Nolte: Yes, Democrats Really Do Want to Groom Your Children

[excalibur]

The truth, that is why they have reacted as they have over a simple law in Florida to protect children K-3. Look at all the lies they have and are spewing over that law.

Of course the political left and the Democrat party want to sexually groom little kids. The evidence is everywhere and the reasons why are sick and political.

Is this not clear enough for you?

How about this?

Or this?

Or the debate we’re having right now…

THE LEFT: We don’t want to sexualize little kids behind the backs of parents. Stop saying that. It’s a lie!

FLORIDA: We’re going to outlaw sexualizing little kids behind the backs of parents.

THE LEFT: NOOOOooooooo!

What kind of country are we living in where we even have to pass a bill that outlaws sexualizing kids aged four to eight in the classroom?

What kind of country are we living in where Florida teachers are angry that they can’t discuss their personal lives with your little kids, much less discuss sex?

What kind of country are we living in where the Walt Disney Co., a company built on the idea of preserving the innocence of children and teaching them lessons about honesty, hard work, and true love, is now openly bragging about feeding the little kids sexual propaganda?

Of course, this is grooming.

What else would you call it?

...​

Nolte: Yes, Democrats Really Do Want to Groom Your Children

Of course the political left wants to sexually groom little kids. The evidence is everywhere and the reasons why are sick and political.

www.breitbart.com

 

[1srelluc]

In a just society a tall building would await the pedos.

 

[excalibur]

One site has basically banned using the word 'grooming'. Guess who runs that site? Leftoids.

 

[Moonglow]

There is no Democrat Party in power in the US. Did you people finish seventh grade?

 

[frigidweirdo]

The truth, that is why they have reacted as they have over a simple law in Florida to protect children K-3. Look at all the lies they have and are spewing over that law.

​

Of course the political left and the Democrat party want to sexually groom little kids. The evidence is everywhere and the reasons why are sick and political.​

​

Is this not clear enough for you?​

​

How about this?​

​

Or this?​

​

Or the debate we’re having right now…​

​

THE LEFT: We don’t want to sexualize little kids behind the backs of parents. Stop saying that. It’s a lie!​

​

FLORIDA: We’re going to outlaw sexualizing little kids behind the backs of parents.​

​

THE LEFT: NOOOOooooooo!​

​

What kind of country are we living in where we even have to pass a bill that outlaws sexualizing kids aged four to eight in the classroom?​

​

What kind of country are we living in where Florida teachers are angry that they can’t discuss their personal lives with your little kids, much less discuss sex?​

​

What kind of country are we living in where the Walt Disney Co., a company built on the idea of preserving the innocence of children and teaching them lessons about honesty, hard work, and true love, is now openly bragging about feeding the little kids sexual propaganda?​

​

Of course, this is grooming.​

​

What else would you call it?​

​

...​

Nolte: Yes, Democrats Really Do Want to Groom Your Children

Of course the political left wants to sexually groom little kids. The evidence is everywhere and the reasons why are sick and political.

www.breitbart.com

The problem is the sexualization of kids happens all over. The media is massively guilty. It's NOT schools doing it.

Schools are, for the most part, trying to EDUCATE children.

Infographic: Sex Education Mandatory in Half of U.S. States

This chart shows state laws on sex education in the U.S.

www.statista.com

Here's a nice map of sex ed in the US.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases by State | National Council For Home Safety and Security

www.alarms.org

Here's a map of STD

Mississippi is number one for STDs.

Teen rights to sex ed, birth control and more in Mississippi - Sex, Etc.

Know the age of consent and understand your rights to sex ed, birth control, abortion and other sexual health services in Mississippi.

sexetc.org

"Mississippi state law requires that abstinence-only or abstinence-plus education be taught in schools."

"however, sex ed in Mississippi “shall not include instruction and demonstrations on the application and use of condoms.”"

"Mississippi state law does not require STDs and HIV/AIDS education, but it school sex ed programs are to discuss “the nature, causes and effects of [STDs],” and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other [STDs].”"

So clearly the lack of GOOD sex ed in Mississippi is part of the problem.

Nevada is number two for STDs in the US.

"Teaching about abstinence or contraceptives, such as condoms, the Pill, or the Patch, is not required."

"Teaching about abstinence or contraceptives, such as condoms, the Pill, or the Patch, is not required."

Nevada's sex ed is probably better than Mississippi's, though I'd suggest Vegas plays a big part in all of this.

Louisiana is third for STDs.

"Louisiana state law does not overtly require sex ed to be taught in school, but as of the 2014-2015 school year, students are required to take a half-credit of health education."

"Students are to “learn about sexual abstinence and sexual risk behaviors…"

California is number 4

The issue with CA is that many people are from outside of CA. Sex ed doesn't impact them if they don't go through sex ed in the first place.

