- Apr 11, 2023
- 44,179
- 21,463
- 2,488
Of course it is. It's part of the process.It’s not part of the actual election and ballots
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course it is. It's part of the process.It’s not part of the actual election and ballots
There is no doubt about democrat cheating except for people who have been living under s rockIt’s your “job” to document your bullshit claims
Or just let them stand as bullshit
Mail in ballots should have signature and photo id. An id with a number!!There is no doubt about democrat cheating except for people who have been living under s rock
Its why libs opposed requiring a picture id to vote
No mail in ballots for anyoneMail in ballots should have signature and photo id. An id with a number!!
or that. absentee ballots only as before.No mail in ballots for anyone
I think it has to be all or nothingor that. absentee ballots only as before.
What there is...is no proof of any of your nonsensical claimsThere is no doubt about democrat cheating except for people who have been living under s rock
Its why libs opposed requiring a picture id to vote
Gonna suck for the military and seniors eh?No mail in ballots for anyone
YesGonna suck for the military and seniors eh?
Again, history confirms what I say is true since dems opposed picture id’sWhat there is...is no proof of any of your nonsensical claims
That was not your claim.Again, history confirms what I say is true since dems opposed picture id’s
My claim was that dems used imposters on election dayThat was not your claim.
You're full of shit
That's an enormous leap there junior.My claim was that dems used imposters on election day
Its why they opposed requiring picture IDs
and the two are exclusive!My claim was that dems used imposters on election day
Its why they opposed requiring picture IDs
it's never been investigated by the courts. Why is that? Why do demofks who own the courts disallow challenges to elections! What we do know is that illegal ballots used in harvesting. There is no evidence those ballots were legit.That's an enormous leap there junior.
There would be ways to prove that such a thing happened...and yet...no proof
Again you just point to one aspect of canvassing and ignoring the one that I am talking about as it is also canvassing
It used to happen all the time before main in ballots eliminated the needThat's an enormous leap there junior.
There would be ways to prove that such a thing happened...and yet...no proof
Maybe Bill Barr can he also laughed and called it bullshit!Explain why?
who is Bill Barr?Maybe Bill Barr can he also laughed and called it bullshit!
I'm saying they don't do what you say. 60 people called them on it and 60 judges said fk you to the 60. Proof shows one person dropped excessive ballots in drop boxes and again, no justice to look at it saying fk you to the proof. Yeah, fk off now.Again you just point to one aspect of canvassing and ignoring the one that I am talking about as it is also canvassing
Canvassing used in the election covers more than just getting people to vote. It also covers how the vote is processed
![]()
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!www.dictionary.com
noun
- the act or process of soliciting votes, subscriptions, opinions, etc., especially from individuals:Although social media definitely impacted their campaign, it was the door-to-door canvassing that made them successful
- the act or process of examining or investigating something carefully, often through debate or discussion :As we can see from even a limited canvassing of the issues in education, the challenges we face at this time come from within and without.
You see I gave a full explanation that it covers various things while you just focus on the one aspect that makes you feel that your right.
Republicans are referred to the right in politics but they are rarely right when they cherry pick aspects of any argument and hold it to be all that there is.