COVID Vaccine Requirements are 100% Political

“Vaccines actually, at least with regard to SARS-CoV-2, can do better than nature... They are better than the traditional response you get from natural infection,” White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said during a COVID-19 briefing in May.

Exactly why vaccines appear to generate more robust immunity than natural infection remains unclear, but Dr. Sabra Klein, a virologist and professor of immunology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said infection and vaccination work in different ways.

“The immune system of people who have been infected has been trained to target all these different parts of the virus called antigens. You’d think that would provide the strongest immunity, but it doesn’t,” Klein said. “The Pfizer or Moderna vaccines target just the spike protein — the part of the virus that is essential for invading cells.

“It’s like a big red button sitting on the surface of the virus. It’s really sticking out there, and it’s what our immune system sees most easily,” she continued. “By focusing on this one big antigen, it’s like you’re making our immune system put blinders on and only be able to see that one piece of the virus.”

In other words, vaccines work to strengthen immune responses gained during natural infection; that’s why health experts advise people who’ve had COVID-19 to still get vaccinated."


Since you can’t read



No point vaccinating those who’ve had COVID-19: Cleveland Clinic study suggests​


The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination

With further statistical analysis, it was observed that the COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously uninfected participants but not in previously infected participants.


Direct from your Cleveland Clinic. Even they are recommending ppl get the shot even if you've been infected


This is still a new virus, and more research is needed. It is important to keep in mind that this study was conducted in a population that was younger and healthier than the general population. In addition, we do not know how long the immune system will protect itself against re-infection after COVID-19. It is safe to receive the COVID-19 vaccine even if you have previously tested positive, and we recommend all those who are eligible receive it.”
 
“Vaccines actually, at least with regard to SARS-CoV-2, can do better than nature... They are better than the traditional response you get from natural infection,” White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said during a COVID-19 briefing in May.

Exactly why vaccines appear to generate more robust immunity than natural infection remains unclear, but Dr. Sabra Klein, a virologist and professor of immunology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said infection and vaccination work in different ways.

“The immune system of people who have been infected has been trained to target all these different parts of the virus called antigens. You’d think that would provide the strongest immunity, but it doesn’t,” Klein said. “The Pfizer or Moderna vaccines target just the spike protein — the part of the virus that is essential for invading cells.

“It’s like a big red button sitting on the surface of the virus. It’s really sticking out there, and it’s what our immune system sees most easily,” she continued. “By focusing on this one big antigen, it’s like you’re making our immune system put blinders on and only be able to see that one piece of the virus.”

In other words, vaccines work to strengthen immune responses gained during natural infection; that’s why health experts advise people who’ve had COVID-19 to still get vaccinated."


Since you can’t read



No point vaccinating those who’ve had COVID-19: Cleveland Clinic study suggests​


The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination

With further statistical analysis, it was observed that the COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously uninfected participants but not in previously infected participants.


Direct from your Cleveland Clinic. Even they are recommending ppl get the shot even if you've been infected


This is still a new virus, and more research is needed. It is important to keep in mind that this study was conducted in a population that was younger and healthier than the general population. In addition, we do not know how long the immune system will protect itself against re-infection after COVID-19. It is safe to receive the COVID-19 vaccine even if you have previously tested positive, and we recommend all those who are eligible receive it.”
They recommend one booster once everyone else at risk is all set and even then they admit that their studies show that current persons with antibodies have zero cases of catching COVID again. Are you ever not dishonest? You’re a coward.
 
“Vaccines actually, at least with regard to SARS-CoV-2, can do better than nature... They are better than the traditional response you get from natural infection,” White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said during a COVID-19 briefing in May.

Exactly why vaccines appear to generate more robust immunity than natural infection remains unclear, but Dr. Sabra Klein, a virologist and professor of immunology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said infection and vaccination work in different ways.

“The immune system of people who have been infected has been trained to target all these different parts of the virus called antigens. You’d think that would provide the strongest immunity, but it doesn’t,” Klein said. “The Pfizer or Moderna vaccines target just the spike protein — the part of the virus that is essential for invading cells.