San Francisco attracts lots of gay people from other states, people who'll move there in their early adulthood, having had sex ed (or not) in another state.

San Francisco, CA | Data USA

In 2021, San Francisco, CA had a population of 866k people with a median age of 38.7 and a median household income of $126,187. Between 2020 and 2021 the population of San Francisco, CA declined from 874,784 to 865,933, a −1.01% decrease and its median household income grew from $119,136 to...

datausa.io

"As of 2019, 34% of San Francisco, CA residents were born outside of the country (300k people)."

Also San Francisco is known as the gay capital of the US and this probably attracts people who do sleep around a lot and don't take as many precautions.

New Mexico is number 5

"Abstinence must be covered and stressed as the only completely effective protection against unplanned pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and HIV/AIDS when transmitted sexually."

So clearly there's a link between the teaching of abstinence only, and proper sex ed and the amount of STDs in a state. Education IS THE ANSWER. It's pretty clear.
But I guess it goes against people's religion, allowing them to push ignorance and problems for their own purposes.

 

[daveman]

There is no Democrat Party in power in the US. Did you people finish seventh grade?

If that's all you've got to complain about, I guess you agree with the rest.

 

[daveman]

The problem is the sexualization of kids happens all over. The media is massively guilty. It's NOT schools doing it.

Schools are, for the most part, trying to EDUCATE children.

Infographic: Sex Education Mandatory in Half of U.S. States

This chart shows state laws on sex education in the U.S.

www.statista.com

View attachment 628455


Here's a nice map of sex ed in the US.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases by State | National Council For Home Safety and Security

www.alarms.org

View attachment 628456

Here's a map of STD

Mississippi is number one for STDs.

Teen rights to sex ed, birth control and more in Mississippi - Sex, Etc.

Know the age of consent and understand your rights to sex ed, birth control, abortion and other sexual health services in Mississippi.

sexetc.org

"Mississippi state law requires that abstinence-only or abstinence-plus education be taught in schools."

"however, sex ed in Mississippi “shall not include instruction and demonstrations on the application and use of condoms.”"

"Mississippi state law does not require STDs and HIV/AIDS education, but it school sex ed programs are to discuss “the nature, causes and effects of [STDs],” and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other [STDs].”"

So clearly the lack of GOOD sex ed in Mississippi is part of the problem.

Nevada is number two for STDs in the US.

"Teaching about abstinence or contraceptives, such as condoms, the Pill, or the Patch, is not required."

"Teaching about abstinence or contraceptives, such as condoms, the Pill, or the Patch, is not required."

Nevada's sex ed is probably better than Mississippi's, though I'd suggest Vegas plays a big part in all of this.

Louisiana is third for STDs.

"Louisiana state law does not overtly require sex ed to be taught in school, but as of the 2014-2015 school year, students are required to take a half-credit of health education."

"Students are to “learn about sexual abstinence and sexual risk behaviors…"

California is number 4

The issue with CA is that many people are from outside of CA. Sex ed doesn't impact them if they don't go through sex ed in the first place.

San Francisco attracts lots of gay people from other states, people who'll move there in their early adulthood, having had sex ed (or not) in another state.

San Francisco, CA | Data USA

In 2021, San Francisco, CA had a population of 866k people with a median age of 38.7 and a median household income of $126,187. Between 2020 and 2021 the population of San Francisco, CA declined from 874,784 to 865,933, a −1.01% decrease and its median household income grew from $119,136 to...

datausa.io

"As of 2019, 34% of San Francisco, CA residents were born outside of the country (300k people)."

Also San Francisco is known as the gay capital of the US and this probably attracts people who do sleep around a lot and don't take as many precautions.

New Mexico is number 5

"Abstinence must be covered and stressed as the only completely effective protection against unplanned pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and HIV/AIDS when transmitted sexually."

So clearly there's a link between the teaching of abstinence only, and proper sex ed and the amount of STDs in a state. Education IS THE ANSWER. It's pretty clear.
But I guess it goes against people's religion, allowing them to push ignorance and problems for their own purposes.

"Abstinence must be covered and stressed as the only completely effective protection against unplanned pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and HIV/AIDS when transmitted sexually."

Do you disagree with that?

 

[mamooth]

Just a note -- using the term "groomer" is universally associated with the speaker being fascist filth, so it's best to avoid using that term. Unless you want people to think you're fascist filth.

The old Nazis accused the Jews of being pedos. The new Nazis accuses Democrats. Fascists don't change their tactics. They try to dehumanize their opposition, to justify even more brownshirt violence.

 

[daveman]

Just a note -- using the term "groomer" is universally associated with the speaker being fascist filth, so it's best to avoid using that term.

No, it's not, you big stupid liar.

 

[whitehall]

To clarify it's John Nolte not actor Nick Nolte.

