LOki
The Yaweh of Mischief
- Mar 26, 2006
- 4,084
- 359
- 85
Nonsense. Only for the faithful does "prove" require "proof" that is absolute and not to be questioned.It takes faith for both sides to believe as they do when you can't prove what you believe that is faith.
Only the intellectually disingenuous insist that if you don't possess the absolutely complete knowledge of everything, then you cannot make any claim of any degree of certainty in the knowledge of anything.
I'm sure it does. I am just as sure that what you think it reveals about me, reveals a great deal about you.To use the term retards is very revealing about you.
This misrepresentation of fact should be considered a lie, if it is intentional.Your side interprets evidence the same way but because they call it science you believe it.
Which, if you have any notion of what you're talking about, is necessarily true.
But, if you are so dissociated from understanding the real world that you have no idea what you're talking about, then perhaps you're a little retarded.
Maybe you just misspoke. Care to try again?
Quite correct. Which is the precise point I'm making regarding the "science" involved in creationism.It's not real science if faith is required to believe such silly things.