“It’s like a big red button sitting on the surface of the virus. It’s really sticking out there, and it’s what our immune system sees most easily,” she continued. “By focusing on this one big antigen, it’s like you’re making our immune system put blinders on and only be able to see that one piece of the virus.”

In other words, vaccines work to strengthen immune responses gained during natural infection; that’s why health experts advise people who’ve had COVID-19 to still get vaccinated."


Since you can’t read



No point vaccinating those who’ve had COVID-19: Cleveland Clinic study suggests​


The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination

With further statistical analysis, it was observed that the COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously uninfected participants but not in previously infected participants.


Direct from your Cleveland Clinic. Even they are recommending ppl get the shot even if you've been infected


This is still a new virus, and more research is needed. It is important to keep in mind that this study was conducted in a population that was younger and healthier than the general population. In addition, we do not know how long the immune system will protect itself against re-infection after COVID-19. It is safe to receive the COVID-19 vaccine even if you have previously tested positive, and we recommend all those who are eligible receive it.”
They recommend one booster once everyone else at risk is all set and even then they admit that their studies show that current persons with antibodies have zero cases of catching COVID again. Are you ever not dishonest? You’re a coward.

How am i being dishonest when i quoted exactly what they said? LOL
 


I got COVID in March 2020 and my most recent donation to the Red Cross was in April 2021 and I remain positive for the antibodies. Looks like I will have them for life. So why are the politicians pushing me to get the vaccine or wear a mask forever? Seems like it’s 100% political and has zero to do with science.

Leftists are morons. Fauci is a fraud.
The immunity may or may not last since everyone is different. Govt cannot keep track of every case and what works or doesn't for every person.

Also the vaccines and immunity from one strain may or may not be as applicable to newer strains.

If the vaccines reduce reactions to variant infections, what about immunity from the first waves of covid?

Not researched, and may not be possible to study with live experiments ongoing.

Your best bet is to do what you feel you can live with independent if that choice turns out better or worse.
 
They recommend one booster once everyone else at risk is all set and even then they admit that their studies show that current persons with antibodies have zero cases of catching COVID again. Are you ever not dishonest? You’re a coward.
It isn't just about catching covid again but the risks of more severe reactions and hospitalizations.

If vaccines pose less risk of harming than of helping, anything that helps even partially reduces the impact on the medical response.

At this point the best we can try for is reducing risks and impact as much as we can though nothing is 100%
 
What process? I have Natural immunity. Don’t need. And you don’t know the side effects of the vaccine. Not the long term ones.
Scientist s say they know for sure for 15 years because it is a family of vaccines since 2005. And they are damn sure has no long-term effects. You idiots make ridiculous statements with no evidence and are totally fear mongered with every possible exception to the rule repeated endlessly on your ridiculous propaganda machine..
 
Scientist s say they know for sure for 15 years because it is a family of vaccines since 2005. And they are damn sure has no long-term effects. You idiots make ridiculous statements with no evidence and are totally fear mongered with every possible exception to the rule repeated endlessly on your ridiculous propaganda machine..
They are damn sure except for the heart issues they may cause.....I got vaccinated too. Relax, leftist.
 
It isn't just about catching covid again but the risks of more severe reactions and hospitalizations.

If vaccines pose less risk of harming than of helping, anything that helps even partially reduces the impact on the medical response.

At this point the best we can try for is reducing risks and impact as much as we can though nothing is 100%
With a 99.95% survivability rate, for those under 72 and without preexisting conditions, all the scare tactics just seem like the government is being nefarious about how important it is to all be vacced. Why do those who dont fall in the dangerous category need to be jabbed, other than to have something real bad happen so the progressive elites can rule who ever is left when most of the population dies from the jab. It is like the prog are in a panic knowing that not enough people are going to die, and the prog elites are going to be in big trouble...
 

Forum List

Back
Top