me a lot more than a woman in her birthday suit. Europeans don't get apoplectic over the human form. They were doing nude paintings 500 years ago. Statues much longer.

Mail order gold digger? Where did you get that from? HuffPo?

Nancy has been heavy handed and nobody elected her to control the drugs that adults take. That should be up to local communities but she, like her worthless husband Ronald believes in making their opinions law for everyone.

"Just Say No"

Just say no controlled drug use? Which law did she push through? You are perpetually confused.

 

[rightwinger]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

 

[Care4all]

Did anyone ever think the Donalds lifestyle and spouse would not be a target? Tons of garbage has been thrown at Hillary's spouse....

 

[Correll]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Such as yourself.

You should be ashamed of your slut shaming.

The fact that you could do it so clearly and still deny that you were doing it, shows how irrationally partisan you are.

If this issue gets legs with the libs, and feminists remain quiet, they will once again prove they are nothing but political whores worthy of nothing but contempt.

 

[Seawytch]

Only if she decides to be the food Nazi and tell schools how to eat.

Bad First Lady character: Wanting to encourage healthy eating among the children of our country.

Good First Lady character: Being a mail order gold-digger bride.

Some people are so ******* stupid.

You missed the point, as usual. Michelle has been heavy handed and nobody elected her to control what everyone's kids eat. That should be up to local communities but she, like her worthless husband believes in making their opinions the law for everyone.

That concerns me a lot more than a woman in her birthday suit. Europeans don't get apoplectic over the human form. They were doing nude paintings 500 years ago. Statues much longer.

Mail order gold digger? Where did you get that from? HuffPo?

Nancy has been heavy handed and nobody elected her to control the drugs that adults take. That should be up to local communities but she, like her worthless husband Ronald believes in making their opinions law for everyone.

"Just Say No"

Just say no controlled drug use? Which law did she push through? You are perpetually confused.

Ah yes...no valid response so we have the ad hominem. Poorly executed I might add.

What law was pushed through? Are you ******* kidding me? The War on Drugs

The presidency of Ronald Reagan marked the start of a long period of skyrocketing rates of incarceration, largely thanks to his unprecedented expansion of the drug war. The number of people behind bars for nonviolent drug law offenses increased from 50,000 in 1980 to over 400,000 by 1997.​

 

[Seawytch]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

No? How about a quote from Herr Trump himself?

“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

We also have interviews with his actual wives. It's not like he's not been in the news for the last 30 years.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Why would it not be an issue in the General? Pointing out that the candidate for the "Family Values" party is three times divorced while the Democratic candidate is still on her first marriage?

 

[rightwinger]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Such as yourself.

You should be ashamed of your slut shaming.

The fact that you could do it so clearly and still deny that you were doing it, shows how irrationally partisan you are.

If this issue gets legs with the libs, and feminists remain quiet, they will once again prove they are nothing but political whores worthy of nothing but contempt.

Marla Maples

 

[Correll]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

No? How about a quote from Herr Trump himself?

“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

We also have interviews with his actual wives. It's not like he's not been in the news for the last 30 years.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Why would it not be an issue in the General? Pointing out that the candidate for the "Family Values" party is three times divorced while the Democratic candidate is still on her first marriage?

1. SOme trash talk from an old rich man with a much younger wife does not demonstrate anything about the women in question. Doesn't even say a lot about the man.

2. Trump won't be running a Family Values campaign. If he says anything that sounds like he might be, it's just a trap for Hillary.

2b Hillary's enabling of Bill's sexual predatory hobby and his vicious cover ups, is worse than Trump's cheating and divorces. BY far, imo.

 

[rightwinger]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

No? How about a quote from Herr Trump himself?

“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

We also have interviews with his actual wives. It's not like he's not been in the news for the last 30 years.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Why would it not be an issue in the General? Pointing out that the candidate for the "Family Values" party is three times divorced while the Democratic candidate is still on her first marriage?

I'm sure it will come up in the General Election

The Clintons have been married for 40 years. As Conservatives point out every day, Hillary is not a "looker. Bill Clinton found other values such as intellect and personal depth. Bill Clinton's marital infidelities are well documented. But Hillary stuck by him and Bill never dumped her for a more attractive model

Trumps marital past has also been well documented in the tabloids for 35 years. He has maintained the image of a millionaire playboy keeping arm candy. He considers attractiveness as a woman's primary asset. He openly cheated on Ivana and dumped her when she lost her looks. He got Marla Maples pregnant before they eventually married. Melania was another fashion model doing soft porn shoots. She is 25 years younger than Trump.