 

[mamooth]

No, it's not, you big stupid liar.

Got it. You want everyone to know you're fascist filth.

Tell us your life story. You weren't always perpetually-triggered fascist filth. You used to be semi-normal.

Aside from me and other liberals here humiliating you over the years, what else started your slide into fascism? Did liberals beat you up on the playground and steal your lunch money? Did a liberal steal your girl? Did the liberals have all the fun while you sulked at home?

Come on, spill. Maybe we can help.

 

[scruffy]

Just a note -- using the term "groomer" is universally associated with the speaker being fascist filth, so it's best to avoid using that term. Unless you want people to think you're fascist filth.

The old Nazis accused the Jews of being pedos. The new Nazis accuses Democrats. Fascists don't change their tactics. They try to dehumanize their opposition, to justify even more brownshirt violence.

Oh please.

The left is the only one with brown shirts around here.

Remember? Summer of Love?

 

[mamooth]

The left is the only one with brown shirts around here.

Again, right out of the fascist playbook.

The Nazis faked stories of violent Jews to justify more brownshirt violence against Jews.

You're faking stories of violent liberals to justify more brownshirt violent against liberals.

And you tried a kristallnacht with your violent assault on the capitol. It's a good thing you're such an incompetent pack of violent fascists.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

So, there you have it. Those who oppose “fascism” these days, define opposing the sexual abuse of children as “fascist”.

Just a note -- using the term "groomer" is universally associated with the speaker being fascist filth, so it's best to avoid using that term. Unless you want people to think you're fascist filth.

 

[mamooth]

So, there you have it. Those who oppose “fascism” these days, define opposing the sexual abuse of children as “fascist”.

No need to be so proud about being a pedo-enabler.

Hey, you set the standard, so you get to live by it. If you can call everyone you don't like a pedo-enabler, liberals get to do it to. Anything else would be a blatant double-standard.

 

[fncceo]

One site has basically banned using the word 'grooming'. Guess who runs that site? Leftoids.

Where do they send their dogs to get gussied up?

 

[scruffy]

Again, right out of the fascist playbook.

The Nazis faked stories of violent Jews to justify more brownshirt violence against Jews.

You're faking stories of violent liberals to justify more brownshirt violent against liberals.

And you tried a kristallnacht with your violent assault on the capitol. It's a good thing you're such an incompetent pack of violent fascists.

BULLSHIT.

You dumbass lying leftard piece of shit.

YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF.

THIS ^^^ is exactly why progs are finished.

"Faking stories of violent liberals".

Fuck you, asshole. I'm not faking anything. I was there. I saw it all with my own two eyes. And so did millions of other PARENTS who were suddenly in fear for the lives of their children.

Fuck you from the bottom of my heart.

 

[Ghost1776]

If you don;t get the freaks out of your schools you are going to see real live Sodom and Gamorrah which tech is taking place now as they come for the American retards children. They have no idea their kids are being seduced as well as raped.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

If you don;t get the freaks out of your schools you are going to see real live Sodom and Gamorrah which tech is taking place now as they come for the American retards children. They have no idea their kids are being seduced as well as raped.

That Teacher is lying.
It's grooming.
The Gay Groomers refuse to accept that those students are not their children.
They believe that they a right to impose their dystopian culture on other people's children.
Parents have a 100% right to instill their culture in their own children
"teacher leave those kids alone"

 

[scruffy]

If you don;t get the freaks out of your schools you are going to see real live Sodom and Gamorrah which tech is taking place now as they come for the American retards children. They have no idea their kids are being seduced as well as raped.

I can't even believe these idiot leftists.

I mean, they literally can't be believed. Every word out of their mouths is a fucking lie.

Like the moron above - oh no, there aren't any violent leftists, it's all a figment of your imagination.

Well, I got news for this fucking retard, there are THOUSANDS of violent leftists, they tore apart 65 population centers this past summer, looted and burnt stores, stopped traffic so mommies couldn't pick up their kids from school and daddies couldn't get home from work, even killed a few people.

But NO, there arent any violent leftists. Of course not. Just like they're not trying to indoctrinated my kids in class. Doesn't happen, right? You show them the pictures, it still doesn't happen. Link them to the lesson plans, it still doesn't happen. Point them to the videos of it actually happening, it STILL doesn't happen.

These lefties are LIARS, there is no expectation whatsoever that any of them are here to engage in actual political debate. How can they, when every word is the exact opposite of reality?

This is why we parents are taking a stand.

These lefties LIE, they lie to the parents, they lie to the teachers, and the lie to the courts. And we're going to expose those lies, and clobber every one of them.

The mere fact that these fucktards can claim 'no violence" shows us exactly what they're made of. They're made of LIES. Lefties are LIARS. If they tell you there's no grooming going on, you can be very damn sure it's happening someplace.