What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs

teapartysamurai

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
20,056
Reaction score
2,557
Points
290
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs

Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.

Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.

The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.

I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
120,561
Reaction score
35,456
Points
2,220
It's all from their Spiritual Father

"...in the spring of 1972, at Tulane University...students asked Alinsky to help plan a protest of a scheduled speech by George H. W. Bush, then U.S. representative to the United Nations - a speech likely to include a defense of the Nixon administration's Vietnam War policies. The students told Alinsky they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush's address. That's the wrong approach, he rejoined, not very creative - and besides causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school. He told them, instead, to go to hear the speech dressed as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards reading, ‘The KKK supports Bush.' And that is what they did, with very successful, attention-getting results." -- From "Let Them Call Me Rebel" by Sanford D. Horwitt
 

Xenophon

Gone and forgotten
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
3,927
Points
48
Location
In your head
Sould be obvious how 'effective' such attacks have been.

Outside of convincing a number of shiteaters they are correct in their loony toon view of this protest movement, its been a spectacular failure.

The movement continues to grow, and every false story, every smear, every bit of underhanded bullshit against it just brings more people into it.
 

VaYank5150

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
11,779
Reaction score
1,064
Points
138
Location
Virginia
Sould be obvious how 'effective' such attacks have been.

Outside of convincing a number of shiteaters they are correct in their loony toon view of this protest movement, its been a spectacular failure.

The movement continues to grow, and every false story, every smear, every bit of underhanded bullshit against it just brings more people into it.

I agree. I cannot wait until the "federation" of Tea Baggers starts to push their own candidates....
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
120,561
Reaction score
35,456
Points
2,220
What happened to the BarackObama.com orchestrated "Coffee Party" movement, run out of foam?
 

Xenophon

Gone and forgotten
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
3,927
Points
48
Location
In your head
Sould be obvious how 'effective' such attacks have been.

Outside of convincing a number of shiteaters they are correct in their loony toon view of this protest movement, its been a spectacular failure.

The movement continues to grow, and every false story, every smear, every bit of underhanded bullshit against it just brings more people into it.

I agree. I cannot wait until the "federation" of Tea Baggers starts to push their own candidates....

Oh, so you are getting all your sack on the chin lovers together to form your own party shiteater?

Good for you!
 

Nosmo King

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
26,370
Reaction score
7,252
Points
290
Location
Buckle of the Rust Belt
It's as if Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers never existed! The wingnut Conservatives are claiming that: " Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL."

They have yet again failed to study history. History and nuance are not strong cards in the hands of Conservatives as they tend to overplay their hands (claiming 'victim-hood' on one side and decrying the "Liberal notion of victim-hood" on the other).

I suggest that the Tea Baggers read how Nixon subverted dissent by planting F.B.I. agents in student protest groups and how that tactic wrecked the First Amendment.

Then, come back and talk about political tactics and make some more ridiculous blanket claims and innuendos.

Poor pissed off Conservatives. Had they just spoken up when the crisis started (back under their boy W), perhaps those of us who see would take them more seriously.
 

Xenophon

Gone and forgotten
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
3,927
Points
48
Location
In your head
It's as if Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers never existed! The wingnut Conservatives are claiming that: " Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL."

They have yet again failed to study history. History and nuance are not strong cards in the hands of Conservatives as they tend to overplay their hands (claiming 'victim-hood' on one side and decrying the "Liberal notion of victim-hood" on the other).

I suggest that the Tea Baggers read how Nixon subverted dissent by planting F.B.I. agents in student protest groups and how that tactic wrecked the First Amendment.

Then, come back and talk about political tactics and make some more ridiculous blanket claims and innuendos.

Poor pissed off Conservatives. Had they just spoken up when the crisis started (back under their boy W), perhaps those of us who see would take them more seriously.
The only 'tea baggers' are the shit eaters who worship at the teet of corrupt big government.

If you want to be taken seriously, I sugest you stop using that phrase, I don't take kindly to being insulted.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
120,561
Reaction score
35,456
Points
2,220
It's as if Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers never existed! The wingnut Conservatives are claiming that: " Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL."

They have yet again failed to study history. History and nuance are not strong cards in the hands of Conservatives as they tend to overplay their hands (claiming 'victim-hood' on one side and decrying the "Liberal notion of victim-hood" on the other).

I suggest that the Tea Baggers read how Nixon subverted dissent by planting F.B.I. agents in student protest groups and how that tactic wrecked the First Amendment.

Then, come back and talk about political tactics and make some more ridiculous blanket claims and innuendos.

Poor pissed off Conservatives. Had they just spoken up when the crisis started (back under their boy W), perhaps those of us who see would take them more seriously.

"...in the spring of 1972, at Tulane University...students asked Alinsky to help plan a protest of a scheduled speech by George H. W. Bush, then U.S. representative to the United Nations - a speech likely to include a defense of the Nixon administration's Vietnam War policies. The students told Alinsky they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush's address. That's the wrong approach, he rejoined, not very creative - and besides causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school. He told them, instead, to go to hear the speech dressed as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards reading, ‘The KKK supports Bush.' And that is what they did, with very successful, attention-getting results." -- From "Let Them Call Me Rebel" by Sanford D. Horwitt
 

masquerade

positivity
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
4,508
Reaction score
1,465
Points
48
Location
right of center
AUTHENTIC TEA PARTY MEMBER!!

Yeah ... I think that's what my sign is going to say on Wednesday when I attend the Tea Party Rally in Boston. My sign in one hand, my camera in the other ... ready to get footage of the truth!
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
14,201
Reaction score
3,563
Points
185
What happened to the BarackObama.com orchestrated "Coffee Party" movement, run out of foam?

