We are seeing a lot of criticism of what Israel did do and is doing. But what should they have done and what should they do? The Squad has no answer, what about you?
Please explain how your answer would prevent such attacks in the future?
Thanks.
First off all - it has always been the clear intention of the Zionists since around 1830 (foremost in Russia) to create an own State called Israel. In the land that their God supposedly promised them. Regardless of who had been living there, in absolute majority for the past 2000 years. aka Palestinian-Arabs and Palestinian Bedouin-Arabs.
Germany aka Nazi Germany was clearly responsible for the Jewish Holocaust. Something that no one - also not the British, could have been aware off in 1917 - when the Balfour declaration came into play - granting Jews a Homeland in Palestine. Until 1936 basically no significant number of Jews were willing to settle in this barren land. So no one in the Western hemisphere really cared about the Balfour Deceleration.
Those who knew the Zionist Jews and their clear intentions were the Arabs. Who already upon the Balfour deceleration voiced a clear opposition. But the Western hemisphere couldn't be bothered.
Due to the Holocaust - the Jewish people until today are living of a collective Western guilt complex, and especially the Zionists know perfectly how to make use of it.
Britain was aware of this added influx of Jewish immigrants since 1936 and thus knew about the increasing violence in Palestine. That the Mufti of Jerusalem - spokesperson of the Palestinian-Arabs was on great terms with Hitler was also known to them - BTW the later PLO/Fatah leader Arafat was a relative of this Mufti.
Britain made the by far largest mistake in granting Trans-Jordan independence in 1946 as being the Kingdom of Jordan. Thereby reducing British Palestine territory by approximately 70%. Furthermore they did not or simply didn't want to recognize the significant cultural and social difference, between Palestinian-Arabs, mostly urban population, and Bedouin Arabs living now in majority in Jordan and far less in Palestine. The vast majority of land owners in the remaining British Palestine were Bedouin-Arabs due to tribal culture and therefore homeland association since hundreds of years.
However until Ben-Gurion took his chances in 1948 via declaring independence and thus forcefully and via intimidation driving of the urban Palestinian-Arabs - there was no friction between Palestinian-Arabs and Bedouin-Arabs. The Zionist played a very smart/insidious policy via promising Bedouin-Arabs that they could keep their lands in Israel, thus hoping to diminish the influence and anti-Israel stance of the Arab League, whilst driving off the urban Palestinian-Arabs.
The Arab League factually couldn't be bothered by Palestinian-Arabs fleeing - mostly into Jordan, but had already made up it's mind, not to tolerate a Jewish State - naturally taking into account that they would easily defeat the Jews and therefore everything returning back to normal aka just as to before 1917.
As history taught the Zionists prevailed and both, Israelis (independent of further Jewish immigrants) and the Palestinian-Arabs breed like rabbits. Causing today's dilemma that Israel simply isn't large enough to house 9 million Israelis and 14 million Palestinian-Arabs, (total population around 23 million people). No matter how Israel might be partitioned. Not to mention the economic survive-ability of such a country, that until today has received approx. US$ 200 Billion since the 50'ies (non inflation adjusted) and has special trade preference regulations throughout the EU and most of the world, such an Israel simple couldn't sustain/survive.
Israel consists to at least 50% of inhabitable desert, making its livable territory incl. Gaza and the West-bank around 8000ml2 - thus equal in size of Slovenia that houses around 2 million people. - or about 90% the size of Vermont housing 700,000 people.
Even if they would be willing to live together in "harmony" - its economically and territorial non feasible - at least to me.
That leaves basically four possibilities:
1. the Zionist way - keep claiming and occupying Palestinian-Arab lands - kill them off, and let the survivors rot in some neighbor-state.
Most likely the reality.
2. Israel agrees to cede the West-bank to Jordan - thus Jordan&PLO+Hamas finding their own arrangement
Highly unlikely but still possible - depending on the US$ flowing into Jordan.
3. the Jews go back to were they came from - mostly Europe.
Probably the moderate Jews would accept - the Zionist never - if the moderates would leave, the Arabs will replay 1948/9 with the remaining Zionists.
4. e.g. Australia offers the Palestinians 30,000 - 50,000mls2 to start up their own country. Plus a Trillion US$ provided from other countries.
I could imagine that the Palestinian-Arabs in majority, would accept under the agreement that Jerusalem is not Israels capital but remains an open city governed via a Jewish/Palestinian council - or the UN appoints e.g. Switzerland to do the job.
Violence would still continue on a lower scale and the Zionists will make sure that eventually Jerusalem becomes theirs.
The Palestinian state in Australia would eventually prosper - and independent of options 1-4 somewhere in the next 50 years, some Islamic country might very well nuke the shit out of Israel - ignoring their own demise.
Which makes option 3 & 4 in a combination - the highest survival chance for Jewish people.