Now, lets compare the family values of Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump

 

[Correll]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Such as yourself.

You should be ashamed of your slut shaming.

The fact that you could do it so clearly and still deny that you were doing it, shows how irrationally partisan you are.

If this issue gets legs with the libs, and feminists remain quiet, they will once again prove they are nothing but political whores worthy of nothing but contempt.

Marla Maples

Sorry. I don't see how that relates to anything in my post.

Are you implying that she is such a "slut" and a "whore" that the very act of naming her makes your case?

 

[rightwinger]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

No? How about a quote from Herr Trump himself?

“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

We also have interviews with his actual wives. It's not like he's not been in the news for the last 30 years.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Why would it not be an issue in the General? Pointing out that the candidate for the "Family Values" party is three times divorced while the Democratic candidate is still on her first marriage?

1. SOme trash talk from an old rich man with a much younger wife does not demonstrate anything about the women in question. Doesn't even say a lot about the man.

2. Trump won't be running a Family Values campaign. If he says anything that sounds like he might be, it's just a trap for Hillary.

2b Hillary's enabling of Bill's sexual predatory hobby and his vicious cover ups, is worse than Trump's cheating and divorces. BY far, imo.

How can a woman standing by her husband be worse than a man dumping his wife because she is getting older and unattractive?

 

[Correll]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

No? How about a quote from Herr Trump himself?

“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

We also have interviews with his actual wives. It's not like he's not been in the news for the last 30 years.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Why would it not be an issue in the General? Pointing out that the candidate for the "Family Values" party is three times divorced while the Democratic candidate is still on her first marriage?

I'm sure it will come up in the General Election

The Clintons have been married for 40 years. As Conservatives point out every day, Hillary is not a "looker. Bill Clinton found other values such as intellect and personal depth. Bill Clinton's marital infidelities are well documented. But Hillary stuck by him and Bill never dumped her for a more attractive model

Trumps marital past has also been well documented in the tabloids for 35 years. He has maintained the image of a millionaire playboy keeping arm candy. He considers attractiveness as a woman's primary asset. He openly cheated on Ivana and dumped her when she lost her looks. He got Marla Maples pregnant before they eventually married. Melania was another fashion model doing soft porn shoots. She is 25 years younger than Trump.

Now, lets compare the family values of Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump

Donald Trump never launched a vicious nation wide smear campaign against an innocent woman(s) in order to protect a sexual predator spouse.

 

[Correll]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

No? How about a quote from Herr Trump himself?

“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

We also have interviews with his actual wives. It's not like he's not been in the news for the last 30 years.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Why would it not be an issue in the General? Pointing out that the candidate for the "Family Values" party is three times divorced while the Democratic candidate is still on her first marriage?

1. SOme trash talk from an old rich man with a much younger wife does not demonstrate anything about the women in question. Doesn't even say a lot about the man.

2. Trump won't be running a Family Values campaign. If he says anything that sounds like he might be, it's just a trap for Hillary.

2b Hillary's enabling of Bill's sexual predatory hobby and his vicious cover ups, is worse than Trump's cheating and divorces. BY far, imo.

How can a woman standing by her husband be worse than a man dumping his wife because she is getting older and unattractive?

Because of the evil and vile way of which Hillary defended her investment.

 

[rightwinger]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Such as yourself.

You should be ashamed of your slut shaming.

The fact that you could do it so clearly and still deny that you were doing it, shows how irrationally partisan you are.

If this issue gets legs with the libs, and feminists remain quiet, they will once again prove they are nothing but political whores worthy of nothing but contempt.

Marla Maples

Sorry. I don't see how that relates to anything in my post.

Are you implying that she is such a "slut" and a "whore" that the very act of naming her makes your case?

From your post

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid

Marla Maples

 

[amrchaos]

Cruz is a loudmouth loser

Why are we talking about him?


Ohhh...my inner Trump took over! Trump is so dangerous that he can install psychological copies into the unsuspecting voter!

Dump Trump! Don't choose Cruz!! Flee the GOP!!!
Easy campaign slogans for Democrats

 

[rightwinger]

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

No? How about a quote from Herr Trump himself?