I think you and I are the only ones who still remember it.

Those who were pushing such a short time ago have let is slide down the memory hole.

It got a lot of positive press until they realized it wasn't going anywhere. Know when to hold em, know when to fold em, know when to walk away, know when to run
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
91,344
Reaction score
23,491
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs

Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.

Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.

The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.

I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.

How convenient. It can't possibly be the more volatile and extremist members of the Tea Party movement - it's sabateurs!

Makes a good excuse for bad behavior I guess.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: blu

edthecynic

Censored for Cynicism
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
41,667
Reaction score
6,147
Points
1,830
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs

Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.

Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.

The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.

I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.
3288761864_51c8fb7575.jpg

That's noted right-wing shill Michelle Malkin posing with the "Swastika Guy," owing to the sign he carried right onto the stage with State Senator Josh Penry, Congressman Mike Coffman, Colorado GOP Chairman Dick Wadhams, State Senator Dave Schultheis, former Congressman Tom Tancredo, and Independence Institute president Jon Caldara, among others.
 
Last edited:

NYcarbineer

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
117,063
Reaction score
13,861
Points
2,210
Location
Finger Lakes, NY
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs

Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.

Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.

The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.

I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.

Do you still think the Nazis were liberals?

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 

editec

Mr. Forgot-it-All
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
41,421
Reaction score
5,662
Points
48
Location
Maine
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs

Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.

Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.

The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.

I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.

How convenient. It can't possibly be the more volatile and extremist members of the Tea Party movement - it's sabateurs!

Makes a good excuse for bad behavior I guess.


Of course if history be our guide, then it is at least a decent possibility that this is (in part at least) how anti-teaparty forces might attempt to discredit that movement.

Hey, I was in PLENTY of rooms with agent provocateurs during the days of Nixxon, folks.

And the modus operandi of power and control that worked for the pseudo-conservatives of that era, is still just as effective as it ever was.

Word to the wise...never join any revolution you didn't start.
 
OP
teapartysamurai

teapartysamurai

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
20,056
Reaction score
2,557
Points
290
It's as if Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers never existed! The wingnut Conservatives are claiming that: " Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL."

They have yet again failed to study history. History and nuance are not strong cards in the hands of Conservatives as they tend to overplay their hands (claiming 'victim-hood' on one side and decrying the "Liberal notion of victim-hood" on the other).

I suggest that the Tea Baggers read how Nixon subverted dissent by planting F.B.I. agents in student protest groups and how that tactic wrecked the First Amendment.

Then, come back and talk about political tactics and make some more ridiculous blanket claims and innuendos.

Poor pissed off Conservatives. Had they just spoken up when the crisis started (back under their boy W), perhaps those of us who see would take them more seriously.

Subverted dissent?????? :lol:

How the hell old are you?

Did you see the protests back then? And you want to read some papers. How about the papers that came into our hands after the Soivet Union fell that cooborate that the Soviets were behind a lot of the groups involved in the protests????

Yeah, Nixon subverted dissent sooooo well, he was dissented out of office.

But when you have to go back that far to try and bring up a case of a "conservative." What does that tell you? :lol:

I hate to break it to you, but Nixon was NOT a conservative.

You want to know what administration started the EPA? Yeah that was Nixon.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
91,344
Reaction score
23,491
Points
2,180
Location
in between
It's as if Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers never existed! The wingnut Conservatives are claiming that: " Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL."

They have yet again failed to study history. History and nuance are not strong cards in the hands of Conservatives as they tend to overplay their hands (claiming 'victim-hood' on one side and decrying the "Liberal notion of victim-hood" on the other).

I suggest that the Tea Baggers read how Nixon subverted dissent by planting F.B.I. agents in student protest groups and how that tactic wrecked the First Amendment.

Then, come back and talk about political tactics and make some more ridiculous blanket claims and innuendos.

Poor pissed off Conservatives. Had they just spoken up when the crisis started (back under their boy W), perhaps those of us who see would take them more seriously.

Subverted dissent?????? :lol:

How the hell old are you?

Did you see the protests back then? And you want to read some papers. How about the papers that came into our hands after the Soivet Union fell that cooborate that the Soviets were behind a lot of the groups involved in the protests????

Yeah, Nixon subverted dissent sooooo well, he was dissented out of office.

But when you have to go back that far to try and bring up a case of a "conservative." What does that tell you? :lol:

I hate to break it to you, but Nixon was NOT a conservative.

You want to know what administration started the EPA? Yeah that was Nixon.

Clearly proof that Nixon was not a conservative. Sure.
 
OP
teapartysamurai

teapartysamurai

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
20,056
Reaction score
2,557
Points
290
Michelle Malkin Crash course: Your illustrated guide to the Tea Party saboteurs

Liberals never could debate honestly. They know if they do, they lose. Their ideas just don't hold up against honest debate. So, they smear.

It's not about honesty or facts. It's about one thing with them, CONTROL.

Any challenge to that is going to be met with every scorched earth tatic they can spew.

The first trick of fighting liberalism is to know that.

I wish the "non partisan, can we all get along, I will reach across the aisle" RINOs would figure this out.

How convenient. It can't possibly be the more volatile and extremist members of the Tea Party movement - it's sabateurs!

Makes a good excuse for bad behavior I guess.

What extremist and volatile? I mean Jesse Jackson Jr. (he was the one right) walked right through a Tea party cameras a blazing, and YET they could not produce any footage to back up their claims to being calling him the N word.

Give me a break. :lol:
 
Last edited:

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top