“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

We also have interviews with his actual wives. It's not like he's not been in the news for the last 30 years.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Why would it not be an issue in the General? Pointing out that the candidate for the "Family Values" party is three times divorced while the Democratic candidate is still on her first marriage?

1. SOme trash talk from an old rich man with a much younger wife does not demonstrate anything about the women in question. Doesn't even say a lot about the man.

2. Trump won't be running a Family Values campaign. If he says anything that sounds like he might be, it's just a trap for Hillary.

2b Hillary's enabling of Bill's sexual predatory hobby and his vicious cover ups, is worse than Trump's cheating and divorces. BY far, imo.

How can a woman standing by her husband be worse than a man dumping his wife because she is getting older and unattractive?

Because of the evil and vile way of which Hillary defended her investment.

If you consider her family her investment. Millions of women have done the same

 

[rightwinger]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

No? How about a quote from Herr Trump himself?

“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

We also have interviews with his actual wives. It's not like he's not been in the news for the last 30 years.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Why would it not be an issue in the General? Pointing out that the candidate for the "Family Values" party is three times divorced while the Democratic candidate is still on her first marriage?

I'm sure it will come up in the General Election

The Clintons have been married for 40 years. As Conservatives point out every day, Hillary is not a "looker. Bill Clinton found other values such as intellect and personal depth. Bill Clinton's marital infidelities are well documented. But Hillary stuck by him and Bill never dumped her for a more attractive model

Trumps marital past has also been well documented in the tabloids for 35 years. He has maintained the image of a millionaire playboy keeping arm candy. He considers attractiveness as a woman's primary asset. He openly cheated on Ivana and dumped her when she lost her looks. He got Marla Maples pregnant before they eventually married. Melania was another fashion model doing soft porn shoots. She is 25 years younger than Trump.

Now, lets compare the family values of Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump

Donald Trump never launched a vicious nation wide smear campaign against an innocent woman(s) in order to protect a sexual predator spouse.

You have never read his divorce records have you?

 

[Correll]

I am really curious-

Who thinks it is inappropriate to attack the looks of the First Lady or the candidates wives-
and who thinks they are fair game?

Correll?
Iceweasel?
Isaac?
Rightwinger?

I don't think a First Ladies looks are the issue

The issue is Donald Trumps superficial views of what makes a good wife and who is worthy of dating him. His history with women is certainly up for discussion. As a millionaire playboy, Trump has shown a preference for arm candy over substance. He has shown how he discards a wife after she no longer is attractive.

It is a reflection of how Trump views women

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Such as yourself.

You should be ashamed of your slut shaming.

The fact that you could do it so clearly and still deny that you were doing it, shows how irrationally partisan you are.

If this issue gets legs with the libs, and feminists remain quiet, they will once again prove they are nothing but political whores worthy of nothing but contempt.

Marla Maples

Sorry. I don't see how that relates to anything in my post.

Are you implying that she is such a "slut" and a "whore" that the very act of naming her makes your case?

From your post

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid

Marla Maples

Soooooo, you're implying that she is so well known for being stupid that I should know that by the mention of her name?

Sorry, I don't know that.

If you want to make that point, that she is stupid, you will have to demonstrate it.

 

[Correll]

Donald Trump's marital history is a valid issue.

Your assumption that his wives were "arm candy" or not "intellectual" has not been supported by anything but your sexist assumption that pretty equals stupid.

No? How about a quote from Herr Trump himself?

“You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

We also have interviews with his actual wives. It's not like he's not been in the news for the last 30 years.

Actually, I should say, that Trump's marital history is a valid issue in the Republican Campaign.

Once we get to the general, no Democrat who stood by Bill Clinton has any moral standing to complain about Donald Trump's history of cheating and divorce.

Why would it not be an issue in the General? Pointing out that the candidate for the "Family Values" party is three times divorced while the Democratic candidate is still on her first marriage?

1. SOme trash talk from an old rich man with a much younger wife does not demonstrate anything about the women in question. Doesn't even say a lot about the man.

2. Trump won't be running a Family Values campaign. If he says anything that sounds like he might be, it's just a trap for Hillary.

2b Hillary's enabling of Bill's sexual predatory hobby and his vicious cover ups, is worse than Trump's cheating and divorces. BY far, imo.

How can a woman standing by her husband be worse than a man dumping his wife because she is getting older and unattractive?

Because of the evil and vile way of which Hillary defended her investment.

If you consider her family her investment. Millions of women have done the same

Millions of women have not lied to the entire nation.